Iceberg of the Vanities
I ask myself why does anyone write a book like this? The answer I came up with is money! Very cleverly crafted, the author appeals to that age old human trait: vanity. His target is senior managers and like any good salesman, seeks to feed their self esteem or vanity. Change brings lots of opportunities to increase ones own prestige and destroy enemies (or those that don¿t think quite the same way that we do). All you have to do is find something that has to change significantly. This is actually very hard to do - to find something that incontrovertibly needs to change drastically. Most sensible changes evolve, tiny increments or alterations over a period of time bring the ship safely into port. It¿s the big project that earns the prestige and the opportunity to dump off the dead bodies that got in the way of ambition. But do you really need a rock solid reason to change? If you can sell a disaster scenario, fear will do the rest. To choose an obvious example the millennium bug issue brought billions of dollars into IT departments around the globe. IT managers and staff soon cottoned on to the idea that they could command exhorbitant wage increases and lay claim to vast resources to counter this threat. They realised, or so they thought, that they were in a no lose situation: if the organisation was not affected by Y2K they could say that it was as a result of a successful programme to counter it. If the organisation succumbed to it, they could say that not enough resources were apportioned for it and they would be able to quote the occasions that they had asked for the resources that the Board did not grant because they thought they were excessive. The outcome was very unexpected. There was no major disaster, no explosions, no major breakdown in communications, no crashes because traffic lights wouldn¿t work. In fact very little at all. Even the organisations that had been taken to court for refusing to do anything to counter Y2K and had still done nothing come the big day, had reported no problems. In fact the only embarrassments were a few companies who had invested very heavily in Y2K and were money had been no issue had succumbed due to oversight by their IT department. The IT world went very quiet for a long time after Y2K! Fear is the key: `will the iceberg crack up in the winter¿? Who knows? No one knows, great! Tons of mileage here! All those poor little penguins drowning in the frozen sea, at the same time as being savaged mercilessly by killer whales! Fear not I will lead you to a better place! Who said that? And when the job is done, and praise and honour are heaped upon me, reluctantly, yes reluctantly there will be a shake up of the management team (sharpen those guillotines). Then I will retire and leave everything in the capable hands of those who supported me, and tell stories to the young ones like some cuddly father figure (and command huge expenses fees on the lecture circuit). Already I have heard of a senior manager saying to one of his subordinate managers that he was a `Nono¿ (an anti change character in the book). OK what did that make him? Vanity of vanities he would see himself as the Louis (the cool wise leader in the book), this is so obviously appealing and gives the highest feel good factor for the `Panther¿ type manager So what¿s all this negative attitude? Don¿t you have a better solution or a better model? The type of leader that I would follow is found in another fable: ¿The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The hired hand is not the shepherd who owns the sheep. So when he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. The man runs away because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep¿ the good shepherd knows his sheep and his sheep know him.¿ But hey! Come on, it¿s only a fable!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.