Our Enemies and US: America's Rivalries and the Making of Political Science

Hardcover (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $18.39
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 65%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (9) from $18.39   
  • New (3) from $49.65   
  • Used (6) from $18.39   

Overview

Ido Oren challenges American political science's definition of itself as an objective science. The material Oren unearthed in his research into the discipline's ideological nature may discomfit many: Woodrow Wilson's admiration of Prussia's efficient bureaucracy; the favorable review of Mein Kampf published in the American Political Science Review; the involvement of political scientists in village pacification and interrogation of Viet Cong prisoners during the Vietnam War. Oren reveals the fervently pro-German views of the founder of the discipline, John W. Burgess, who stated that the Teutonic race was politically superior to all others, and he presents evidence of a long-term, intimate relationship between the discipline and the national security agencies of the U.S. government.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Library Journal
This provocative book is certain to stir up controversy at the next round of political science conventions. Oren (political science, Univ. of Florida) examines the ideological origins and practices of the discipline, from Woodrow Wilson's admiration for German efficiency to its influential involvement in Cold War politics. His conclusions challenge the proclaimed objectivity of political science, which he feels "is attached to its homeland rather than to democracy per se." Moreover, this attachment is elastic, even "accomodationist," depending upon shifts in U.S. foreign policy. Oren delves into the surprising response of political scientists to Nazi Germany, Stalin's Soviet Union, and the Cold War era, skillfully incorporating the views of Max Weber, Robert Dahl, and Charles Merriam. He proposes a new reflexive approach to studying politics-an approach that considers the historical processes. Similar views have been expressed previously-in, e.g., David Ricci's The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy-but this carefully reasoned work confronts the very identity of political science. Highly recommended for graduate-level collections.-Thomas A. Karel, Franklin & Marshall Coll. Lib., Lancaster, PA
From the Publisher

"In this fascinating critical history of American political science, Ido Oren notes that the image of the profession that emerges from its own discourse is 'one of an objective science that investigates politics yet remains outside politics, and whose question and conceptual constructs are not embedded in any historical or national context.' Oren outright rejects this dispassionate, objective image. . . . Oren concludes that while political science is predominately a body of thought with an American national and historical perspective, the profession rarely acknowledges that perspective.'—Virginia Quarterly Review

"This provocative book is certain to stir up controversy at the next round of political science conventions. . . . This carefully reasoned work confronts the very identity of political science."—Library Journal

"In this important and courageous book, Oren engages in a research activity in which few American political scientists dare to venture, namely a critical investigation of the history of the discipline. . . . Critics of mainstream political science will find that this book supports many of their intuitions about the ideological nature of the American science of politics, while those in the mainstream may be left shocked and horrified. Whatever the case, Oren's factually based account of the development of American political science provides a wealth of thought-provoking material that all serious scholars can ill afford to ignore."—International Affairs

"Despite the evidence accumulated by Oren, and in the numerous other studies he cites, political science's self-image remains that of a detached, objective, and scientific discipline, untouched by the powers that be. Its principal texts—theoretical, methodological, historical—do not consider it worthy of note that the discipline is steeped in the political and ideological structures of the American system of power, and that it is vital to consider ways to overcome the limitations on freedom of thought that such a condition imposes. As the 'war on terror' gathers pace, Oren remains skeptical as to whether political science has any chance of retaining its detachment from American state policy and thought. For once the words of praise on the dust jacket of a book—in this case from the varied voices of Noam Chomsky and David Easton—reflect the contents of what is within its covers."—Inderjeet Parmar, University of Manchester, Journal of American Studies, 38 (2004), I.

"Oren's book forces readers to reflect on the complex ways that disciplinary canons, institutions, and broader cultural norms interact to produce scholarship. Our Enemies and US is a theoretically informed history of the knowledge/power nexus in political science but it is also a very timely book."—Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

"Oren's is a thoughtful and compelling addition to the growing literature on the history of political science, and must reading for political scientists who want to better grasp the genesis and development—and the limitations as well as the potential—of their own inquiries."—Journal of Politics

"Ido Oren challenges 'the self-image of American political science as a detached science that is somehow attached to democracy.' His provocative and enlightening book should, in his closing words, 'provoke a long-overdue debate on the identity of American political science.'"—Noam Chomsky, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"Our Enemies and US is an exciting and timely addition to the growing literature on the development of American political science. It should be critical reading for all social scientists, new and old. It compels us to reassess the degree to which we have fulfilled our own aspirations to objectivity. It invites us to recognize the extent to which, in the past, time and place have only too often imposed unsuspected but serious limits on the presumed objectivity of scholarship in our discipline. Even more unsettling, there appears to be little reason to believe that such constraints are not actively at work in shaping much of our research today."—David Easton, University of California, Irvine

"This book represents the new generation of research in the history of political and social science and demonstrates that critical reflection can be grounded in objective scholarship. Ido Oren has undertaken a study of the past of political science that no one with a serious concern about the evolution of the discipline can ignore." —John G. Gunnell, Distinguished Professor, State University of New York at Albany

"Ido Oren has written a fascinating and provocative book. His courageous and clear-minded account of the socially and politically constructed foundations of American political science is a critical milestone in the developing critique of the discipline, and should be widely read."—Bruce Cumings, University of Chicago Committee on International Relations

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780801435669
  • Publisher: Cornell University Press
  • Publication date: 11/28/2002
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Pages: 256
  • Product dimensions: 6.30 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 0.90 (d)

Meet the Author

Ido Oren is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Florida.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface
Introduction: American Political Science as Ideology 1
Ch. 1 Imperial Germany 23
Ch. 2 Nazi Germany 47
Ch. 3 Stalin's Soviet Union 91
Ch. 4 Cold War Politics 126
Conclusion: Toward a Reflexive Political Science 172
Notes 183
Index 227
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 9, 2004

    Useful study of academic bias

    American academic Ido Oren started his research by looking at the common idea that democracies do not fight each other. He shows how studies only support this idea because our concept of democracy is produced by the same historical patterns against which the claims are `tested¿, a history partly shaped by the USA¿s international rivalries. So, before World War One, Woodrow Wilson, the political scientist, described Imperial Germany as an advanced constitutional state, a model for administrative reform. Yet when he became President, Woodrow Wilson took the USA into war against Germany, and described it as an autocracy. Oren looks at American political science as an ideology: its claims to uphold the ideals of liberal democracy, as expressed, for instance, by Samuel Huntingdon, a past President of the American Political Science Association. Yet the apartheid government used Huntingdon¿s writings, as when he backed it against `the worse alternative¿ of a government led by `the revolutionaries of the ANC¿. He advised the apartheid government that increased authoritarianism might be necessary for reform, rationalising its repression, and he backed its `centralization of power¿. Typically, the CIA funded some of his research. Oren studies American political science¿s characterisations of the USA¿s chief enemies last century, its concomitant characterisations of the USA, and its involvement in the wars against Imperial Germany, Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. ¿I document a systematic pattern of change in the portrayals of these enemies before and after their conflicts with us.¿ Also, he shows the pattern of concurrence between US wars and transformations in political science¿s visions of the USA. The Soviet Union was seen as all state, no society, the USA as all society, no state. He chronicles the growth of intimacy between the political science profession and the State Department, especially during the US attack on Vietnam. Oren asks whether `American political science might be more attached to America¿s regime than to democracy¿. He concludes that it indeed works from the US state, not an objective, perspective.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)