The Purpose of the Past: Reflections on the Uses of History

Overview

An erudite scholar and an elegant writer, Gordon S. Wood has won both numerous awards and a broad readership since the 1969 publication of his widely acclaimed The Creation of the American Republic. With The Purpose of the Past, Wood has essentially created a history of American history, assessing the current state of history vis-à-vis the work of some of its most important scholars-doling out praise and scorn with equal measure. In this wise, passionate defense of history's ongoing necessity, Wood argues that we...

See more details below
This Hardcover is Not Available through BN.com
The Purpose of the Past: Reflections on the Uses of History

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$13.99
BN.com price
Note: This is a bargain book and quantities are limited. Bargain books are new but may have slight markings from the publisher and/or stickers showing their discounted price. More about bargain books

Overview

An erudite scholar and an elegant writer, Gordon S. Wood has won both numerous awards and a broad readership since the 1969 publication of his widely acclaimed The Creation of the American Republic. With The Purpose of the Past, Wood has essentially created a history of American history, assessing the current state of history vis-à-vis the work of some of its most important scholars-doling out praise and scorn with equal measure. In this wise, passionate defense of history's ongoing necessity, Wood argues that we cannot make intelligent decisions about the future without understanding our past. Wood offers a master's insight into what history-at its best-can be and reflects on its evolving and essential role in our culture.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Jonathan Yardley
The Purpose of the Past is a beacon of common sense, sanity and wisdom. It is rare indeed when a collection of mere book reviews can stand alone as a unified and coherent book, but that is just what this one is. Handsomely written, deeply informed and resolutely fair-minded, it is essential reading for anyone who cares about history and the uses and abuses to which we subject it.
—The Washington Post
Publishers Weekly

The subtitle of this latest offering from Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Wood (The Radicalism of the American Revolution) is far grander than what he delivers between the covers: a collection of 21 book reviews of works by Simon Schama, Theodore Draper and Joyce Appleby, among others, written over the past three decades for periodicals like the New York Review of Booksand the New Republic. Though reviews are occasional pieces not designed to be republished years later, some of Wood's pieces make enduring points. He lambastes scholars who clutter their writing with unintelligible jargon, and he worries that today's historical scholarship, too driven by present concerns, fails to retain a sense of how the past really is different. He makes clear that he prefers old-fashioned political history to cultural history that draws on postmodern theory. Indeed, the book is maddeningly repetitive: Wood invokes Peter Novick's This Noble Dreamover and over, though not as often as he laments the use of theory in cultural history and the "radical Foucault-like agendas" that seem to drive certain literary historians. This volume is not without merit, but rather than appending a short afterword to each review, Wood would have done better to craft a new, unified reflection on the discipline of history. (Mar. 17)

Copyright 2007 Reed Business Information
Kirkus Reviews
History teaches little and has scarce influence on the present. So why bother to study it at all?This sometimes impatient set of essays by noted historian Wood (Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different, 2006, etc.) offers a provocative answer: Knowledge of the past may not necessarily guide decisions made in the present-would that it did-but it at least "can have a profound effect on our consciousness, on our sense of ourselves." Rather hippie-ish sentiments, one might think, but in Wood's universe consciousness embraces the political, which can be good and bad. Thus James McGregor Burns, for instance, comes in for a shellacking in a 1982 New York Review of Books piece for imagining in The Vineyard of Liberty that the 1850s were, like the 1960s, full of revolutionary potential, lacking but a sans-culotte leader to set things in motion: "But then one sometimes forgets," writes Wood, "that Burns is a political activist for whom writing history is really politics by other means." Similarly, Barbara Tuchman, who had a few political axes of her own to grind, gets a gentler but still tough assessment for her insistence that history has some utility. Wood is careful to distinguish her portentous popularizing from that of David McCullough, "who genuinely seems to want just to tell a good story about the past." Elsewhere, Wood writes approvingly of big-picture endeavors such as David Hackett Fischer's Albion's Seed (1989), while taking books such as Simon Schama's Dead Certainties (1991) to task for confounding history and fiction. History does teach one big lesson after all, Wood concludes: "Nothing ever works out quite the way its managers intended or expected."A takeaway pointwell worth the price of admission, but there are many more in this solid collection. Fruitful reading for academics and history buffs alike.
The Barnes & Noble Review
When a writer sets out to publish a collection of his or her essays and reviews, the finished product all too often shows traces of the author's unsuccessful struggle to create a unifying theme for disparate and unwieldy material. But Gordon S. Wood, the eminent historian of 18th-century America, has not had to make any such effort, for this collection of his long reviews (most of which initially appeared in The New York Review of Books) serves as a neat anatomy of the changes intellectual fashion has imposed on his discipline over the past 25 years, and a commentary upon the process of writing history that is both sensible and sensitive -- and sometimes impassioned, as well.

