Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths

Overview

From the grisly investigations showcased on highly rated television shows like CSI to the bestselling mysteries that revolve around forensic science, medical examiners have never been so visible-or compelling. They, and they alone, solve the riddle of suspicious death and the existential questions that come with it. Why did someone die? Could it have been prevented? What are the implications of ruling a death a suicide, a homicide, or an accident? Can medical examiners unmask ...
See more details below
Hardcover (1)
$27.50
BN.com price
(Save 14%)$32.00 List Price
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (10) from $4.77   
  • New (5) from $17.81   
  • Used (5) from $4.77   
Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$10.49
BN.com price
(Save 41%)$18.00 List Price

Overview

From the grisly investigations showcased on highly rated television shows like CSI to the bestselling mysteries that revolve around forensic science, medical examiners have never been so visible-or compelling. They, and they alone, solve the riddle of suspicious death and the existential questions that come with it. Why did someone die? Could it have been prevented? What are the implications of ruling a death a suicide, a homicide, or an accident? Can medical examiners unmask the perfect crime?

Postmortem goes deep inside the world of medical examiners to uncover the intricate web of social, legal, and moral issues in which they operate. Stefan Timmermans spent years in a medical examiner's office following cases, interviewing examiners, and watching autopsies. How medical examiners speak to the living on behalf of the dead is Timmermans's subject, revealed here in the day-today lives of the examiners themselves.

About the Author:
Stefan Timmermans is professor of sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Jurimetrics
Considering the entire panorama of formal education and subsequent professional work experience inherent in the field of forensic pathology, the prospective reader of Postmortem has an understandable right to ask how the author . . . a professional sociologist . . . would be so presumptuous as to even attempt to address the subject. . . . Well, all such skepticism will be quickly dispelled by readers of this fascinating and provocative book. . . . Even longtime forensic scientific and medical experts . . . let alone all less experienced newcomers to the adversarial system of criminal and civil justice . . . would profit immensely by carefully reading and seriously considering the implications of this discussion.

— Cyril H. Wecht

JAMA
The book is beautifully and intelligently written. Packed as it is with valuable and well-referenced information about forensic pathology, the articulation of concepts and issues is of even greater merit. . . . Postmortem is a wake-up call to forensic pathology. . . .This book should be viewed as provocative, rather than threatening, and should be a stimulus for important discussions and action by the forensic pathology community.”

— Victor W. Weedn

Toronto Globe and Mail
The chaste, unemotive tone is as forensic as the subject matter and frames [Timmermans'] accounts, vividly and tightly written, but which cannot wash away either the sadness or the gruesomeness.

— Owen Richardson

New England Journal of Medicine
Postmortem should cause [forensic pathologists] to think more deeply about what they do. The case reports are intriguing, unlocking the secrets of the dead and merging the relation of the dead to the legitimate interests of the living. Well-written and extensively referenced.

— Yale H. Caplan

Times Higher Education Supplement
As a text examining the role, position and contribution of forensic pathol
— Tim Thompson
Journal of Legal Medicine
A captivating text that should be read by every forensic pathologist. It is one I particularly recommend to all persons interested in why decisions about the cause and manner of death are made as they are and in understanding the structural biases under which the system works. The book gives a unique look into the inner workings of the system because it does not focus on the processes as much as the how and why the system operates. The arguments are well structured and well supported by the author's extensive research.

— Kent E. Harshbarger

Journal of Law and Medicine

"Postmortem is well written, at times memorably so. It is interesting, challenging and fresh. Those interested in death investigation will find it difficult to put down. . . . Postmortem is a landmark work in the sociology of death investigation and should be read by all who are interested in the competing methods of ascertaining how the dead can constructively speak to the living."

— Ian Freckelton

Publishers Weekly

"Controversial award-winning sociologist Timmermans (Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR) looks at the work of medical examiners in this intriguing study, which serves as a welcome antidote to the almost endless stream of true-crime memoirs by MEs across the country. Timmermans spent years as a field observer inside a large ME office in an effort to understand everything about their practices. He observes that the decision to label a death suspicious and thus to be reviewed by an ME means that 'the social order of dying' has been disturbed and the ME's job is, in a sense, to manage the resulting uncertainty and possible danger (of, say, a previously unrecognized infectious disease). The portrait emerging from the author's study of the important social role MEs play is a useful corrective to the media-inspired image of the all-knowing and perfect CSI technicians. Some of the writing is not for a mass audience ("a meta-analysis of clinical trials trumps a randomized, double-blind clinical trial... "), but Timmermans's detailed look at the notorious Louise Woodward "nanny trial" and other topical subjects (such as organ donation) make this a must-read for anyone interested in learning what postmortems really involve."
American Sociological Association

Elliot Freidson Award (from the medical sociology section of the American Sociological Association

Toronto Globe and Mail

"The chaste, unemotive tone is as forensic as the subject matter and frames [Timmermans'] accounts, vividly and tightly written, but which cannot wash away either the sadness or the gruesomeness."—Owen Richardson, Toronto Globe and Mail

— Owen Richardson

New England Journal of Medicine

"Postmortem should cause [forensic pathologists] to think more deeply about what they do. The case reports are intriguing, unlocking the secrets of the dead and merging the relation of the dead to the legitimate interests of the living. Well-written and extensively referenced."—Yale H. Caplan, New England Journal of Medicine

— Yale H. Caplan

JAMA

“The book is beautifully and intelligently written. Packed as it is with valuable and well-referenced information about forensic pathology, the articulation of concepts and issues is of even greater merit. . . . Postmortem is a wake-up call to forensic pathology. . . .This book should be viewed as provocative, rather than threatening, and should be a stimulus for important discussions and action by the forensic pathology community.”—Journal of the American Medical Association

— Victor W. Weedn

Times Higher Education Supplement

"As a text examining the role, position and contribution of forensic pathology in modern society, [the book] is an interesting and provocative read."

— Tim Thompson

Journal of Legal Medicine

"A captivating text that should be read by every forensic pathologist. It is one I particularly recommend to all persons interested in why decisions about the cause and manner of death are made as they are and in understanding the structural biases under which the system works. The book gives a unique look into the inner workings of the system because it does not focus on the processes as much as the how and why the system operates. The arguments are well structured and well supported by the author's extensive research."—Kent E. Harshbarger, Journal of Legal Medicine

— Kent E. Harshbarger

Publishers Weekly
Controversial award-winning sociologist Timmermans (Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR) looks at the work of medical examiners in this intriguing study, which serves as a welcome antidote to the almost endless stream of true-crime memoirs by MEs across the country. Timmermans spent years as a field observer inside a large ME office in an effort to understand everything about their practices. He observes that the decision to label a death suspicious and thus to be reviewed by an ME means that "the social order of dying" has been disturbed and the ME's job is, in a sense, to manage the resulting uncertainty and possible danger (of, say, a previously unrecognized infectious disease). The portrait emerging from the author's study of the important social role MEs play is a useful corrective to the media-inspired image of the all-knowing and perfect CSI technicians. Some of the writing is not for a mass audience ("a meta-analysis of clinical trials trumps a randomized, double-blind clinical trial... "), but Timmermans's detailed look at the notorious Louise Woodward "nanny trial" and other topical subjects (such as organ donation) make this a must-read for anyone interested in learning what postmortems really involve. (May) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
American Sociological Association

Elliot Freidson Award (from the medical sociology section of the American Sociological Association

JAMA - Victor W. Weedn

“The book is beautifully and intelligently written. Packed as it is with valuable and well-referenced information about forensic pathology, the articulation of concepts and issues is of even greater merit. . . . Postmortem is a wake-up call to forensic pathology. . . .This book should be viewed as provocative, rather than threatening, and should be a stimulus for important discussions and action by the forensic pathology community.”
Toronto Globe and Mail - Owen Richardson

"The chaste, unemotive tone is as forensic as the subject matter and frames [Timmermans'] accounts, vividly and tightly written, but which cannot wash away either the sadness or the gruesomeness."
Jurimetrics - Cyril H. Wecht

"Considering the entire panorama of formal education and subsequent professional work experience inherent in the field of forensic pathology, the prospective reader of Postmortem has an understandable right to ask how the author . . . a professional sociologist . . . would be so presumptuous as to even attempt to address the subject. . . . Well, all such skepticism will be quickly dispelled by readers of this fascinating and provocative book. . . . Even longtime forensic scientific and medical experts . . . let alone all less experienced newcomers to the adversarial system of criminal and civil justice . . . would profit immensely by carefully reading and seriously considering the implications of this discussion."
New England Journal of Medicine - Yale H. Caplan

"Postmortem should cause [forensic pathologists] to think more deeply about what they do. The case reports are intriguing, unlocking the secrets of the dead and merging the relation of the dead to the legitimate interests of the living. Well-written and extensively referenced."
Times Higher Education Supplement - Tim Thompson

"As a text examining the role, position and contribution of forensic pathology in modern society, [the book] is an interesting and provocative read."
Journal of Legal Medicine - Kent E. Harshbarger

"A captivating text that should be read by every forensic pathologist. It is one I particularly recommend to all persons interested in why decisions about the cause and manner of death are made as they are and in understanding the structural biases under which the system works. The book gives a unique look into the inner workings of the system because it does not focus on the processes as much as the how and why the system operates. The arguments are well structured and well supported by the author's extensive research."
Journal of Law and Medicine - Ian Freckelton

"Postmortem is well written, at times memorably so. It is interesting, challenging and fresh. Those interested in death investigation will find it difficult to put down. . . . Postmortem is a landmark work in the sociology of death investigation and should be read by all who are interested in the competing methods of ascertaining how the dead can constructively speak to the living."
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780226803982
  • Publisher: University of Chicago Press
  • Publication date: 6/15/2006
  • Series: Fieldwork Encounters and Discoveries Series
  • Edition description: 1
  • Pages: 367
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 1.10 (d)

Meet the Author

Stefan Timmermans is professor of sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles. He is the author of two previous books, including Sudden Death and the Myth of CPR.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Postmortem

How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths
By Stefan Timmermans

University of Chicago Press

Copyright © 2006 Stefan Timmermans
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-226-80398-8


Introduction

Brokering Suspicious Deaths

Death is not an individual but a social event. When, with a barely noticeable sigh, the last gasp of air is exhaled, the blood stops pulsating through arteries and veins, and neurons cease activating the brain, the life of a human organism has ended. Death is not official, however, until the community takes notice. In modern societies, a physician-any physician will do-verifies that death has occurred, often by simply putting a stethoscope on the chest to listen for heart sounds and palpating for a pulse. Except in cases of organ procurement, the last medical act consists of filling out a death certificate, where the physician notes the time and cause of death.

Death work is routinized in three sequences, each with a different orientation: an implicit focus on death avoidance during life, a dignified dying experience, and a clean, quick disposal after death. As one of the first and most influential works of medical sociology explained, societies function on the premise that people do not get sick, and if they do get sick, it is their responsibility to get better. Talcott Parsons's "sick role" could be extended to a "death role." It is everyone'sresponsibility to keep on living. The health care system operates from a negative orientation: the traditional emphasis is not necessarily to promote wellness and health, but to minimize physical deterioration and complications among those already ill. Death is the outcome to be avoided. Statistically, a country's bill of health is measured in infant mortality, life expectancy, leading causes of death, and potential productive years lost. The postponement of death permeates every aspect of health care but is particularly well manifested in the omnipresence of resuscitation technologies in intensive-care units and emergency departments.

When in spite of all intentions and aggressive treatments death is inevitable, the interaction at the deathbed is reversed. With 75 percent of U.S. deaths taking place in hospitals or nursing homes, most deaths occur as routines in well-prepared places, surrounded by specialized staff who manage culturally appropriate passings. The transition from cure to care might be made hours, days, or months before death occurs and is a consequence of an inoperable, incurable deterioration in an illness trajectory. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross's influential books on the psychodynamic acceptance of pending death paved the way for conformity in light of mortality and carved out a space for spiritual and religious guidance. In near unison, patients, relatives, and health care providers report that they envision a "good" death as occurring with pain and symptoms under control, conscious decision making at the end, time to prepare for death, spiritual closure, an opportunity to reciprocate to others, and affirmation of the whole person. New groups of specialists, including palliative-care physicians, cater to this cultural model by offering terminal care in hospices. Stringent right-to-die initiatives are gaining momentum. The emphasis is on maintaining autonomy for the patient while mining the medicine cabinet to ease pain and suffering.

Once death has occurred, medicine relinquishes any claims for further intervention (again, with the notable exception of organ and tissue procurement). The attending physician certifies death by noting the time and a cause of death, which is usually the patient's primary diagnosis. The corpse is transferred to a funeral director, who takes care of embalming, wakes, and funerals according to laws and religious customs. A good disposal is a quick and clean event, celebrating the memory of the deceased.

The contradictory attitudes of death avoidance and acceptance are resolved in light of medical history and age. When old age has been reached or physicians have declared that a cure is unavailable, not only is death sanctioned, but one is also expected to accept death. Even when it is unfathomable for relatives and friends, most deaths make medical sense: a diabetic patient was known to have had bad coronary arteries; a nursing home resident had been treated for advanced liver carcinomas; a child died after a lengthy bout with lymphoma; emergency-department staff noticed a heart attack in progress on the EKG monitor of a middle-aged woman and were unable to reverse the process. The medical history links an individual's death to the big natural killers: heart disease, cancer, stroke, and infectious diseases. The pattern softens the inevitability of the passing. Death is not a random event but due to a chronic or progressive process that ravaged vital organs. For old people, a death of natural causes is tolerated in light of life's achievements and the physical decline and suffering associated with aging. Even without a strong medical history, the elderly are expected to live with the possibility of pending death.

When deaths fall outside this interpretive medical spectrum, however, the social order of dying is disturbed. About 20 percent of people die in suspicious circumstances, meaning out of place and time. The social institutions and professionals taking care of the dying did not anticipate the death, which generates an anomalous, potentially threatening situation. Suspicious death raises the possibility of a public health danger. Did the itchy rash and flu-like symptoms mask an anthrax infection? Was a traumatic death due to criminal activity? After an unexpected death, rumors are rife about who might benefit financially or emotionally, casting doubt on the sincerity of the grievers. Sometimes it is not the manner of death that is questionable but the identity of the deceased. Who should be notified when an unidentified body is found? Because of the tight medical control surrounding most terminal events, death becomes suspicious not only when crime is involved, but also when the passing escapes a medical prognosis: when people die without medical records, when they die unexpectedly under medical care, or when they die because of trauma in a medical setting. The danger of a suspicious death resides in the possibility that more such victims will be claimed. To investigate the risk and uncertainty of suspicious death, another kind of death worker-a coroner or a medical examiner-toils in a morgue. These professionals are part of an invisible public health and criminal justice infrastructure whose sole task is to investigate suspicious deaths.

Social scientists, health care providers, and bioethicists have extensively studied the emergence of hospice care, right-to-die initiatives, and aggressive lifesaving interventions in order to evaluate the quality of the contemporary dying experience. Deaths that escape close medical management, however, have received attention only summarily. The lack of critical scrutiny is remarkable, because death investigators enact a relationship to death different from that of the clinician. In contrast with common health care interventions, death investigators' work is guided not by cure or care-avoiding death or preparing for the final transition-but by the need to generate expert knowledge about life. Determining the cause and manner of suspicious deaths is highly technical work, dependent on scene investigation findings, autopsy observations, toxicology test values, and a close reading of medical files. This expert work necessarily has a strong cultural dimension, because it involves locating corpses in contested categories of death. This book, based on three years of observation in a medical examiner's office, looks at the daily work of death investigators as a cultural instance of managing lethal risk, uncertainty, and danger.

