BN.com Gift Guide

The Order of Days: The Maya World and the Truth About 2012 [NOOK Book]

Overview

The world's foremost expert on Maya culture looks at 2012 hysteria and explains the truth about what the Maya meant and what we want to believe.

Apocalypse 2012: An Investigation into Civilizations End. The World Cataclysm in 2012. 2012: The return of Quetzalcoatl. According to many of these alarmingly titled books, the ancient Maya not only had a keen insight into the ...

See more details below
The Order of Days: The Maya World and the Truth About 2012

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$11.99
BN.com price

Overview

The world's foremost expert on Maya culture looks at 2012 hysteria and explains the truth about what the Maya meant and what we want to believe.

Apocalypse 2012: An Investigation into Civilizations End. The World Cataclysm in 2012. 2012: The return of Quetzalcoatl. According to many of these alarmingly titled books, the ancient Maya not only had a keen insight into the mystical workings of our planet and the cosmos, but they were also able to predict that the world will end in the year 2012.

David Stuart, the foremost scholar of the Maya and recipient of numerous awards for his work, takes a hard look at the frenzy over 2012 and offers a fascination (and accurate) trip through Mayan culture and belief. Stuart shows how the idea that the "end of the Mayan calendar," which supposedly heralds the end of our own existence, says far more about our culture than about the ancient Maya. The Order of Days explores how the real intellectual achievement of ancient Maya timekeeping and worldview is far more impressive and remarkable than any of the popular, and often outrageous, claims about this advanced civilization.

As someone who has studied the Maya for nearly all of his life and who specializes in reading their ancient texts, Stuart sees the 2012 hubbub as the most recent in a long chain of related ideas about Mesoamericans, the Maya in particular, that depicts them as somehow oddball, not "of this world," or as having some strong mystical link to other realms.

Because the year 2012 has no prominent role in anything the ancient Maya ever actually wrote, Stuart takes a wider look at the Maya concepts of time and their underlying philosophy as we can best understand them. The ancient Maya, Stuart contends, were worthy of study and admiration not because they were strange but because they were altogether human, and they developed a compelling vision of time unlike any other civilization before or since.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
“More than a rebuttal of the apocalypse-pushers, The Order of Days is a broader (and more interesting) consideration of the role that time played in Maya culture…. An authoritative study of an fascinating and timely topic. And not to worry if your reading takes you beyond next Dec. 21.”  -The Wall Street Journal
Kirkus Reviews

Highly concentrated amalgamation of doomsday-theory debunking and Mayan ethos.

A leading Mayanist scholar and Mesoamerican art professor (Univ. of Texas), Stuart began appreciating Maya culture at an early age during trips to jungle ruins with his parents, lifelong experts. Staunchly dedicated, the author has collected field research and documented the evolution of native kingdoms predating the Mesoamerican civilization—present-day southern Mexico and northern Central America—and the classic eras that established it, along with deciphering much of the coded Maya hieroglyphic script. He expounds on this research in dense, informative chapters about how the Maya society developed into a deeply mystical, animistic collective, invoking their notions of timekeeping and day-naming, cosmology and science. Also relevant to the author's research was how their 260-day calendar was intricately designed and calculated and what the Maya people considered cosmic "deep time." Stuart adroitly dispels common misconceptions that put the Mayan culture in an "exotic", "alien" light to outsiders, which, to him, constitutes a "major cultural misunderstanding." Though he appreciates the enthusiasm of the "guru" mentality, the author openly dismisses the recent ominous hype cultivated by New Age writers like John Major Jenkins and others who've analyzed the Maya calendar and its perceived dire consequences for the world at large. This is "complete nonsense," the author writes, and he goes on to dispense a vast and illuminating chronicle of the Maya people and their fascinating cultural significance. While much of Stuart's scholarly interpretation borders on textbook analysis, even he confesses that a healthy amount of his personalized conjecture might be viewed as "half-baked" at its early developmental stage. The author deeply examines the core beliefs and the intricate written languages of the Maya civilization and seeks to convey a better understanding of not only its culture and history, but how it correlates to the overblown media buzz about the Earth's hypothesized demise in 2012.

Chockablock with facts, graphs and illustrations—supreme fodder for specialists but somewhat impenetrable for the casual reader.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780307720818
  • Publisher: Crown Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 5/17/2011
  • Sold by: Random House
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 272
  • File size: 13 MB
  • Note: This product may take a few minutes to download.

Meet the Author

David Stuart is a Mayanist scholar and professor of Mesoamerican art and writing at the University of Texas at Austin. He began deciphering Mayan hieroglyphs at the age of eight, under the tutelage of Linda Schele. He has made major contributions in the field of epigraphy, particularly related to the decipherment of the Mayan script used by the pre-Columbian Mayan civilization of Mesoamerica.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

PREFACE

In the last half- century, modern scholars have made an astounding intellectual journey. Beginning in the 1950s and ’60s, archaeologists and historians finally began the rigorous process of understanding many key aspects of ancient Maya civilization, much of it by “cracking the code” of the elaborate Maya hieroglyphic script, left to us on hundreds of stone monuments and ceramic vessels. This work has enveloped me for most of my life, with my interest in the Maya beginning when I was a boy accompanying my parents on their expeditions to remote jungle ruins back in the 1970s. Over the years I’ve been incredibly fortunate to participate in this transformation of knowledge, working with many colleagues in diverse fields to bring the ancient Maya from the realm of prehistory into that of history. Now, after several exciting decades, their written record is mostly understood, and it has forever changed our view of Maya history, religion, and culture. I like to think that we’re now at a place in the study of the ancient Maya not unlike where Egyptologists were in the early nineteenth century, at which time an ancient civilization suddenly was ripe for study in grand detail, right on the heels of the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs by Jean- François Champollion.

With regard to the Maya, we are nowadays in a similar “heady” time, albeit with far more scientific methodology and context in hand than early Egyptology ever had. But has the popular understanding of ancient Mesoamerica and the Maya advanced so much? I have to wonder. Lately I find myself confused and even frustrated by what I see in the popular representation of the Maya in today’s media, whether it be in print or on- screen. Seldom can I roam through a large retail bookstore, sit in front of a television, or surf the Web without seeing some reference to the year 2012, now just a couple of years away as I write this. Many of the books on 2012 have evocative, even alarming titles, such as Apocalypse 2012: An Investigation into Civilization’s End; or The World Cataclysm in 2012: The Maya Countdown to the End of Our World; or 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl; or Maya Cosmogenesis 2012: The True Meaning of the Maya Calendar End- Date. According to many of these strange- sounding books and TV shows— and none of them is ever consistent in its message— the ancient Maya, having some keen insight into the mystical workings of our planet and the cosmos, were able to predict that the world would end or in some way be radically transformed in the year 2012—on the winter solstice December 21, to be exact (although, again, some sources differ about the precise day).

This is all complete nonsense. As someone who has studied the Maya for nearly all of his life, and who specializes in reading their ancient texts in order to understand their history, religion, and culture, I have to lay down the line and assert that any such statements about the Maya predicting the world’s demise or, alternatively, some “transformation of consciousness” in 2012 is, to put it as simply and directly as possible, wrong. Not only wrong, but misleading. There’s something larger at work here, more than just the ideas of a few kooks who have little interest in real Maya history and culture. The 2012 hubbub seems to be the most recent in a long chain of related theories and ideas about Mesoamericans, and the Maya in particular, depicting them as somehow oddball, not “of this world,” or having some strong mystical link to other realms and dimensions. As early as the nineteenth century, the emerging accounts of ancient civilizations in Mexico were widely seen as too impossibly advanced to be the handiwork of “Indians,” especially among many in the young United States, where native populations were being slaughtered, displaced, and culturally marginalized along an ever- increasing frontier. Some people claimed that the impressive ruins of Central America had to be the works of Phoenicians, Israelites, Scandinavians (?!), or even inhabitants of the lost continent of Atlantis. How could “Indians” have built such great cities and created such artwork?—or so the thinking went.

This notion was largely dispelled among scholars by the mid-1800s, as archaeology blossomed and exploration established no doubt about historical and cultural links between the ruined cities and the native inhabitants of the area. But by the twentieth century, the same vein of thinking had morphed somewhat, now depicting the ancient Maya not so much as Old World seafarers but as peaceful, star- gazing intellectuals little concerned with the real world of human affairs. No wonder, perhaps, that by the 1970s, pop culture references to the exotic Maya had them making direct contact with aliens, who, after all, must have built their cities using spaceships. Even today we see the same motif in movies and books. The most recent Indiana Jones film— always good PR for archaeology— shows Maya pyramids in the Amazon, of all places, guarding crystal skulls and flying saucers.

At present, with the ominous year 2012 fast approaching, it isn’t surprising that many of these same ideas are back in the news. According to many breathless writers and to TV accounts, the “Maya calendar will end,” and the Maya were somehow able to tap in to their mystical knowledge to predict the future of our time. At the very least, through some supposed special connections to the outer cosmos or to the inner being of humanity (depending on what you read), the Maya alone were able to predict a coming end of times, a galactic alignment with the rising sun, and the transformation of human consciousness, among other weird and great insights. I’m convinced that these outlandish claims about 2012 and its meaning (as if it needs a meaning) are the latest manifestations of a deep- seated idea within the American popular imagination, that Mesoamerican peoples and the “mysterious Maya” are exotic and even, in some way, alien.

