The Perreaus And Mrs. Rudd / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 96%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (35) from $1.99   
  • New (10) from $5.95   
  • Used (25) from $1.99   


The Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd tells the remarkable story of a complex forgery uncovered in London in 1775. Like the trials of Martin Guerre and O.J. Simpson, the Perreau-Rudd case—filled with scandal, deceit, and mystery—preoccupied a public hungry for sensationalism. Peopled with such familiar figures as John Wilkes, King George III, Lord Mansfield, and James Boswell, this story reveals the deep anxieties of this period of English capitalism. The case acts as a prism that reveals the hopes, fears, and prejudices of that society. Above all, this episode presents a parable of the 1770s, when London was the center of European finance and national politics, of fashionable life and tell-all journalism, of empire achieved and empire lost.

The crime, a hanging offense, came to light with the arrest of identical twin brothers, Robert and Daniel Perreau, after the former was detained trying to negotiate a forged bond. At their arraignment they both accused Daniel's mistress, Margaret Caroline Rudd, of being responsible for the crime. The brothers' trials coincided with the first reports of bloodshed in the American colonies at Lexington and Concord and successfully competed for space in the newspapers. From March until the following January, people could talk of little other than the fate of the Perreaus and the impending trial of Mrs. Rudd. The participants told wildly different tales and offered strikingly different portraits of themselves. The press was filled with letters from concerned or angry correspondents. The public, deeply divided over who was guilty, was troubled by evidence that suggested not only that fair might be foul, but that it might not be possible to decide which was which.

While the decade of the 1770s has most frequently been studied in relation to imperial concerns and their impact upon the political institutions of the day, this book draws a different portrait of the period, making a cause célèbre its point of entry. Exhaustively researched and brilliantly presented, it offers both a vivid panorama of London and a gauge for tracking the shifting social currents of the period.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Toronto Star
An absorbing tale of the lifestyles of the rich and infamous. The Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd gets positively gripping as the authors walk us through the political, social, financial, legal and media background of the whole episode.
Times of London
Thoroughly absorbing. This is altogether a most significant and interesting story, its cast of characters including some of London's finest.
Times of London
Thoroughly absorbing. This is altogether a most significant and interesting story, its cast of characters including some of London's finest.
Publishers Weekly
In this thoroughly researched examination of a famous 18th-century forgery trial, the authors skillfully interweave legal, economic and social history to place the "Perreau-Rudd affair" into its larger historical context. In 1775, as news of rebellion in the American colonies began to trickle in, London was preoccupied with a high-class scandal the twin brothers Perreau, Robert and Daniel, and Mrs. Rudd, Daniel's elegant mistress, were accused of engaging in a forgery scheme. The brothers pleaded their innocence and then accused Mrs. Rudd of masterminding the crime. Mrs. Rudd claimed that Daniel had forced her to participate in the crime to finance his spendthrift ways. The London press, faced with three upper-crust defendants and a sordid tale of betrayal, found the case irresistible and, the authors explain, "the papers helped to produce a new genre, the sensational criminal trial." The Perreaus and especially Mrs. Rudd used the press to plead their innocence. Why the public fascination? In an era of burgeoning commercial enterprise, the case exposed profound insecurities about the stability of "paper instruments," such as bonds of credit. The authors do a fine job of exploring the economic underpinnings of 18th-century England. Many viewed the case as a Hogarthian morality lesson: financial excess and deceit leading to the gallows (where the Perreau brothers ended up). The case also triggered questions regarding important legal issues, such as the Crown's role in granting pardons and the role of magistrates in offering immunity to criminal conspirators in exchange for their cooperation. The authors have created a first-rate work of historical research, one that will certainly appeal tothose interested in either the history of law or the development of public and media fascination with scandal. (Oct.) Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
The 1775 case in which twin brothers Robert and Daniel Perreau and Daniel's mistress, Margaret Caroline Rudd, were accused of forging bonds filled the British newspapers with stories and letters debating the guilt of all three. Rudd was portrayed as a courtesan forger and Daniel as her bankrupt, extravagant lover (and father of her children), while Robert was seen as a high-society apothecary and secret stock gambler. Some claimed that Rudd was the victim of ambitious men, while others believed that she deceitfully ensnared the Perreaus. The Perreau convictions shocked and titillated the middle and upper classes. The moral drama symbolized society's fears at a time when conspicuous consumption fascinated people, "IOUs" substituted for money, and forgery undermined prosperity. Though Rudd went free, she was destitute and discredited; the brothers were hanged. Andrew (history, Univ. of Guelph; Philanthropy and Police) and McGowen (history, Univ. of Oregon) present a readable, meticulous study that offers insights into women's status, law, economy, and society; the work has some mass appeal. Another book on the subject, published in England this year, is Sarah Bakewell's The Smart: The True Story of Margaret Caroline Rudd and the Unfortunate Perreau Brothers (Chatto and Windus). Recommended for academic and larger public libraries. Nigel Tappin, Huntsville, Ont. Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
A tale of two crimes: the first, an endlessly juicy mystery that captivated England in the late 18th century; the second, the tragedy of that fascinating episode being done in by lifeless prose. History profs Andrew (Univ. of Guelph) and McGowen (Univ. of Oregon) dredge up a sordid affair that figures in few standard histories of England, and one that begs to be turned into a film: two 40-something twin brothers fall under the spell of a skillful courtesan who enlists them in trying to pass off a forged bond; caught in the act, the brothers are nearly let off by their would-be victims but protest their innocence a little too loudly; enter the constabulary, the judiciary, and the hangman. The tale, open-and-shut in the eyes of the presiding judge, turns out to be a bit more complicated: in exploring the case of the brothers Perreau and the beguiling Mrs. Rudd, the authors call forth conflicting testimonies, contemporary newspaper accounts marked by a loose regard for the facts, and the political climate in a time of colonial revolt and widespread anti-Scottish and anti-Semitic sentiment, all of which had bearing on the outcome. Andrew and McGowen are careful researchers, and they do a good job of elucidating the social history of the time and some of the Rashomonish qualities of Perreau/Rudd affair. Ultimately, however, their bloodless exposition overcomes the inherent interest of the story: "Although newspaper accounts dominated discussion of the case, they were supplemented by the several versions of events that appeared in pamphlet form"; "Although publishers expressed a general commitment to fairness, objectivity, and honesty, the conditions of publication militated against theirrealization"; "The actions undertaken to bring Mrs. Rudd to trial struck some as an abuse of power loaded with disturbing consequences for society." And so on, until it all becomes such a bitter chore to read that only the most dogged student of the era will persist to the index. In the hands of, say, Luc Sante, this tale of the London lowlife would have been gold. As it is, general readers should hold out for the movie.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780520220621
  • Publisher: University of California Press
  • Publication date: 10/1/2001
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 376
  • Lexile: 1310L (what's this?)
  • Product dimensions: 6.13 (w) x 9.25 (h) x 1.13 (d)

Meet the Author

Donna T. Andrew is Professor of History at the University of Guelph and author of Philanthropy and Police (1989). Randall McGowen is Professor of History at the University of Oregon.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

That, for which many their Religion, Most men their Faith, all change their honesty, Profit, (that guilded god) Commodity. He that would grow damned Rich, yet live secure, Must keep a case of Faces.

THOMAS DEKKER, If This Be Not a Good Play, the Devil's in It


London newspaper readers were startled in March 1775 to see the first reports of an extensive forgery. This crime always attracted attention in eighteenth-century Britain, if for no other reason than that a conviction almost certainly carried the offender to the gallows. The English financial system at that time was held up to a great extent by faith in the individual's word. If that faith was broken–as it was each time forgery was committed–the authorities felt compelled to punish the transgressor severely.

From the first, this was an unusual case. Two respectable men–identical twins, in fact–and an elegant woman stood accused of the offense. No doubt the social status of the suspects, and the revelations of various sordid details of the conspiracy, would have excited gossip and drawn the attention of the news-hungry press at any time. Still, the sensation created by this episode was without parallel. At each turn events followed an unexpected path. Daniel and Robert Perreau sought to fix sole responsibility for the crime on the woman, Mrs. Rudd, while she insistently proclaimed her innocence and accused them of perpetrating the scheme. Even as the bewildered authorities sought to get to the bottom of the affair, the public debated the guilt or innocence of the accused. Through the brothers' trials in June, and then in the months before Rudd's trial in December, the controversy filled the papers. The case of the Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd, one correspondent wrote to a newspaper in June, "is lately become the topic of general conversation, from the high department of state down to the microscopic atmospheres of every petty coffee and porter-house politician." Discussed in pamphlets, debated in letters to the press, with illustrations of the participants in the major magazines, the celebrated affair was impossible to avoid.

The Perreau-Rudd case preoccupied the public between March 1775 and February 1776. At first glance this attention is puzzling. Britain had, after all, entered a period of imperial crisis, one of the century's defining moments. The nation was slipping into a civil war with its American colonies. The trials of the brothers in June coincided with the first reports of bloodshed at Lexington and Concord. Yet the public was at least as much taken up with the tangled stories of the Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd as it was with the fate of empire. "So very extraordinary an affair," one pamphlet declared, "as has lately been discovered, is not to be parallelled in the history of any time or any country." Such hyperbole was typical of these self-serving publications, yet it must have come close to the truth for contemporaries reading competing newspaper accounts day after day. To more reflective commentators the attention accorded to this squalid business appeared dangerously excessive. The space given to reports of Mrs. Rudd's antics suggested that a spirit of whimsy had gripped the nation or, more darkly, that some fatal corruption had overturned notions of decency and common sense. These protests failed; the appeal of the case was irresistible, in part due to the peculiar personalities of the individuals involved, especially the inimitable Mrs. Rudd. There was also the perplexing question of where the truth lay in this murky affair. Glamour and a good mystery usually make an extraordinary trial the compelling topic of conversation. The obsessive quality of public interest in this case, however, suggests that it was more than a harmless diversion from the anxieties of the moment. Not merely an innocent preoccupation, its confusions and complexities served to compound the growing sense of a crisis of confidence brought on by difficulties at home and in the colonies.

This book attempts to explain the fascination that the affair of Mrs. Rudd and the Perreaus exerted over the country. It also offers a glimpse into neglected corners and hidden relationships within that society. The decade of the 1770s has most frequently been studied in relation to imperial concerns and their impact upon the political institutions of the day. We intend to draw a different portrait of the period, making the cause célèbre our point of entry. Familiar figures such as John Wilkes and George III, Lord Mansfield and Sir John Fielding people our book, but so do those less well known, speculators and courtesans, as well as judges and politicians. The neat categories of "respectable" and "unrespectable" do not capture the complexity of this society. When the public read about the Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd, they saw them not as aberrant types but as neighbors and acquaintances, people who embodied striking features of the age.

What was it that people recognized as they read with mingled curiosity and uneasiness the details of the case? Forgery cases often involved tales of individuals who aimed high and fell hard when they were detected. Frequently some clerk or merchant turned to crime after living a life of dissipation and extravagance. In the present instance both motives, luxury and ambition, appeared to operate. The principals, like so many Londoners, came from various corners of the British Isles. They had been drawn to the metropolis by the prospect of connection, opportunity, and advancement. London was the capital of a great empire; it was the vibrant center of trade and finance, the residence of the court, and the seat of Parliament. Coming from relatively obscure backgrounds, the Perreaus and Mrs. Rudd, in their various ways, sought to vault to the upper rungs of London's finely graded social ladder. Their biographies carry us back and forth across the city. They aspired to the glamorous world represented by the fashionable West End. Here, among the squares where the nobility and upper reaches of the professions shared addresses, the scene was composed of opulent display, polite conversation, and polished manners. To gain access to this enchanted realm required wealth. The brothers looked to the City, where stock speculation seemed to promise a shortcut to riches. Between the City and the West End lay the Covent Garden area, a world of courtesans, actresses, and prostitutes. Here was a more ambiguous neighborhood of illicit but tolerated pleasures, where beauty and wit provided another avenue to success–or, more often, a road to misery. In its midst was Bow Street, where a magistrate's court attempted to maintain order in this unruly district. Bow Street belonged both to Covent Garden and to the legal structure of the metropolis. The magistrates sent those accused of serious crimes to Newgate, the most important house of detention in the metropolis. From there delinquents were carried to trial at the Old Bailey, where eight times a year judges and juries handed down verdicts of acquittal or guilt, life or death. The condemned traveled west to Tyburn Hill, once on the edge of town but now increasingly surrounded by prosperous new streets and shopping districts. London was still intimate enough that much of what the papers offered appeared to be shared gossip rather than hard news. The Perreau-Rudd case was a metropolitan story, not only in the sense that its participants lived and operated within the town but also because its themes and emotions spoke of the quality of life there.

If the story offers a panorama of London, it also provides a gauge for tracking the shifting currents of the period. For the case captured the mood and feel of the 1770s–a mixture of folly, silliness, and excess, yet also of challenge and decision. Having gained possession of its first great empire by the conclusion of the Seven Years' War, Britain almost immediately faced intractable political and economic problems in managing these outposts. By the mid-1770s, in both its American and Indian dominions, crises of administration and finance had erupted that raised doubts about the viability or very survival of this empire. Furthermore, at home, Britain's own political system was being tested and the claims of established institutions questioned. For many contemporaries these divisive issues found expression in savage satires on the conduct of powerful personalities. The public turned to discussions of the character and even the physiognomy of individuals as a way of understanding contemporary events. In the most obvious sense, the Perreau-Rudd case fit this pattern; it presented a morality tale, expressing the disquiet felt about current social trends. Here were ambitious people, seduced by the lures and charms of the fashionable life of London, who had resorted to unscrupulous means in a desperate effort to get ahead. The catastrophe that overwhelmed the Perreau family, whatever its origins, provided a sobering lesson in the midst of a drift into war.

Seen in this light, the tale echoed themes found in a much longer tradition, often expressed in literature but especially on the stage, of dismay or outrage at the consequences of new forms of wealth. The epigraph to our book comes from a line in a 1611 play by Thomas Dekker. A familiar attack upon trade, it decried the influence of London in spawning a particular kind of character and conduct. The play's villain, in recommending a "case of faces" for anyone who wished to grow very rich, yet remain secure, advised them to acquire a box of masks, alternate personae that could be changed at will. Success required ruthlessness, safety duplicity. Seemingness, shifting identities and loyalties, were thus recognized and feared as the sine qua non of the ambitious Londoner. This anxiety is the leitmotif that runs through our case. The three principals, to different degrees and with varying success, acted different roles. As the case unfolded, evidence was offered that revealed that these handsome, well-spoken people were not as they seemed. Each week exposed some new instance of Mrs. Rudd's art. But hints of misconduct swirled around the brothers as well. The case, however, would not have been so unsettling had it amounted to no more than this, the disclosure of unpleasant truths that lay behind seemingly pleasing appearances. It was not merely another instance of duplicity exposed. What made the public especially uneasy was that while much was revealed, much else remained hidden or obscure. Even what was in plain view was susceptible to different interpretations. There seemed no way to make sense of the affair, to know, finally, who was responsible for the crime that had been committed. This was, after all, not a play; it was a legal case, one that promised a fateful outcome. The Perreau-Rudd trial was a "case of faces," both a revelation that fair might well be foul, but even worse, that it might not be possible to determine which was which. Doubt and a grim fatality haunted its progress, even as contemporaries surrendered to its spell.

Copyright © 2001 by the Regents of the University of California.
Not to be reproduced without written permission of the publisher.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


1. To the Hanging Tree
2. Alarming Crimes and Unsettling Stories
3. The Press and the Case
4. Passing Fair
5. Fashion and Its Discontents
6. Private Credit and Public Confidence
7. Debating the Law
8. Writing Her Life: Mrs. Rudd's Life Stories
9. Mrs. Rudd on Trial
10. "If
Innocents Should Suffer"
11. Looking Back


Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)