Objects in Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear

( 1 )

Overview

Harriet Rose, 26, is an American photographer just winning recognition for her work. A travel fellowship brings her to visit her best friend and former roommate, Anne Gordon, in Switzerland. In an ongoing letter to her boyfriend, Harriet reports on strange developments in Anne's life, most notably her affair with a much older married man, which seems to be leading to a disastrous conclusion. Before she can rescue Anne, events take a series of unexpected turns, and Harriet must reexamine her own life and past, and...
See more details below
Paperback
$11.81
BN.com price
(Save 9%)$13.00 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (12) from $1.99   
  • New (4) from $6.18   
  • Used (8) from $1.99   
Objects in Mirror Are Closer Than They Appear: A Novel

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99
BN.com price

Overview

Harriet Rose, 26, is an American photographer just winning recognition for her work. A travel fellowship brings her to visit her best friend and former roommate, Anne Gordon, in Switzerland. In an ongoing letter to her boyfriend, Harriet reports on strange developments in Anne's life, most notably her affair with a much older married man, which seems to be leading to a disastrous conclusion. Before she can rescue Anne, events take a series of unexpected turns, and Harriet must reexamine her own life and past, and come to terms with the difficulties and possibilities of human relationships.

Already excerpted in The New Yorker, Katharine Weber's witty first novel of attraction and deception, a tale with the sensibility of a Margaret Atwood, pulses with cultural references and word games that echo Nabokov.

Award-winning photographer Harriet Rose has won a travel grant to Geneva, where she will stay with her old roommate and best friend, Anne Gordon. But Anne is in the midst of a disastrous affair with a much older married man, and Harriet struggles with how to rescue her.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
"An amazing first novel . . . wise, flippant, deep, witty—characteristics which are seldom found together. It is also a good story."—Madeleine L'Engle
 
"With vibrancy and a steady barrage of linguistic bio, . . . Weber provides a blend of artistry and insight far beyond what we usually see in a first novel." --San Francisco Chronicle
 
"Wonderfully complex characters, witty prose, ironic situations, and tragic consequences . . . It's Weber's control of the language that holds this cleverly touching book together."--Charlotte Observer
 
"Engaging . . . Ms. Weber's nuanced renderings of childhood traumas, of families in crisis and of Harriet's grandmother are impressive." --New York Times Book Review

“I much enjoyed this delightfully witty novel.”—Iris Murdoch
 
A New York Times Notable Book of the Year
A Publishers Weekly Best Book of 1995
Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Tender and funny and sometimes jolting, this is a first novel of remarkable accomplishment. It tells of a young, thoughtful photographer, Harriet Rose, her newfound love for a young artist and a few surreal weeks in her life when she goes to Geneva to stay with an old friend, Anne Gordon, who is embroiled in a deeply unsuitable affair with a married man. Both of them had childhoods scarred by tragic loss: Harriet is kept afloat by humor, her art (she is obsessed with reflected images) and her love for levelheaded Benedict Thorne; but Anne drowns in desperate aloneness, snatching at selfish lust as love. In outline it sounds like a grim tale, but in fact Weber's sly and prickly wit, her delight in the farcical aspects of the most tragic situations and her sure sense of the rewards-and limits-of feminine friendship cast a life-enhancing glow over the proceedings. Her elegant narrative voice, rife with little puns and pop-culture throwaways, can cope equally well with a darkly hilarious account of growing up in Queens and the shenanigans of a deeply selfish Auschwitz survivor. There may, as in many first novels, be personal material here, but if so it has been alchemized into something decidedly rich and strange. It will be fascinating to see what Weber does next. (Apr.)
Library Journal
Harriet is a photographer who has won a travel grant to Geneva. There, she stays with her former Eighth Street roommate, Anne, who is working for an international business whose function is unclear. Harriet writes to her lover, Benedict, about her concern for her friend: Anne has changed. She is having an affair with a married man who survived Auschwitz with her father and seems confused and sad. Harriet's picture-taking allows her to see through the lens what is not visible to the eye as she looks at her life and that of her friend. She reminds us that what is seen in mirrors may offer a distorted view of reality. This well-written first novel combines both tragedy and a happily-ever-after conclusion. Recommended.-Joanna M. Burkhardt, Univ. of Rhode Island Coll. of Continuing Education Lib., Providence
Elizabeth Benedict
Engaging...Ms. Webber's nuance renderings of childhood traumas, of families in crisis, and of Harriet's grandmother are impressive. -- The New York Times Book Review
Andrew Solomon
With vibrancy and a steady barrage of linguistic brio,...Webber relies upon artistry and insight far beyond what we usually see in a first novel. -- San Francisco Chronicle
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780307587947
  • Publisher: Crown/Archetype
  • Publication date: 7/5/2011
  • Pages: 288
  • Product dimensions: 5.20 (w) x 7.90 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author

KATHARINE WEBER is the author of True Confections, Triangle, The Little Women, and The Music Lesson. She lives in Connecticut with her husband, the cultural historian Nicholas Fox Weber.

KatharineWeber.com

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Part 1
 
Geneva, July 3
 
Oh, Benedict, It’s been fi ve days since your touch. Your touch, hell, your rib-crushing hug at the security checkpoint. I think I have a bruise, Dr. Heimlich, would you mind taking a look at my clavicle? Have I told you how easily I bruise? How easily I bruise: Once, when I was maybe seven and I was walking with my grandmother, my marvelous grandmother, Gay, across 59th Street to the Park, I darted out into the street at an intersection. She grabbed my wrist, for fear of what she called Come-Arounders—cars turning the corner at a high rate of speed and disregard—and by the next day I had developed a perfect set of her fi ngerprints. I thought it looked as though a freshly printed felon had taken my wrist in the middle of a booking. (Did you know that when I was little, I wanted very much to be an FBI agent?)
 
That same afternoon, when we were waiting for the light to change at Second Avenue, a little boy darted into the street in front of us, with traffi c streaming close by, and Gay let go my hand to trot right after him so she could whisk him back up onto the sidewalk with a quick underarm hoist. And then the little boy turned around and hissed, “Fuck you, lady!”
 
It was no little boy at all, but a dwarf, a middle-aged dwarf with acne scars and a Don Ameche mustache. He and I were about the same height. My grandmother grabbed my arm and we backed away together as she murmured, “So sorry, so sorry,” in a tone that suggested a limited command of English. She hustled me into the nearest doorway as the dwarf advanced, shouting horrible obscenities at us still. This was fortunately a luncheonette, and we backed into the doorway as if that had been our intention all along, and we sat at the counter, Gay and I, and had coffee frosted milk shakes and the dwarf went away and we kept looking at each other and laughing.
 
I still can’t believe she is gone. I wish you had known her. I dream about her. God, I miss her. Even when she was dwindling away with encroaching senility, she was still there at the core in some tiny way. One of the last times I saw her, about a week before she curled up to die—I just realized she died exactly six months ago today, which is perhaps why I fi nd myself thinking about her now—she seemed to have no idea who I was. But she tugged at my sleeve and kept saying, “What’s this?” until I fi gured out what she was asking and said, “I’m Harriet.”
 
“Are you really?” she asked. “Are you really Harriet? In that case, I love you!”
 
Funny: that moment with the dwarf. Horrifying, but reassuring. Something about Gay always made me feel protected, almost magically so. Though God knows she was impossible, judgmental, full of rules for others to live by. She’s in my thoughts all the time. And I carry her with me in other ways, too. She was, of course, English, as you know. But she was really English. I wish you could have heard her voice. Even though Gay emigrated as a young child and lived in New York for the rest of her life, she had all sorts of her mother’s habitual gestures of speech, which I absorbed osmotically, without even knowing that certain phrases or words weren’t ordinary American talk.
 
Was it Alexander Portnoy who thought spatula was Yiddish? When I was small, Gay read to me a lot (possibly because she wasn’t particularly adept at making conversation with a toddler), and what she read included some books from her own childhood, as well as books she had read to my mother when she was little. Consequently, when I was about six (the story goes), I asked my mother for a sixpence for the gumball machine in the shoe store. (My mother thought this was a bit much and instituted an embargo on Enid Blyton books.) So. My own use of language, spoken and written, ends up somewhere halfway over the sea, unless I’m mindful. There I go. (I notice when you raise those eyebrows over some of my more uncommon utterances, don’t think I don’t.) Maybe it’s one of my connections with Anne. Though I insist that I come by my affectations more honestly.
 
I wouldn’t say that Gay was affected, exactly. Is it an affectation if the things you say and do run deep, through and through? But you know, even though I ended up living with Gay for most of a year, I was never completely at my ease with her, I never felt that I knew her, not really. Maybe that’s why I soaked up what I could, mimicked her as a way of trying to fi gure her out.
 
After our milk shakes that afternoon, we went, as always, to the Park and watched the seals catch those silvery fi sh fl ung by keepers, one fi sh after another; life could be so sardine-y and simple. I always wanted this moment to last forever; it never did. The disappointed seals would slide into the watery murk and swim in urgent revolutions. Ritually, the disappointed child would feed greasy peanuts to squirrels, feeling guilty for eating some.
 
We would laugh at our refl ections in the glass of the monkey house and make monkey faces. (This was always a thrill, as Gay was at other times quite perfectly ladylike.) Then we would hunt for a balloon man so we could buy my requisite green balloon, and then we would walk back to Sutton Place. So it was on the way back, I guess, that I darted and she clutched. She had to rescue somebody. I had to let her rescue somebody. I had those fi ngerprints for a long time. I regretted their fading away; I liked them.
 
So here I am. Anne worries me. Imperial, imperious, imperative. Still the Anne Gordon of Eighth Street days, but not. Wan, thin, pale as a graduate student who hasn’t emerged from library stacks to fi nd out the season. She has developed something far beyond her old queerly tentative self that I suppose you might call a style. But you wouldn’t call it a style; I’m not sure what you would call it. Tootsishness. Isn’t that one of your words? A toots on wheels, you might say if you passed her on the street. Her new look seems to derive from scarves and boots and sunglasses in the hair and eyeliner and I don’t know what else. She’s frighteningly accessorized.
 
Anne’s arms, for instance, are racked with silver bangles. At fi rst I thought she was wearing Slinkies on her wrists. She didn’t know what a Slinky was, though, when I suggested this. You probably think women should wear one bracelet per wrist. Which makes me think of that day when you stroked my arm for an hour and described all the muscles and nerves under the skin. I hadn’t noticed my arm in years. Not since I was little and used to lick the sun-salt from my arms at the beach when I lay on a towel waiting for the hour to be up after lunch. But I had never seen my own arm through another’s eyes, loved my own arm. The anatomy lesson of Dr. Thorne. Was it three or four hours? (I discovered that evening, in the bathroom mirror, that my face was pinked from the sun. For the next couple of days, people kept asking me if I had gone to Vermont for spring skiing.)
 
We sprawled on that rock in Central Park and talked all afternoon, and we weren’t touching except for that one place where your fi ngertips brushed up and down on the inside of my left arm. That tiny electrical point of connection, those molecules of skin touching. I wanted that moment to last forever. It was only the second time we were together. We had never even kissed. I embarrass myself even now when I think of it. (The smile you are smiling you were smiling then.)
 
Anne has acquired an edge that was not there in New York. She is even more impossibly affected than she used to be, with her Lauren-Bacall-as-Alistair-Cooke delivery, always amusing in light of her Westchester origins, although she did, inexplicably, go to that hoity-toity Swiss boarding school. Thus her immunity to whole chunks of popular culture.
 
She loves old movies, for instance, has an uncanny memory for entire scenes, especially the Bogart-Bacall or Tracy- Hepburn ones, and yet she simply has never heard, or never noticed, the music of that vintage you’d think she would also love. The music we love. Anne’s not literally tone-deaf, but she claims that she just can’t remember a tune, not even for fi ve minutes, not even while the song is being sung.
 
At a Shippen Gallery opening someone once tried to get everyone to sing “Button Up Your Overcoat”—I don’t remember quite why, though I’m sure it made sense at the time—and Anne just wouldn’t do it. Reluctantly, she mouthed the words, but no sound came out.
 
I’ve tried to fi ll in some of the lacunae. On Eighth Street, I would endure Anne’s schmaltzy Chopin, and Anne would listen as best she could to my Lee Wiley records. Remedial Show Tunes 101. She had got to the point where she was really taken with some lyrics, though she was still comparatively immune to the music itself; Anne still seemed unable to hear the connection between words and music. It’s a curious defi ciency. Now, with Victor, she’s probably done some backsliding into Viennese waltzes and I’ll have to start over.
 
Even as I write these words, I worry that you won’t like her, that it doesn’t even sound as though I like her very much. I adore Anne. And—outside of family—I have never felt as loved by anyone, until there was you. We are so alike and unalike at the same time. And, though I feel these changes in her that I can’t quite pin down, we always used to enjoy our samenesses and differences, if you know what I mean. How can I describe a friendship in more precise terms? You’ve heard so much, but in bits and pieces. It’s much more than mutual eccentricities and passions for cultural artifacts. We can—or used to be able to—fi nish each other’s sentences. We just knew each other as women can, as men so rarely do, at least heterosexual ones.
 
Anne’s a terrifi cally loyal friend, one of the smartest people I know, and she’s not just interesting, she has that rarer capacity of being interested. And she has a very droll side that unbuttons at unexpected moments, though those moments don’t usually survive in the telling. One of the things I mean to say is that she’s not like anybody else. A teacher at l’Ecole Prétentieuse, or whatever it was called, apparently used to habitually say to her, “Mademoiselle Gordon, vous êtes une drôle d’originale!”
 
That’s why Anne in Geneva is such a puzzle to me. I don’t feel that I know what’s going on with this person with whom I used to feel almost telepathically connected. For instance: Benedict, what do you call the meal you eat in the middle of the day? Same here: lunch. One of the most beautiful words in the English language, n’est-ce pas? I could swear my old pal and roommate Anne used to call it lunch, too. We used to eat it together sometimes and it never went by any other name. (Certainly not the dreaded b-----, though if it was late enough, we called it “lupper.”) Nowadays she calls it luncheon, as it must be known among the Geneva intelligentsia. But she doesn’t seem to eat it, oh, no, not our Anne, because during the luncheon hour she is consorting with her married lover.
 
Even in New York days, when she worked at Shippen, she didn’t exactly always eat lunch in the manner of a normal person, I admit. Unless you call an entire bunch of raw carrots a normal lunch. She did it to save money for going to the movies, she told me. Gloria pays her people slave wages, I know, but still. The fi rst time I ever laid eyes on Anne, she was in that little back workroom scrubbing away at a bunch of carrots over the sink in the corner where the coffee things are. Gloria was showing me the gallery; we were at the nerve-wracking point when she was thinking of putting me in a group show, and I was grateful for the distraction when Gloria introduced me to this odd creature, so angular and Vermeerish at the same time. I was particularly struck by her unusual voice. I didn’t know if I liked it or hated it, but I wanted to hear more. We shook hands, and her hand was wet because of the carrots, and she apologized too much about that. I developed an instant sort of crush on her; she fascinated me.
 
Once, before Anne left, I met Victor. She and I were roommates by then; it was about six months before she actually left New York to come here. This falls under the Had I But Known category of meeting people. Just as we fi gure you probably encountered Anne in the course of your own gallery wanderings in those prehistoric days before you and I met, but didn’t know to pay attention. (I still can’t believe I’ve known you only—what?—three months.)
 
I wish you knew Anne. I wish you could help me fi gure out what is going on here. When you wandered through shows at Shippen, you probably passed within a few feet of her, when she was fi ling invoices, or she was stashed away in the back washing carrots and making telephone calls in various languages. You would be more likely to have chatted up the more visible woman who worked at the front desk there, named Marjorie Something, also known as Our Favorite Anti-Semite. (“A nice fellow,” she would sniff about some client, “although one of the Chosen, I believe.”)
 
So I met him a long time ago, as it turns out. Victor Marks, I mean, speaking of the Chosen. Anne’s nonlunch date. But at the time I could swear he was represented to me as yet another mere Friend of the Family, an enormous category of humanity known to Anne that seems to embrace half the Eastern European refugee population of the greater New York area. He came to Eighth Street to take Anne out to dinner one night early last winter. I only vaguely remember the evening, and vaguely remember him as some old guy in a blazer standing in our hallway, winded after three fl ights of stairs. It didn’t occur to me to notice him. It didn’t occur to me in all these months that that was Victor.
 
He even looks a little bit like “Daddy” (a dour, retired Austrian baker with a fl our allergy whom Anne addresses as Henry, who lives alone with his bitter memories in deepest New Jersey), whose life Victor is credited with saving in a children’s barracks (where they shared a bunk) at Auschwitz. Something about a potato.
 
How long has this been going on? It was only last winter. Anne says Victor is fi fty-nine. He looks older to me. He has a wife, who from Anne’s descriptions has got to be the Polish Julie Andrews, and three young children, whose names, if you can believe it, are Lucien, Otto, and Minerva.
 
So, after four days here, the routine is more or less this: Anne gets up and does things to her hair and walks into the sharp corners of furniture and mutters, “Merde,” and leaves at about eight. (The merde habit is a leftover affectation from her New York days, and she needs to fi x it because here it is of course not a charming expression in another language.)
 
I have the fl at to myself for the rest of the day, as she had promised in her letters of enticement this last spring, so I can read and write, or go out and take pictures, and otherwise squander time in splendid solitude. But: every day, Anne and Victor come here, to this fl at, for what I believe is quaintly called a “nooner.” And here I am.
 
So of course here I am not, rain or shine, at the appointed hour. This is a bit much, despite all the thick and thin I’ve been through with Anne. For one thing, and it’s a big one: I am sleeping with her in her bed, as there isn’t a couch, and Anne refused to let me sleep on bedding on the fl oor. It’s a big bed, and I sleep very much on my own side—you know how little I move in my sleep—but I feel like a voyeur; the bed feels crowded. Much is made of ostentatious sheet-changing on my behalf. But: did Anne tell me about Victor when I won the Swift and we made plans for my month in Geneva? She absolutely insisted that I must stay here with her. So I feel a bit boxed in. I suppose I could look for another place to stay, but that would be insulting and impossibly expensive, and I have no idea how to go about doing it. And I’m not here forever, anyway, just until the end of the month. And I return to the thought that Anne wants me right here with her, for reasons I can’t quite grasp that go beyond any discussed or so far discussable reasons.
 
And: it turns out that the reason she left her job as the only trilingual staff member at Shippen Gallery (essential slot she fi lled; they’re bereft without someone to translate foreign auction catalogs and place telephone orders at the Czech deli over on Second Avenue) was Victor. Her job at UGP is a piece of cake, a lot of fi nancial paper shuffl ing and occasional simultaneous interpreting of meetings between the polite and cold Swiss men in dark suits who run the front offi ce and the hostile and sneering Arabs—known, I regret to say, as “towel heads”—who secretly control everything. This is according to Anne, who has never before had a grasp of or interest in world politics or oil markets.
 
UGP seems to be an enormous consortium of petroleum investors. I can’t even determine what the initials stand for, and I have no idea what it is or does. The Arabs speak terrible English that’s mostly strange slangy metaphors, and the Swiss speak equally terrible unidiomatic English that’s entirely correct and formal, and it’s their only common language, so Anne has to convey in French whatever she thinks the Arabs mean to say. Meanwhile the Arabs transmit to her in a not particularly gracious polyglot of German, English, Italian, and street slang they pick up here and there.
 
The Arabs have provided no opposite number for Anne, as is often the custom in these situations, so when these meetings occur, she has to strain to make both sides feel understood as well as feel that they understand. If world oil prices collapse or something, I think it will be safe to assume that Anne was more concerned with the former than the latter.
 
All the Arabs have three-day beards and funny smells, according to our representative in the fi eld, who is herself obsessed with funny smells because she is convinced that colleagues around the offi ce—there are about fi fty other people there, doing something or other with computers and fax machines and telephones—can tell when she and Victor have been At It. (My theory is that she and Victor are At It so regularly that if there is any sort of clue, no one would notice.
 
Come to think of it, Anne is a bit, well, Clorox-y. I assumed it was her deodorant.)
 
Anne herself seems to spend a lot of time on the phone, pecking away at a computer, or hovering over a fax machine. When Anne showed me around the offi ce yesterday, after OBJECTS IN MIRROR ARE CLOSER THAN THEY APPEAR | 13 hours, I could hardly believe that she knew what she was doing there, it’s such an alien setting. Anne has always seemed more a member of the quill pen and sealing wax set. Watching her fax a document was like watching someone rehearsing the stage business for a part in a play.
 
