- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
The Wild & Woolly Will
At one time, the Dobson household consisted of a mother and a father, a boy and a girl, one hamster, one parakeet, one lonely goldfish, and two hopelessly neurotic cats. We all lived together in relative harmony with a minimum of conflict and strife. But there was another member of our family who was less congenial and cooperative. He was a stubborn, twelve-pound dachshund named Sigmund Freud (Siggie), who honestly believed that he owned the place. All dachshunds tend to be independent, I'm told, but Siggie was a confirmed revolutionary. He was not vicious or mean; he just wanted to run things—and the two of us engaged in a power struggle throughout his lifetime.
Siggie was not only stubborn, but he wouldn't pull his own weight in the family. He wouldn't bring in the newspaper on cold mornings; he refused to chase a ball for the children; he didn't keep the gophers out of the garden; and he didn't do any of the usual tricks that most cultured dogs perform. Alas, Siggie refused to engage in any of the self-improvement programs that I initiated on his behalf. He was content just to trot through life, watering and sniffing and barking at everything that moved.
Sigmund was not even a good watchdog. This fact was confirmed the night we were visited by a prowler who entered our backyard at three o'clock in the morning. I suddenly awoke from a deep sleep, got out of bed, and felt my way through the house without turning on the lights. I knew someone was on the patio and Siggie knew it too, because the coward was crouched behind me! After listening to the thumping of my heart for a few minutes, I reached out to take hold of the rear doorknob. At that moment, the backyard gate quietly opened and closed. Someone had been standing three feet from me and that someone was now tinkering in my garage. Siggie and I held a little conversation in the darkness and decided that he should be the one to investigate the disturbance. I opened the back door and ordered my dog to "Attack!" But Siggie had just had one! He stood there throbbing and shaking so badly that I couldn't even push him out the back door. In the noise and confusion that ensued, the intruder escaped (which pleased both dog and man).
Please don't misunderstand me: Siggie was a member of our family and we loved him dearly. And despite his anarchistic nature, I did finally teach him to obey a few simple commands. However, we had some classic battles before he reluctantly yielded to my authority. The greatest confrontation occurred when I had been in Miami for a three-day conference. I returned to observe that Siggie had become boss of the house while I was gone. But I didn't realize until later that evening just how strongly he felt about his new position as captain.
At eleven o'clock that night, I told Siggie to go get into his bed, which was a permanent enclosure in the family room. For six years, I had given him that order at the end of each day, and for six years Siggie had obeyed. On that occasion, however, he refused to budge. He was in the bathroom, seated comfortably on the furry lid of the toilet seat. That was his favorite spot in the house, because it allowed him to bask in the warmth of a nearby electric heater. Incidentally, Siggie had to learn the hard way that it was extremely important that the lid be down before he left the ground. I'll never forget the night he learned that lesson. He came thundering in from the cold and sailed through the air—and nearly drowned before I could get him out.
On the night of our great battle, I told Sigmund to leave his warm seat and go to bed. Instead, he flattened his ears and slowly turned his head toward me. He braced himself by placing one paw on the edge of the furry lid, then hunched his shoulders, raised his lips to reveal the molars on both sides, and uttered his most threatening growl. That was Siggie's way of saying, "Get lost!"
I had seen this defiant mood before and knew that I had to deal with it. The only way to make Siggie obey was to threaten him with destruction. Nothing else worked. I turned and went to my closet and got a small belt to help me "reason" with 'ol Sig. My wife, who was watching this drama unfold, told me that as soon as I left the room, Siggie jumped from his perch and looked down the hall to see where I had gone. Then he got behind her and growled.
When I returned, I held up the belt and again told the angry dog to get into his bed. He stood his ground so I gave him a firm swat across the rear end, and he tried to bite the belt. I popped him again and he tried to bite me. What developed next is impossible to describe. That tiny dog and I had the most vicious fight ever staged between man and beast. I fought him up one wall and down the other, with both of us scratching and clawing and growling. I am still embarrassed by the memory of the entire scene. Inch by inch I moved him toward the family room and his bed. As a final desperate maneuver, Siggie jumped on the couch and backed into the corner for one last snarling stand. I eventually got him into his bed, but only because I outweighed him two hundred to twelve!
The following night I expected another siege of combat at Siggie's bedtime. To my surprise, however, he accepted my command without debate or complaint and simply trotted toward the family room in perfect submission. In fact, Siggie and I never had another "go for broke" stand.
It is clear to me now that Siggie was saying on the first night, in his canine way, "I don't think you're tough enough to make me obey." Perhaps I seem to be humanizing the behavior of a dog, but I think not. Veterinarians will confirm that some breeds of dogs, notably dachshunds and shepherds, will not accept the leadership of their masters until human authority has stood the test of fire and proved itself worthy. I got that message across to Siggie in one decisive encounter, and we were good friends for the rest of his life.
This is not a book about the discipline of dogs. But there is an important aspect of my story that is highly relevant to the world of children. Just as surely as a dog will occasionally challenge the authority of his leaders, a child is inclined to do the same thing, only more so. This is no minor observation, for it represents a characteristic of human nature that has escaped the awareness of many experts who write books on the subject of discipline. When I wrote twenty-five years ago, there was hardly a text for parents or teachers that adequately acknowledged the struggle—the confrontation of wills—that strong-willed children seem to love. For them, adult leadership is rarely accepted unchallenged; it must be tested and found worthy before it is respected. It is one of the frustrating aspects of child rearing that most parents have to discover for themselves.
The Hierarchy of Strength and Courage
But why do some children, particularly those who are strong-willed, have such a pugnacious temperament? One of the simplistic answers (there is a more complete explanation in chapter 3) is that it reflects the admiration boys and girls have for strength and courage. They will occasionally disobey parental instructions for the precise purpose of testing the determination of those in charge. Why? Because they care deeply about the issue of "who's toughest." This helps explain the popularity of superheroes—Robin Hood and Tarzan and Spider-Man and Superman—in the folklore of children. It also explains why they often brag, "My dad can beat up your dad!" (One child said in response, "That's nothing, my mom can beat up my dad too!")
Whenever a youngster moves into a new neighborhood or a new school district, he usually has to fight (either verbally or physically) to establish himself in the hierarchy of strength. This respect for power and courage also makes children want to know how tough their leaders are. Thus, whether you are a parent, a grandparent, a Scout leader, a bus driver, or a schoolteacher, I can guarantee that sooner or later, one of the children under your authority will clench his little fist and take you on. Like Siggie at bedtime, he will say with his manner: "I don't think you are tough enough to make me obey." You had better be prepared to prove him wrong in that moment, or the challenge will happen again and again.
This defiant game, which I call Challenge the Chief, can be played with surprising skill by very young children. A father told me of taking his three-year-old daughter to a basketball game. The child was, of course, interested in everything in the gym except the athletic contest. Dad permitted her to roam free and climb on the bleachers, but he set definite limits regarding how far she could stray. He took her by the hand and walked with her to a stripe painted on the gym floor. "You can play all around the building, Janie, but don't go past this line," he instructed her. He had no sooner returned to his seat than the toddler scurried in the direction of the forbidden territory. She stopped at the border for a moment, then flashed a grin over her shoulder to her father, and deliberately placed one foot over the line as if to say, "Whatcha gonna do about it?" Virtually every-parent the world over has been asked the same question at one time or another.
The entire human race is afflicted with the same tendency toward willful defiance that this three-year-old exhibited. Her behavior in the gym is not so different from the folly of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. God had told them they could eat anything in the Garden except the forbidden fruit ("do not go past this line"). Yet they challenged the authority of the Almighty by deliberately disobeying His commandment. Perhaps this tendency toward self-will is the essence of original sin that has infiltrated the human family. It certainly explains why I place such stress on the proper response to willful defiance during childhood, for that rebellion can plant the seeds of personal disaster. The weed that grows from it may become a tangled briar patch during the troubled days of adolescence.
When a parent refuses to accept his child's defiant challenge, something changes in their relationship. The youngster begins to look at his mother and father with disrespect; they are unworthy of her allegiance. More important, she wonders why they would let her do such harmful things if they really loved her. The ultimate paradox of childhood is that boys and girls want to be led by their parents but insist that their mothers and fathers earn the right to lead them.
