The Night Journal

( 23 )

Overview

A mesmerizing novel of four generations of Southwestern women bound to a mythical legacy

With its family secrets and hallowed texts containing explosive truths, The Night Journal suggests A. S. Byatt’s Possession transplanted to the raw and beautiful landscape of the American Southwest. Meg Mabry has spent her life oppressed by her family’s legacy—a heritage beginning with the journals written by her great-grandmother in the 1890s and solidified by her grandmother Bassie, a ...

See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$14.86
BN.com price
(Save 7%)$16.00 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (67) from $1.99   
  • New (10) from $1.99   
  • Used (57) from $1.99   
The Night Journal

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$11.99
BN.com price

Overview

A mesmerizing novel of four generations of Southwestern women bound to a mythical legacy

With its family secrets and hallowed texts containing explosive truths, The Night Journal suggests A. S. Byatt’s Possession transplanted to the raw and beautiful landscape of the American Southwest. Meg Mabry has spent her life oppressed by her family’s legacy—a heritage beginning with the journals written by her great-grandmother in the 1890s and solidified by her grandmother Bassie, a famous historian who published them to great acclaim. Until now, Meg has stubbornly refused to read the journals. But when she concedes to accompany the elderly and vipertongued Bassie on a return trip to the fabled land of her childhood in New Mexico, Meg finally succumbs to the allure of her great-grandmother’s story—and soon everything she believed about her family is turned upside down.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
Sumptuous, surprise-filled . . . The Night Journal is near perfect, a beautifully restrained epic with nary a wasted word. (Texas Monthly)

Crook has a clear gift for detail and dialogue. . . . [T]here’s plenty to keep you engaged and engrossed in The Night Journal. (The Philadelphia Inquirer)

Kirkus Review
Reading the journals of her Harvey Girl ancestor sends a young Texas woman back in time to the New Mexico frontier in Crook's warmly drawn novel (Promised Lands, 1994, etc.).

Thirtyish Meg Mabry, an administrator in an Austin hospital, has a prickly relationship with her irrepressible grandmother, Claudia Bass. A renowned historian universally known as Bassie, the old lady made her reputation by publishing the journals of her mother, Hannah, a Harvey Girl at the Montezuma Hotel in New Mexico at the turn of the century. Bassie also essentially raised Meg after the girl's alcoholic mother proved unreliable. She now insists that her granddaughter accomplish two things before Bassie dies: Meg must read the six volumes of her great-grandmother's journals, and she must accompany her grandmother to Pecos, where Bassie was born and lived briefly before Hannah died of TB. To her ire, Bassie learns that the visitor's center in Pecos, located near the site of the old Bass homestead, plans to excavate Dog Hill, where the bones of her mother's pets are buried. With the help of mild-mannered archaeologist Jim Layton, Bassie and Meg dig up the dog bones in order to remove them. But what is a human skeleton doing buried there? While this mystery unfolds, Meg plows through great swaths of the journals, which make delightful reading as Hannah vividly describes her work at the hotel and friendships with other waitresses. But they have a darker side as well. Hannah's husband, engineer Elliott Bass, bore lifelong emotional scars resulting from the murder of his family by Mormons during the infamous Mountain Meadows wagon-train massacre in Utah. During their marriage, Elliott traveled extensively, laying track for the fledgling railroad, sending home detailed letters (also included) while Hannah experienced a growing intellectual attraction to the son of a rich local sheep-rancher.

A multilayered narrative of impressive historical perspicacity, enriched by the author's loving attention to character.

Publishers Weekly
At age 37, Meg Mabry, a single, overworked medical engineer, still hasn't found her place in the world, a predicament due in part to her rejection of her heritage. She's the great-granddaughter of Hannah Bass, a woman whose journals about frontier life in New Mexico (dating 1891 to 1902) have become famous thanks to Meg's grandmother Claudia Bass (Bassie), a historian who built her career promoting the diaries. But Meg resents the domineering Bassie (who raised her) and refuses to read the journals, acoping strategy Crook doesn't make entirely credible. Meg finally delves into Hannah's story when she reluctantly accompanies her grandmother from Austin, Tex., to Pecos, N. Mex. There, a discovery at the burial site of Hannah's dogs calls into question the veracity of Bassie's life work. Meg, meanwhile, falls for archeologist Jim Layton and embarks on a journey into her family's past that will confront her with some difficult truths about herself. Excerpts from the journals punctuate the layered but sometimes unconvincingly plotted narrative, and the historical detail depicts the uneasy late 19th-century melding of Anglo, Native American and Mexican cultures. Crook's third novel (after Promised Lands) blends mystery, chick-lit-style romance and historical fiction for a glimpse of the current and past American West. (Feb. 6) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
Library Journal
Meg is sick of her family history-great-grandmother Hannah was famed for diaries detailing her daring life on the frontier as a Harvey Girl and subsequently a railroad engineer's wife. But then Meg discovers that the diaries may not have been entirely truthful. With a six-city tour. Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780143038573
  • Publisher: Penguin Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 1/30/2007
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 464
  • Sales rank: 526,399
  • Product dimensions: 5.10 (w) x 8.20 (h) x 1.00 (d)

Meet the Author

Elizabeth Crook is the author of two previous novels and has been published in anthologies and periodicals such as Texas Monthly and Southwestern Historical Quarterly. She has devoted most of the last decade to researching and writing this book.

Read More Show Less

Interviews & Essays

An Author Q&A with Elizabeth Crook

Your previous two novels were works of historical fiction, and The Night Journal contains a historical novel of sorts within its framework, in the journals of Hannah Bass. What is it about historical fiction that interests you as a writer?

My mother read a lot of historical fiction to my brother and sister and me when we were growing up: the Newbery winners like Caddie Woodlawn and The Bronze Bow, classics by authors such as Frances Hodgson Burnett and Fred Gibson, and a long list of others-The Witch of Blackbird Pond, Roller Skates, Five Little Peppers, and Thee, Hannah! come to mind-these books were an enormous part of my family life as we experienced them together. There was a magical book called Blue Willow and one that I still cherish in a battered old copy, The Colt from Moon Mountain, and all the books by Louisa May Alcott, which were not exactly historical when they were written but were old-fashioned and otherworldly to me. My brother and I also watched a lot of old westerns, like Gunsmoke and Bonanza, on television so I suppose I became comfortable at an early age moving in and out of the past. As a teenager I fell in love with the Brontë novels and Dickens and historical novels by Daphne du Maurier and Elizabeth Goodge. The Child from the Sea was particularly moving and unforgettable and I can still remember the imagery in the final paragraph. I never liked fantasy books-even those my brother loved such as the Narnia series and A Wrinkle in Time -I found them unnerving and ultimately unbelievable as they suspended the rules of life. History, to the contrary, defined and clarified the rules of life; I liked that clarity as it gave me an understanding of reality. To study an era of time and be able to fathom it-that was satisfying. I'm not an adventurous person as far as travel goes, being fairly rooted, but when I research a period of time from the past, that is like traveling in time and is enormously exciting. Books about the future seem unsettling to me, but stories about the past, even when they're violent or disturbing, seem comforting and familiar as they are based on the premise of real life.

How did this novel, which is based both in the 1890s and 1989, pose challenges to you as a writer? What was it like to balance and juxtapose the frontier diary voice of Hannah with the more modern perspective and voice of Meg?

When I started this book I had just completed my second book, which was an old-fashioned historical epic about love and war set in Texas in the 1830s. I was reluctant to get back into the chaotic and extensive research required for historical fiction and decided to try to write a contemporary novel. I cast about for material, but was uninspired. Then my husband and I took a trip to New Mexico and some friends whom we were staying with suggested that I drive over and look at some old Pueblo ruins in the area. So I drove over to Pecos Pueblo.

I think every writer is always in search of those places that suddenly, for inexplicable reasons, set your mind on fire. Pecos did this for me the same way that the mission at La Bahia did when I wrote Promised Lands. Still, I was reluctant to start into so much heavy research again, so I thought that perhaps I could set only half of the book in the past, and that this would require me to do only half the amount of research. However, this plan turned out to ridiculous. To write even a few historical scenes with any authenticity you have to know the period intimately-you have to know everything about it that would affect the characters, which is pretty well everything. In the end the book took twice as long to write as my other books, instead of half as long. I was developing two sets of characters, in two different time periods, writing in two different voices, and then I had to piece it all together and make it work as a whole and cut each story down to half the size it wanted to be, so that the book would be a viable length.

Writing Hannah's part, once the research was done, was not too difficult, but I had a lot of trouble settling on the contemporary narrative voice and struggled with this right up to the last draft. Third person is more difficult to write than first person as it requires more discipline.

How much research did you do in the course of writing this novel?

A great deal. I always dread the concept of research and try to devise ways not to have to do it, but once I start, it draws me in. It's especially compelling in the beginning when you don't know exactly what you're looking for; you're just traveling through the material-obscure old accounts, old catalogs like Montgomery Ward's, compilations of correspondence, books about the clothing, architecture, transportation, politics, and every other aspect of the times-and finding things to dramatize. It's an act of discovery, like searching for four-leaf clovers. Writing historical fiction isn't so much about making things up as about finding those moments in history, or even just the details of daily life in the past that lend themselves to drama. I didn't know in the beginning that the book would contain so much about the railroad industry or about the treatments for tuberculosis; in fact, I don't even remember now what I thought the book would be about. But the fact is, if you start reading about New Mexico, you're going to come across the railroad and the Harvey Girls, and you're going to learn about sanatoriums for tuberculous patients, which were a big business and philanthropic endeavor in that territory for many years. And you're probably going to see the drama in these subjects, and then out of all the information, a story will start to form. I'm not a writer with a lot of vision, but I recognize moments when I come across them, I recognize that the hills outside of Las Vegas, New Mexico, are a moody and evocative landscape, and that Pecos Pueblo and the Montezuma Hotel have limitless stories embedded in their histories. And I can figure out, with a lot of trial and error and over the course of years, how to make coherent use of these aspects and events.

How much of this story is true? Which locations and stories are based on real-life counterparts?

The contemporary characters are completely mine. Some of my friends might recognize some characteristics, or a moment of interaction might seem vaguely familiar to them, but I suppose this is usually the case in most novels-that snippets of real people or real moments are put in there. Bassie isn't fashioned after any one individual, but I've known and dearly loved several cantankerous old women who have shared a few of her traits.

Some of the events in Hannah's journals are inspired by family history. My great grandparents moved to Texas because my great grandfather and his eldest son were suffering from terminal tuberculosis (as ultimately is the character of Hannah in the novel) and the dry air of the Texas hill country was said to be curative. It was only when I began researching the history of tuberculosis and its treatment, when I was writing the novel, that I began to understand the extent of suffering of these people and their families. I think this is the usual case with family stories-they lose their clarity eventually, and a person's life is reduced to a statement such as "My great grandfather died of tuberculosis." Only through research can we come close to the reality of what a statement like this really means.

There was a family in Las Vegas similar to the Morales family in the book, but there was not a character specifically like Vicente Morales. Parts of Elliott's career are based roughly on the achievements of two different railroad survey engineers from the period, one in particular who left behind a number of letters to his wife and who is mentioned in my acknowledgments but who died well before my character Elliott did in the story-therefore my use of a second engineer to continue the career and the advancement of the railroad up to the turn of the last century.

The places in the novel are all real. I try never to take liberties with facts, such as dates or places, because I want the reader to know that the story could have happened exactly the way I've written it, even if it didn't actually happen at all. I don't put vegetation where it doesn't grow or wildlife where it doesn't exist. I don't invent buildings or towns. I try to get details right. However, I don't mind digging up a dead body that was never actually buried-as long as it could have been.

Why tell the story through the granddaughter, Meg, who is one generation removed from Bassie, and not her daughter, Nina?

Bassie needed to be elderly in order to have been born in the time period I wanted to represent. Meg needed to be moderately young, because I wanted her life still to be ahead of her so that the lessons she learned wouldn't be wasted. Also, the age difference allowed me to see the modern part of the story not only from two different viewpoints but also from two widely different stages of life, and this was interesting to me. Nina, as it turned out, simply filled in the gap between these two women. It was tricky fitting all the time frames together because I had a lot of events that had to happen at certain times: the Mormon massacre, the years that the Montezuma was open, the beginning of tourism in the west. I would have liked to make Meg's story exactly contemporary-2006-but couldn't pull that off without making Bassie too old to be credible, so Meg's story had to be set in the 1980s. At one point in the writing I thought I could simply be vague about the present time frame and exactly when Meg and Bassie traveled to New Mexico, and that no one would notice-it could feel as if it was anytime in the last ten or fifteen years without putting a date to it. But then there was the problem of cell phones. You can't fudge on something like that: either your characters have cell phones or they don't. And if they do, the story changes, things are handled differently, the entire way in which Meg relates to her work back in Austin while she's in New Mexico would be drastically different if she was carrying a cell phone. In the end I simply fell back on my rule of authenticity: it had to happen in a way it could have happened. So, for Elliott to have survived the Mormon massacre, and to have married Hannah without too much of an age difference between them, and for Hannah to have had Bassie, and for Bassie to remain a force to reckon with during my contemporary plot, then Meg and Bassie had to have taken the trip to New Mexico in the late 1980s.

The land of New Mexico, vividly described in both Hannah's journals and Meg's modern observations, is very much a character in the novel. What drew you to this geographic area and these time periods specifically?

I did not want to write about Texas again. I toyed with several ideas for stories in the northeast, but in the end it just seemed natural to stay in the southwest and simply move a little farther west and a little later in time from the last book I'd written.

Then when I discovered Pecos Pueblo, I started nosing around for a story. Right outside of Pecos there was a sign that said LAS VEGAS 60 MILES, or something like that, and I thought this referred to Las Vegas, Nevada. So I headed in that direction to see what was going on. Of course nothing was going on: Las Vegas, New Mexico, is not Las Vegas, Nevada. No billboards, no flashing lights. But I was intrigued with the town when I got there. I went into the old Plaza Hotel and looked around and inquired about the town and the area and was told about the Montezuma ten miles away. So I drove up there into the mountains. Seeing that place from the road-the spires rising up out of those hills-is breathtaking. I parked on the campus area around the building but the building was in such bad shape that it had been roped off and locked up. The next night I came back with my husband and we stayed at the Plaza Hotel and went back to the Montezuma, and I ignored the NO TRESPASSING signs to get a better look. But it was dark and I couldn't see much, and I couldn't get in. It just happened that at dinner later that night at the Plaza I overheard the people at the next table talking about the Montezuma, and one in that party turned out to be Philip Geier, the president of the United World College, that owned the Montezuma, as it was in the middle of their campus. I introduced myself and he very kindly offered to set up a tour with the caretaker so I could see the interior.

So I found the places for the story by starting off without a notion of where I wanted to end up. I think this is not unusual.

Much of Hannah's early diary entries are presented directly to the reader, telling of her travels, time spent at the Montezuma, and her courtship with Elliott Bass. The later journals, after she marries Elliott and has Claudia, are summarized for the reader. Why did you choose to put this distance between the journals and the reader? Was it to convey plot points more quickly than a re-recreation of diary entries would allow, or to create a distance between the reader and Hannah, so that the reader knows the journals through Meg's perspective?

Exactly right on both counts. I couldn't write the whole journal, which was (supposedly) volumes long. I had to leave out anything that didn't advance the story or give crucial information about the characters. Also, I wanted the reader to see some of the story through Meg's reading of the journals as a way to draw the two stories together.

It's tricky to write scenes in journal format without making the journalist (in this case Hannah) appear self-absorbed. Descriptions by a "journalist" or "diarist" of himself or herself are generally off-putting as they require too much self-awareness. It's a curse to a lot of books written in first person: the reader immediately dislikes a narrator who is talking a lot about himself and seems preoccupied with his own appearance or other people's impression of him. I had to tinker with Hannah's journals constantly in order to avoid this pitfall, and am not sure how well I succeeded. Writing some scenes in third person helped as it allowed me to observe and describe Hannah without her needing constantly to observe and describe herself. It is one thing in a journal to describe events and situations that pertain to other people, and even to describe an emotional reaction to those events. But to describe oneself within a scene can begin to border on too much self-awareness, which is never an appealing characteristic.

Several of the characters witness violent deaths early in their respective development: Hannah's earliest diary entries after witnessing the deaths from the train accident; the horrific, prolonged massacre at Mountain Meadows of Elliott's parents; the gory deaths of Jim's parents in a car crash. Why as a writer did you feel it was important to include these scenes: in your opinion, how does violence irreparably change a person?

