Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power

Outside the Law: Emergency and Executive Power

by Clement Fatovic
     
 

View All Available Formats & Editions

The origins of presidential claims to extraconstitutional powers during national crises are contentious points of debate among constitutional and legal scholars. The Constitution is silent on the matter, yet from Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War to George W. Bush’s creation of the "enemy combatants" label, a number of

Overview

The origins of presidential claims to extraconstitutional powers during national crises are contentious points of debate among constitutional and legal scholars. The Constitution is silent on the matter, yet from Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus during the Civil War to George W. Bush’s creation of the "enemy combatants" label, a number of presidents have invoked emergency executive power in defense of actions not specifically endorsed in the Constitution or granted by Congress.

Taking up the debate, Clement Fatovic digs into the intellectual history of the nation’s founding to argue that the originators of liberal constitutional theory explicitly endorsed the use of extraordinary, extralegal measures to deal with genuine national emergencies. He traces the evolution of thought on the matter through the writings of John Locke, David Hume, William Blackstone, and the founding fathers, finding in them stated support for what Locke termed "prerogative," tempered by a carefully construed concept of public-oriented virtues. Fatovic maintains that the founders believed that moral character and republican decency would restrain the president from abusing this grant of enhanced authority and ensure that it remained temporary.

This engaging, carefully considered survey of the conceptions of executive power in constitutional thought explains how liberalism's founders attempted to reconcile the principles of constitutional government with the fact that some circumstances would demand that an executive take normally proscribed actions. Scholars of liberalism, the American founding, and the American presidency will find Fatovic's reasoned arguments against the conventional wisdom enlightening.

Editorial Reviews

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
Provides a scholarly review of the discussions about emergency power by those who debated and drafted the United States Constitution and then advocated for and against its ratification. He also gives a thorough analysis of the writings on emergency power by four key political theorists... whose work influenced our Founding Fathers' view... Mr. Fatovic demonstrates quite convincingly that the importance of contingency and emergency events was never far from the minds of either the political theorists or the creators of the United States Constitution.

— Ernest B. Abbott

Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management - Ernest B. Abbott
Provides a scholarly review of the discussions about emergency power by those who debated and drafted the United States Constitution and then advocated for and against its ratification. He also gives a thorough analysis of the writings on emergency power by four key political theorists... whose work influenced our Founding Fathers' view... Mr. Fatovic demonstrates quite convincingly that the importance of contingency and emergency events was never far from the minds of either the political theorists or the creators of the United States Constitution.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780801893629
Publisher:
Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication date:
09/30/2009
Series:
The Johns Hopkins Series in Constitutional Thought
Pages:
368
Product dimensions:
6.30(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.30(d)
Age Range:
18 Years

Meet the Author

Clement Fatovic is an assistant professor of political theory at Florida International University.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >