Pacific [NOOK Book]

Overview


In a triumphant return to the characters that launched his career two decades ago, Tom Drury travels back to Grouse County the setting of his landmark debut, The End of Vandalism. Drury’s depictions of the stark beauty of the Midwest and the futility of American wanderlust have earned him comparisons to Raymond Carver, Sherwood Anderson, and Paul Auster.

When fourteen-year-old Micah Darling travels to Los Angeles to reunite with the mother ...
See more details below
Pacific

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$13.49
BN.com price
(Save 43%)$24.00 List Price

Overview


In a triumphant return to the characters that launched his career two decades ago, Tom Drury travels back to Grouse County the setting of his landmark debut, The End of Vandalism. Drury’s depictions of the stark beauty of the Midwest and the futility of American wanderlust have earned him comparisons to Raymond Carver, Sherwood Anderson, and Paul Auster.

When fourteen-year-old Micah Darling travels to Los Angeles to reunite with the mother who abandoned him seven years ago, he finds himself out of his league in a land of magical freedom. He does new drugs with new people, falls in love with an enchanting but troubled equestrienne named Charlotte, and gets thrown out of school over the activities of a club called the New Luddites.

Back in the Midwest, an ethereal young woman comes to Stone City on a mission that will unsettle the lives of everyone she meets—including Micah’s half-sister, Lyris, who still fights fears of abandonment after a childhood in foster care, and his father, Tiny, a petty thief. An investigation into the stranger’s identity uncovers a darkly disturbed life, as parallel narratives of the comic and tragic, the mysterious and everyday, unfold in both the country and the city.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

The New York Times Book Review - Daniel Handler
I like [Drury's] oddball but easygoing rhythm…I like his take on the everyday vernacular…which he often moves into contexts that feel wrong but fit right…I like his occasional bouts of absurdity…that often bump up against something deep and abstract. I like the specificity of his eye…that grounds his more far-flung stretches…Drury gives us the wondrous and engaging stuff of real storytelling, of actual inquiry and investigation into the haunting and jokey puzzles of the world, at a time when so much literature stops short of invoking something larger or spends so much time touting grand themes that it forgets to make something happen. Pacific is a terrific book, and a strange one, as strange as the world and the great literature that helps us make our way through it.
Publishers Weekly
Loneliness and fantasy bend reality in Drury’s thin new work (after The Driftless Area), which returns readers to the world and characters of his much-celebrated 1994 novel The End of Vandalism. In the opening pages, Micah Darling, the son of casual thief Tiny, is taken by his TV actress mother Joan out of his small Midwestern town to live in Los Angeles. He soon makes friends with a set of privileged teenage drug enthusiasts and falls in love, like everybody else, with the beautiful but anguished Charlotte. “It’s like a law of nature. Gravity, then Charlotte,” says one, sardonically. Back in the Midwest, meanwhile, PI Dan Norman is on the trail of conman Jack Snow, whose forgeries of Celtic artifacts have led him to a thousand-year-old stone found in a dead man’s hand in a bog in Ireland. As the investigation wears on, the lives of local residents are roiled when a mysterious and unhinged young woman arrives on a mission to recover the ancient Celtic stone. Cutting between decadent Los Angeles teenagers and weary smalltown men and women, all of whom struggle with loneliness and aimless desire, the two disjointed plot lines never really intersect. Still, uncanny dialogue, deadpan humor, a few morbid twists, and a considerable amount of quirk make for an engaging read. Agent: The Wylie Agency. (May)
From the Publisher

—A New York Times Editors' Choice
—A San Francisco Chronicle Recommended Book
—An Amazon.com Best Book of the Month

"I like [Drury's] oddball but easygoing rhythm. . . . I like his occasional bouts of absurdity. . . . All great books are strange. Every lasting work of literature since the very weird Beowulf has been strange, not only because it grapples with the strangeness around us, but also because the effect of originality is startling, making even the oldest books feel like brand-new stories. . . . Drury overlays the grand and mythic with the specific and everyday, giving ordinary moments the majesty of legend. . . . [He] gives us the wondrous and engaging stuff of real storytelling, of actual inquiry and investigation into the haunting and jokey puzzles of the world, at a time when so much literature stops short of invoking something larger or spends so much time touting grand themes that it forgets to make something happen. Pacific is a terrific book, and a strange one, as strange as the world and the great literature that helps us make our way through it."—Daniel Handler, The New York Times Book Review

"Drury gives his characters the sharpest dialogue I've read in some time. He's interested in people, their odd decisions and their strange perceptions about everyday things. . . . Drury never loses focus. . . . Each new character [he] introduces plucks an intricate web, and the reverberations are felt far and wide. On the surface, Pacific is a disarmingly plain tale about people managing loss. But look closer, and you'll see it's as deep as the ocean it's named after."—San Francisco Chronicle

"Elegant, simple prose . . . Drury's fiction is chockablock with . . . tiny epics unfurling and resolving in quick, universally funny vignettes. In Pacific, these center around the characters from his debut, The End of Vandalism, certainly among the funniest, most humane American novels of the last quarter-century. . . . The philosophy in [his] fiction resides somewhere between humanism and absurdism. . . . [Pacific] has a Hollywood audition scene as unsettling, absurd, and deadpan as anything in Sunset Boulevard . . . [and a] pitch-perfect satire of a [student activist group] worthy of Wet Hot American Summer."—The Boston Globe

"There are novels you read to find out what happens next, and novels you read to linger in the moment. Tom Drury's new book, Pacific, falls squarely in the second category. . . . [Written with] sharp observations and deadpan wit."—NPR

"The reader never sees where Drury is headed with his story, which is what makes his stories so fresh and satisfying and unlike other authors. His novels are reminiscent of the films of David Lynch, with a touch of author Haruki Murakami thrown in. . . . Reading him makes one feel more human. That's the beauty of Drury. . . . You read Drury to linger in the world he has created and marvel at the weird and wonderful characters that inhabit it."— World-Herald (Omaha)

"Some writers are good at drawing a literary curtain over reality, and splashing upon the curtain all colors of their fancies. And then there are the writers who raise the veil and lead us to see for the first time. Tom Drury belongs to the latter, and is a rare master at the art of seeing. Reading Pacific makes me once again fall in love with Drury’s words, and his perception of a world that is full of dangers and passions and mysteries and graces."—Yiyun Li

"A fine percussive beat sweeps the reader along . . . The always fresh perspective of this one-of-a-kind writer will have you responding like his character who 'laughed with surprise in her heart."—Kirkus Reviews

"Uncanny dialogue, deadpan humor, a few morbid twists, and a considerable amount of quirk make [Pacific] an engaging read."—Publishers Weekly

"As in his previous masterful novels, Drury weaves carefully metered sentences, deeply felt scenes, and struggling characters into an endlessly entertaining tapestry of human comedy and small-town living."—Booklist

"Poetic, clever, and concise . . . Drury-ese [is] a language that exists mostly in dialogue and description, a dry bed of humor built on a sturdy rhythm and benevolently wry observation. . . . If The End of Vandalism provided a world for readers to slow down and catch their breath, Pacific is determined to knock it out of them."—New York Observer

"One of the great strengths of Drury's fiction is his ability to suggest the deep funny-sadness of life without sinking to ridicule or bathos. He celebrates quirkiness of speech and habit for its ability to particularize the individual beyond stereotype. Unexpected gestures connect characters and reveal wounds of the heart. . . . Drury invests his characters with a warm-blooded immediacy that demands respect. . . . It's rare to read a novel with so little cliché or convoluted prose, in which the dialogue is both believable and exceptional."—Shelf Awareness

Kirkus Reviews
Getting by, getting over, getting laid: Drury's characters keep busy in his fifth novel, another wild ride. Some of them we've met before in Hunts in Dreams (2000) and The End of Vandalism (1994): Charles, Joan, Lyris and Micah. The action is split among small Midwest towns and Los Angeles. Charles, now known as Tiny, had a plumbing business which has since failed. His ex-wife, Joan, has moved to LA and has a juicy role in a TV show. Stepdaughter Lyris has moved into town to shack up with a young newspaper reporter. Joan re-appears to claim 14-year-old Micah and move him to the coast. She's going to take another stab at this mothering business; or is she just playing a role? These departures leave Tiny in an empty nest. Out of loneliness, he starts stealing boxes from the loading docks of big-box stores. That's kids' stuff compared to Jack Snow's criminal enterprise. Jack is an ex-con shipping fake Celtic artifacts from a warehouse. It's his bad luck to be tracked down by Sandra Zulma, his old childhood playmate. Sandra is now cuckoo, lost in a Celtic fantasy world, but with the single-minded energy of the mad, she is looking for a rock that Jack may own. Also on Jack's trail is Dan, once the sheriff but now working for a detective agency, though he hates the sleaze. He and his wife, Louise, are emblems of decency; their private sorrow is the loss of a daughter at birth. Meanwhile, in LA, Micah is experimenting with drugs and girls, while Joan is making the leap to the big screen and sleeping with the screenwriter. The second half includes a murder and a divorce; Micah, overwhelmed, calls his half sister Lyris, who flies out to help. There's no plot or protagonist, but a fine percussive beat sweeps the reader along. The always fresh perspective of this one-of-a-kind writer will have you responding like his character, who "laughed with surprise in her heart."
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780802194800
  • Publisher: Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
  • Publication date: 5/7/2013
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 208
  • Sales rank: 534,486
  • File size: 2 MB

Meet the Author


Tom Drury is also the author of The End of Vandalism, Hunts in Dreams, The Driftless Area, and The Black Book. His fiction has appeared in The New Yorker, Harper’s Magazine, and The Mississippi Review, and he has been named one of Granta’s “Best Young American Novelists.”
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

PACIFIC

A Novel


By Tom Drury

Grove/Atlantic, Inc.

Copyright © 2013 Tom Drury
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-8021-1999-5


CHAPTER 1

Joan had to find a school for Micah in the fall. She made packets with an eight-by-ten glossy, transcripts, and an essay he'd written. This is how the essay started:

When I was small I survived a tornado that blew the van in which I was a passenger through a silo. The wind was so loud that all the world and its things seemed to be made of sound waves. Tools floated about like you might pick one from the air as an astronaut would in zero gravity. The tornado taught me that you can get in and out of trouble in unexpected ways. I used to have a goat who would knock things over and pin them with her forelegs as if to say, "Now it is mine." My favorite subject is world history. I think it was a bad deal when the citizen farmers were forced to move to Rome where they had nothing to do in the second century.


Joan thought the essay was thoughtful and creative and she appreciated mention of the tornado which they'd gone through together.

She mailed applications to the Weaving School, Adamantine Prep, Mary Ellen Pleasant Country Day, Brentwood Polyphonic, and Our Lady of Good Counsel on the Hill. None of the schools had an opening for Micah. Our Lady of Good Counsel on the Hill put him on a waiting list.

"That sounds promising," said Joan.

They drove up to the school for an interview. The road climbed the foothills and Joan pointed out a section of roadway that had fallen down a ravine across the valley.


One sunny day of so many Micah took a bus west on Sunset Boulevard to see Thea. Palm trees listed south, leaves fluttering in the wind. The Chateau Marmont rose above trees. He knew it was important but not why.

Billboards lined the boulevard—a bottle of tequila lit up like an altar, a watch too complicated to be useful, a man and two women coated in oil and shirtless in lowrider jeans.

Then the bus went down the hill into Beverly Hills, where businesses and billboards gave way to hardwood groves and hedges and walls and pillars.

Thea's place had a mechanical gate with a warning depicting a stick figure pinned between gate and post, limbs splayed in alarm.

Micah walked up the broad and curving driveway, making way for a plumber's truck that was leaving and got Micah thinking of Tiny. His world and this world seemed to occupy different dimensions. Micah was a traveler who had gone between them.

The house was enormous and ornamental as if a government should be in it and Thea met him out front by a fountain with a statue of a headless woman holding an open book.

"So, this is my crib," said Thea.

"How many people live here?"

"Just us four. My dad built it so his family would have a place to gather. But my aunts and uncles built their houses with the same idea. They're in Ojai and La Jolla and north of San Francisco. So now they can't agree where the family should gather."

They walked around to the back gardens, where hedges radiated from a great tree with smooth gray bark and hundreds of branches thick with purple leaves. Hidden in the leaves was a treehouse with glass windows and cedar shakes.

"God damn," said Micah.

They climbed a ladder to the treehouse. It was messy inside. Clothes and books and food wrappers lay wherever Thea had dropped them. Micah began picking things up and organizing them and Thea joined him.

"I spend a lot of time here," she said. "I don't sleep well in the house. The vertical space is oppressive."

The treehouse had a futon, a bumper pool table, a refrigerator, a desk, and a chair. They played pool. Thea leaned over the table, biting her lower lip with her little front teeth. She won the game in no time. Bumper pool was harder than Micah thought.

"Well, I get so much practice," she said. "You'll get better the more you play."

"Then you'll invite me back."

"Of course. As now we are friends."

After the game they sat on the futon and Thea took a dark green tin in her lap, opened it, and rolled a joint. She lit up and inhaled, waving her hand beside her throat.

"What do you think of Charlotte?" she said.

"Is she in those Boston shoe ads?"

"Yeah. Hold it in."

Micah held his breath. "I like the one when they're on a boat," he said in a deep voice.

"I want you to think about something. Charlotte's going around with people who aren't good for her. They drink all the time, and the only reason they follow her is ... well, you know how she looks."

"Yeah, beautiful," said Micah. "You both are."

Her ears turned red, just like that. "I'm not Charlotte."

"You're very pretty, in my opinion."

She looked at him sadly, as if trying to arrange the thousand and one things he didn't know into a manageable list.

"Have you ever asked anybody out?"

"Sure," said Micah. "Well, not really."

"I want you to ask Charlotte out."

"Isn't she kind of old for me?"

"How old are you?"

"Fourteen."

"Hmmm." Thea was quiet, and Micah thought she might forget the whole idea.

"That is young," she said. "But I saw how she looked at you, Micah. She really cared about you, making sure your high was okay. That was the old Charlotte."

"Where would I ask her out to?"

"It's not a big thing. Just say you'll get some coffee."

Micah agreed and Thea hugged him. He climbed down from the treehouse, walked out the way they had come, opened the gate, and waited half an hour for a bus.

The lights were coming on over Sunset and people sat talking in restaurants that spilled onto the sidewalks. Hollywood pigeons strolled the globe of the Cinerama Dome.


Eamon was typing on a laptop and watching History's Mysteries in the family room when Micah got home. The TV showed an aerial view of a metal warehouse among trees.

"Soon sounds of hammering and sawing begin to emanate from their headquarters," said the narrator.

"What is this?" said Micah.

"I don't know. World War II something or other."

Eamon muted the television. The scene cut to two men sitting at a table covered with blueprints. They seemed elated over whatever they were building.

"Did you ever go out with Charlotte?" said Micah.

"Sophomore year."

"What happened?"

"We stopped."

"How come?"

"We just did. Why?"

Micah sat down and retied the laces of his sneakers. "I was thinking of asking her to have coffee."

"Everybody falls in love with Charlotte. It's like a law of nature. Gravity, then Charlotte."

"It's not love. It's coffee. Thea said I should."

"You're a big coffee drinker, huh?"

"No. I hate it."

"Have latte. But now, Thea told you. This is interesting. Where did you see Thea?"

"At her treehouse."

"Really." Eamon gave Micah a little push. "You're just the latest thing, aren't you?"


Early every morning Joan ran in the park. She did not wear earphones but heard music in her head, Ode to Joy or Alegria or The Munsters Theme. One day at the soccer field she saw a young woman sleeping on the grass. Coming closer, she realized that it was Charlotte Mann.

Charlotte wore a short black dress, one red shoe, and a black leather jacket with rawhide fringe and brass studs. She was asleep on an orange blanket in the grass. Joan covered her legs and touched her shoulder.

Charlotte sat up and looked around and scratched the back of her head with both hands. Unbraided, her hair fell in waves to her shoulders.

"Well, this is embarrassing," she said.

She got up, took the blanket by two corners, and gave it a shake. Cigarettes and a lighter shot from the blanket. She walked toward them, crooked on one shoe.

"What happened?" said Joan.

Charlotte flopped down, took the shoe off, lit a cigarette, and blew a smoke ring. "What time is it?"

"Twenty after seven."

"What day is it?"

"Tuesday."

"Do you see my phone?"

Joan looked around. "How did you get here?"

"I don't remember. We were at a house and then we were at a club. Then maybe a house again. Or that might have been the first house. People kept stepping on my ankles. Maybe I'll stay here till someone comes."

"No one is coming. It's morning."

"They might be driving ever so slowly."

"Charlotte. Honey. Wake up. You can't be doing this to yourself."

They walked across the soccer field. Wearing the blanket like a shawl, Charlotte dropped the mateless shoe into a trash can.

"I'm sorry you found me this way."

"You don't have to worry about your place with me," said Joan. "I know you. I know what my boys think of you. You have a good heart."

"No I don't. My heart is a mess."


Micah and Charlotte did not go for coffee. Instead she picked him up in a small yellow Datsun pickup and they drove up to Mount Wilson on Angeles Crest Highway. Charlotte wore khaki shorts, green sneakers, and a pink tank top with a border of shiny green stones against her copper skin.

The mountain road climbed, steep with switchbacks. Rocks had fallen in the roadway, and Charlotte cranked the wheel, steering carefully around them. The sky was deep blue, with lavender clouds around faraway peaks.

A famous observatory stood on top of the mountain, white domes rising from forests with pinecones big as footballs. Charlotte knew all about the place. George Hale had worked here, and Edwin Hubble. Observations of the sun gave way to observations of all space. Einstein came up to talk things over. The universe expanded.

Micah and Charlotte looked at Hubble's chair in the gloomy vault of the Hooker Telescope while listening to a recording by someone named Hugh Downs. The chair appeared to have been borrowed from the Hubbles' dining room table.

"Imagine being Hubble," said Charlotte.

"I can't. He's too smart."

"It's late, it's cold. You write down this number, you turn some dial, you write down another number."

"Something doesn't add up."

"The things you are learning are going to turn this world upside down."

They were quiet then. Breathing quickly, Charlotte ran her hands beneath her hair and lifted it back over her shoulders. They walked down with the voice of Hugh Downs fading in the stairwell.

They ate at the Cosmic Cafe in a wooded pavilion between the observatory and the parking lot. Charlotte drove past a cluster of communications towers and a little way down the mountain before stopping at a turnout.

A dusty trail took them along the mountain wall, where they sat cross-legged on a flat rock projecting over nothing. Someone had run a power line out here on scarred poles, but the line stopped and there was one last pole in the sand with nothing attached to it.

"Look at that," said Micah.

Charlotte stared at the column of sky, drawing her knees up and wrapping her arms around them. "Would you mind if I bit you on the arm?" she said.

"Is this a hypothetical question?"

"I wouldn't break the skin."

"Why?"

"I don't know. Sometimes I just get nervous and have to bite something. Do you know what I mean?"

"Do it to yourself how you would do it."

She raised her forearm to her mouth and bit. Her eyes opened wide. Then she presented her arm and they examined it together. Slowly the pale white of teeth marks turned the lion-mane color of her skin.

"Are you afraid it will hurt?" she said.

"Does it?"

She shrugged. "Some?"

Micah rolled the sleeve of his work shirt above the elbow and brushed off his arm.

"Do you want to?" she said.

"Can't be that bad."

"Good man! I'm so excited." She gathered her hair in an elastic band, settled beside him, and took his arm in both hands, drawing the two of them shoulder to shoulder.

"Now you say when to stop," she said.

"Okay."

She bent her head and closed her eyes. At first Micah felt only the warmth of her mouth and the softness of her lips.

Her teeth closed, gathering a cord of flesh. It didn't hurt much at first, and then he felt the pressure inside his arm. He saw that it would be easy to play this game till blood was drawn.

Charlotte opened her mouth when she realized he would not call it off. Her teeth had left an oval of perfect dashes, inside of which the hair on his arm was swirled and wet. His arm cooled as it dried.

He looked at her and saw that she had tears in her eyes and realized that he did too. Maybe the bite had hurt more than he thought and maybe it was something else. They leaned their faces one toward the other without thinking and kissed for a long time.

This was Micah's first kiss, and he knew he would remember it all his life. When it was over they sat with their hands on the hot flat rock and legs stretched before them.
(Continues...)


Excerpted from PACIFIC by Tom Drury. Copyright © 2013 Tom Drury. Excerpted by permission of Grove/Atlantic, Inc..
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Interviews & Essays

Barnes & Noble Review Interview with Tom Drury

Tom Drury walks into an unmarked bar. Previously, when he'd pass by on walks through his current neighborhood, Manhattan's Upper East Side, he thought it abandoned. But then he discovered it was just an unmarked bar with a Victorian interior that suggested a haunted house quality. Naturally, he was curious to investigate and thus decided it was an appropriate setting to discuss his fifth novel, Pacific, published by Grove Press.

Unmarked bars would fit comfortably into a Tom Drury novel, where vanishing field machinery, vandalized water towers, and strangely articulate electronics conspire to create a world that, as Daniel Handler pointed out in The New York Times Book Review, feels "as strange as the world and the great literature that helps us make our way through it."

The End of Vandalism, his first novel, released in 1994, was serialized in The New Yorker and is now considered a modern classic (GQ named it one of the fifty best novels of the past fifty years; a reviewer for The Boston Globe called it "certainly one of the funniest, most humane novels of the past quarter century").

Pacific is Drury's third novel to revisit many of the characters living in and around Grouse County, a tiny farm community that in some way resembles (but is not, he insists) the small Iowa town where he was born in 1956 (The second is Hunts in Dreams, released in 2000). Sheriff Dan Norman has retired; his redheaded wife, born Louise Montrose, has moved on from photography and now runs a thrift shop; Louise's onetime husband Tiny Darling is up to his usual small-time malfeasance, and a platinum-haired, Celtic-obsessed stranger named Sandra Zulma, who proves adept at wielding both swords and yardsticks, comes to town.

This time, however, Drury transplants several characters to Los Angeles (where he lived between 2004 and 2010). Joan, once a strident Christian, has become an actress in a new drama called Mystic Forensic and decides to have a second go at parenting Micah, her fourteen-year-old son with Tiny Darling (Micah's sister, Lyris remains in Grouse County). Micah's new coastal lifestyle includes drugs, Venice Beach, and a beautiful girl named Charlotte, who has "perfect eyebrows," drives a pickup truck that would not be out of place in Grouse County, and looks like one of the girls in the Boston Persuasion shoe commercial (which in fact, she turns out to be).

Before Tom Drury was a novelist, he worked as a reporter for several papers around New England. After he was a novelist, he worked as a writing instructor at Wesleyan University (where I was his student in both literary journalism and fiction writing during the mid-'90s), an editor on the foreign desk of the St. Petersburg Times, and an editor for the website of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art. He now lives in Manhattan with his wife and daughter.

As it happens, my tape recorder is so sensitive that not only does it pick up our own conversation, but at the very same time that he is telling me that people speak in fragments, not purposeful dialogue good for exposition, it has also recorded fragments of dialogue from the surrounding tables. Transcribing the tape is not unlike being a character in a Tom Drury novel, and I feel like I may, at any time, uncover a fiendish plot. When I tell him about the ghost dialogue, he writes back, "You might be able to uncover a fiendish plot, but should you? I believe this was the plot of many Hitchcock films."

Our conversation at the unmarked bar included the comforts of illuminated appliances in darkened rooms, Celtic epics, and the difference between a sentence written by Tom Drury and one performed by Red Skelton. Ghost dialogue not included. —Amy Benfer

The Barnes & Noble Review: I just read all three Grouse County books back to back. The dialogue is similar. But The End of Vandalism feels so snappy, so perfectly stylized. In Pacific, the sentences between the dialogue felt more relaxed, maybe even a little mournful, or elegiac. How do you feel about the tone of this book?

Tom Drury: I think of the three Grouse County books as radically different in style from each other. In The End of Vandalism, there's always an outlet of humor. And while it was called deadpan humor, it is overtly funny and you don't find that so much in Pacific. Progressively, there is less in Hunts in Dreams and less in Pacific. I'm still keen to the humor of certain situations — like when the guy has sold the canoe out from the other guy, that made me laugh.

BNR: Ah, yes. The $900 canoe. He was just doing the guy a favor. Taking the canoe off his hands.

TD: As he says, it was a $900 canoe. We don't know what he got for it.

BNR: Presumably considerably less.

There might a kind of mournfulness, as you say, but it's more a seriousness. Or something. Even when we were editing The End of Vandalism, my editor, Veronica Geng, would say you don't want to feel like it has to be funny on every page. That's something I've taken to heart. I try to be interesting on every page, but not necessarily through humor.

BNR: That last scene in The End of Vandalism is both — funny as hell and also very sad.

TD: "The scientist dies"? Maybe that is a projection of what's coming.

BNR: "The scientist dies" — that's said in response to the television. In Pacific, you also have semi-sentient devices. A radio plays while one character is dying. Later, another radio seems to suggest a ghost. I found another seemingly astute television in The Black Brook. What narrative possibilities do you see in electronic devices? Is it just randomness or another outlet for humor? Or is it more of this sentient connection that allows you to at least suggest the possibility of, say, ghosts?

TD: What I like about TV and radio is that they allow you to bring all kinds of images and dialogues into the narrative where they serve a purpose just as if someone in the story were seeing or hearing them in real life. I don't think of mass media as sentient to the point of knowing who is in the room. It's more that people want to make sense of everything so that these random electronic messages can be interpreted by them as part of their stories. And mostly they should be random, and not all manipulated by the writer to make some point. The relationship should be a little mysterious to everyone.

BNR: To continue with the man vs. machine theme, Micah, the teenage boy in Pacific joins a group called the New Luddites while living in LA. One of the sweetest scenes in the novel is when a passing stranger translates the image of Micah and his new girlfriend, Charlotte, into Palmer cursive, a style of writing that has fallen out of fashion. But as in all your novels, technology seems rather friendly: Like Dan, who has always been comforted by the light coming off small appliances, Micah seems to find as much solace in "a friendly light shining from beneath the cupboards" as he later does looking off to the horizon at sunrise. Also the New Luddites protest itself — broadcasting the National over the school PA — is both literally using technology to disseminate art, and itself requires pretty decent hacking skills. It seems like you may be saying the technological world and nature don't have quite as many gripes with each other as it may seem. True?

TD: The technological world is so vast that it's hard to know what it's doing or what trouble it might cause. Lights are pretty low-tech and I think that in places where there is real darkness at night and lots of it they are welcome. More so by Dan than most, maybe. What the New Luddites do is of a different order. At one point I had them debating the use of the computer to undermine the computer, whether they could use it to that extent and still be square with their principles. I cut that part, but someone said you can't change the system if you won't go anywhere near it. And it's really more a question of how the technology is used. Micah tells the headmaster it's all about money and that the social network is a Trojan horse, which, because of cellphones, people no longer see what is in front of them. I think he's right about all these things. But when he needs to talk to Lyris near the end, he has to borrow someone's cellphone. Maybe it's like the vandalism of the first novel. Albert and his friends did not object to the water tower as a visual medium, they just wanted to paint their own words on it.

BNR: I can't decide if the use of drugs in this novel is another example of synthetic substitutes for emotion being valued just as much as their natural counterparts. But they often don't seem overtly negative — as one of the kids has it, these are "vision" as opposed to "metabolic" drugs and even though Micah is fairly troubled when he starts using them, there does seem to be a kind of mysticism, even spirituality to his drug use that harks back to a kind of old-school California drug subculture.

TD: I do think the drug use is a ritual of Micah's acceptance rather than something bad. It's how he and Charlotte find a connection. There's that line, "She really cared about you, making sure your high was okay." Drugs, alcohol included, can be useful as a way of helping characters reach a kind of emotionality or openness they might not otherwise have. Just like in life. Of course it can be overdone. Charlotte passes out in public sometimes, and Micah ends up drunk and confused as to whether his sister is in the Midwest or hiding under a lifeguard shack on the beach. But yeah there is a kind of spirituality going on, in the lines Micah sees among the stars and the sunrise he and Charlotte see after a night of drinking and running around.

BNR: To go back to Grouse County, Dan and Louise, who were the emotional heart of The End of Vandalism are back and still at the emotional center of Grouse County.

TD: They're not thirty anymore. And Louise has her night time worries. The childlessness that perhaps didn't mean so much to them when they were a young couple perhaps comes home to them. I very much found that Louise and Lyris were kind of gravitating towards each other because one doesn't have a daughter, and the other doesn't have a mother. That just seemed to happen as the narrative went. I think there's more of an emphasis on family, but at the same time, the family seems hard to achieve in this book.

BNR: But there are many functional families in this books, they just aren't usually the nuclear ones? For example, neither Lyris nor Micah have a great mother in Joan, but Louise is a mother to Lyris, and Lyris to Micah. Might it also be true that the families one chooses can sometimes be stronger than the ones one is born with, even if they are, as you say, hard to achieve?

TD: Yeah, that is an excellent point. At one point Micah was thinking that he did not blame Joan and Tiny for who they were as parents and that he would find his family wherever he went, in the people around him. This was when he is hanging out with Beth after they take painkillers together. I cut that thought of Micah's, too. It's interesting how many things that were cut speak directly to your questions. That's a good thing probably. Usually when I take out something like that it's because I think either the reader will know this from what is happening or, if not, saying it directly won't make it so.

BNR: I also sort of love that Tiny Darling's fatherly advice — hit him in the solar plexus! — turns out to be surprisingly practical. But Joan seems as damaging and incompetent as ever. Is this the difference between bad mothers and bad fathers?

TD: I think Joan is better than you think. A little better anyway. She lets Micah do pretty much whatever he wants, it's true, and some will see that as neglect. She seems somehow bound to break up a family whenever a child of hers arrives. But that little scene where she is helping him with his homework and they come up with The Age of Fabric to help him memorize the presidents. Or when she is telling him about the Olympic skater who once lived in their apartment building. Or how she owns up to having left him. I think that is an important moment because Micah is saying he did not view her departure as something that she did to someone, and she says, "To you, that's who it was done too." Sort of reminding him of his validity as an individual, which is a good thing for a kid to understand.

BNR: They're not in Grouse County anymore. But none of their families of origin back in Grouse County were that great either.

TD: It's one thing when you're estranged from your parents when you're in your late twenties, or in combat with them, as Louise was with Mary in EOV, but twenty years later, it's a different thing. And not as funny, and not as redeemable. You always think, "Well, there will always be time." And then time goes away.

BNR: Louise and Dan started out The End of Vandalism in their mid-thirties. So they are in their fifties, now? Are they your contemporaries?

TD: Yeah, roughly. More or less. That's how I think of them. I was thinking End of Vandalism plus seven years is Hunts in Dreams plus seven more years is Pacific. That wouldn't quite bring us up to now, but it brings us into the late 2000s. I had to ask myself things like, "Could Perry Kleeborg [Louise's boss at the photography studio] still possibly be alive?" And I thought, "No, no way. He's got to be dead."

BNR: But turning his photography studio into a thrift shop is such a nice gesture. It's a way to collect and archive the past.

TD: What you see of Grouse County in Pacific is about a movement away from the country and the little towns toward the medium-sized cities, which maybe — who knows? — is even sociologically correct. I can go into a certain place, and I can say, "There was a farm here, and a farm here, and a farm here, and they'r gone." Louise and Dan both work in the city. But there's just not as many country scenes. Which is partly ?cause, one thing in writing these, if I did something in The End of Vandalism, I don't want to do it again.

BNR: But you do repeat the characters. You are obviously striving for continuity on some level.

TD: They're the same characters in changing social structures and language. The End of Vandalism to me was kind of like a letter from somebody eccentric at home.

BNR: And by home you mean?

Someone living there. Living in Grafton. Calling it a letter from home makes it sound sweeter than it is. You get letters from home that are not sweet. And that are sardonic and somewhat cryptic.

BNR: You grew up in Iowa, right?

TD: It's up near Mason City. It's called Swaledale. It's got a population now of about 150. It had 220 when I was growing up. Very tiny. 220, I believe was the high mark. And that's when I was a kid.

My life in the town I grew up in was much quieter than The End of Vandalism. Part of the reason I think I wrote it was because it was too damn quiet when I was young, and I wanted people to come out and talk. And they do. There's so much dialogue in The End of Vandalism. It's almost like I wished that the dialogue would have been there.

BNR: Did you know any writers when you were growing up?

TD: I didn't even know what to read. I read True Grit. I read Nine Stories by Salinger. And I read S. E. Hinton, who I still think is really good.

BNR: Me, too. And there is a That Was Then, This Is Now reference in Pacific.

TD: I read those in high school. Then I went to college and took some journalism courses. I really, honest to God, didn't know what to read until I was out of college and living in Boston, and someone said, "Well, why don't you read Hemingway?" And I thought, OK. I guess I'll try this Hemingway fellow.

BNR: I've heard he's quite good.

TD: Yes, me too. So I just didn't know. Which I don't think is bad. Ultimately, it helps you to be original, to the extent that you are.

BNR: How old were you when you left?

TD: Twenty-four. I got a journalism degree at Iowa, I went out to the East Coast. I was doing clerical work in a law firm, in a big, tall building that I thought was thrilling. The wind would come off Boston harbor and the building would go back and forth and you'd be riding the elevator, scraping the walls, and I would think, "This is so great. This is so incredible." After living in a town of 150. I worked three newspaper jobs, culminating in the Providence Journal in '83? I wanted to try grad school, and Brown was right there.

BNR: Brown is very much known as an experimental program. But you are more realist.

TD: Here's the cool thing that I found. Bob Coover was very adept at dealing with writing of all kinds. The last interview we had before I graduated, he said, "You can do this. What else can you do?" And by "this," he meant a form of fiction that was sufficient, but not good.

The thing that I did was find that voice in The End of Vandalism. I thought, well, what can I do? I knew I had a sense of humor. You begin by thinking whatever you can do, that doesn't matter. That's not literature. Literature is this idealized thing that someone else does with all the skills that you don't have. I eventually realized the humor that I had could help create a style and a way of looking at things.