Hmm. I hadn't actually realized that that was the case-that so many characters had violence in their history. I suppose I find violence both troubling and deeply interesting. I've always found it easier to write violent scenes than to read them or watch them in a movie, because I'm in control of what happens. Nothing is going to happen unless I allow it to, and there's a certain comfort in that-in pulling all the strings. Perhaps the reason I'm drawn to violence is the same for many people: we want to see things from the inside in order to understand them and to come to terms with them-to put them to rest, if that's possible (and often I think it isn't, but the drive is still there). It isn't just morbidity or gruesomeness that draws us, but empathy and the sense that by investing in the violence we can somehow then deal with it better emotionally in real life.

What writers or books have had an important influence on you or your life?

My mother read to us-I've mentioned some of the books that first come to mind in the answer to a previous question, but there were a lot of others with more contemporary stories. I also grew up loving poetry: my grandmother on my mother's side and also my father were constantly quoting from memory. I was fortunate to grow up in a family of readers. These days I find myself more interested in nonfiction history than historical fiction, and it certainly has more of an influence on my life. One of the last scenes I injected into The Night Journal was the train wreck that occurs at the beginning of the journals; books about nineteenth-century train wrecks completely engrossed me while I was casting aside historical novel after novel that failed to capture me. This caused me to realize how much I love reading true accounts of actual events, and how meaningful and necessary these are, and how much I appreciate them as literature. In these accounts the information is all there for the taking; it has not been filtered through anyone else's imagination. It's enlightening because it's true to life.

What are you writing next?

I don't know yet. I find it increasingly hard to find time to write. I've been reading about several historical events, but most of these are so tragic I'm uncertain I want to deal with any of them for years on end. A friend and I have discussed possibly writing a screenplay, perhaps a comedy, but I'm not sure I have any talent for this, and I certainly have no experience. Nevertheless, it would be a way to write without having to get back into a lot of heavy research.

Read More Show Less

Reading Group Guide

INTRODUCTION
In her third novel, author Elizabeth Crook creates a transporting story of one family’s legacy over the course of one hundred years, stemming from the diaries of a frontier woman faced with the duties, passions, and dangers of her times.

In The Night Journal, the diaries of Hannah Bass have attracted the attention and devotion of academics and readers for decades. Candid and passionate, written in the 1890s, the journals offer the rare account of a woman in the American West during the Victorian era, a time of expansion, indiscriminant violence, and burgeoning industry.

Nearly a century later, the journals have been edited and published to great acclaim by Hannah’s only child, Claudia Bass, known to all as Bassie, now a retired professor of southwestern history and respected worldwide for her work transcribing her mother’s journals. Bassie’s granddaughter, Meg Mabry, however—a thirty-seven-year-old career woman who as a child was raised by Bassie and remains bitter toward Bassie’s domineering, caustic guardianship and the burden of her expectations—finds the very thought of the family legacy oppressive and refuses even to read the journals.

When Bassie learns that the hill on the property of her childhood home is going to be flattened to make room for modern expansion, she insists that Meg travel with her to New Mexico to recover the skeletal remains of two dogs her mother buried there. She recalls being awakened during the night to the sound of gunshots and remembers seeing her mother, Hannah, and a man named Vicente Morales take a pickax to the frozen ground and dig the grave for a dog shot by poachers. Driven and determined in her memory, Bassie refuses to let this one final and vivid image of her mother be bulldozed away.

But when the ground is excavated, far more than dogs’ bones are unearthed, and the discovery of what is buried in the grave sends Bassie and Meg on a search back through time to the turn of the last century and into the secret lives of Bassie’s mother and father—Hannah and Elliott Bass—and Vicente Morales. The journey shakes the foundation of the history on which Bassie has built her life and her long career and changes Meg’s perception of the past as well as her expectations for her own future. In the fabled landscape of her ancestry, Meg allows herself at last to read the journals and reconstruct the past, solving a shocking and confounding mystery. With the support of Jim Layton, the archaeologist involved in the excavation, she sets out to find the one missing journal—suspected to exist but never confirmed—that will detail the final year of Hannah’s life and shed light on the unexplained disappearance of Hannah’s husband, Elliott.

Both a fascinating historical epic of the Southwest and a searing personal story of one family’s coming to terms with its own past, The Night Journal is a contemporary love story and a historical mystery, depicting the conflict between cultures in New Mexico at the turn of the last century, between sexes both then and now, and inevitably the conflicts between generations. It is centered on the mystery of the contents buried in a dog’s grave, but the underlying, broader mystery is about connections between the past and the present and the ways in which people relate to their ancestors both in life and in legacy.

ABOUT ELIZABETH CROOK

Elizabeth Crook is the author of two previous novels and has been published in anthologies and periodicals such as Texas Monthly and Southwestern Historical Quarterly. She has devoted most of the last decade to researching and writing this book.

AUTHOR INTERVIEW
Your previous two novels were works of historical fiction, and The Night Journal contains a historical novel of sorts within its framework, in the journals of Hannah Bass. What is it about historical fiction that interests you as a writer?

My mother read a lot of historical fiction to my brother and sister and me when we were growing up: the Newbery winners likeCaddie Woodlawn and The Bronze Bow, classics by authors such as Frances Hodgson Burnett and Fred Gibson, and a long list of others—The Witch of Blackbird Pond, Roller Skates, Five Little Peppers, and Thee, Hannah! come to mind—these books were an enormous part of my family life as we experienced them together. There was a magical book called Blue Willow and one that I still cherish in a battered old copy, The Colt from Moon Mountain, and all the books by Louisa May Alcott, which were not exactly historical when they were written but were old-fashioned and otherworldly to me. My brother and I also watched a lot of old westerns, like Gunsmoke and Bonanza, on television; so I suppose I became comfortable at an early age moving in and out of the past. As a teenager I fell in love with the Brontë novels and Dickens and historical novels by Daphne du Maurier and Elizabeth Goudge. The Child from the Sea was particularly moving and unforgettable and I can still remember almost word for word an image described at the very end. I never liked fantasy books—even those my brother loved such as the Narnia series and A Wrinkle in Time—I found them unnerving and ultimately unbelievable as they suspended the rules of life. History, to the contrary, defined and clarified the rules, and this was a great relief to me as it gave me an understanding of reality. To study an era of time and be able to fathom it—that was satisfying. I’m not an adventurous person as far as travel goes, being fairly rooted, but researching the past is like traveling in time and is preposterously exciting for me. Stories about the past, even violent and disturbing ones, seem comforting and familiar as they are based on the premise of real life.

