The Princes in the Tower

( 27 )

Overview

Despite five centuries of investigation by historians, the sinister deaths of the boy king Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York, remain one of the most fascinating murder mysteries in English history. Did Richard III really kill "the Princes in the Tower," as is commonly believed, or was the murderer someone else entirely? In this utterly absorbing and meticulously researched book, English writer Alison Weir, an authority on the history of the British royal family, at last provides a conclusive ...
See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$12.16
BN.com price
(Save 24%)$16.00 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (111) from $1.99   
  • New (13) from $5.79   
  • Used (98) from $1.99   
The Princes in the Tower

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$11.99
BN.com price

Overview

Despite five centuries of investigation by historians, the sinister deaths of the boy king Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York, remain one of the most fascinating murder mysteries in English history. Did Richard III really kill "the Princes in the Tower," as is commonly believed, or was the murderer someone else entirely? In this utterly absorbing and meticulously researched book, English writer Alison Weir, an authority on the history of the British royal family, at last provides a conclusive solution to this age-old puzzle. Carefully examining every shred of contemporary evidence as well as the dozens of modern accounts, Weir reconstructs the entire chain of events leading to the double murder. In The Princes in the Tower we are witnesses to the tumultuous reign of Edward IV, the princes' powerful, handsome, promiscuous father. We see the unfolding rivalry between the Wydvilles, the common family of Edward's shrewd queen, and Richard, Duke of Gloucester, his ambitious brother. And finally we are swept up in the vortex of intrigue that followed Edward's death - the naming of his twelve-year-old son Edward as heir; Richard's swift arrival in London and his lightning strike for power; the imprisonment of the princes in the Tower of London; and the hushed-up murders that secured Richard's claim to the throne as Richard III. Weir considers in turn each of the prime suspects in the murder: the grasping, conspiratorial Duke of Buckingham; the shadowy Sir James Tyrell, Richard's trusted retainer; the possibility that the boys may have died of natural causes; and of course, Richard III himself, a complex man of charm and intelligence twisted by a ruthless ambition for power. More than an historical murder mystery, The Princes in the Tower is a richly detailed tapestry of English court life in the late fifteenth century - the bitter rivalries that exploded in the Wars of the Roses; the splendor and corruption of the royal family; the violence and tre

Did Richard III really kill the boy king Edward V and his younger brother? The bestselling author of The Six Wives of Henry VIII reconstructs the events of 1483 to create a riveting, true crime story.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Weir examines the 1483 disappearance of Richard III's two young nephews and determines that he was to blame for their murders. Aug.
Library Journal
Proponents of Richard III will not be pleased by this book. Weir The Six Wives of Henry VIII , LJ 2/15/92 explores documentary evidence and various theories about the fate of the famous princes Edward V and his brother, ages 12 and 10 in the Tower of London. Relying on contemporary accounts, Weir assesses credibility and compares details. Her sound research and rational arguments make a convincing case for Richard's direct involvement in the murder of his two young nephews. While she admits that there is no convincing evidence that Richard was hunchbacked or more evil than his contemporaries, Weir does show that he was supremely unpopular, largely because of the murder of the children. This is an excellent and persuasive book, one that belongs in all collections covering the history of Great Britain.-- Katharine Galloway Garstka, Intergraph Corp., Huntsville, Ala.
From the Publisher
 • "The mystery of the Princes in the Tower is a cause of outrage as well as a whodunnit—a deeply researched appraisal." — Daily Telegraph

 • "Alison Weir has examined all the contemporary and near-contemporary chronicles with care. Her book, lucidly written and well-researched, makes absorbing reading." —Sunday Times

From Barnes & Noble
Five centuries later, the sinister deaths of the boy king Edward V & his younger brother Richard remain one of England's most fascinating murder mysteries. Historian Weir examines the evidence behind this tale of conspiracy & deception.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780345391780
  • Publisher: Random House Publishing Group
  • Publication date: 7/28/1995
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 320
  • Sales rank: 136,498
  • Product dimensions: 5.40 (w) x 8.20 (h) x 0.70 (d)

Meet the Author

Alison Weir

ALISON WEIR is the best-selling female historian since records began and the third biggest selling historian in Britain. Her books include Britain's Royal Families, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Children of England, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Henry VIII: King and Court, Mary, Queen of Scots, Isabella: She-Wolf of France, Queen of England, Katherine Swynford: The Story of John of Gaunt and His Scandalous Duchess and the novels, Innocent Traitor and The Lady Elizabeth. She lives and works in Surrey.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Author's Preface
1 Richard III and the Chroniclers 1
2 The Sanctuary Child 14
3 Richard of Gloucester 27
4 Clarence and the Wydvilles 37
5 'Deadly Feuds and Factions' 52
6 'Those of the Queen's Blood' 63
7 'An Innocent Lamb in the Hands of Wolves' 77
8 The Lord Protector 87
9 The Fall of Hastings 97
10 'This Act of Usurpation' 109
11 Richard III 128
12 Conspiracies 139
13 The Princes in the Tower 147
14 The Wicked Uncle 163
15 Rebellion 179
16 An Especial Good Lord 191
17 An Incestuous Passion 202
18 A Dark Prince 219
19 Pretenders 231
20 Tyrell's Confession 243
21 The Skeletons in the Tower 249
Genealogical Table: Lancaster and York 259
Select Bibliography 261
Index 273
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3.5
( 27 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(6)

4 Star

(10)

3 Star

(6)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(4)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 27 Customer Reviews
  • Posted April 30, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    I Also Recommend:

    Weir is not a Richard III "revisionist"

    This book has a different tone than the other Weir histories/biographies I've read recently. She's not rehabilitating a historical figure or detailing the causes of a civil war; this time she's showing us the extant historical record and whether or not that historical record tells us what happened to Edward V and his brother, Richard. The story of the Princes doesn't flow quite like her other books because she has to back up a few times to go over the origins of historical documents and the accuracy of contemprorary sources (Sir Thomas More's biography of Richard III is considered a particularly accurate source because More had access to those close to Richard during his reign). In the end, Weir's interpretation of the historical evidence makes it clear that Richard III is implicated in the deaths of the Princes and that the children died before Henry VII invaded England. Whether Richard III ordered the childen's murder or they died through natural causes or mistreatment is unclear but it was widely believed that the Princes were dead by 1485 because Richard was unable to exhibit the children in public when it would have been politically advantageous to do so. If you are a Richard III revisionist, this book is not for you. If you like Shakespeare's play then you'll like this book because it gives dimension and context to one of Shakespeare's famous villains.

    10 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 5, 2009

    I Also Recommend:

    Finally a Definitive Account of the Sons of EdwardIV.

    I have read many books on the subject & have always believed RichardIII murdered his nephews. Now there are many RichardIII associations who proclaim his innocence. I wanted a book that would give me all the answers like who,where when (I was pretty sure I knew why.) I had read other books by Alison Weir & had great respect for her research methods & balanced portrayals of people. She can also keep you entertained. It's not like reading a text book. You understand these people & care about them. I believe she started with an open mind and went where the evidence took her. You'll have to read it yourself to see where that it. If you are interested in this centuries old mystery,this is the book for you.

    4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 19, 2007

    Bad history at best, misleading propaganda at worst.

    Being new to the debate over the fate of the Princes metioned in the title, I read the book with an open mind, having already digested a work defending Richard. Ms. Weir is at the very least guilty of bad history. Her argument is supported by her own conjecture, which she treats as undisputed fact. Her over-reliance on sources that are at the very least tainted by the distinction of having been printed under the reign of the usurper Henry VII. Her most credible source is anonymous, even taking into account that anonymous sources bring with them a measure of skepticism. The author also fails to address any arguments counter to her own. The final coffin nail to this utterly dead work is the lack of footnotes and end notes, making the act of following her research all but impossible. Even for a book intended for general readership, this book is a disservice to any interested in English history.

    3 out of 8 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 9, 2002

    specious reasoning, at best

    I agree with the other reviewer here: this book is so full of contradictions it's difficult to keep track. It's obvious that the author set out to discredit Richard, and when an argument seems to go against that she twists it to fit. For example, when Richard's wife (and childhood friend) dies, Richard cries at the funeral. Since Ms. Weir has already decided that Richard poisoned her, she claims he was putting on a show to prove his innocence. Why would that be necessary? At a time when men did not often cry, why would Richard-a man portrayed here as evil as they come, who probably kicked some puppies on his way to the funeral-go to that length? She tells us about numerous mistakes made by Sir Thomas More, but continues to take his word as gospel. For example, we know now that Richard was not 'Crouchbacked'. The author even admits this. More was one of the main purveyors of this myth, as others that Ms. Weir dismisses as fiction. So why, then, would you use the rest of his book as evidence? If I read a book claiming America had become independent in 1903, I wouldn't exactly consider the rest of that book to be factual. She also mixes up some dates and seems to forget what has been written before. She tells us that after Richard's coronation on July 5, 1483, 'the Princes in the Tower were never seen alive again'. Later in the book she mentions that one of her sources 'had cause to know' the Princes were alive in August, for he had seen them. That seems like a contradiction to me. Reporting rumor as fact (and dismissing rumors to the contrary of her opinions) does not a factual book make. It is also inconceivable to me that a girl who know her uncle has murdered her brothers would still want to marry him, no matter how ambitious she may be (and the only proof offered for Richard's plot to marry his cousin was a leter written by her saying that she loved him deeply-there is no evidence at all that Richard returned these feelings.) I read this book without a definite opinion of who killed the Princes. Now I have one-the opposite of what the author wanted. Nobody should be convicted on evidence this flimsy and full of contradiction.

