- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
|A note on the text|
|Bk. I||The object of life||3|
|Bk. II||Moral goodness||31|
|Bk. III||Moral responsibility : two virtues||50|
|Bk. IV||Other moral virtues||82|
|Bk. VI||Intellectual virtues||144|
|Bk. VII||Continence and incontinence : the nature of pleasure||167|
|Bk. VIII||The kinds of friendship||200|
|Bk. IX||The grounds of friendship||228|
|Bk. X||Pleasure and the life of happiness||254|
|App. 1||Table of virtues and vices||285|
|App. 3||The sophists and Socrates||289|
|App. 4||Plato's theory of forms||292|
|App. 5||The categories||295|
|App. 6||Substance and change||296|
|App. 7||Nature and theology||300|
|App. 8||The practical syllogism||302|
|App. 9||Pleasure and process||303|
|App. 11||Aristotle in the middle ages||306|
|Glossary of Greek words||310|
|Index of names||313|
Aristotle lays down the foundations for life and mans purpose. He asserts that the supreme good, or highest goal for man, is happiness. A happiness that consists of a rich and fulfilling life focused on virtuous behavior rather than pleasure. He concludes that man should fulfill his rationality through contemplation and moral education to reach this goal. A major theme in this book is Aristotle's rejection of Plato's Theory of the Forms. He argues that learning should be empirical (derived from what can be experienced and observed) and not based on overcoming reality. Another theme is the criticism of Hedonism (which was the philosophy of the time) which said, "Eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we die." Aristotle argued that true happiness or "eudaimonia" comes from living a full, rich, and virtuous life, not from pleasure.
I like how Aristotle confronted Hedonism and previous perceptions of happiness that ignore morality as a means of achieving pleasure. This is still a huge problem in our society, as many people are in search of bodily pleasures and ignore matters of the soul. I like the idea of the Golden Mean, that every virtue in excess or in deficiency can be a vice. I disliked how dry and hard to get through the book was, but it's understandable as much of Aristotle's work include the organization of his thoughts as they are being explained. I also strongly disagreed with his idea of incontinence (or indifference). I consider this a vice which is more than just bad, because although it may simply require passivity and not action, it is still a choice to refuse good when it is in one's power to give it, and this is an evil which is almost unforgivable.
I recommend this book to everyone. Although some of the ideas may seem simple to us now that they have been accepted for hundreds of years, they are still remarkably complex for the time that they were written. The ideas about virtue, happiness, friendship, contemplation, and purpose are still relevant and valuable today.
5 out of 6 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Ethics nowadays is so confused and grouped with 'morals' that few consider the difference. Those who do use the argument for Ethics to veer the rest towards their own views and so 'Ethics' as a set of conduct is constantly hijacked by the 'righteous' for their own purposes.
It is great we still have Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics to remind us what it is all about.
And this new translation is conscise, clear, up-to-date and with plenty of endnotes conferring with other valued translations of the past and current academic debates regarding it.
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics shows us that conduct is a choice only the human animal with our ability to question and to reason can develop into a set of ethics that brings us with equilibrium with ourselves, our community and planet. Making us thus greater than the sum of our individual parts as one gestalt entity, and as part of a community of humans.
It shows us our choices ought to be irrespective of fear of a hell or hope of a reward.
It is choices we ought to develop into habits, into our ethics for our humanity alone. For the benefit to our interactions with our families, friends, community, society and planet at-large.
With this in mind Aristotle proceeds then to clearly delineate, describe and quantify what these particular choices are that we develop normally but that should be actively and conscientiously sought out by us to make us better more wholesome human beings. Because if we are to live one life on this planet and nothing more, we should try and learn to be a positive part in it and of it. Thus become of value to ourselves, our community, our planet.
It is always with great interest I seek these arguments and am in my 2nd read of this very rewarding book.
3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted June 7, 2006
As most philosophy professors would agree this book is a classic and should be read by all students before leaving college.
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 16, 2003
Posted March 4, 2000
Posted May 19, 2015
Posted May 30, 2015
Posted May 8, 2015
Posted May 2, 2015
Posted March 22, 2015
Posted March 22, 2015
Posted October 26, 2014
Posted September 2, 2014
Posted August 16, 2014
Posted August 13, 2014
Posted August 13, 2014
Posted August 12, 2014
Posted August 8, 2014
Posted January 8, 2015
Posted August 5, 2014