How did this novel, which is based both in the 1890s and 1989, pose challenges to you as a writer? What was it like to balance and juxtapose the frontier diary voice of Hannah with the more modern perspective and voice of Meg?

When I started this book I had just completed my second book, which was an old-fashioned historical epic about love and war set in Texas in the 1830s. I was reluctant to get back into the chaotic and extensive research required for historical fiction and decided to try to write a contemporary novel. I cast about for material, but was uninspired. Then my husband and I took a trip to New Mexico, and some friends whom we were staying with suggested I drive over and look at some Pueblo ruins in the area. So I drove over to Pecos Pueblo.

I think writers are always in search of those places that suddenly, for inexplicable reasons, set their minds on fire. Pecos did this for me the same way that the mission at La Bahia did when I wrote Promised Lands. I went down into one of the kivas and found it to be mesmerizing, with bits of floating dust illuminated by the light that came down form the entry above. And I knew this was a place I wanted to write about. Still, I was reluctant to start into so much heavy research again, so I had the sudden idea that perhaps I could set only half of the book in the past, and that this would liberate me and require me to do only half the amount of research. However, this plan turned out to be ridiculous. To write even a few historical scenes with any authenticity—even just to get your characters out of bed and feed them breakfast—you have to know the period intimately. You have to know everything about it that would affect the characters, which is pretty well everything. In the end the book took twice as long to write as my other books, instead of half as long. I was developing two sets of characters, in two different time periods, writing in several different voices; and then I had to piece it all together and make it work as a whole and cut each story down to half the size it wanted to be, so that the book would be a viable length.

Writing Hannah’s part, once the research was done, was not too difficult, but I had trouble settling on the contemporary narrative voice and struggled with this right up to the last draft. Third person is more difficult to write than first person, as it requires more discipline. So each story presented its own specific challenge: for Hannah’s story it was the research, for Meg’s it was the voice. Which is one reason I was relieved to go back and forth between the two. Ultimately that jump in time became the most important thing about the book. The book is about family legacies and how our generation often feels like a paler version of our ancestors, and what it would be like if we could actually go back and reconstruct the lives of our great and great-great grandparents, and see these lives not as they have been represented to us but as they really were. So it necessarily needed to span the generations. All of us live our lives with some amount of secrecy, and this influences how we will be remembered: most of us in subtle ways edit the real story to put ourselves in the best light. Later the stories about us that are passed down and the photographs and letters that survive are all to some extent altered by successive generations and by the arbitrary deletions and distortions of time—artifacts are lost, records are destroyed, evidence goes up in flames—so that often what is left is a long way from the truth. History does not take place in a vacuum; one day leads to the next, and I wanted this book to show how even the events that are untold or forgotten string along from the past to the present on a continuous strand.

How much research did you do in the course of writing this novel?

A great deal. When you write historical fiction you have to disappear daily though a wormhole to the past and arrive at the location of your story. Once you’re there you have to understand the life-style perfectly enough to dress your characters, and move them around, and help them make a living. I always dread the research this requires, but once I start, it draws me in. It’s especially compelling in the beginning when you don’t know exactly what kind of facts you’re looking for; you’re just traveling through the material—obscure old accounts, old catalogs like Montgomery Ward’s, compilations of correspondence, books about the architecture, transportation, politics, and every other aspect of the times—and finding things to dramatize. It’s an act of discovery, a treasure hunt. One find leads to another. Writing historical fiction isn’t so much about making things up as about finding those moments in history, or even just the details of daily life in the past that lend themselves to drama. I didn’t know in the beginning that the book would contain so much about the railroad industry or about the treatments for tuberculosis. But the fact is, if you start reading about New Mexico, you’re going to come across the railroad and the historical Harvey Hotels and resorts, and you’re going to learn about sanatoriums for tuberculosis patients, which were a big business and philanthropic endeavor in that territory for many years. And you’re probably going to notice the drama in this information. A story will start to form. I’m not a writer with a lot of vision, but I recognize moments when I come across them, I recognize that the hills outside of Las Vegas, New Mexico, are a moody and evocative landscape, and that Pecos Pueblo and the Montezuma Hotel have limitless stories embedded in their histories. And I can figure out, with a lot of trial and error and over the course of years, how to make coherent use of these aspects and events.

How much of this story is true? Which locations and stories are based on real-life counterparts?

The contemporary characters are completely mine. Some of my friends might recognize a few of their personality traits transfused into one or two of the characters, or a moment of interaction might seem vaguely familiar to them; but I suppose this is usually the case in most novels—that snippets of real life are put in there. Bassie isn’t fashioned after any one individual, but I’ve known and dearly loved several cantankerous old women who have shared a few of her qualities.

Some of the events in Hannah’s journals are inspired by family history. My great grandparents moved to Texas because my great grandfather was suffering from terminal tuberculosis (as ultimately is the character of Hannah in the novel) and the dry air of the Texas hill country was said to be curative. It was only when I began researching the history of tuberculosis and its treatment, when I was writing the novel, that I began to understand how deeply this person and his family suffered. I think this is the usual case with family stories—they lose their clarity eventually, and a person’s life is reduced to a statement such as “My great grandfather died of tuberculosis.” Only through research can we come close to the reality of what a statement like this really means.