The Replacement of Coroners with Medical Examiners

Coroners have traditionally conducted death investigations and still serve about half of the U.S. population. Their mandate dates back to the twelfth century, when officers collected money owed to the English Crown and were known as "crowners" or "keepers of the pleas of the crown." Coroners had broad powers to hold inquests, hear confessions in sanctuaries, grant pardons, seize treasure, confiscate royal fishes (whales, sturgeons, and porpoises), and investigate shipwrecks. Medieval coroners' rolls show, however, that they were engaged mostly with inquests into suicide and homicide. The investigation of death carried consequences. Suicide was a crime against God and king that resulted in forfeiture of the victim's estate. Accidental deaths caused by a moving inanimate object (e.g., a well, horse cart, or mill wheel) entailed forfeiture of the object. Coroners held inquests in public places after viewing the corpse and questioning witnesses so that the jury could render a verdict.

In the nineteenth century, the position of coroner in the United States was part of the patronage and spoils system of municipal government. Coroners were not judges but had the authority of committing magistrates, and they could make arrests and set bail for prisoners. In spite of their legal authority, coroners often had little legal knowledge; some lacked even basic literacy skills. Coroners initially operated on a fee-for-service basis, receiving payment at each inquest. In New York City, at the turn of the twentieth century, they first became salaried. Regardless of the form of remuneration, bribes and embezzlement in coroners' offices were legion, because coroners had great leeway in presenting evidence and steering a verdict in a desired direction. Politicians were put on the payroll of businesses attempting to avoid bad publicity or liability when deaths occurred because of safety violations. These politicians served as "fixers": for a fee, they tried to influence the coroner's court by picking the jury members, paying off the coroner or district attorney, condoning perjury, or sending key witnesses out of state. Similarly, well-connected families paid for suicides to be classified as accidents and unsavory details to be suppressed. George LeBrun, secretary to the New York coroner's and later medical examiner's office from 1898 until his retirement in the 1940s (and himself a political appointee) reported that the success of businesses and individuals depended on the corruption of the coroner: "A few of the coroners, and let me emphasize that it were only a few, were outrageous crooks who dispensed 'justice' for cash. Their only interest in each new case was to discover how they could extort money, and they used the power of their office for blackmail purposes." Even uncorrupted coroners would manipulate the usual procedures of the death investigation system when a politician asked for a favor to protect a family against the stigma of suicide. When the determination of suicide was straightforward, for example, no inquest would be held, allowing the coroner to file the death certificate days later-escaping the attention of reporters, who checked only the new cases.

Coroners are now public officials, appointed or elected. They do not necessarily have medical backgrounds or training in death investigation. They may still, however, hold inquests before juries to determine the manner of death. For example, the coroner of McLean County, Illinois, may call an inquest in front of six citizens of the county. The inquest is open to the public, and the jurors determine the manner of death (suicide, accident, homicide, natural death, or undetermined death) on the basis of the information presented. Coroners may employ physicians to perform autopsies and technicians to conduct toxicology testing. In some counties, anyone can become a coroner, so that the post has been held by tow-truck drivers, paramedics, plumbers, bar owners, nurses, carpenters, police officers, and funeral directors. Coroners still run death investigations in counties and districts of eleven U.S. states. In an attempt to professionalize their trade, some counties have required coroners to meet stricter education requirements (including basic medical or legal training) and obtain certification in programs offered by the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators. Eighteen states now have a mix of coroner and medical examiner systems, and medical examiners are the sole death investigators in twenty-two states, practicing on a state, county, or district level. Medical examiners began to replace coroners in 1877, in Massachusetts, but most systems switched between 1955 and 1985. The shift to a medical examiner then stalled in the mid-1980s. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, about half of the U.S. population is served by coroners and the other half by medical examiners. There are more than two thousand death investigation jurisdictions, most at the county level.

The switch to a medical examiner system entails an expansion of scientific power and a curtailing of political power. All states with medical examiners require them to be physicians, and most demand additional certification in anatomical and forensic pathology. Medical examiners do not preside over a jury inquest but base their conclusions largely on a scene investigation, medical files, an autopsy, and laboratory tests. All inquiries take place behind closed doors, out of the public eye. Although the police are in charge of the crime scene, medical examiners have jurisdiction over the corpse and can request paraphernalia found at the crime scene that might shed light on the death. Medical examiners are charged with identifying the body and determining the cause and manner of death. The cause of death is "a disease, abnormality, injury, or poisoning that contributed directly or indirectly to death," perhaps cerebral hemorrhage, asphyxiation, severe pulmonary congestion and edema, or sudden infant death syndrome. Five categories constitute the possibilities for the manner of death: natural, accident, suicide, homicide, and undetermined. The forensic manner of death is not legally binding for law enforcement or prosecution but is a crucial part of fact-finding in criminal investigations.

The replacement of coroners with medical examiners is a milestone in the long history of growing medical authority over death. George LeBrun, who witnessed the transition from the coroner's court to the medical examiner's office of New York City in 1918, noted the difference in the quality of the death investigation when the scrupulous Dr. Charles Norris, a professor of pathology at Columbia University medical school and director of the Bellevue Hospital laboratories, became the first medical examiner. Appalled by the lack of understanding of gunshot wounds, Dr. Norris and his assistants fired all kinds of guns into different materials from various ranges and angles, studied the gunpowder marks and shot patterns, and then applied this knowledge to cases. Dr. Norris's superior professional knowledge became apparent when he disagreed with a former coroner's physician (who was now working in law enforcement) and successfully established that a death previously considered a suicide was actually a homicide; in another case, Dr. Norris changed an apparent homicide to a suicide.

According to LeBrun, not only corruption but also legislative initiative disappeared with the coroner's court. When the coroner's inquest worked well, it was a perfect vehicle for bringing awareness of dangerous situations into the public realm and instituting reforms. In the heyday of the New York City coroner's office, the politically savvy coroner's court was at the forefront in requiring elevator safety devices, advocating for the replacement of open streetcars discharging passengers in the middle of the street with buses that pulled up to the curb, requiring poisons to be labeled as such, fighting for driver's licenses, and spearheading one of the first gun-control laws, the Sullivan law. LeBrun attributed the coroner's power to his privileged position and to the open character of the inquest, which led to well-cultivated contacts with politicians and reporters. The early New York City medical examiner's office still had the power to call public inquests, but Dr. Norris never used that privilege, preferring that the district attorney take the lead.

(Continues...)



Excerpted from Postmortem by Stefan Timmermans Copyright © 2006 by Stefan Timmermans. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction : brokering suspicious deaths 1
1 Making the case for heart disease 35
2 The fifty-one percent rule of suicide 74
3 Forensic credibility at the "nanny trial" 113
4 The perfect crime 157
5 A baby died, where were the parents? 195
6 The organ and tissue trade 225
Conclusion : the hope of forensic authority 251
Postscript : "how can you watch autopsies?" 275
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 5, 2006

    Postmortem is a title not just for the general public, but especially for the college- level medical collection.

    Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths offers what few competitors can: a close-up look into just how medical examiners work. The author spent three years shadowing examiners to understand how they probe questionable deaths, and Postmortem covers not just the physical but the legal, social and moral issues faced by the industry. From issues of objectivity in the face of subjective evidence to influences in headline cases, Postmortem is a title not just for the general public, but especially for the college- level medical collection.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 30, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 26, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)