BNR: Since all the novels, at least, are written in the third person, the humor is the thing, to me, that shapes your point of view as the narrator. You are the one offstage setting up the jokes and things that the characters themselves don't get or don't necessarily see.

TD: Right. And sometimes many of the readers, too.

BNR: That sounds like more of this "deadpan humor" I hear so much about...

TD: That's what they all say...I don't know what they mean.

BNR:...That's what the kids say...

TD: I've never understood that. Red Skelton, whom you wouldn't remember...

BNR: I know of Red Skelton...

TD: OK, Red Skelton: not deadpan. We know that. There's this big kind of jokey style. But I don't know. Who writes that way? Maybe somebody. But I don't know who.

BNR: But your humor is all about the spaces between the words, which is what all literature is about.

TD: It's about being aware of the possibilities of change within in a sentence or within a scene. Sentences can start out very serious, and you might discover something funny or offbeat at the end. Same thing with scenes. Very few things are totally devoid of any possibility of humor. If you are aware of that possibility, and alive to the scene becoming that way, then it just happens naturally. That's what I feel living is like, too. I find a lot of things that make me smile or make me laugh over the course of the day.

It also has to do with a form of realism. You walk down the street, you don't hear any purposeful dialogue that would be good for exposition. All you hear is fractured bits, which is the way we speak to each other. I tried to be true to that. Always my fallback is, "What is life like?" Get as close to that as you can. As opposed to, "What is literature like?" I feel like, try using life as the model. You may end up with something interesting and different.

BNR: You were, in fact, my literary journalism teacher. I feel like part of your skill with dialogue comes from having once been a journalist.

TD: Yeah, I'm with you. I used to love working with a tape recorder. It's not a bad thing to do if you want to learn how to write dialogue. I don't do non-fiction anymore. Eventually you just feel constrained by the facts. You want to go where the words take you, and people's actual lives don't always conform. And you can't know them that well.

With this book in particular, there was a real effort to cut it to the bone with narrative and get it down to the things I could still be interested in reading after I had read it eighty times. Also, I have been working on a screenplay for The Driftless Area. Coming off that, you really have to think about, what is this doing? Why is this here? If it's not here for a reason, cut it. Which is totally antithetical to The End of Vandalism, which was all about, And I'll tell you something else... that you don't need to know!

BNR: Given your skill with dialogue, I had been meaning to ask you if you had done work for TV or screenplays. And the answer seems to be yes.

TD: We have the screenplay. It's finished. It's slated to shoot in late summer. I wrote it with this great director, Zachary Sluser. So the answer is, yeah. But I love the power of fiction. In a screenplay, you write a scene and you think, "This is going to require so much." The collaboration of many, first of all. And it's tricky. For example, to do the car accident that is in Pacific, it would be expensive, you know.

BNR: Michael Bay expensive! And you don't have to think about that when you are a fiction writer.

TD: Not at all! It's like, "I made a car accident today! And it didn't cost me a dime!"

BNR: So you wrote Pacific when you were actually living in LA, right?

TD: No, I was living here. [New York City].

BNR: So once again, like writing about Iowa, a letter from a place you had already left.

TD: See, and I don't say Iowa. I never say Iowa. You said Iowa.

BNR: Sorry. Grouse County.

TD: It's OK. But the important thing to me is that to me these places are not these places. This is not supposed to be the Midwest, or Iowa, or Midwesterners or Iowans. It's supposed to be people that exist in my head.

I always feel that way when I am writing about a place. I use an actual, physical location as a kind of a stage. Just like a playwright might have a favorite stage. And then you'll come back and you can do anything there. But the characters, they're not supposed to represent. They're just supposed to be, and hopefully they are spontaneous and new. I'm not trying to say, "This is what the place is like." Or, "This is what the people are like." Because I don't think that's the way it is, or they are. They are made up.

BNR: There is a certain sensibility that goes with each place, whatever that place is. And there is a certain collision of sensibilities that comes from relocating the characters from Tom Drury's Grouse County to, well, Tom Drury's Los Angeles...

TD: No ambiguity there, yes, it is Los Angeles. It's Santa Monica.

BNR: One of the biggest differences between Grouse County and Los Angeles seems to be the intrusion — and possibility — of strangers. When a stranger shows up in Grouse County, she is literally trying to kill people. When Micah arrives in LA, he can't even imagine enough people to fill up all the buildings. But the strangers don't seem so bad: they are also the ones who make room for a stray like Micah. Others have suggested that this novel makes LA into another small town. What contrasts do you see between Tom Drury's L.A. and Tom Drury's Grouse County?

TD: There's a lot more for a kid to do in Los Angeles. One of the things Micah tells Thea he used to do is walk along the abandoned railroad tracks. Here there are kids and mobility and parties and drugs and horses and mansions both perfect and falling apart. I think both places at least in this novel are very tolerant of strangers. The difference lies not so much in the place as in the stranger. Micah is trying to find an exciting life and Sandra is caught in some kind of mythological time loop that makes her sense of reality absurd at first and finally very dangerous. Still, everyone is courteous to her, and everyone is always offering her clothes to wear.

BNR: And Joan, the Bible thumper and erstwhile mother, is now an TV actress on Forensic Mystic, or Mystic Forensic...

TD: I can't remember either. BNR: I am actually obsessed with Forensic Files. That's the only trash TV I watch.

TD: What? Forensic Mystic?

BNR: No, Forensic Files. True crime.

TD: We don't get TV, but I just noticed through ads and stuff that there's all these shows about these women who have, like ESP, and solve crimes and things. Also I just like the rhyme of Forensic Mystic It's sort of a nod to "Disco Mystic," which is a song by Lou Reed, many years ago.

BNR: You have a lot of song lyrics in this novel.

TD: There's not so many. There's the National ["Fake Empire"]. Thing with song lyrics is you have to go track down the copyright.