 Fundamentally, this speaks to an inability in much of our own culture, seldom addressed or even recognized, to confront the fact that many ancient Americans were as civilized as their counterparts in the Old World. There’s a lot of intellectual baggage behind these thoughts and denials, some going back to centuries- old notions about “the Indian” as a noble savage, or maybe just a savage. Couple these ideas with the profound cultural barrier that exists between the United States and the history and culture of Mexico and Central America, and you have a recipe for major cultural misunderstanding.

To me, the whole situation reveals the fact that modern America still has a difficult time grasping the reality of ancient advanced cultures south of our border. If one looks at attitudes about Mexico and illegal “aliens” today, maybe this is not so surprising. The irony is acute. For just at the moment when decades of hard work in the field and in the libraries have paid off, when we can proudly claim to have cracked the Maya code, most of the loudest “expert” voices are those who simply misrepresent the truth about the Maya, a remarkable people who deserve far, far better. In other words, nearly all of the books and television shows on 2012 are by gurus and spiritualists who wouldn’t know a Maya glyph if one hit them on the nose. I’m convinced that the emerging 2012 phenomenon says far more about today’s culture and its larger concerns than about the ancient Maya.

This profound misrepresentation of the Maya motivated the writing of this book. In my outlook, the reality of Maya accomplishments is far more interesting and awe- inspiring than the ubiquitous false claims about their culture and what, if anything, they had to say about the future. This book is not about New Age thinking but instead about old age thought, based on what ancient Maya records, as best we can understand them, actually had to say about time and the workings of the cosmos, and about their place— not ours— within this complex worldview.

Because 2012 has no prominent role in anything the ancient Maya ever wrote (only one clear reference to the date exists among thousands of inscriptions), this book takes a wider look at the Maya concepts of time and at the philosophy that gave rise to them, at least as we can best understand the two. One of my overarching goals is to provide ample evidence that the real intellectual achievements of ancient Maya timekeeping and worldview— incomplete as what has been passed down to us is— are far more impressive and remarkable than any of the more popular outrageous and wrongheaded claims about Maya uniqueness or otherworldliness. The ancient Maya are worthy of study and admiration not because they are strange, but because they are altogether human, and because they developed a compelling vision of time unlike that of any other civilization before or since. Their layered but unified philosophy of time and the cosmos no doubt seems very foreign to our way of thinking about the universe, but because of our common humanity, we can approach it, understand much of it, and give credit where credit is due.

I’ve learned a great deal about the Maya in the course of writing this book, and in fact, in it, I present a few important ideas for the first time. For example, it’s become clear to me that published descriptions of the Maya calendar have often been wrong, or at the very least incomplete, even in the academic literature considered the standard reference works on the subject. In chapter 8 I present what I believe to be the first account of how the ancient Maya structured their view of “deep time” using numbers far larger than previously thought. Theirs was a conception of cosmic time that dwarfs anything in our own cosmology by many magnitudes of scale. Many of these new ideas might be half- baked at this early stage, and they will need careful review by colleagues and future students, but I’m excited at the prospects that we may finally be much closer to understanding the big picture of how the Maya and their fellow Mesoamericans “made” time, and created a calendar of remarkable insight and mathematical skill.

Although it might be surprising to some readers, this is not a book about ancient Maya astronomy. There are reasons for this. First, despite having a long career in Maya archaeology and epigraphy, I’m far from being an expert in the arcane study of ancient Venus tables, eclipse records, or moon ages— and, frankly, all those numbers make my head hurt. Several colleagues know far more about those things than I do, and have written clear and accessible treatments that I could never improve upon. But the main reason I’ve avoided a focus on astronomy touches on a larger point I hope to make: it’s simply that the Maya and their Mesoamerican neighbors, while masters at watching and understanding the night sky, have for far too long been singled out in this area as strangely precocious in having advanced knowledge of planetary cycles and the like. Astronomy has been a focus of Maya research— sometimes the focus— for a very, very long time. In fact, much of the work on Maya art and hieroglyphs back in the 1920s and ’30s involved little else. In playing down the themes of astronomy in these pages, I in no way wish to deny their importance, but I do hope to shift the conversation away from the night sky somewhat, at least momentarily, in order to show that the Maya calendar and the time concepts underlying it had many other interesting dimensions. I also want to stress that this book isn’t about critiquing the various ideas and theories among New Age thinkers, the so- called “2012-ologists,” concerning that year. These pseudo- scholars purport to know what will happen, and they even claim some special knowledge about the Maya, but the published works I have seen are neither very sophisticated nor informed by even a cursory knowledge of Maya archaeology, history, or culture. I’ve learned from experience that a point- by- point refutation of their oddball theories would probably fall on deaf ears, for scholarship and understanding of Maya culture are not really what’s of interest to them. Instead, their ideas seem to originate from a very different kind of mentality, one that is often self- centered and rooted in complex and varied agendas about the challenges and worries of the present day: the environment, politics, and a quest for inner spirituality.