On behalf of those readers who have never experienced such a confrontation, let me describe how a determined kid is typically constructed. At birth he looks deceptively like his more compliant sibling. He weighs seven pounds and is totally dependent on those who care for him. Indeed, he would not survive for more than a day or two without their attention. Ineffectual little arms and legs dangle aimlessly in four directions, appearing to be God's afterthoughts. What a picture of vulnerability and innocence he is!
Isn't it amazing, given this beginning, what happens in twenty short months? Junior then weighs twenty-five pounds and he's itching for action. This kid who couldn't even hold his own bottle less than two years earlier now has the gall to look his two-hundred-pound father straight in the kisser and tell him where to get off? What audacity! Obviously, there is something deep within his soul that longs for control. He will work at achieving it for the rest of his life.
When our children were young, we lived near one of these little spitfires. He was thirty-six months old at the time and had already bewildered and overwhelmed his mother. The contest of wills was over. He had won it. His sassy talk, to his mother and anyone else who got in his way, was legendary in the neighborhood. Then one day my wife watched him ride his tricycle down the driveway and into the street, which panicked his mother. We lived on a curve and the cars came around that bend at high speed. The woman rushed out of the house and caught up with her son as he pedaled down the street. She took hold of his handlebars to redirect him, and he came unglued.
"Get your dirty hands off my tricycle!" he screamed. His eyes were squinted in fury. As Shirley watched in disbelief, this woman did as she was told. The life of her child was in danger, yet this mother did not have the courage to make him obey her. He continued to ride down the street while she trailed along behind, hoping for the best.
How could it be that a tiny little boy at three years of age was able to buffalo his thirty-year-old mother in this way? Clearly, she had no idea how to manage him. He was simply tougher than she—and they both knew it. This mild-mannered woman had produced an iron-willed youngster who was willing to fight with anyone who tried to run him in, and you can be sure that his mom's physical and emotional resources were continually drained by his antics. We lost track of this family, but I'm sure this kid's adolescent years were something to behold.
A Lesson in a Supermarket
In thinking about the characteristics of compliant and defiant children, I sought an illustration to explain the vastly differing thrusts of human temperaments. I found an appropriate analogy in a supermarket. Imagine yourself in a grocery store, pushing a cart up the aisle. You give the basket a small shove, and it glides at least nine feet out in front and then comes to a gradual stop. You walk along happily tossing in the soup and ketchup and loaves of bread. Grocery shopping is such an easy task, for even when the cart is burdened with goods, it can be directed with one finger.
But buying groceries is not always so blissful. On other occasions, you select a cart that ominously awaits your arrival at the front of the market. When you push the stupid thing forward, it tears off to the left and knocks over a stack of bottles. Refusing to be outmuscled by an empty cart, you throw all your weight behind the handle, fighting desperately to keep the ship on course. It seems to have a mind of its own as it darts toward the eggs and careens back in the direction of a terrified grandmother in green tennis shoes. You are trying to do the same shopping assignment that you accomplished with ease the week before, but the job feels more like combat duty today. You are exhausted by the time you herd the contumacious cart toward the checkout counter.
What is the difference between the two shopping baskets? Obviously, one has straight, well-oiled wheels that go where they are guided. The other has crooked, bent wheels that refuse to yield.
Do you get the point? We might as well face it; some kids have crooked wheels! They do not want to go where they are led, because their own inclinations take them in other directions. Furthermore, the parent who is pushing the cart must expend seven times the energy to make it move, compared with the parent of a child with straight wheels. (Only mothers and fathers of strong-willed children will fully comprehend the meaning of this illustration.)
But how is the strength of the will distributed among children? My original assumption was that this aspect of human temperament is represented by a typical bell-shaped curve. In other words, I presumed that a relatively small number of very compliant kids appeared at one end of the continuum and an equally small number of defiant youngsters were represented at the other. The rest, comprising the majority, were likely to fall somewhere near the middle of the distribution, like this: However, having talked to at least 100,000 harried parents, I'm convinced that my supposition was wrong. The true distribution probably looks more like this:
Don't take this observation too literally. Maybe it only seems that the majority of toddlers are confirmed anarchists. Furthermore, there is a related phenomenon regarding sibling relationships that I have never been able to explain. When there are two children in the family, one is likely to be compliant and the other defiant. Who knows why it works out that way. There they are, born to the same parents, but as different as though they came from different planets. One cuddles to your embrace and the other kicks you in the navel. One is a natural sweetheart and the other goes through life like hot lava. One follows orders and the other gives them. Quite obviously, they are marching to a different set of drums.
