Pitch Dark

( 1 )

Overview

"What’s new. What else. What next. What’s happened here."
 
Pitch Dark, Renata Adler's follow up to her prize winning book Speedboat, is a book of questions. It is also a book of false starts, red herrings, misunderstandings, and all-too-fleeting revelations. Kate Ennis is poised at a critical moment in her affair with a married lover, and moments (conversations, things unsaid, misunderstandings) of that fraught relationship reverberate ...
See more details below
Paperback
$11.70
BN.com price
(Save 16%)$14.00 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (10) from $7.76   
  • New (7) from $7.76   
  • Used (3) from $8.11   
Pitch Dark

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$10.49
BN.com price
(Save 25%)$14.00 List Price

Overview

"What’s new. What else. What next. What’s happened here."
 
Pitch Dark, Renata Adler's follow up to her prize winning book Speedboat, is a book of questions. It is also a book of false starts, red herrings, misunderstandings, and all-too-fleeting revelations. Kate Ennis is poised at a critical moment in her affair with a married lover, and moments (conversations, things unsaid, misunderstandings) of that fraught relationship reverberate throughout the novel, following Kate from her house in rural Connecticut and her New York City brownstone apartment, to a small island off the coast of Washington, and to an utterly dark road in a remote corner of Ireland. Told in Adler’s celebrated fragmented style, and constructed from the bare bones language of everyday life, Pitch Dark transcends its parts to come to the kind of wisdom achievable only after a relentless quest.
 
“Renata Adler has succeeded with Kate in creating a character worth the trouble of writing and reading about, because of Kate's lively ideas, her intelligent opinions, her funny narrative style and her wonderful access to her own honesty. We feel for her plight, her broken heart, her love story.” —Muriel Spark, The New York Times
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher
“Two things hold Pitch Dark together and give it speed and magic. The first is Miss Adler’s gift for language and observation . . . and the second is her willingness to write candidly, even rawly, about emotions.” —Michiko Kakutani, The New York Times

“These novels are records of a penetrating intelligence, a skeptical intelligence (but, thank God, not a reflexively skeptical intelligence). They are novels that persuade you of their claims to truth, and ones in which any literate young person in publishing in New York can see a bit of her or himself […] It’s great to have these novels back in print, at long last.” —Meghan O’Rourke, The  New Yorker’s Page-Turner Blog

"Adler's novels concede the necessity of making fiction quicker, more terse, descriptively less elaborate than the traditional thing called a novel, not so much in deference to shrunken attention spans, but as the most plausible way of rendering the distracted, fragmentary quality of contemporary consciousness [...] They describe what it's like to be living now, during this span of time, in our particular country and our particular world. This is what the best novels have always done, and with any luck will continue to do." —Gary Indiana, Bookforum

"Pitch Dark, like Speedboat, exudes a certain openness, a vulnerability, even. Adler dispenses with the defined paths of traditional narrative, along with expectations of order and sequence, and instead pieces together a collage of consciousness." —Jennifer Szalai, The New York Times Book Review

“Imaginative, intelligent, and original.” —Elizabeth Hardwick

“If you simply allow [Adler’s fragments] to settle in their own patterns, flashing light where they will, you’ll find Pitch Dark a bright kaleidoscope of a book.” —Anne Tyler

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781590176146
  • Publisher: New York Review Books
  • Publication date: 3/19/2013
  • Pages: 168
  • Sales rank: 787,591
  • Product dimensions: 4.90 (w) x 7.80 (h) x 0.60 (d)

Meet the Author

Renata Adler is an American journalist, critic, and novelist. Born in 1938 in Milan and raised in Connecticut, she was educated at Bryn Mawr, Harvard, the Sorbonne, and Yale Law School. Adler began her writing career at The New Yorker in 1962 and, except for a year spent as the chief film critic for The New York Times (1968–69), remained on staff there for the next four decades. Her essay collections include A Year in the Dark and Toward a Radical Middle, both from 1969; Reckless Disregard: Westmoreland v. CBS et al., Sharon v. Time (1986); and Canaries in the Mineshaft (2001). Her 1976 novel Speedboat won the Ernest Hemingway Award for Best First Novel; in 1983 it was followed by Pitch Dark.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

                                    I. ORCAS ISLAND
 
We were running flat out. The opening was dazzling. The middle was dazzling. The ending was dazzling. It was like a steeplechase composed entirely of hurdles.
 