Yet she appears to do her job perfectly well, and she seems to be making a fortune at this so-called profession (annually, about ninety g’s, at which don’t sneeze), which is just as well because she is giving away the best years of her life, and meanwhile a tiny cup of admittedly excellent coffee costs four dollars in a café here. Victor is her boss at UGP, you see. Have I said that? I’m not sure I’m explaining this very well. I’m just trying to sort it out myself.
 
He’s the head of the division, or something. He created the job for her after they slept together in his hotel room in New York that fateful winter night. He sat on the edge of the bed and calculated and formulated and ruminated and made her a job offer on the spot. I remember her coming in at around four in the morning, after dinner out with “Daddy’s old friend from Auschwitz,” but naive me thought they had stayed up talking about the potato. I never connected her decision to go to Geneva, to take a mysterious job for an oil cartel, with the soon-forgotten (by me) events of that night—her hot date with an old, balding, Hungarian refugee.
 
And Anne can play her cards pretty close to the vest, when I think back on all the heartfelt conversations we had about her decision to leave New York, leave that which we call the art world, bail out of our apartment, move to Geneva. It never occurred to me to cross-examine her about how exactly she came to be offered this high-powered job while cutting the occasional mat, scrubbing carrots, and ordering Eastern European takeout at Shippen Gallery.
 
I knew that it wasn’t the fi rst time they had met; Anne had told me before he came to get her that night that she remem bered meeting him once when she was ten and he came for dinner, in Hastings-on-Hudson. He hadn’t seen Anne’s father since the war ended, and both men wept and hugged each other and spoke (in what Anne insists is some obscure variation of a Yiddish dialect from the Austro-Hungarian Empire that they both know) about many dead people.
 
Victor has since told Anne, and Anne told me just this morning, that what he most clearly recalls about that night fi fteen years ago is going into the kitchen where Anne was helping her mother do the washing up. Victor chummily put his hand on Elizabeth’s shoulder, which caused fi erce little Anne to brandish a paring knife in his direction. He thinks this is a funny story, according to Anne, and says it was the moment he fell in love with her. Isn’t it romantic?
 
Anne’s apartment—she always calls it the fl at—is small, but somehow even in the dark you would know where you are; it’s totally Swiss. I cannot forget for one moment that I am in Switzerland; whenever I raise my head, something Swissly effi cient strikes me, like the tiny little kitchen across from where I sit. It’s in an alcove, a sort of open closet, and has no oven and looks like the sort of stewardess-packed kitchen on a Boeing 757 that you glimpse on your way to the toilet.
 
This is the perfect very grown-up and very modern mistress’s apartment. It faces out onto an anonymous courtyard. Everybody’s shutters are closed but ours. Who are those people in the other fl ats? KGB agents, smugglers, characters from Françoise Sagan novels? It’s a third-fl oor walk-up; there are clean but grimly institutional stairs of gritty marble. Every time I’ve been up or down them an elderly woman all in black has been on her knees washing them. There is an elevator, which I have used once, the day I arrived. I may be the only person to have used it since the War. (Oh, yes, Switzerland. What war? Well, you know what I mean.) It creaked up the three stories in about twice the time it would have taken me to walk with my two suitcases. I was already confused about which fl oor I wanted because in America when we say fi rst fl oor we mean it. Then I cut my hand rather badly on the folding gate contraption, and I arrived at Anne’s door with blood dripping in a trail behind me down the dim marble hallway. When I went out with Anne to get milk for the tea an hour after I had come in, there was no trace of it.
 
There is very little furniture in this L-shaped room; Our Lady of the Perpetual Milk Crate has reformed. Anne has a table with two chairs; that’s where I am now. There is a high chest of drawers, with a large mirror over it, and the bed, or should I say The Bed. It’s very low and modern, the only expensive item in the place. Victor has a bad back—Victor has many infi rmities—so when Anne arrived, she spent all her money on it. She doesn’t seem to notice how impersonal the place is. Or maybe she likes the ambience of a hospital room. It does have that feeling of a place where some sort of procedures are performed on the human body. Which I guess you could say is the case.
 
The ceiling is so high that I think the room may be taller than it is wide. It’s like being at the bottom of a box. The scale is so odd, in fact, that when I look at the very tall doors in their very tall doorframes, I feel diminished and am reminded of being a child in my room, looking up at the tops of doors and wondering what the top of my head might look like from up there on the lintel.
 
