Origins of the Dred Scott Case: Jacksonian Jurisprudence and the Supreme Court, 1837-1857 / Edition 1

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $8.75
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 63%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (7) from $8.75   
  • New (3) from $14.98   
  • Used (4) from $8.75   

Overview

The Supreme Court's 1857 Dred Scott decision denied citizenship to African Americans and enabled slavery's westward expansion. It has long stood as a grievous instance of justice perverted by sectional politics. Austin Allen finds that the outcome of Dred Scott hinged not on a single issue—slavery—but on a web of assumptions, agendas, and commitments held collectively and individually by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney and his colleagues.

Allen carefully tracks arguments made by Taney Court justices in more than 1,600 reported cases in the two decades prior to Dred Scott and in its immediate aftermath. By showing us the political, professional, ideological, and institutional contexts in which the Taney Court worked, Allen reveals that Dred Scott was not simply a victory for the Court's prosouthern faction. It was instead an outgrowth of Jacksonian jurisprudence, an intellectual system that charged the Court with protecting slavery, preserving both federal power and state sovereignty, promoting economic development, and securing the legal foundations of an emerging corporate order—all at the same time. Here is a wealth of new insight into the internal dynamics of the Taney Court and the origins of its most infamous decision.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

"In this original and provocative look at one of the most important judicial decisions in American history, Austin Allen skillfully re-creates the mid-nineteenth century Supreme Court's intellectual world. For the first time, Allen dissects the internal workings of Roger Taney's Court, showing how the justices constructed a logic parallel but separate from the political controversies that raged outside their Court. This book is indispensable for understanding the intricate connections between Jacksonian democracy, the Supreme Court, and the coming of the Civil War."—Christopher Waldrep, author of The Many Faces of Judge Lynch

"Austin Allen has written an absolutely superb, and original, book that is full of extraordinarily clearly presented insights about the various legal contexts within which the Dred Scott litigation occurred and was decided by the Supreme Court. Anyone interested in the development of American constitutional law and the role of the Supreme Court must read this book."—Sanford Levinson, University of Texas School of Law

"Austin Allen has found a new and intriguing angle on the infamous Dred Scott case. . . . He explains relatively technical and obscure elements of early nineteenth-century law in an accessible and clear fashion. . . . This book is essential reading for anyone interested in the Dred Scott case, and is quite valuable for anyone interested in the Supreme Court, law, and politics during the Jacksonian era."—Civil War History

"This brilliant volume is filled with insight across antebellum legal thought. . . . Everyone working in antebellum legal history needs to engage this book. We will all be grappling . . . with Allen's thoughtful, bold book for the rest of our careers. He has opened Dred Scott again to study and shown us that we have much to learn about the complex relationship of judicial doctrine and proslavery ideology."—Register of the Kentucky Historical Society

"Here is a wealth of new insight into the internal dynamics of the Taney Court and the origins of its most infamous decision"—McCormick Messenger

"Allen's well-written book is a fine introduction to Jacksonian jurisprudence and the politics of the Taney court . . . original and informative."—Journal of American History

"Allen has written a fine book: instructive, perceptive, and well researched . . . [Origins of the Dred Scott Case] will not be the last word on the subject, but, from this point forward, it must be part of any intelligent discussion."—American Historical Review

"Makes important contributions this scholarship on sectional controversies in antebellum America."—Law and History Review

Law and History Review
... makes important contributions this scholarship on sectional controversies in antebellum America.
—Mark A. Graber
Read More Show Less

Product Details

Meet the Author

Austin Allen is an assistant professor of history at the University of Houston, Downtown.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction : beyond the sectional crisis 1
Pt. I Beneath Dred Scott : Jacksonian jurisprudence and the dimensions of self-rule 9
1 Realizing popular sovereignty : partisan sentiment and constitutional constraint in Jacksonian jurisprudence 13
2 Imposing self-rule : professionalism, commerce, social order, and the sources of Taney court jurisprudence 36
3 Evidence of law : popular sovereignty and judicial authority in Swift V. Tyson 52
Pt. II Toward Dred Scott : slavery, corporations, and popular sovereignty in the Web of law 69
4 Moderating Taney : concurrent sovereignty and answering the slavery question, 1842-1852 75
5 The limits of judicial partisanship : corporate law and the emergence of southern factionalism 98
6 The sources of southern factionalism : corporations, free blacks, and the imperatives of federal citizenship 116
Pt. III Inescapable opportunity : the Supreme Court and the Dred Scott case 133
7 The failure of evasion : Dred Scott v. Emerson, Strader v. Graham, Swift v. Tyson, and Dred Scott v. Sandford 139
8 The political economy of blackness : citizenship, corporations, and the judicial uses of racism in Dred Scott 160
9 Looking westward : concurrent sovereignty and the answer to the territorial question 178
Epilogue : United Court, divided union : judicial harmony and the fate of concurrent popular sovereignty 203
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)