- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Other sellers (Paperback)
-
All (18) from $8.00
-
New (9) from $23.69
-
Used (9) from $8.00
More About This Textbook
Overview
It is a commonplace that the United States lagged behind the countries of Western Europe in developing modern social policies. But, as Theda Skocpol shows in this startlingly new historical analysis, the United States actually pioneered generous social spending for many of its elderly, disabled, and dependent citizens. During the late nineteenth century, competitive party politics in American democracy led to the rapid expansion of benefits for Union Civil War veterans and their families.
Some Americans hoped to expand veterans' benefits into pensions for all of the needy elderly and social insurance for workingmen and their families. But such hopes went against the logic of political reform in the Progressive Era. Generous social spending faded along with the Civil War generation.
Instead, the nation nearly became a unique maternalist welfare state as the federal government and more than forty states enacted social spending, labor regulations, and health education programs to assist American mothers and children. Remarkably, as Skocpol shows, many of these policies were enacted even before American women were granted the right to vote. Banned from electoral politics, they turned their energies to creating huge, nation-spanning federations of local women's clubs, which collaborated with reform-minded professional women to spur legislative action across the country.
Blending original historical research with political analysis, Skocpol shows how governmental institutions, electoral rules, political parties, and earlier public policies combined to determine both the opportunities and the limits within which social policies were devised and changed by reformers and politically active social groups over the course of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
By examining afresh the institutional, cultural, and organizational forces that have shaped U.S. social policies in the past, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers challenges us to think in new ways about what might be possible in the American future.
Editorial Reviews
Journal of Economic History
Recognition that a kind of welfare state emerged even in America has hardly stilled the need to ask, once again, why the American variant came out so differently from those in western Europe. Skocpol's newest book... brings to these issues as powerful and iconoclastic an intellect as the historical sciences possess. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers belongs on a shelf of social policy history classics.
— Daniel T. Rodgers
Journal of Policy History
Protecting Soldiers and Mothers is doubly important because it gives us new facts to think about and new perspectives within which to think about them…Skocpol's research is so original and thorough and her critical intelligence is so strong...that her book will become the necessary starting point for all who study the evolution of social welfare policies in the United States.
— Aaron Wildavsky
Nation
Complex, richly detailed...and grounded in extensive archival research...[Skocpol] has demonstrated that the polity and political institutions do matter...[A] powerful book that will surely generate a great deal of new research and writing about the history of social provision in the United States.
— Alex Keyssar
New York Times Book Review
A monumental study that will likely become a classic in the history of the modern welfare state.
— Rosalind Rosenberg
Women's Review of Books
Invites readers to remember a halcyon period in women's politics when—both in spite and because of women's formal political exclusion—extensively organized, politically active women united around motherhood and claimed a place for women in social policy.
— Gwendolyn Mink
Library Journal
Despite having instituted one of the world's earliest broad-based social welfare programs (Civil War pensions for veterans and their families), the United States did not develop into a full welfare state like other Western democracies. In a detailed historical case study of social policy from the 1880s to the 1920s, Skocpol (sociology, Harvard) examines how government, political parties, cultural values, unions, women's organizations, and other groups all played a part in this process. Of particular interest is the role of mass organizations for women, which won ``maternalist'' welfare policies for women and children in the years before women's suffrage. Skocpol's analysis, which includes frequent comparisons with European countries, is replete with well-documented primary source material. Although academic language and style may make this daunting reading, scholars and students of social history will find it fascinating background for current debates on U.S. social policies. An important acquisition for all academic libraries.-- Mary Jane Brustman, SUNY at Albany Libs.Booknews
Distinguished sociologist Skocpol (Harvard U.) draws a bead on the prevailing wisdom regarding the development of modern social policy in the US. Blending original historical research with political analysis, she shows that, contrary to the common view that the US lagged behind the countries of Western Europe, the US actually pioneered generous social spending, first during the late 19th century for Union Civil War veterans and their families, then during the early 20th century (before suffrage) to assist American mothers and children. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)Product Details
Meet the Author
Theda Skocpol is Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. Her previous works include the prize-winning States and Social Revolutions.
Table of Contents