Former U.S. president Franklin Roosevelt was clearly a strong-willed child and grew up to be a very strong-willed man. When he was a boy, he once strung a string across the top of the stairs where it could not be seen. Predictably, his nurse came along carrying a supper tray and tripped, making what must have been a spectacular plunge downward. The record does not reveal what punishment he received for this wicked trick. We are told, however, that Franklin was very bossy with his peers and that he liked to win at everything. When he was once scolded for the way he treated other children, he said, "Mummie, if I didn't give the orders, nothing would happen." That is a strong-willed child.
Temperamental differences often create serious relational problems within the family. The strong-willed child faces constant discipline and is subjected to many threats and finger-wagging lectures, while his angelic brother, little Goody Two-shoes, polishes his halo and soaks up the warmth of parental approval. They are pitted against each other by the nature of their divergent personalities and may spend a lifetime scratching and clawing one another. (Chapter 9 offers specific suggestions regarding the problem of sibling rivalry and conflict.)
I have described the approach to life taken by the tougher kids. Let's look quickly at the easygoing child, who spends most of his time trying to make his parents happy. In reality, he needs their praise and approval; thus his personality is greatly influenced by this desire to gain their affection and recognition. A word of displeasure or even the slightest frown from his parents can disturb him. He is a lover, not a fighter.
Excerpted from The New Strong-Willed Child by JAMES DOBSON. Copyright © 2004 James Dobson, Inc.. Excerpted by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc..
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Posted February 22, 2008
I apologize for my ignorance, but don't understand that accusations that this is a child abuse book as I read other reviews. I have a different view as someone that grew up abused, not that it warrants me a more qualified opinion, but it opened me up to reading this book because I did not want to repeat what was done to me. I also wanted to learn how to handle my son, so I read this book often. So I hope what I say helps someone to understand this book better somehow. From what I've read, the book advocates spanking as a last resort and even should not be administered depending whether the child is acting in their nature/age or they do act in defiance. It even depends on their personality how you should discipline your child. I just re-read the part about a little girl that would take her sweet time getting ready for school because she had to make sure everything was in place. This girl wasn't being defiant, she's just organized . Her mother tried yelling and aggression, but Dobson recommended instead that the mother utilizes a calm attitude, stickers, and charts for her daughter to follow, the most severe punishment was losing a star on the chart and sleeping an hour earlier. Throughout the book, Dobson condemns the use of anger, yelling, and physical aggression on your child at all costs, which is I got used to growing up. Furthermore, there are all these conditions and circumstances he advises parents to examine to determine whether spanking is appropriate or if the parent should be more clear and realistic about what they demand of their child. This book is my constant reference, being my strong-willed son is constantly growing. Being abused myself, this book helped me draw a line within myself between being a bully to my child and being a loving parent disciplining my child. This book is a guideline for my husband and I as to how we treat our son. As a result, we hear from everyone we know our son is the most well behaved of all the toddler boys they know. Most of all, my husband and I learned how to keep our home an emotional and physical safe-haven because of what Dobson advocates, even if we both came from unsafe backgrounds. I honestly wish people could re-examine this book and it's entirety instead of having this microscope view on the spanking.
30 out of 30 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted August 11, 2008
A parent who loves their children disciplines them. Children need boundries set for them and consequences for breaking them. This book is excellent at showing parents 'like myself' who may not be the best at knowing exactly what boundries to set and what discipline to enforce with each broken rule. It explains that children are human and cannot be punished for everything. Yet when they are directly disobedient a spanking is a must. I have tried it and it works. It does take time, but when done in love, it works. I have learned consistency is key with discipline. Now, I rarely have to enforce a spanking anymore. They now know that there are rules at home to follow, just as in school, or anywhere else, and they now follow them. No more embarrassing trips to the grocery store or temper tantrums in the pediatrician's waiting room. This book shows never spank or discipline in anger. Wait, take a time out if necessary and then address the situation. It's a must have for parents who feel at the end of their rope. Hang in there, there's hope. I know.