There was a family in Las Vegas similar to the Morales family in the book, but there was not a character specifically like Vicente Morales. Parts of Elliott’s career are based roughly on the achievements of two different railroad survey engineers from the period, one in particular who left behind a number of letters to his wife. He is mentioned in my acknowledgments. However, he died well before my character Elliott did in the story, and therefore my use of a second engineer to continue the career and the advancement of the railroad up to the turn of the last century.

The places in the novel are all real. I try never to take liberties with facts, such as dates or places, because I want the reader to know that the story could have happened exactly the way I’ve written it, even if it didn’t actually happen at all. I don’t put vegetation where it doesn’t grow or wildlife where it doesn’t live. I don’t invent buildings or towns. I try to get details right. However, I don’t mind digging up a dead body that was never actually buried—as long as it could have been.

Why tell the story through the granddaughter, Meg, who is one generation removed from Bassie, and not her daughter, Nina?

Bassie needed to be elderly in order to have been born in Hannah’s time. Meg needed to be moderately young, because I wanted her life still to be ahead of her so that the lessons she learned in the course of the story wouldn’t be wasted. Also, the age difference allowed me to see the modern part of the story not only from two different viewpoints but also from two widely different stages of life. Nina filled in the gap between these two women with a character I hoped to be believable as Bassie’s daughter—with the necessary damage to her self-confidence that having Bassie for a mother would entail—and also believable as Meg’s mother, with a plausible effect on Meg. It was tricky fitting the historical time frames together, because I had a lot of events that had to happen at certain times: the Mormon massacre, the years that the Montezuma was open, the beginning of tourism in the west. I would have liked to make Meg’s story exactly contemporary—2006—but couldn’t pull that off without making Bassie too old to be credible. So Meg’s story had to be set in the 1980s at the very latest. At one point in the writing I thought I could simply be vague about when, exactly, Meg and Bassie traveled to New Mexico, and that no one would notice—it could feel as if the story happened anytime in the last ten or fifteen years without putting a date to it. But then there was the problem of cell phones. You can’t fudge on something like that: either your characters have cell phones or they don’t. And if they do, the story changes, things are handled differently; the entire way in which Meg relates to her work back in Austin while she’s in New Mexico would be drastically different if she were carrying a cell phone. In the end I simply fell back on my rule of authenticity: it had to happen in a way it could have happened. So, for Elliott to have survived the Mormon massacre, and to have married Hannah without too much of an age difference between them, and for Hannah to have given birth to Bassie, and for Bassie to remain a force to reckon with during my contemporary plot, then the latest Meg and Bassie could have taken the trip to New Mexico was about 1989.

The land of New Mexico, vividly described in both Hannah’s journals and Meg’s modern observations, is very much a character in the novel. What drew you to this geographic area and these time periods specifically?

Making the land a prominent part of the book gives the reader a sense of where they are. It certainly grounds me as a writer. It also sets the mood. As for the landscape I selected, after writing about the Texas Revolution in my second book I didn’t want to write about Texas again. I toyed with several ideas for stories in the northeast, but in the end it just seemed natural to stay in the southwest and simply move a little farther west and a little later in time from the last book I’d written.

Then when I discovered Pecos Pueblo, I started nosing around for a story. Right outside of Pecos there was a sign that said LAS VEGAS 60 MILES, and I thought it was referring to Las Vegas, Nevada, so I decided I would drive over there and see what was going on. Of course nothing was going on: Las Vegas, New Mexico, is not Las Vegas, Nevada. It is a small town. There are not a lot of billboards or flashing neon signs on the outskirts, which was my first indication that I was not in Nevada. Nevertheless the place interested me when I got there, and I went into the old Plaza Hotel on the square and asked what there was to see in the area. I was told there was a huge old abandoned resort hotel ten miles up in the mountains that had been in operation at the turn of the century but was now nearly in ruins, so I drove up there. Seeing that place from the winding road, with the spires rising up out of those hills—is breathtaking, and I knew the moment I lay eyes on it that I had found a second location for my story. I parked on the campus area around the building but the building was in such bad shape that it had been roped off and locked up. The next night I came back with my husband and we stayed at the Plaza Hotel and went back to the Montezuma, and I ignored the NO TRESPASSING signs to get a better look. But it was dark and I couldn’t see much, and I couldn’t get in. It happened that at dinner later that night at the Plaza I overheard the people at the next table talking about the Montezuma; one in that party turned out to be Philip Geier, the president of the United World College, that owned the Montezuma, as it was located on their campus. I introduced myself and he very kindly offered to set up a tour with the caretaker so I could see the interior.

So I found the places for the story by starting off without a notion of where I wanted to end up. I think this is not unusual.

Much of Hannah’s early diary entries are presented directly to the reader, telling of her travels, time spent at the Montezuma, and her courtship with Elliott Bass. The later journals, after she marries Elliott and has Claudia, are summarized for the reader. Why did you choose to put this distance between the journals and the reader? Was it to convey plot points more quickly than a re-recreation of diary entries would allow, or to create a distance between the reader and Hannah, so that the reader knows the journals through Meg’s perspective?

Exactly right on both counts. I couldn’t write the whole journal, which was (supposedly) volumes long. I had to leave out anything that didn’t advance the plot or give crucial information about the characters. Also, I wanted the reader to see some of Hannah’s life through Meg’s reading of the journals as a way to draw their stories together.

It’s tricky to write scenes in journal format without making the journalist (in this case Hannah) appear self-absorbed. Descriptions by a “journalist” or “diarist” of himself or herself are off-putting when they require too much self-awareness. It’s a curse to a lot of books written in first person: the reader immediately dislikes a narrator who is talking a lot about himself and seems preoccupied with his own appearance or other people’s impression of him. I had to tinker with Hannah’s journals constantly in order to avoid this pitfall, and am not sure how well I succeeded. I had to give her an urgent reason for writing: she wants to compose a record of her times and of what it is like for a woman to live in the west. She is, therefore, writing her observations about the place and the people who live there; she is outwardly observant instead of inwardly absorbed. This keeps her from seeming annoyingly full of herself. It is one thing in a journal to describe events and situations that pertain to other people, and even to describe an emotional reaction to those events. It is less appealing to describe oneself within a scene; I needed, at times, to relieve Hannah from doing this. Writing some of the scenes in third person helped, as it allowed me to observe Hannah without her needing constantly to observe herself.

Several of the characters witness violent deaths early in their respective development: Hannah’s earliest diary entries after witnessing the deaths from the train accident; the horrific, prolonged massacre at Mountain Meadows of Elliott’s parents; the gory deaths of Jim’s parents in a car crash. Why as a writer did you feel it was important to include these scenes: in your opinion, how does violence irreparably change a person?

Hmm. I hadn’t actually realized that so many of the characters had violence in their history. I suppose I find violence both troubling and deeply interesting. I’ve always found it easier to write violent scenes than to read them or watch them in a movie, because I’m in control of what happens. Nothing is going to happen unless I allow it to, and there’s a certain comfort in that. Perhaps the reason I’m drawn to violence is the same for many people: we want to see things from the inside in order to understand them and to come to terms with them—to put them to rest, if that’s possible (and often I think it isn’t, but the desire is still there). It isn’t just morbidity or gruesomeness that draws us, but empathy with the victims, and the sense that by investing in the violence we can somehow then deal with it better emotionally in real life.

What writers or books have had an important influence on you or your life?

My mother read to us—I’ve mentioned the books that first come to mind in the answer to a previous question, but there were a lot of other books with more contemporary stories. I also grew up loving poetry: my grandmother on my mother’s side and also my father were constantly quoting from memory. I was fortunate to grow up in a family of readers. These days I find myself more interested in nonfiction history than historical fiction, and it certainly has more of an influence on my life. One of the last scenes I injected into The Night Journal was the train wreck that occurs at the beginning of the journals; books about nineteenth-century train wrecks completely engrossed me while I was casting aside historical novel after novel that failed to capture me. This caused me to realize how much I love reading true accounts of actual events, and how meaningful and necessary these are, and how much I appreciate them as literature. In these accounts the information is all there for the taking; it has not been filtered through anyone else’s imagination.

What are you writing next?

At the moment I’m enjoying the feeling of being finished and not splitting time between two worlds, only one of which is real. When I finally start on something new I’ll be dealing again with an unformed plotline supported by too many note cards, too many undeveloped characters, too many thoughts; I’ll be waking up in the night too often to scribble an idea on a notepad in the dark only to look at in the morning and wonder what in the heck it says. It’s chaotic, really, and disorienting. Writing is fueled by an urgency to finish, and this is a great thing for a short project, but stringing that feeling along for years on end can get uncomfortable. I’m not in any hurry to start it up again. But the fact is, I won’t be happy for long if I’m not writing. So I’ll probably look around for a while, and then one day wander into some place like the kiva at Pecos Pueblo, and my heart will start pounding, and that will be it. I won’t really come out of there for several years.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  • How important is it in our contemporary lives to feel a connection to the past or to have an understanding of our ancestors? Are the stories about your ancestors important to your own self-image?
     
  • Are we, as a generation, pale in comparison to our ancestors, as Meg seems to believe? In other words, do we lack their strength? Are there ways in which we are stronger?
     
  • Most of the major characters in the book have suffered difficult or traumatic childhood experiences. Is it inevitable that difficult childhoods lead to dysfunctional relationships later in life, or can these experiences be overcome? What are the different ways in which each character attempts to cope? Do you think Elliott’s attempt to leave the past behind by focusing only on the future, and refusing to talk about his memories, can be effective?
     
  • Bassie essentially raised both Nina and Meg. Why did her overbearing personality affect them so differently? Are some children more genetically inclined to survive bad parenting?
     
  • Many of the central characters—Bassie, Elliott, Jim, and even Meg—are in some respects orphans. What does it mean to be an orphan? How does being orphaned affect a person’s connection to the world around them?
     
  • Which of the historical male characters are you more drawn to—Elliott Bass or Vicente Morales? Which one do you respect more?
     
  • Is your respect for Hannah diminished by the ultimate revelation of her affair with Vicente? Do you think you, as a reader, are more forgiving of, and less judgmental about, extramarital affairs between historical characters than you are of those between contemporary characters?
     
  • Do you believe Meg and Jim are soul mates, kept apart through circumstance, or are they merely swept up in the drama of Hannah and Elliott’s story?
     
  • Are you relieved that Meg ultimately resists having an affair with Jim, or would you feel more satisfied if she had allowed the relationship to go further? In general do you prefer, in literature, to be gratified or left slightly unsatisfied? Do you feel that stories, and perhaps even real-life stories, are richer if a deep love affair is left somewhat unrealized, or if it is fully satisfied?
     
  • Given Meg’s personality, do you think she matures and changes enough in the course of the book that her future will be different from what it would have been had she not gone to New Mexico with Bassie?
     
  • Meg and Jim are surprised by several discoveries in the last third of the novel. Which of these discoveries took you by surprise as a reader and which did you anticipate?
     
  • Were you ultimately more engaged by Meg’s story or by Hannah’s? Which did you find yourself most eager to return to while reading, and most reluctant to leave?
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 23 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(9)

4 Star

(6)

3 Star

(3)

2 Star

(4)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 23 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 31, 2009

    I really liked this book.