But that would not be a steeplechase at all. It would be more like a steep, steep climb.
 
They were shouting, Tell it, big momma, tell it. I mean, the child is only six years old.
 
Do I need to stylize it, then, or can I tell it as it was?
 
He knew that she had left him when she began to smoke again.
 
Look here, you know, I loved you.
 
I wonder whether he will ever ask himself, say to himself, Well,
she wasn't asking all the earth, why did I let her go?
 
 
My back went up, Viola Teagarden used to say, with a little thrill of self-importance, pride and pleasure, head raised, nostrils
Haring, back straightening slightly, as though she had received a small electric charge right through her chair. My back went up.
 
She also spoke with a kind of awe of what she called "my anger," as though it were a living, prized possession, a thoroughbred bull, for instance, to be used at stud, or as a man who has married a beautiful,
unpredictably unpleasant woman, far richer and younger than himself, might say "my wife." Leander Dworkin, too, though he hardly knew Viola and in fact despised her, had what he called "my rage." It resembled, sometimes a hothouse of imaginary grievances under lavish cultivation, sometimes a pulse which he measured constantly to see whether, with whom, and to what degree he must be angry, sometimes a source of astonishment and pleasure, sometimes just a horse to be taken for a canter or a gallop on the moors.
In times of rage, he wanted nothing to distract or mollify him. Even flattery, for which his appetite was otherwise undiscriminating and enormous, would infuriate him on his way to an apotheosis. A few people humored him in this. They were his friends. Inevitably,
it was with one or more of these few friends that he was angry—a source, at first, always of distress, since he broke off with words as harsh as they were capricious, and then, for the long quiet interval that followed, of relief.
 
To begin with, I almost went, alone, to Graham Island.
 
He thought of himself, even spoke of himself, as extraordinarily handsome. His hair, which grew to collar length, was reddish. His hairline was receding; his eyes, which blinked constantly over his contact lenses, were the palest blue. Though he was by no means a strikingly ugly man, the source of his belief in his physical beauty seemed to lie in this: that he was tall. Leander Dworkin was the amplifying poet. ·Willie Stokes was the poet of compression. Both taught poetry, and wrote novels, when we were in graduate school.
We met in two improbable seminars, taught by great men. Notions of Paradise, and Sound in Literature. The first was literary utopias,
essentially; the second, onomatopoeia. Both were so crowded at the start that students had to be selected on the basis of some claim of special knowledge. In Paradise, that year, we had one grandson of
Oneida, one nun, one believer in the Skinner box, some students of Rousseau, the Constitution, Faust and Plato, and one participant in experiments with a new drug, psylocybin, under the guidance of Leary and Alpert, two young instructors in psychology. In Sound,
I remember just one specialist, a pale, dark-haired Latin scholar,
who rocked continuously in his chair whenever he read us onomatopoetic phrases he had found among the classics. The murmuring of innumerable bees in immemorial elms; l'insecte nette gratte la secheresse. Fairly late in the semester, when we were asked what our papers were going to be about, this young man said he wanted to write about the sound of corpses floating through literature. Oh,
the professor said, with some enthusiasm, after just a moment's hesitation,
you mean Ophelia. No, the young man replied, I want the sound of the sea.
 
To begin with, I almost went, instead, to Graham Island.
For a woman, it is always, don't you see, Scheherazade.
In nineteen sixty-four, the dean announced to the trustees that,
for all intents and purposes-meetings, sleep, meals, electricity, demands upon her time and one another's—the students had abolished night.
 
"Brahms," he said, in explaining to a colleague why he did not attend that autumn's campus concert series. "All of it was Brahms.
All, every. Eight. Things. Of Brahms."
 
