Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language / Edition 1by Maxwell Bennett, John Searle, Peter Hacker, Daniel Dennett
Pub. Date: 04/01/2009
Publisher: Columbia University Press
In Neuroscience and Philosophy three prominent philosophers and a leading neuroscientist clash over the conceptual presuppositions of cognitive neuroscience. The book begins with an excerpt from Maxwell Bennett and Peter Hacker's Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Blackwell, 2003), which questions the conceptual commitments of cognitive/i>/i>… See more details below
In Neuroscience and Philosophy three prominent philosophers and a leading neuroscientist clash over the conceptual presuppositions of cognitive neuroscience. The book begins with an excerpt from Maxwell Bennett and Peter Hacker's Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Blackwell, 2003), which questions the conceptual commitments of cognitive neuroscientists. Their position is then criticized by Daniel Dennett and John Searle, two philosophers who have written extensively on the subject, and Bennett and Hacker in turn respond.
Their impassioned debate encompasses a wide range of central themes: the nature of consciousness, the bearer and location of psychological attributes, the intelligibility of so-called brain maps and representations, the notion of qualia, the coherence of the notion of an intentional stance, and the relationships between mind, brain, and body. Clearly argued and thoroughly engaging, the authors present fundamentally different conceptions of philosophical method, cognitive-neuroscientific explanation, and human nature, and their exchange will appeal to anyone interested in the relation of mind to brain, of psychology to neuroscience, of causal to rational explanation, and of consciousness to self-consciousness.
In his conclusion Daniel Robinson (member of the philosophy faculty at Oxford University and Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Georgetown University) explains why this confrontation is so crucial to the understanding of neuroscientific research. The project of cognitive neuroscience, he asserts, depends on the incorporation of human nature into the framework of science itself. In Robinson's estimation, Dennett and Searle fail to support this undertaking; Bennett and Hacker suggest that the project itself might be based on a conceptual mistake. Exciting and challenging, Neuroscience and Philosophy is an exceptional introduction to the philosophical problems raised by cognitive neuroscience.
Columbia University Press
- Columbia University Press
- Publication date:
- Edition description:
- New Edition
- Sales rank:
- Product dimensions:
- 5.40(w) x 8.10(h) x 0.50(d)
- Age Range:
- 18 Years
Table of Contents
Introduction, by Daniel RobinsonThe ArgumentSelections from Philosophical Foundations of NeuroscienceNeuroscience and Philosophy, by Maxwell R. BennettThe RebuttalsPhilosophy as Naive Anthropology: Comment on Bennett and Hacker, by Daniel DennettPutting Consciousness Back in the Brain: Reply to Bennett and Hacker, Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience, by John SearleReply to the RebuttalsThe Conceptual Presuppositions of Cognitive Neuroscience: A Reply to Critics, by Maxwell R. Bennett and Peter M. S. HackerEpilogue, by Maxwell R. BennettStill Looking: Science and Philosophy in Pursuit of Prince Reason, by Daniel RobinsonNotes
Columbia University Press
and post it to your social network
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
See all customer reviews >