Philosophy of Law / Edition 6

Philosophy of Law / Edition 6

by Coleman Feinberg
     
 

ISBN-10: 0534524974

ISBN-13: 9780534524975

Pub. Date: 08/01/1999

Publisher: Wadsworth

Joel Feinberg's leading anthology -- now featuring new co-author Jules Coelman -- presents legal cases and essays written by many of the best scholars in legal philosophy. Effectively invigorating traditional philosophy of law themes by relating them to the real concerns of modern society, this best-selling collection continues to grow in popularity. Feinberg and…  See more details below

Overview

Joel Feinberg's leading anthology -- now featuring new co-author Jules Coelman -- presents legal cases and essays written by many of the best scholars in legal philosophy. Effectively invigorating traditional philosophy of law themes by relating them to the real concerns of modern society, this best-selling collection continues to grow in popularity. Feinberg and Coleman include an exceptional selection of relevant topics, a balance of substantive positions on controversial questions, and lightly edited classics.

While this Sixth Edition largely follows the Fifth in its organization -- moving from issues of law and liberty to justice, responsibility, and punishment -- there are many important enhancements:

  • Nineteen of the book's 79 selections are new to this edition
  • New selections include works by: Brian Bix, Jules Coleman and Arthur Ripstein, Susan Dimock, Ronald Dworkin, Joel Feinberg, Leslie Green, Mark Kelman, Anthony T. Kronman, David Luban, Toni M. Massaro, Stephen Perry, Plato, Russ Shafer-Landau, and Ernest J. Weinrib.
  • Revised section introductions enrich understanding of the readings.

Read More

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780534524975
Publisher:
Wadsworth
Publication date:
08/01/1999
Series:
Philosophy Ser.
Edition description:
Older Edition
Pages:
810
Product dimensions:
7.87(w) x 9.45(h) x (d)

Table of Contents

Preface
Pt. 1Law1
Natural Law Theory7
"Natural Law Theory"7
"The Natural Law Theory of St. Thomas Aquinas"19
The Challenge of Legal Positivism33
"A Positivist Conception of Law," from The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (1832)33
"Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules," from The Concept of Law (1961)45
"Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals"59
"Positivism and Fidelity to Law - A Reply to Professor Hart"76
"Eight Ways to Fail to Make Law," from The Morality of Law (1964)91
"Negative and Positive Positivism"95
Law from the Perspective of the Judge108
"The Dilemmas of Judges Who Must Interpret 'Immoral Laws'"108
"The Model of Rules"130
Riggs v. Palmer, Court of Appeals of New York, 1889147
"Integrity in Law," from Law's Empire (1986)152
"The Third Theory of Law"167
"The Path of the Law"174
"Legal Realism," from Law and the Modern Mind (1963)180
"Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law"182
The Moral Obligation to Obey the Law210
Crito210
"Letter from Birmingham Jail," from Why We Can't Wait (1963)219
"Difference Made Legal: The Court and Dr. King"227
Pt. 2Liberty254
The Case for Self-Determination259
"The Liberal Argument," from On Liberty (1859)259
Challenges to Self-Determination271
"Paternalism," from Morality and the Law (1971)271
Constitutional Privacy281
Griswold v. Connecticut, United States Supreme Court, 1965281
Roe v. Wade, United States Supreme Court, 1973287
Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvanis v. Casey, United States Supreme Court, 1992291
Bowers v. Hardwick, United States Supreme Court, 1986295
Freedom of Expression and Its Limits306
"Limits to the Free Expression of Opinion"306
Cohen v. California, United States Supreme Court, 1971322
Village of Skokie v. National Socialist Party of America, Supreme Court of Illinois, 1978326
Texas v. Johnson, United States Supreme Court, 1989330
"Civil Rights versus Civil Liberties: The Case of Discriminatory Verbal Harassment"339
Principles of Constitutional Interpretation356
"The Right of Privacy: The Construction of a Constitutional Time Bomb," from The Tempting of America (1990)356
"Discovering Fundamental Values," from Democracy and Distrust (1980)359
"Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning"374
Pt. 3Justice389
The Machinery of Justice: Three Sample Procedural Problems394
"Torture and Plea Bargaining"394
"Jury Nullification," from Conflicts of Law and Morality (1987)404
"The Serpent Beguiled Me and I Did Eat: Entrapment and the Creation of Crime"409
Justice and Compensation419
"Mischief and Misfortune"419
"Loss, Agency and Responsibility for Outcomes: Three Conceptions of Corrective Justice"439
Justice and Contract453
"Contract Law and Distributive Justice"453
"Babies for Sale: Reflections on the Baby M Case"471
"Surrogate Motherhood as Prenatal Adoption"484
Justice, Affirmative Action and Racial Quotas492
"Equal Treatment and Compensatory Discrimination"492
"The Message of Affirmative Action"499
California Constitution, Article I sec. 31513
Inequality and Gender514
"The Reasonable Woman"514
State v. Rusk, Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1981519
Regina v. Morgan, House of Lords, 1976523
State v. Kelly, Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984525
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, United States Supreme Court, 1981530
"Sexuality, Authenticity, and Modernity"538
Pt. 4Responsibility549
Responsibility for Results554
"The Impossibility of General Strict Liability"554
"Causation and Responsibility," from Causation in the Law (1959)572
"The Decline of Cause"584
"Blame, Punishment and the Role of Result"592
Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad Co., New York Court of Appeals 1928598
Summers v. Tice, Supreme Court of California, 1948604
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, Supreme Court of California, 1980608
Responsibility for Nonintervention623
"Notes on the Indian Penal Code," from Works of Lord Macaulay (1866)623
"The Case for a Duty to Rescue"625
Some Criminal Defenses646
People v. Young, New York Court of Appeals, 1962646
"The Case of the Speluncean Explorers"648
"The Case of Lady Eldon's French Lace"663
The M'Naghten Rules, House of Lords (1843)668
The Insanity Defense, from Model Penal Code (1956)669
State v. Guido, New Jersey Supreme Court, 1963672
"What Is So Special About Mental Illness?" from Doing and Deserving (1970)674
Pt. 5Punishment683
What Is Legal Punishment?688
"The Expressive Function of Punishment," from Doing and Deserving (1970)688
"Shame, Culture and American Criminal Law"699
What, If Anything, Justifies Legal Punishment?727
"The Classic Debate"727
"Fantastic Counterexamples and the Utilitarian Theory," from Crime, Guilt and Punishment (1987)732
"The Moral Worth of Retribution"746
"The Failure of Retributivism"769
Victims' Rights: Restitution or Vengeance?780
"Retributivism: A Test Case for Ethical Objectivity"780
"Getting Even: The Role of the Victim"788
Payne v. Tennessee, United States Supreme Court, 1990799
The Death Penalty817
Furman v. Georgia, United States Supreme Court, 1972817
Woodson v. North Carolina, United States Supreme Court, 1976826
"In Defense of the Death Penalty: A Practical and Moral Analysis"836
"Should We Execute Those Who Deserve to Die?" from An Eye for an Eye: The Morality of Punishing by Death (1987)842

Read More

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >