Originalism and the Good Constitution

Originalism and the Good Constitution

by John O. McGinnis, Michael B. Rappaport
     
 

View All Available Formats & Editions

Originalism holds that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its meaning at the time it was enacted. In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities--both its original enactment under Article…  See more details below

Overview

Originalism holds that the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted according to its meaning at the time it was enacted. In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities--both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. A text approved by supermajorities has special value in a democracy because it has unusually wide support and thus tends to maximize the welfare of the greatest number. The authors recognize and respond to many possible objections. Does originalism perpetuate the dead hand of the past? How can originalism be justified, given the exclusion of African Americans and women from the Constitution and many of its subsequent Amendments? What is originalism's place in interpretation, after two hundred years of non-originalist precedent? A fascinating counterfactual they pose is this: had the Supreme Court not interpreted the Constitution so freely, perhaps the nation would have resorted to the Article V amendment process more often and with greater effect. Their book will be an important contribution to the literature on originalism, now the most prominent theory of constitutional interpretation.

Read More

Editorial Reviews

Gary Lawson
Originalism and the Good Constitution is a major contribution to constitutional theory that has no obvious substitute or counterpart. This book will be much noticed and much discussed as part of the growing debate over constitutionalism.
Volokh Conspiracy - Ilya Somin
This book is a fascinating and innovative defense of originalism. Unlike some other originalists, who defend the theory because they claim it is the only feasible way to interpret legal texts, McGinnis and Rappaport argue that originalism is superior to living constitutionalism because it produces better consequences, in the form of legal rules that benefit more people over time…A great strength of the book is that McGinnis and Rappaport do not shy away from difficult issues that some other originalists downplay or ignore…This is the best book on originalism in a long time, and anyone interested in the subject should read it.
National Review online - Ed Whelan
Originalism and the Good Constitution is an impressive work, rich with interesting and intelligent arguments. In developing their normative argument for originalism, McGinnis and Rappaport stake out and defend various positions on contested points of originalist methodology. Their book will surely play a prominent role in the ongoing debate over originalism.
Choice - A. D. Sarat
Originalism and the Good Constitution offers the most elaborate and coherent explanation and defense of originalism now available.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780674727366
Publisher:
Harvard University Press
Publication date:
11/01/2013
Sold by:
Barnes & Noble
Format:
NOOK Book
File size:
565 KB

Related Subjects

Meet the Author

John O. McGinnis is George C. Dix Professor of Constitutional Law at Northwestern University.

Michael B. Rappaport is Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >