- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
All (11) from $14.77
-
Used (11) from $14.77
Ships from: Frederick, MD
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Marietta, OH
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Richmond, TX
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Martinez, CA
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Mt. Prospect, IL
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Mt. Prospect, IL
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Mt. Prospect, IL
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Punta Gorda, FL
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: Punta Gorda, FL
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Ships from: columbus, OH
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Stuart left Virginia under acting on General Robert E. Lee's discretionary orders to advance into Maryland and Pennsylvania, where he was to screen Lt. Gen. Richard Ewell's marching infantry corps and report on enemy activity. The mission jumped off its tracks from virtually the moment it began when one unexpected event after another unfolded across Stuart's path. For days, neither Lee nor Stuart had any idea where the other was, and the enemy blocked the horseman's direct route back to the Confederate army, which was advancing nearly blind north into Pennsylvania. By the time Stuart reached Lee on the afternoon of July 2, the armies had unexpectedly collided at Gettysburg, the second day's fighting was underway, and one of the campaign's greatest controversies was born.
Did the plumed cavalier disobey Lee's orders by stripping the army of its "eyes and ears?" Was Stuart to blame for the unexpectedcombat the broke out at Gettysburg on July 1? Authors Wittenberg and Petruzzi, widely recognized for their study and expertise of Civil War cavalry operations, have drawn upon a massive array of primary sources, many heretofore untapped, to fully explore Stuart's ride, its consequences, and the intense debate among participants shortly after the battle, through early post-war commentators, and among modern scholars.
The result is a richly detailed study jammed with incisive tactical commentary, new perspectives on the strategic role of the Southern cavalry, and fresh insights on every horse engagement, large and small, fought during the campaign. About the authors: Eric J. Wittenberg has written widely on Civil War cavalry operations. His books include Glory Enough for All (2002), The Union Cavalry Comes of Age (2003), and The Battle of Monroe's Crossroads and the Civil War's Final Campaign (2005). He lives in Columbus, Ohio.
J. David Petruzzi is the author of several magazine articles on Eastern Theater cavalry operations, conducts tours of cavalry sites of the Gettysburg Campaign, and is the author of the popular "Buford's Boys" website at www.bufordsboys.com. Petruzzi lives in Brockway, Pennsylvania.
Anonymous
Posted September 19, 2006
This excellent book examines one of the more fascinating and controversial aspects of the Gettysburg campaign. As the title implies the authors find 'Plenty of Blame to Go Around' regarding the Confederate loss at Gettysburg rather than simply subscribe to the simplistic version that Stuart failed Lee and either contributed to, or in fact caused the Confederate defeat. They examine Stuart's mission and actions in detail using a wealth of memoirs, letters and other primary sources previously untapped by other historians. They arrive at some sound conclusions, meticulously disecting the controversies and setting the record straight. The book is richly illustrated with photographs of the participants (many of which I've not seen before) and excellent maps of the theater of operations. As there is no substitute for standing on the acutal ground where these events took place, the book includes a first rate driving tour with easily followed directions so the reader can spend a day following in the footsteps of history and gaining a better appreciation of what did, and what did not occur. This is in my opinion the definitive work on Stuart's actions during the Gettysburg campaign and is a 'must read' for any student of the Gettysburg battle or of Civil War Cavalry operations.
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted September 27, 2009
I found the book totally unconvincing and intellectually shallow. There were also many typos/grammar errors. Not recommended.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted November 26, 2006
Very well-written book: nicely paced and easy to follow. There are actually three books in one here: A very detailed look at the ride, a thorough review of the contentious criticism and defense of the ride, and then a nice driving tour to finish things off. The authors used a number of new primary sources to augment the telling of the story of the ride itself. The attention to important details during the ride make the tail interesting both in terms of an enjoyable read, as well as for future reference work for Gettysburg students. The 3 chapters devoted to the controversy are nicely laid out - I particularly liked the extended quotes. One doesn't have to worry too much about 'taking things out of context.' The author's conclusions in the 3rd chapter are well thought out, and presented in a very clear manner. The addition of the driving tour is also very nice - one can certainly imagine taking a day (or two) and driving along the route laid out, and reviewing the critical points of the battle as presented in the book. All in all, a delightful read, and a wonderful resource on this critical part of the Gettysburg Battle. (As to the related title recommendation, after reading Plenty of Blame, if you are hankering for some more, go read Mr. Wittenberg's book on the critical cavalry action on Brinkerhoff's Ridge and East Cavalry Field.)