 So, for me, a great many of the doomsday predictions and radical ideas about 2012 say far, far more about the tensions pervading our own society and culture than anything about the ancient Maya. This book looks at how scholarship of the twentieth century, influenced by those ideas of the Maya as so strangely “other,” steered their vision in the popular imagination toward the place we now find ourselves, where the ancient Maya are somehow seen as strange harbingers of our own future. In sum, what follows is really about time and its place in Maya culture. It’s also about how Western academics and popular culture have struggled to understand it. It examines history, ancient texts, modern Maya religion, and the early development of research to show how the Maya conceived of a remarkable structure to time and space that’s significant on its own as a compelling human achievement.

David Stuart
Austin, Texas
September 8, 2009
12.19.16.12.0 13 Ahaw 18 Mol
Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Author's Note ix

Preface xi

1 The Itzá Prophecy 1

2 Mesoamerican Times 30

3 The Essence of Space 65

4 Finding Order 93

5 Ideas of the Day 115

6 Long Counting 162

7 Beginnings and Endings of the World 195

8 The Deepest Time 229

9 Kings of Time 252

10 Seeing Stars 283

Appendices 317

Endnotes 327

Bibliography 333

Acknowledgments 341

Index 343

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 30, 2011

    This will be a Christmas Gift

    Sorry - I have bought this book as a Christmas Present for my daughter - cannot give you a review

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 12, 2011

    more from this reviewer

    Wonderful View into Maya History, Archaeology, Anthropology and Time-Keeping

    Remember what life was like in 1999? Millennium fever was sweeping the world and scientists, regular folk and the new-age-erati were focused on January 1, 2000. Y2K was coming and it was bringing with it a digital Armageddon. And when it finally arrived, we celebrated (and ducked) and nothing happened...except January 2, 2000.

    Something very similar is happening again with the approach of the much anticipated date of December 21, 2012, otherwise known as 13.0.0.0.0 on the Maya calendar. Will it bring mass destruction through floods, fire, and asteroids (as Hollywood might have us believe)? Or will it be the dawning of a new religious age that's something more spiritual, peaceful and fulfilling than the multitude of religions that already exist around the world?

    David Stuart is one of the world's preeminent Maya epigraphers and historians. In his recently released "The Order of Days", Stuart expresses his frustration with the pop culture hullaballoo over the Maya's supposedly prophetic importance of December 21, 2012. The date is very real and very important to the Maya but Stuart emphatically points out that "no Maya text, ancient, colonial, or modern-ever predicted the end of time or the end of the world."

    With an eye on 12/21/12, Stuart takes an anthropological, archaeological and historical look into the far and near past of Mesoamerican cultures and, as Stuart himself writes, "examines history, ancient texts, modern Maya religion, and the early development of research to show how the Maya conceived of a remarkable structure to time and space that's significant on its own as a compelling human achievement."

    December 21, 2012 was extremely important to the Maya. Just like January 1, 2000 was important to the modern world. Those 3 zeros that follow the "2" make it an inherently key, though arbitrary, calendar-based milestone. Key milestones in the never ceasing revolutions of time were much more important to the Mayas than they are to modern Americans. We use those cycles of time to celebrate. For the Maya, time and dates, and their passages, were THE driving force in the day-to-day, practical, and spiritual lives of the Maya.

    The sole reference to the infamous 12/21/12 date comes from a small ruin at Tortuguero, not far from the better known site of Palenque in Mexico. Stuart writes, "On a large slab...it reads (in glyphs) that "thirteen bak'tuns will end on a date that corresponds to 12/21/12." This is the only reference to that specific date, and from that alone has come a multitude of speculation over what this actually means."

    Time was so important...controlling it, or at least the perception of controlling it, became a key role within the ancient Maya communities. "...Shaman priests who oversaw (religious) ceremonies were probably well versed in the messages and meanings of time as it was anciently structured - what Mesoamerican cultures called the "Order of Days" - using it as a framework to divine the reasons why" the gods, and what they represented (rain, for example), did what they did.

    Stuart writes, "Time was not just a means of measuring the course of history but was also a...shaping force in human experience...time was an "actor" invested with personality and character who shaped the very nature of history itself."

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)