BNR: You don't have to track them down. You can mishear them. There is a long history of mishearing song lyrics, too.

TD: True. I had a thing in, I forget what book. Remember Dolly Parton and Kenny Rogers had a song called "Islands in the Stream"?

BNR: Oh, and it was about the Hemingway book, too, wasn't it?

TD: Hell if I know. I referred to that song that the character always thought of as "Island Dentistry." People like to say, "Well, it felt really timeless, but then you had the National in it." Well, OK. Doesn't bother me.

BNR: The National are already timeless themselves, goddammit. There is the kid singing M. C. Hammer's "Hammertime" in The End of Vandalism. And I swear Micah and Charlotte are listening to Janelle Monae in the club. "Tightrope," which came out in 2010.

TD: "The Tightrope" is Leon Russell. Seventies.

BNR: Transpositions and mishearings indeed. It is also Janelle Monae. Look it up. I swear you will like it. My copy of The End of Vandalism is from the year I took your class. It was annotated by college me. As it turns out, adult me does not find what college me has to say about your novel particularly interesting.

TD:That's sort of how the Celtic aspect came about. I found a book called the Tain, which is a translation by Thomas Kinsella of an Irish epic called the Tain Bo Cuailnge. It was annotated by with little underlines and marginal comments. The comments had the i dotted with a hollow circle, which made me think, This is a woman who is writing this.

BNR: Hollow dots over the i's are very much a teenage girl thing.

TD: There were these passages that were about sex and it would say in the margin, "Sexual innuendo?" And I was thinking, Innuendo? What are you talking about? That's sex! But it made me think about this person, who, at a very young age, got very deeply into these epics and took it into herself and it became her reality. And it made me think, "What would happen if that had a deep effect on somebody?" I don't know if you can think of games you played as a kid?

BNR: Well, Dungeons and Dragons is a classic touchstone for people my age. There is a Sam Lipsyte story about it. Paul LaFarge wrote on it, too.

TD: But even before that. Playacting or running in the yard. Swordplay with sticks. Like, kids, like, below ten. And then maybe somebody eventually grows out of it. And maybe the other person doesn't grow out of it at the same time. And maybe that other person goes farther into it. That's what I thought about the character of Sandra. The characters have some sort of weird protectiveness of her. There's some sort of general distrust of law enforcement, I think.

BNR: Which is ironic, given that the most long- running hero of the Grouse County books is Dan the sheriff. But there is that line about him saying him not trusting the rules now that he is no longer enforcing them. But this book is full of people breaking the rules. There are so many betrayals. Infidelity, all the way through.

TD: It's approached in different phases. Dan, ten percent. Joan and Gray, the sex-addled screenwriter...

BNR: About whom we get the classic line, "I thought you could count on men to be callous and evasive..."

TD: Right. I thought that was kind of true. I'm not sure if it is, but I kind of hope it is.

BNR: That you can count on men to be callous and evasive? Or that you can't?

TD: That you can't. Joan thought Gray would be easy to sleep with and forget because, in the way of men, he would want to sleep with and forget her. Instead he begins following her around like he's insanely devoted to her even though it seems to be her audition reel that he's really in love with.

I think Louise and Dan kept on OK. Somebody said to me, "Oh, you hate to see Dan and Louise flailing." But I don't know if they are flailing. I always feel like people are always saying my characters are "flailing" or "bumbling." And I think, "What are their lives like? Who are these people who have these perfect lives in which they never flail or bumble?" Really. I hate to analyze my own book.

BNR: You are allowed to analyze your own book!

TD: I always go back to Huck Finn as a character. He didn't expect anything. He didn't have any Victorian expectations of a good or proper life, and so he was very well equipped to deal with whatever happened. A lot of my characters are the same way. Their feelings aren't hurt when things go wrong, because they don't have a sense of entitlement about things going well.

BNR: Many writers will go back and forth between writing full-time and teaching. But you see to go back and forth between writing novels and journalism and...

TD: Day jobs.

BNR: Are there day jobs that you have found help or hinder your writing?

TD: Here's the thing: I was never writing when I was doing any of those jobs. I was writing a little bit when I was at Wesleyan. But I wasn't writing when I was doing journalism. What it does to your writing is stop it. That's my advice.

BNR: So the advice is marry a financier?

TD: No, the advice is: Keep a damn low overhead. I don't regret any of it. I was able to be a more present father to my child, my girl. It's hard to argue with that. And you think, well, if the world was deprived of two Tom Drury novels, the world will probably get over it. I'm not unhappy having five novels. That ain't bad. Go back to the kid in the little town of 150 and say, "Hey, kid, you're going to write five novels." It's OK with me.

June 14, 2013

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3.5
( 3 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 29, 2014

    Illuvatar

    *The wizard paces restively, destroying intricate mechanisms by accident and messing with levers*

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 28, 2014

    /),(\

    It's "Kaiju", "Jaeger", and her name is "Mako".

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 28, 2014

    Pacific Rim RP!

    Heyo! This is hopefully gonna be an active RP! You can be a Jkaiju or a Kyager pilot! And you may RP only ONE main character from the movie. I'm Yaku or whatever her name is. And this RP takes place before they beat the Jkaijus. So. Here are the rules. <p> 1. NO GODMODDING! This means tt your Kyager can't be OP! <br> 2. BE ACTIVE! I hate it when people aren't active! <br> 3. TELL US WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE FOR A WHILE! Please, tell me or anyone else that is on! <br> 4. PLEASE NO SE<_>XUAL OR IMMATURE OR INNAPROPRIATE OR BAD LANGUAGE/ACTOINS! Please bleep out the swears like fu<_>ck <br> 5. STICK TO THE STUFF THAT COULD HAPPEN IN THE MOVIE! No category 5+ Jkiajus! This is before that! <p> Map next res

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)