10 out of 10 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 30, 2010
I would recommend this book to anyone who would like to gain control back in their home and not feel guilty for being "too strict" of a parent. Dr. Dobson presents ways to raise a strong willing child through discipline delivered in a loving and Christian way. Some of his views on spanking I did not agree with but by using the other methods, I did not need to get to that point with my child. It also confirmed that many of my instincts were correct. Raising children is not easy, especially strong-willed ones. As long as you are consistent and loving, everyone will get through some of the rough patches of childhood.
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 18, 2011
As a mother of a very strong willed little girl I am finding this book helpful. Some of these reviews have me concerned though. Spanking is NOT child abuse, hot sauce is NOT child abuse, and if your 5 childred are perfect with never having to raise your voice or using any other methods than you cannot possibly begin to understand what us parents go through who actually have strong children with a brain of their own. I do not own 5 robots but I do have one of my children who keeps me on my toes. This book has some great tips on how to talk to her and deal with her behavior. I am a good Mom and am raising my kids in a loving home, not hectic and abusive like my upbringing but some kids just have a mind of their own.
So congratulations to all those reviews below where somehow they ended up with all these perfect kids they've never snapped at, spanked & the kids are perfect. My experience are those who have had a soft upbringing tend to be the rude adolescent children out in the malls, movie theateres, etc. because what are we gonna do to them. Give me a break and go do some parenting.
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 15, 2008
Posted April 16, 2008
To those of you educated reviewers who consider this book abuse-'Do you even have children?' I, too, am a parent who has two opposites. One is extremely easy-going. The other is extremely strong willed. Unless you have experienced both kind of children, you have NO CLUE what you are talking about. Before I had the second 'strong willed child' I, too, thought I knew all about how to raise a child, and what was wrong with the way other people raised THEIR 'strong-willed' children. I HAD NO IDEA WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT. You must experience it to know it. This book worked wonderfully for my child, who requires much structure. I do not condone abuse, and in no way, do I see Dr Dobson condoning it either. Perhaps if we would have used more of this kind of discipline, our prisons would not be so overcrowded today and families would stay together...
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 1, 2008
I turned to this book out of desperation. My child is defiant, delibertly disobeys me, has meltdowns for no apparent reason and is very difficult to console once an outburst begins. After trying Dr. Dobson's techniques, I found my toddler became more aggressive than before. He began to talk about hitting and spanking too. If he didn't like something his older brother did, he would say he was going to spank his brother. He talked a lot about being spanked himself and it was apparent the spanking was affecting him negatively. I felt horrible for spanking him and wish I would have never followed Dr. Dobon's advice. I feel like a complete idiot and admit this is one of the worst mistakes I have ever made in my life. I saw fear in my child's eyes when I spanked him and it broke my heart to think that he would ever be afraid of me. Parenting by fear is not a healthy way to raise a child.
3 out of 19 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
If you're a frustrated parent of an endlessly bucking child whom you love dearly but can't seem to get through to, this is the book for you. Dr. Dobson is straightforward and honest about effective ways to reach your child in order to teach obedience and respect in a firm but loving way, which is extrememly refreshing in a society where "firm" has been a dirty word since the 60's. If you're willing to accept that it is YOUR responsibility to parent your child appropriately for his own good and you're looking for the Christian-centered methods that work, you're in the right place. Dr. Dobson is excellent--he will not pat you on the head and tell you it's alright. He simply tells you how to get over yourself and parent your child the way God intended you to. Read it and be refreshed! Your child will thank you!
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted February 22, 2014
I am so glad i read this book. There were times i wondered if there was something wrong with my two year old. The wildness and rage of his tatrums along with his wild out of control defiance led me to wonder if there was literally something wrong with him. I have this huge burden lifted off my shouldrrs after reading this book as i better understand his behavior now and how to handle it. Great biblical advice. Highly recommend
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 17, 2012
I have only read the first few lines of this book where he describes how he beat his dog into submission and I am sickened. This is the lead in to how I am to manage my child? If anger and dominance were all it took, my kids would be completely cured by now. However, I've noticed that my anger only gets them more angry and defiant.
I highly recommend The Explosive Child as a book to help you in your relationship with your difficult child. Since I read it my life with my daughter has completely changed. She surprises me now with many insightful words about her own behavior and her meltdowns, while not completely gone, are greatly diminished.
0 out of 8 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 28, 2007
I have read the previous edition and look forward to reading this one. I am a parent to a child with ADHD, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Defiance Disorder. Trust me, we have tried every loving form of discipline we and our therapist can think of. Time out didn't work, spanking didn't work, hot sauce and soap didn't work. Each family and child have to work together to find the discipline that works best for them. While we may not implement Dr. Dobson's every recommendation, he is a very helpful resource to many parents. I do not condone child abuse, or any form of destructive emotional ploys in order to get your child to behave in a manner that suits the parent. What I do condone is raising a child with their own unique and wonderful personality and spirit intact while being a productive and concerned member of society. Our own personal situation is one of great severity and it is nice to know that good christian men like Dr. Dobson are there to offer advice. It is up to us to choose if that advice fits our family. I would encourage you to look at this book in that manner. Read it. If you only agree or find one thing helpful or useful for you and your children, then it was worth the money you paid for it. After all, we all love our children and will do anything to be the parents they deserve.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 1, 2007
I never have read so many total nonsense as in reviews to this topic. To raise a healthy, responsible and loving child it is necesairy to set lines to your child in the same way society, justice and so on set boundaries to us adults. If not your child is bound to get in trouble from bad to worse. I see this happening in the free tolerant Netherlands where i was born and lives. Parents nowadays must be afraid to so much as touch your child (in a loving way) to be charged with child abuse, pedofilie, or even raping, resulting in child-care taking children away from their homes, breaking up families and so on. So i want to give out a very strong and clear warning to all against child-abuse. I am also against child abuse but certainly not as i imagine dr Dobson is, against a spanking as a means to give out a strong statement to a child or beast alike that they crossed a line that was clearly set to the child. Jail in the Netherlands was never so full as nowadays, no spanked persons there as was said in one of the reviews. But perpetraders of any kind get younger every day it seemes. Do you still wonder why? Children and adults alike think of themselves first, then of there nearest family-members and in tenth place or so of other people. Governments start zero-tolerance-policy on crime, but take away an important instrument of education from parents, teachers and educaters in general to maintain zero-tolerance in their home, school and/ or sportfacility. Everyday visable result, looting, agressive behaviour of youngsters, vandalism and this is only a tip of the iceberg. My simple advice to all is start educational places for parenting, educationing to children, where people can come freely for advice and walk freely out again with no fear of interference in family-live. This way parents, educationers, teachers and so on can learn to discipline (or spank) an unwilling headstrong child or infant without it becoming psychological (sending in corner or to room) or fysical ( beating a child in hospital-care) abuse.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted August 20, 2007
I am in eager anticipation of reading this book, and while I've not done so yet, the reviews I have read seem torn down the middle. Half say 'bravo' while half say 'put it in the trash.' My only frame of reference is to say that I am the strong willed child referenced in this book. While not related to Dr. Dobson I am one who actually has benefited from parents who had the wisdom to discipline me correctly with help from this book. In patient endurance, with wisdom and clear explanation, and with a bending of my will but NOT my spirit, yes indeed my parents actually spanked me...and I've turned out the better for it, unabused, not emotionally disturbed or suffering any long term psychological disrepair for having been a 'victim' of Dobson's wisdom. I look forward greatly to reading and deciding for myself how the principals set forth in this book can be practically applied and implimented in my own home, with love, respect, and the best intentions for my children.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted July 1, 2007
Being at my wit's end 10 years ago, I purchased this book. Dr. Dobson's wisdom under fire gave me hope that I could handle my child with calm (which was missing) and dignity for us both. All children are different, but this book fit mine to the T. I am proud to say, I have raised a caring, empathetic and respectful son. He may speak his mind to me, but always knows I am his parent. Dr. Dobson stated years ago that I must have control over this child when he was small, because one day he would be bigger than me. That is now true, but because of the respect I have shown him and taught him, he will not cross that line. This isn't a book about beating children. This is a book about gaining control and setting limits.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 31, 2007
This is not child discipline - this is child abuse. Christians should know better that 'spare the rod, spoil the child' is not current any longer. With New Testament -New Law - comes Jesus, and Jesus does not hit children. The author has a psychology degree received in the 60¿s. His training was before all the research that has been done showing the many harms of corporal punishment of children. He is not a doctor, and he¿s not ordained in any religion. The American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Association all disagree with Dobson¿s views on discipline.