    3 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 22, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Little Princes in the tower

    I enjoyed this book there was alot more information then expected. I felt so bad for there situation, they never got justice...I've ever known much information on these two princes until now and would highly recommend it to anyone else wanting to know more.

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 10, 2005

    Flawed account

    The arguments didn't hold water. That plus the book wasn't an easy read, it was befuddling at times just trying to figure out the argument's point. It is historical fiction... it shouldn't be that hard. The facts were unconvincing. You really had to muddle through to take the author's point and even then it was a stretch to put 1 plus 2 together to equal 5.

    2 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 21, 2014

    Very Informative History of The Princes in the Tower

    Weir writes an extremely interesting account of what happened to the legendary Princes in the the Tower. In forming her conclusions, Weir sets the turbulent stage of the War of the Roses and relies upon the historical records that survive from this period of time. The princes, the boys of King Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville, were last seen alive in 1493, some 500+ years ago. Weir culls through the evidence and applying inferences drawn from that evidence and the social and political climate at the time the evidence was created, she draws the trap tighter around the prime suspect in the boys' deaths. Weir does not force the evidence to fit her conclusion, but lets it flow from logic and admits when her sources are lacking or conflicting.

    This is an excellent work of English history. Anyone who is interested in the Starz series The White Queen would enjoy this true depiction of some of those characters.

    I also highly recommend Weir's The Lady in the Tower, a historical account of the last months of Anne Bolyen's life.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 11, 2013

    Highly recommended

    A must read for history lovers. The wars of the roses culminated in King Richard lll taking the rightful heirs, his nephews, the princes of York, under his "protection" and holding them in the Tower of London. What happened to these young innocents of history is a mystery to this day. Author Alison Weir brings this story to life with engrossing detail and excellent research and presentation of facts.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 26, 2013

    more from this reviewer

    I suggest for another point of view regarding Richard III, reade

    I suggest for another point of view regarding Richard III, readers should read Sharon Kay Penman's book, The Sunne in Splendour, which is about the life of Richard and his brother Edward the father of the two princes in the Tower. She comes to the conclusion that Richard did not order the death of his nephews but, in fact, the Duke of Buckingham had much more to gain from the deaths of the princes and had the opportunity to order their deaths. Richard III had no motive to have them killed. There are some historians who believe Henry Tudor was the culprit, but she deduces that he had no opportunity to do so. I think this is a mystery which will never be solved to the satisfaction of everyone.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 12, 2008

    Not Ms. Weir's best work.

    Ms. Weir's Tudor non-fiction is engaging, intelligent, supported, and wholly reliable. This book, however, felt and read more like a Ph.D. thesis, where mentions of the Princes, as sidenotes to the grander scheme, were continually intruding on the story, rather than being the main focus of it. Every fact seemed to be forced to relate to that theme, rather than the murder occurring as an organic result. I would recommend this as a novel to acquaint oneself with Richard III and his tumultuous reign, but if you are searching for true crime or a thoroughly detailed discussion of forensics, then this is not the book to start your research.

    1 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 30, 2008

    Very interesting book!

    This book was very detailed and presented very interesting takes on the disappearance of the Princes of the Tower. I really enjoyed Weir's take on the legend and thought she backed it up with legitimate evidence.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 10, 2006

    Actually, I liked it.

    Part of the problem with giving your review on a book like this is that depending on where you fall in the Richard III arguement it will influence what you think of the book. I, for one, am inclined to agree with the author in her opinion on this issue. Based on that, I found this book to be interesting and enlightening. In fact, I find the so called 'Pro-Richard' biographies to be full of backward logic and surmises. For someone who falls on the other side, no amount of proof or conjecture will ever convince you otherwise. Ah, the joy of old history!

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 27, 2012

    save your $

    Rehash, rehash, rehash.

    0 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 21, 2012

    Great book

    Wonderful

    0 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 30, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 21, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 22, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 27, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 26, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 6, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 27 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)