Though he was my friend, I did not see Leander Dworkin often.
We found that our friendship was safer on the telephone. Sometimes we spoke daily. Sometimes we did not speak for a year or more. But the bond between us, I think, was less stormy, and in some ways more intense, than Leander's relations with people he actually saw. Once every few years, we would have dinner together,
or a drink, or just a visit. Sometimes alone, more rarely with someone with whom he was living and whom he wanted me to meet.
One night, when we had gone, I think, off campus for hamburgers,
. I noticed, on Leander's wrist, several thin, brown, frayed and separating strands, like a tattered cuff of rope. Leander said it was an elephant-hair bracelet, and that Simon, his lover, had given it to him. It was frayed because he always forgot to remove it, as he ought to, before taking showers. Elephant hairs, it seems, are talismanic. It was going to bring him luck. Elephant-hair bracelets are expensive; they are paid for by the strand. In the following year,
Leander wrote many poems, and at last received his tenure. When we met again, months later, the frayed strands were gone. In their place was a thin, round, sturdy band of gold, which encased,
Leander said, a single elephant hair. When I asked what had happened to the old bracelet, he said, "I lost it, I think. Or I threw it out." For some time, Leander had spoken, on the phone, of a woman, a painter, whom he had met, one afternoon, outside the gym, and whom he was trying to introduce, along with Simon, into his apartment and his life. The woman was in love with him, he said. She was married to a real-estate tycoon. Her name was
Leonore. He was anxious for me to meet her. I knew that, in addition to his appetite for quarrels, Leander likes triads, complications,
any variant of being paid for. But I looked at the bracelet, and I
thought of Simon, and I thought, Leonore plays rough.
 
 
It was as boring, you know, as droning, and repetitive as a waltz,
as a country-and-western lament in waltz time. It was as truly awful as a vin rosé.                 
 
Well, what did you pull out ahead of me on the road for, from a side street, when there were no other cars in sight behind me, if you were going to drive more slowly than I did?
 
It was early evening, in the city. The TV was on. We watched
The Newlywed Game. The moderator had just asked the contestant,
a young wife from Virginia, What is your husband's least favorite rodent? "His least favorite rodent," she replied, drawling serenely and without hesitation. "Oh, I think that would have to be the saxophone."
 
He knew that she had left him when she began to smoke again.
Is that where it begins?
I don't know. I don't know where it begins. It is where I am.
I know where you are. You are here. She had left him, then?
Years ago, he had smoked, but not when they met. So she stopped, as people do when they are in love. Take up cigarettes, or give them up, or change brands. As people do to be at one at least in this. Long after that, she began to smoke again.
 
So he knew she had left him?
 
Not knew, not left. Not right away, or just at first.
 
Why don't you begin then with at first?
 
Look, you can begin with at first, or it seems, or once upon a time.
 
Or in the city of P.
 
Or in the city of P. In the rain. But I can't. It is not what I
know how to do.
 
Well, you must get these things straight, you know, resolve them in your mind before you write them down.
 
From the moment she knew that she was going to leave him,
she started to look old. There was about her a sudden dimming, as in a bereavement or an illness, which in a way it was. He. They.
Look, I would start short, if I could, with something shorter. The story of the boy, for instance, who did not cry wolf. Except that, of necessity, we can have no notion of that story, since the boy of course is dead.
 
So is the one who did cry wolf.
 
True, but he lasted longer.
 
Probably. I suppose that's right. He knew that she was going to leave him when she began to smoke again.
 
You can rely too much, my love, on the unspoken things. And the wry smile. I have that smile myself, and I've learned the silence, too, over the years. Along with your expressions, like No notion and Of necessity. What happens, though, when it is all unsaid, is that you wake up one morning, no, it's more like late one afternoon, and it's not just unsaid, it's gone. That's all. Just gone.
I remember this word, that look, that small inflection, after all this time. I used to hold them, trust them, read them like a rune. Like a sign that there was a house, a billet, a civilization where we were.
I look back and I think I was just there all alone. Collecting wisps and signs. Like a spinster who did know a young man once and who imagines ever since that she lost a fiancé in the war. Or an old fellow who, having spent months long ago in uniform at some dreary outpost nowhere near any country where there was a front,
remembers buddies he never had, dying beside him in battles he was never in.
 
Hey, wait.
 
All right. There was, of course, a public world as well.
I was there, in Montgomery, Alabama, on a summer's day in the late seventies, when the Attorney General of the United States,
a Southerner himself, spoke at the ceremony in which a local judge,
who had worked for more than twenty years, with courage and humanity and in virtual isolation, on the federal district court, was promoted to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. That court, like the district court under the local judge, had been a great court,
decent, honorable, articulate and brave. The Attorney General himself had, for some years, been a member of it—quite often, as it happened, in dissent. Here he was, though, in the late seventies,
the Attorney General, Old Mushmouth, as the wife of one of the court's more distinguished judges had always, somewhat injudiciously and in his absence, called him, here he was, the Attorney
General of the United States, speaking at the inauguration of a great federal district judge into a great federal appellate court. He mentioned the Ku Klux Klan. He alluded to it several times, the
Klan. And each time, he referred to its membership, the members of the Klan, he called them. Clamsmen. No question about it, that's how he pronounced it. Clamsmen. It was no reflection on the
Attorney ·General. True, the judge's wife had never thought much of his diction. True, in the court's most important decisions, he had been so often in dissent. But years had passed. He had come to speak well and to do honor. And this business of the Clamsmen,
well, it may have had to do with molluscs, bivalves. Even crustaceans.
I remember a young radical, in the sixties, denouncing her roommates as prawns of imperialism.
 
 
Alone. What an odd gloss we have here on Alone at last. Since alone at last, for every hero in a gothic, every villain in a melodrama,
traditionally assumes a cast of two.
 
You know I hate wisecracks.
 
So do I.
 
 
One morning, in the early nineteen-eighties, Viola Teagarden filed a suit in a New York State court against Claudia Denneny for libel. Also named as defendants were a public television station and a talk-show host. Viola Teagarden's lawyer, Ezra Paris, had been, all his life, a civil libertarian; in every prior suit, he had been on the side of the right to speak, to print, to publish. He was em-
barrassed by Teagarden v. Denneny et al., which, as he knew, had no legal merit. He justified it to himself on grounds, of which Viola had persuaded him, that she was sad, hurt, pitiable, distraught. He also thought, in friendship, that he owed her something. Her current book was dedicated to him. But his province had always been the First Amendment, and he preferred not to think about who was paying his rather considerable legal fees, Martin Pix, a young, immensely rich, vaguely leftish media executive, who had recently come, yacht and fortune, into Viola's special circle. That circle, as
I gradually came to understand, was one of the most important cultural manifestations of its time.
 
 
Look here, you know, look here. All the things she had too much class to mention were the things he never knew.
 
Well, but that's the point. I mean, it hardly takes much class not to mention things if he already knows them anyway.
 
 
It was as though he had been born in the presence of the doubt,
the censor, the laugher at serious things, the unlaughing member in the audience of a comedian, the voluble warner against places where there is no danger, the reticent giver of directions toward a place through which no one has safely passed. The check was forever less than half a step behind the impulse. Clamped to the hoof of the Arabian horse of thought, report, or feeling, there were always the teeth of the question: is this altogether true? The least of the harm in it was the waste of energy and attention, in having always to be doubly sure, in letting pass the moments of high possibility,
in seldom taking action, in having always just a bit to understate and overprove.
 
Wait, wait, wait, wait. Can you not avoid, on the one hand,
the Rorid, overly elaborate, on the other hand, the arid exploration of that after all limitless desert rock of desolation called Square One?
 
What are you, some sort of anti-claque?
 
 
Sometimes he loved her, sometimes he was just amused and touched by the degree to which she loved him. Sometimes he was bored by her love and felt it as a burden. Sometimes his sense of himself was enhanced, sometimes diminished by it. But he had come to take the extent of her love as given, and, as such, he lost interest in it. She may have given him this certainty too early, and not just out of genuine attachment. One falls out of gradations of love and despair, after all, every few days, or months, or minutes.
With courtesy, then, and also for the sake, for the sake of the long rhythms, she kept the facade in place and steady, unaffected by every nuance of caring and not caring. He distrusted her sometimes,
but on the wrong grounds. He thought of her as light with the truth, and lawless. And she, who was not in other ways dishonest,
who was in fact honorable in his ways and in others, was perhaps dishonest in this: that not to risk losing him, or for whatever other reason, she concealed, no, she did not insist that he see, certain important facets of her nature. She pretended, though with her particular form of nervous energy she was not always able to pretend this, that she was more content than she was, that her love for him was more constant than, within the limits that he set, it could be.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(1)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 2, 2013

    Genius---- Brilliant fun........A MUST READ!!!! THANK YOU FOR RE

    Genius---- Brilliant fun........A MUST READ!!!! THANK YOU FOR REPRINTING THIS!!!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)