Politics By Other Means: Law in the Struggle Against Apartheid, 1980-1994

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
$47.08
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $3.71
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 93%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (13) from $3.71   
  • New (3) from $53.75   
  • Used (10) from $3.71   

Overview

Politics by Other Means explores the fundamental question of how law can constrain political power by offering a pathbreaking account of the triumphant final decade of the struggle against apartheid.

Richard Abel presents case studies of ten major legal campaigns including: challenges to pass laws; black trade union demands for recognition; state terror; censorship; resistance to the "independent" homelands; and treason trials.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Jonathan Klaaren
As this review is written in May 1996, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission is concluding a series of hearings, held in East London, Cape Town, Johannesburg, and Durban, designed to give the victims of apartheid of all political persuasions a chance to tell their stories. From these stories -- and others unearthed through further hearings, archival research, and in the field investigation as well as the stories of the perpetrators -- the Commission will attempt to fulfill its mandate of national reconciliation through discovering the truth of the events between 1960 and 1993. Many South Africans seem to be placing great faith (or at least great hope) in the Commission's ability to discover what really happened in this time period. Indeed, the discovery of the truth is the explicit quid pro quo for amnesty; within certain limits of proportionality, the perpetrators may trade their stories for immunity from criminal prosecution and civil liability. In one sense, Richard Abel's book, POLITICS BY OTHER MEANS, LAW IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST APARTHEID, 1980-1994, engages in a story-telling enterprise similar to that of the Truth Commission. Abel employs a largely descriptive method, presenting detailed histories of "ten pivotal legal campaigns during the last years of apartheid." (3). These ten campaigns cover a wide scope of anti-apartheid action. Abel begins in Chapter 3 with the 1980s victories of the Legal Resources Centre, a public interest legal organization, against the pass laws that restricted the rights of blacks to reside in urban areas. Another campaign featured both the collective resistance of the End Conscription Campaign and the individual trials of several white conscientious objectors to military service in the South African Defence Force (Chapter 4). Abel also covers similar high-profile legal events such as the Alexandra treason trial (Chapter 9), the three month closing of a leading anti-apartheid newspaper (Chapter 8), and the granting of an interdict restraining the police in Port Elizabeth from torturing emergency detainees (Chapter 7). Perhaps fittingly, a key figure in this last event who exposed the prevalence of official torture, Wendy Orr, sits presently as a member of the Truth Commission. Other chapters treat legal campaigns revolving around issues of labor and land. South Africa's longest-running labor dispute saw the union, Metal and Allied Workers' Union, winning the final court battle but losing the war against the employer in not being able to return to work when faced with a newly hired work force (Chapter 5). The same trade union, aligned with the United Democratic Front, suffered murders at the hands of and engaged in violence with Inkatha in the Natal midlands (Chapter 6). Two chapters cover the general topic of forced removals, where residents of an urban township (Chapter 12) and a black village in a "white area" (Chapter Page 96 follows: 10) were able to ultimately resist government efforts to move them. In another campaign around land issues, the residents of the Moutse district used both ethnicity and gender to fight against incorporation into KwaNdebele, one of the apartheid Bantustans or homelands (Chapter 11). The bulk of the book is thus a presentation of these "narratives of resistance through law" (6), occasionally in detail that is downright excessive. Yet of course, these narratives are employed, like the Truth Commission, towards a certain end. In Abel's case, this end is the attempt to "understand the value and limits of legality in resisting authoritarian regimes." (3). For Abel, "South Africa . . . presents the ideal setting in which to explore the central question of jurisprudence: the circumstances under which, extent to which, and ways in which legality constrains state power." (3). The material presented in this narrative format is the major strength of the book. Indeed, its value as a record is acknowledged in a cover blurb by Albie Sachs, a former ANC stalwart who is presently a Justice of South Africa's Constitutional Court: "Many U.S. scholars pronounced boldly and brilliantly on the evolving situation in South Africa, and got it all wrong. Rick Abel was more modest and painstaking in his endeavors, and he got it right. This study is a meticulously recorded version of some of the major political trials in the last decade of apartheid." In another sense, however, Abel's project differs significantly from the Truth Commission's. The stories Abel tells are based upon a conception of truth that is considerably less robust than that implied by the Commission's statutory duty "to establish the truth in relation to past events." Certainly, the Commission would agree with Abel that some parts of these stories will never be known with certainty. For instance, Abel forthrightly engages in informed speculation about the causes of the bureaucratic reaction to the Legal Resources Centre's successful test cases against the pass laws. (63-64). But Abel goes beyond such an acknowledgment of incomplete knowledge. He is alive to the notion that the truth is inherently ambiguous: "A threshold lesson is humility about the possibility of ascertaining the "truth" about what happened (a variant of the fact skepticism of legal realists like Jerome Frank). Why were the four MAWU supporters driving around the armed Inkatha encampment the night before the rally? Certainly not seeking a quiet place for Phineas and Flomena to make love [as they claimed]." (203) Abel states elsewhere that "facts are almost always ambiguous." (536 but cf. 534). Moreover, Abel also argues against the truth of sociological generalizations. At least in regard to his subject material here, high-level political trials/campaigns, the sociologist capitulates to the historian: "This book concerns large, complex events, extending over many years, involving scores of participants, with repercussions for the entire society. Each case is idiosyncratic and inherently unpredictable, peculiar not only to South Africa in the 1980s but also to the unique conjuncture of time, place, and actors. Historical interpretation must complement, and often displace, sociological generalization." (545). Abel highlights the character of individuals and the important role of chance. Still, beneath all protestations of mere Page 97 follows: story-telling lies some form of social theory. Abel is explicit in viewing law as relatively autonomous from politics (Chapter 2). However, more fundamental to his project is his theory of collective action, contained within his primary unit of analysis, a legal campaign. The first step is "the construction of adversaries: who they are and whether individual or collective." (524) Second, parties will choose a mode of engagement. In Abel's view, executive, legislative or adjudicative action (that is, legal action) is usually a second choice for both opposition and government after the option of negotiation. (525). Third, a party has to choose whether to be proactive or reactive. Here, with the planning advantages on the side of the government, Abel concludes that law was more effective as a shield (reactive) rather than as a sword (proactive) for the opposition. (527f). Abel also forthrightly answers his own question about the worth of law in opposing unjust regimes: "[D]id law make a difference? The bottom line is an unambiguous yes. The opposition secured victories in court that eluded them elsewhere and did so at least partly because of law." (533). Indeed, Abel places himself in a theoretical tradition seeing the rule of law as a universal cultural achievement. (3). What Abel arguably deemphasizes is the cultural role law may play in such campaigns. For instance, Abel is aware of the problems of assuming rather than explaining identity but he at times paints government and opposition with a broad brush that may not withstand finer-grained analysis. Interestingly enough, an emphasis on the role of ordinary people as opposed to their legal representatives is a principal theme of the short foreword by none other than President Nelson Mandela. These conclusions about the role of law in collective action together with some characterizations of South African society form perhaps the secondary strength of the book. Together they constitute a number of propositions about the role of law during this time period and in South African society more generally which are ripe for research. For instance, borrowing from Toqueville, Abel asserts that legality is as important to South African political culture -- both in constructing apartheid and in opposing it -- as it has been to that of the United States. (11-12). Moreover, contrary to present memories, Abel writes that "[t]he legal profession . . . failed to champion the rule of law." (19) Finally, noting the South African commentators' "obsess[ion]" with the constitutional framework, Abel forecasts that "at least as significant as substantive rules are the organization and composition of legal institutions: the bench, prosecutorial branch, and the legal profession." (548). With suggestions such as these coupled to the accounts of some of the significant anti-apartheid legal campaigns, Abel's book will serve both as a first-level history -- such as the Truth Commission may provide -- but also as a guide in understanding the role of law in South African society.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780415908177
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis
  • Publication date: 6/20/1995
  • Series: After the Law Series
  • Edition description: ANN
  • Pages: 664
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 1.34 (d)

Meet the Author

Richard Abel teaches law at UCLA and has published numerous books and articles on the legal profession and informal justice.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Foreword
Foreword
Foreword
Preface
Glossary of Acronyms and Foreign Words
Ch. 1 Speaking with the Ogre 1
Ch. 2 Politics by Other Means? 7
Ch. 3 Carving Loopholes in the Pass Laws 23
Ch. 4 White Resistance to the Military 67
Ch. 5 Seeking Recognition 125
Ch. 6 Mpophomeni and the War in Natal 173
Ch. 7 State Terrorism: The Response of Law and Medicine to Police Torture 211
Ch. 8 Censorship and the Closure of the New Nation 259
Ch. 9 The Alexandra Treason Trial 311
Ch. 10 Bakwena ba Magopa: The Last Forced Removal 385
Ch. 11 Moutse and KwaNdebele: Ethnicity and Gender in the Challenge to Grand Apartheid 435
Ch. 12 Disestablishing Oukasie 495
Ch. 13 The Roles of Law 523
Notes 551
References 597
Index 631
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)