The only good light is here at the table, where I can see the blank shuttered faces of those other apartments. If I duck down, I can see a little slice of Swiss sky; I guess that’s the allotment that comes with the fl at.
 
Yesterday I had lunch in a café around the corner, and when the waiter offered me a dish of extra little pickles—two had come with my ham sandwich—I accepted. Then the bill came and I saw that I had been charged four francs for “cornichons supplémentaires.” So the Swiss are a pickle-counting people, and I must remember to count my pickles before they go down the hatch. (Did I really eat six? I wonder.) When I faxed Anne my fl ight information last week, I added, WILL YOU BAKE A CAKE? (Now that she knew I was coming.) But I always forget how charmingly unknowing of popular culture this girl is, how much she missed by going to school abroad, by having a European father and, after seventh grade, a deceased mother, and she had never heard of the song—she thinks that maybe she has heard of Jimmy Durante, but she’s probably got Will Durant, or Asher B. Durand, in mind—and so she went out and bought a cake (a dense poppy-seed one from a Viennese bakery of which Victor approves) because, as I have said, she has no oven. Just a very literal mind.
 
I do love her though, and I am cross with myself for my impatience with this strange new mistress-person. Anne of Cleavage. It makes me doubt what I thought I knew. What did I know? Who was that in New York with whom I shared those two rooms on Eighth Street for a year and a half? We were practically living in each other’s pockets, and maybe I mistook a mutual love of so many books and movies and a million other things for something else. Have I told you that we once sat through The Philadelphia Story twice when it was shown at the Modern? We both know most of the good lines. We both used to want to be Katharine Hepburn. If Tracy Lord had had a best friend, the George Kittredge alliance would never have got so out of hand.
 
Anne used to have a certain kind of rational, if not practical, approach to life. But this new Anne seems to have no good sense, and no good sense of herself. I want to shake her, slap her, wake her up from this fugue state. And then I’m impatient with my impatience.
 
She also has no good records. I just got up for a stretch and a prowl, and I see nothing worthwhile except for the Django Reinhardt album I gave her for her birthday last year, which she doesn’t seem to have opened. Too much Rachmaninoff, way too much. Also odd books: very affettato fi ction (The Name of the Rose, an unread-looking Pynchon, dog-eared Du Maurier, and strange quantities of Ann Beattie and Paul Theroux), three different How to Improve books (sex life, complexion, thighs), and, of course, your basic, up-to-date Survivor Guilt Library: The Abandonment of the Jews, Holocaust Testimonies, the Annotated Diary of Anne Frank, Eichmann in Jerusalem, Children Without Childhoods, Nazi Doctors, Wartime Lies, Sophie’s Choice, The Painted Bird, and every book by Primo Levi. (I wonder if I could make money with a Holocaust Book Club. You bet. People would be too guilty to return any of the monthly selections.)
 
Oh, maybe I’m just jealous of Victor and feel left out, relegated to a more distant role in Anne’s life. And Anne knows me well enough to discern my lack of enthusiasm for him. (The Gay Gibson term for my response to Victor is modifi ed rapture.) For all I know I made Anne feel left out in my letters to her about you. But this is more than the dislocation and adjustment between the best of friends, each of whom thinks she has met the love of her life. Something about this makes me uneasy.
 
But I’m rambling. Maybe life doesn’t have to be as complicated as I always seem to think it is. So. Please forgive these platitudes. Benedict: you are my You. This month ahead of me is more than a little bit alarming, and not just because of Anne, and this peculiar situation with Victor. I am, because of you, squaring off to account for myself, in some ways for the fi rst time. You showed me the way. You make me see that I really have to think about my photographs. Your relationship to your painting is so solid; you have incredibly high standards for your own work. You make me want to assess and revise everything in my work. You make me realize how much of my work isn’t good enough, how tempted I am to coast. I worry that you are too confi dent, not in yourself but in me. This is hard to say: You don’t know the half of it, dearie. Maybe you don’t even know the quarter of it.
 
So I’m in Geneva, city of watches and illicit romance, the measly grant from the Swift Foundation covering my plane tickets, and, if I’m lucky, maybe one good meal out with Anne while I’m here, but it’s nice work if I can get it. Gloria tells me that the prestige of winning a Swift is worth far more than I realize. I certainly hope so. Meanwhile, I’m stewing over several ideas for some groups of pictures. And I do have the commitment from Gloria for a small back-room show at Shippen in late winter.
 
I mean to take a lot of pictures based on refl ections in shop windows. This is perhaps too neat a sequel to my self-portrait series, but what can I say? Does it strike you as too pandering, too commercial, too expected, too Harriet Rose? It will be more subtle than it sounds, I promise.
 
So here’s hoping for an astonishing month, Benedict. It seems wrong that I have gone away from you right now. But this trip was arranged for several weeks before we met, as I keep reminding you in order to remind myself that I haven’t just fl own the coop, that you’re real and you’ll be there. You’ve become part of me, you’re inside me all the time. When I think of you, I think about the future in a different way than I ever did before. The important things are starting to be clear to me, some for the fi rst time. I feel balances shifting, in good ways, in major ways.
 
With you I can begin to care, and to stop caring. I mean: there is a freedom, for the fi rst time, to think about the sensibility in my work in a pure way.
 
There’s a song stuck in my head. Remember the night we drank rusty nails and listened to the entire score for “Of Thee I Sing”? I had never really paid attention to the words before. Now I can’t stop thinking about Mr. and Mrs. Wintergreen, at the beginning of “Who Cares?”:
 
Who cares what the public chatters? Love’s the only thing that matters.
 
I miss you in all ways. I passed a walled garden yesterday on my way back from my pickle lunch, and I could hear a tennis game, and it made me think of you in that New Hampshire air teaching tennis to overprivileged monsters.
 
Do you know, the fi rst person scares me, Benedict. The very photographs for which I am known, the pictures that put me squarely in the middle of the Brat Pack for better or worse, the photos that in a sense made me, those self-portraits: they were torture.
 
It’s all done with mirrors. And how. Have you ever really looked yourself in the eye? Your self-portraits are so stripped: of course you have. It’s part of what makes you so different from me. I hardly dare to catch my own eye.
 
Maybe I’ve arrived too soon in my work. The journey, not the arrival, matters and all that. Gloria Shippen chose me for that “3 Under 30” show because of what she called the “authority” of those self-portraits. What Shippen Gallery, what the critics who boosted me along by singling me out for praise, what even those check-writing collectors who suddenly needed to own a Harriet Rose thereafter, what they all don’t know is that any so-called authority lies in the eye of the beholder.
 
And I count myself as a beholder. I don’t mean to say my work isn’t good. It’s damned good. But time and again, when I was printing those pictures, I would see something in the darkroom that I hadn’t seen when I was setting up those shots. I take credit for those things, but it makes me uneasy. How can I own those inadvertent plays of light or the random objects that made Sanford Schwartz analyze the Balthus references in my oeuvre, for God’s sake? Before last year I didn’t know I had an oeuvre. (Why does a Frenchman have only one egg for breakfast? Because one egg is un oeuf. ) Has my life changed because The New Criterion loves me? I really don’t know. I really don’t even know with certainty about my own criteria for my work, old or new.
 
In short, Benedict, my photographs mean more than I knew I meant. Does that make sense? Is this what art is? I think of my pictures as decisions about what to show, a diagnosis of what’s beneath the skin: a slice, a biopsy. A pathology report. It’s art that scares me.
 
At the moment, I’m not sure I could ever do another series like those relentless mirror self-portraits. I know too much. By that I mean: I know how little I know. I could never put myself out there again like that. But in this month here I intend to call my own bluff. I mean to sneak up on myself, in those shop windows. I’ll be there, if you know where to look.
 
But now it’s nearly noon. I’ve got to vacate the love nest. I wish I could hear your voice. I wonder if we have made a mistake, agreeing on this mutual meditative transatlantic silence. I wonder if I have broken the rules, in writing to you this way. I wonder if I will ever have the nerve to show you these letters or journals or whatever they are.
 
I just took out the little red-striped-shirt portrait of you that I took two weeks ago. Oh, Benedict. Getting sentimental over you.
 
Noon: Love you and leave you—
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(1)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 13, 2011

    Good book, unusual point of view

    good book, the writing style was a little different--went from main character (sort of) writing to her boyfriend about her friend, to her remebering her past and then back to the present in more of a third person perspective....could have been a little more in depth on the friend who is the focus of the book....

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)