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted November 24, 2006
Very early, not long after midnight in fact, on June 25, 1863, J.E.B. Stuart and his staff mounted up and began the most controversial ride any cavalrymen would make during the Civil War. The trip would take them within six miles of Georgetown, just outside of Washington. They would pass on, capture a significant Union supply train, cross the Potomac, tear up the C & O Canal, canter across Maryland, and enter Pennsylvania, where they would fight a couple of engagements and go so far north as Carlisle, outside Harrisburg, the state capital. There, on the evening of July 1, Stuart would get the order to rejoin the Confederate army at Gettysburg. When he finally faced his commander, Stuart heard these words: ¿General Stuart, where have you been?¿ After giving a response, Lee¿s disappointment was manifest. ¿I have not heard a word from you for days, and you the eyes and ears of my army.¿ All histories of the Gettysburg Campaign deal with Lee¿s question, where was Stuart? His attempt to again ride around the Union Army, as he had been able to do with relative impunity in 1862, is well known. The difficulties he created for Lee, who entered unfamiliar ground once he crossed the Potomac, have been widely discussed. But Stuart¿s ride has never received the full, detailed study it deserves until this book¿s recent release. Both of the author¿s are well-respected authorities on Civil War cavalry, and as the title of the work implies, they conclude that Stuart was hardly alone in carrying the blame for his absence from Lee¿s army at such a crucial time. The book contains a thorough and well-written description of just where Stuart was, and of the orders and correspondence that were part of the decision- making process. All of the actions and engagements that Stuart¿s troopers participated in are well described, even the least known, such as the Battle of Hunterstown on July 2. (Since the subject is Stuart¿s ride to Gettysburg, the cavalry engagement on July 3 is not discussed.) Nearly half of the book is devoted to ¿the controversy,¿ to the debate that started shortly after Gettysburg was fought about how costly Stuart¿s absence was to the Army of Northern Virginia. Lee being the infallible figure he was to many in the South, Stuart was a logical and available scapegoat on which to hang blame for the lost battle, and later for the lost war. The authors fully set out their own conclusions, but give their readers plenty of facts so that you can reach your own about how much blame Stuart should have shouldered. They also provide plenty of great maps and pictures, as well as a terrific description of a driving tour you can take the next time you are near Gettysburg. Get the book. It¿s good.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted October 31, 2006
Authors Wittenberg and Petruzzi have written a fine study on the exploits of J.E.B. Stuart's cavalry, and their long road to the battlefield at Gettysburg. It is a spellbinding account of what they went through from the crossing of the Potomac River, and then through the trials and tribulations and hardships they all encountered during those days of late June and early July, 1863. As the title suggests, the book offers a full interpretation of those who were involved in the events of this part of the campaign, and the authors account is a fair and balanced look at the mistakes made, what was done right, and just how the word luck becomes a part of such a movement that took place over those days in early summer, 1863. The research done is impeccable, and the authors have found nuggets that add to the story, and are for the first time included in this book. The book is filled with photos of those involved, and the maps included helps the student to follow the action as described in the narrative. The footnotes are a must read on their own, and helps to expand the tale of the journey that Stuart and his troopers found themselves in those few days. The inclusion of Stuart's after battle report on his part in the Gettysburg Campaign adds to the book, and as one reads it, you can tell when he wrote it, he was already fielding questions about his 'delay' in reuniting with the main body of Lee's Army. The addition of a driving tour for those sites mentioned in the narrative completes the book, and is an a fine feature for those who wish to follow the roads Stuart and his men traversed on their way to Gettysburg. The authors include a photo of the Felty Barn, which was a landmark at the Battle of Hunterstown. Unfortunately, the barn was torn down recently, but am glad a photo of the place was taken before its demise. Highly recommend this book, and know students of the Civil War will not be disappointed in reading this extraordinary story.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted February 2, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted February 13, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted February 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Overview