    A friend passed along this book to me and it turned out to be a great read. I have now given 3 copies of this book as gifts!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 29, 2008

    A New Mexico vacation...

    One of my favorite places to visit is New Mexico. While reading this book, I felt like I was in that magical countryside. When I finished, it took me a while to 'come back down to earth' and my mind kept returning to the story and the characters. It felt like a loss, not being able to pick up the book and return to that life.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 24, 2006

    Gripping, insightful, and funny too!

    Gripping, insightful, and funny too! I lived with Meg and Bassie and Hannah all weekend. Couldn't stop reading. I loved Night Journal! Gripping, insightful, and funny too--a mystery with endless surprises, most dealing with relationships (the essence of mystery?). It's history at its best, a connecting backdrop for our lives. I felt like a Harvey Girl, I breathed the Pecos air, I miss Bassie--and Jim. An edge-of-your-seat action drama set in a meticulously researched historical background, it still has me thinking.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 22, 2006

    Night Journal

    If you have a thing for New Mexico, if the sound of a train whistle in the desert night makes you lonely for the past, this is the book for you. 'Night Journal' has the colorations, layers, depth and magic of a piece of exquisite turquoise.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 9, 2008

    more from this reviewer

    Interesting contemporary romantic mystery with a powerful historical base

    In Austin, thirty-seven years old hospital engineer Meg Mabry detests her grandma renowned historian Claudia ¿Bassie¿ Bass, who raised her with an iron fist and expectations of excellence. Bassie made her reputation when she published her mother¿s journal of her life as a Harvey Girl in New Mexico. Before she dies the elderly family matriarch demands her granddaughter reads the six volumes and accompanies her when she makes a pilgrimage to her birth town in Pecos, New Mexico where the visitor's center plans to dig up Dog Hill where Bassie¿s mother buried her pets. --- Bassie, assisted by archaeologist Jim Layton, and Meg dig up the canine bones with plans to inter them elsewhere. However, among the remains is a human skeleton. Stunned by the mystery, Meg turns to the journals she avoided all her life. There she learns her great-grandmother enjoyed her work and apparently loved a nearby sheepherder while her spouse never recovered from the massacre of his family in Utah. --- THE NIGHT JOURNAL is an interesting romantic mystery supported by fictional historical journal entries. The accounts from 1902 provide an intriguing look at New Mexico struggling with three cultures (American, Native American and Mexican) colliding in contrast to today¿s society of partial assimilation and some clashing. The story line includes the ¿required¿ romance between Meg and Jim though that is done in a refreshing manner for this type of novel chick lit style although it remains unnecessary to the delightful historical comparative analysis investigative tale. --- Harriet Klausner

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 15, 2006

    Night Journal

    If you have a thing about New Mexico, if you enjoy a contemporary story with a historical plot, if the sound of a train whistle in the desert night makes you feel lonely for the past--this book is for you. 'Night Journal,' has the colorations, the layers, the magic of exquisite torquoise.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 15, 2006

    An Unforgettable Read

    I loved this book. The writing is beautiful and heartbreakingly moving, and the characters are unforgettable, rendered with such sympathy and poignancy that I began to feel for them as I would for cherished friends. As the story unfolds, I found myself more and more absorbed by the two worlds depicted, and stayed up all night reading to finish it. From the start, Meg¿s journey is completely compelling, as she begins her long-delayed search for and acceptance of her family¿s famous past and how it has shaped her own life. As Meg reads her great-grandmother Hannah¿s journals, Hannah¿s experiences as a Harvey girl in turn-of-the- century New Mexico unfold and provide a riveting- though sometimes painful- depiction of her life and those times. The contemporary and historical stories flow together seamlessly, as the journals provide clues to the mystery Meg uncovers when she travels to the family¿s old homeplace in New Mexico. The Night Journal is a love story, a family saga, a page-turner mystery, and a keen and insightful exploration of how we come to be who we are.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 29, 2014

    more from this reviewer

    One of my favorite books. I've read it twice and loaned it to f

    One of my favorite books. I've read it twice and loaned it to friends.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 13, 2012

    wordy, boring, lengthy

    This book could have been good had it not gone on and on about nothing.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 5, 2010

    Very depressing book

    Did not think this lived up to the reviews I had heard, would not recommend this.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 24, 2009

    A Walk Through the Past To Discover the Present

    This spellbinding story will have you feeling a personal relationship with the people in the present, while clamoring to know more about the people in the past. As Crook brings real places to life with history and present, you'll find yourself mapping out your own trip to Las Vegas, NM and the Pecos Pueblo in hopes of having 1/8 the experience Meg has. Your love/hate relationship for Bassie survives the entire book, and even when you put it down your mind continues to contemplate the situation. The only downside is the book moves slow at times, and you're eager to get back to some action, allowing your mind to skip ahead. Still, for any lover of turn of the century 1900 history, the culture of New Mexico, railroads, or a good generational love story, needs to read this book.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 18, 2009

    Am I missing something?

    I liked the historical parts of this book, and would find myself occasionally interested in what was happening, but basically I was just glad when it was over.<BR/><BR/>I would have enjoyed it more if it had just been written by Hannah and had spent more time with the history of that era. I could have done without the Meg/Jim/Bassie saga.<BR/><BR/>This was one of those books that I had trouble enjoying because I found each of the characters to be supremely unlikable.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 2, 2008

    This Book was interesting, but not great

    I purchased this book on the strength of other reviews and I was somewhat disappointed. The books' format was an interesting way of writing, but the story was a little weak.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 5, 2006

    Must read

    WONDERFUL BOOK. History, mystery, drama, love triangle, beautiful writing and most interestin plot. I can go on praising this author and this book forever. Can not wait for more books from this writer.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 29, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 7, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 12, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 22, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 3, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 21, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 23 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)