So Disappointed
Okay, so here it goes. Let me preface this entire review with the fact that I have been following Gaelen Foley since I was a teenager (I'm 22 now) and she has been my FAVORITE Historial Romance novelist EVER, so it paaaains me to say this. Her writing has become stilted and hackney. When I first started reading G.F. her stuff was so original. The characters were deep, the plot was exciting, the imagery was amazing and it was so new and beautiful. I was seriously taken away. It was unlike any of the other stuff I had ever read. Her Ascension Trilogy. Wow. The Knight Miscellany. Amazing. But I started to notice towards the end of the Miscellany that she seemed to be grasping at straws. I read through the Spice Trilogy and said "Well, perhaps she's going in a new direction." I loved her so much I just COULDN'T bring myself to say that it was losing the nuance and vigor it once had. I was so disappointed with the last Night Miscellany book I was pretty beside myself. This Inferno series could be so much more than it is. Let's just be real, it's disappointing. You can't read the Ascension Trilogy and the first 4-5 books of the Knight Miscellany and be happy with any of these. Those characters had STORIES, they had STRUGGLES, they had HEART. These books' characters are just one interchangeable character with another. There is so much missing from this entire book that, honestly, I just couldn't finish it. I'm about 50 pages from the end and I'm like "BLEHHH." I love the adventurous stuff; make it MORE Indiana Jones if you WOULD. I'd love that! I mean, we can't say "The F word just doesn't belong here" and "It just seemed TOO adventurous for my taste." We have to be real, we're ladies reading HISTORICAL ROMANCE NOVELS. Seriously. None of these books display real romance in the correct light anyway because none of us are going to go off and find ourselves dukes to marry who happen to be spies. These are entertainment. I miss the old Gaelen Foley. I miss her stories and her groundbreaking characters, her nuances and her love scenes, because we all know that's why we read these things. Where's the fire? Where's the passion? Where's the VIGOR? I'm willing to stick it out if she's going in a different direction, but it seems to me she's become too comfortable with being a writer and is perhaps consumed with popping out a new book rather than making sure that it is immaculate. I realize there is research involved in these things and time and money and emotions, but no one wants to read novels where they are just one interchangeable character after another! Each of these women are strong, yet not too strong. They're dainty, but not too dainty. They're beautiful, but not too beautiful. They're the same and it's boring. Each of us here are entirely different people and I want to see that in a novel. I want to recognize people by their differences and say "That is who that person is and I can tell you what she's about. I can picture her in my head and I can distinguish her from others." The same with the men. Make them about more. Make them more than mystery and glistening abs. Give them a purpose. Give them a strength. Give them a backstory. Give them weakness. Give them weakness other than "I'll never love again because I lost someone and I don't know how to love." Give us a story that's not about: This man sews his seeds, but she'll teach him how to LOVE BY GOLLY. I miss the old Gaelen
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.