0 out of 7 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted February 10, 2006
Proverbs 22:15-15 15 Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him. Without training, children only know foolish thought processes and reactions to life. If they are not corrected and taught wisdom, they will pursue these errors to a life of hell. And the best and only way of such correction and training is by the use of the rod. A rod is a straight, slender wand of wood or other material that applied to the back can cause moderate pain without any bodily harm. It stings rather than thuds. It is called the rod of correction, for its purpose is to correct the foolishness raging in every child. Parents do not spank much anymore and of course, the amount of public crime and general rebellion, especially among youth, is much greater. But truth does not change. And truth is simple. The rod of correction will save children from hell in this life. We still kill capital offenders but many want to outlaw spanking, which would save such fools from killing others and thereby themselves.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 15, 2006
'Spanking ¿ delivered with respect, in self-control and never with anger or hostility ¿ is an effective way to train up a defiant child. Discover the appropriate age for spanking, who should not use spanking, and what to do if you and your spouse disagree on discipline.' This is a driect quote from Dr. Dobson. Does this sound like a man who wants you to abuse your children? Read the book and see how it relates to your own family.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 15, 2006
The previous reviews were obviously written by people without strong-willed children. As the mother of one simple, angelic child and one strong-willed, forceful, extremely intelligent child, the difference that can exist between siblings is obvious to me every day. From the first time I held my second child he was easy going and relaxed. My first child threw tantrums from day one. Anyone who has held two of their own children knows that babies are all different. This book recognizes that and offers parents options for dealing with difficult children. At no time does the author recommend, encourage or glorify beating or abusing children. There is a huge difference and psychology and the law recognize that. Whenever people wonder what is wrong with society and what is going wrong with our youth, this is the book that I quote. We are raising a society of selfish, whining, perpetual adolescents. We have 30 year olds who cannot settle on one life partner or a career because they still do not know what they want to be when they grow up. Even worse, who was there to discipline the demanding and whining and need for immediate gratificatin at all costs of our corporate raiders? Someone should have loved them enough to read this book. Dobson is clear that not all children are strong-willed and that many go through their early and teen years without any difficulty or stress for themselves or their parents. But if your child does fall into one of his clearly-defined and humorously -titled categories, there are ways to temper love with strict discipline to ensure a safe and prosperous future for your child.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 21, 2005
In The New Strong-Willed Child, James Dobson adds nothing new to the misguided perspective and harmful advice he has sold to all-too-many parents in his numerous earlier writings. Once again he projects onto infants and children a malicious power drive and advises parents to punish (spank) them into submission through inflicting pain. He describes infants and children in demeaning, contemptuous terms, such as spitfires, hot lava, Hurricane Hannah, little chameleon, goof-off, groaning lump, gangly legs. He puts the worst possible spin on children¿s behavior in anecdotes, purportedly authentic but possibly fictional, that are crafted to support Dobson¿s denigrating prejudices against children. James Dobson¿s views of children are false, as well as antithetical to what has been discovered through scientific observations in clinical, field, and experimental settings. The contributions to human understanding of attachment theory and research, developmental and clinical psychology, biochemistry, and neurobiology provide a very different picture of children¿s motivations and needs and of optimal patterns of parenting. Dobson focuses his hostile gaze on children as isolated objects to be conquered by parents in an egregiously unequal power struggle. He fails utterly to understand children¿s needs and behavioral reactions to familial, environmental, social, and cultural contexts. His childrearing approach is authoritarian and abusive. He writes as if an inadequate style of permissive parenting were the only alternative to his harsh, physically punitive manner. He ignores abundant evidence in support of a third way, involving empathic, nonviolent, authoritative (not authoritarian) parenting. Readers who wish to raise physically and emotionally healthy, ethically responsible, and caring children would be wise to shun the toxic writings of James Dobson. Much better books are available, written by authors who actually love children and who are well informed about the most scientifically reliable perspectives on human nature and childrearing. Mitch Hall Dean of the School of Humanities New College of California
0 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted July 19, 2005
This book reminds me of a line from Shakespeare: A tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing. This is a sad book with ignorance on every page. Stay away.
0 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.