As Wood points out, historiography has undergone a revolution since the 1960s. At that time the traditional study of history "from above" -- the narration and analysis of diplomatic and political events, largely the handiwork of "great men" -- began to give way to a surge of interest in history from below, as historians delved into the lives of hitherto marginalized people such as women, peasants, and slaves. Scholars turned from straightforward narrative to a historiography informed by social sciences like anthropology and ethnography; in the 1980s the focus shifted once again to what is now known as "cultural history," with a strong emphasis on race, class and gender. "By now," Wood says, "little else seems to matter.... History departments appear to have stopped hiring anyone but cultural historians, the assumption being that cultural history is the only kind of history worth doing."

Intensifying the situation was the fact that historians, following sheep-like in the errant footsteps of literary critics, became increasingly besotted with theory. "Implicit in many of these theories, which tended to emphasize the textual construction of reality, was an epistemological skepticism" that has had, Wood claims, "devastating implications for historians,...undermining the ground for any sort of historical reconstruction at all." Postmodernist scholars launched an attack on the entire Enlightenment project, claiming that "truth," whether historical or scientific, is nothing but an ideological construct.

Of course historical skepticism was hardly invented by postmodern theorists; as early as the fifth century B.C., Herodotus was dryly observing of his craft, "Very few things happen at the right time and the rest do not happen at all. The conscientious historian will correct these defects." But to recognize that a historical narrative is partly a creation of the historian is not the same thing as dismissing the ideal of historical reconstruction out of hand and deciding, like the controversial theorist Hayden White, that historical narrative is just another form of fiction. If we are never to realize the 19th-century dream that history might become a completely objective science, neither should we give up and assume that there is no authentic past to uncover, no reality to try to re-create.

The re-creation of such authenticity ought to be the historian's central concern, Wood says.

To be able to see the participants of the past in this comprehensive way, to see them in the context of their own time, to describe their blindness and folly with sympathy, to recognize the extent to which they were caught up in changing circumstances over which they had little control, and to realize the degree to which they created results they never intended -- to know all this about the past and to be able to relate it without anachronistic distortion to our present is what is meant by having a historical sense.
Anachronistic thinking is the chief barrier to achieving a historical sense, and such reflexive thought processes are difficult to overcome; as Wood is well aware, "history books are as much a product of the present as the past." What do the appearance and reception of any particular book tell us about ourselves and our culture at the moment the book appears? This is a theme that pops up again and again in Wood's essays. In discussing Gary B. Nash, for instance, whom he classifies as one of the best of "the 'race, class, gender' historians of the past generation," Wood demonstrates the futility of viewing history through the lenses of political ideology: Nash is "so bound up in the modern Marxian categories of class warfare" that he is hard put to account for whatever fails to conform with his rigid categories -- such as the fact that many of the 18th-century aristocrats Nash so dislikes were leading abolitionists, or that the Scots-Irish radicals he admires were supporters of slavery in Pennsylvania.

Again stressing the manner in which current prejudices and concerns affect the writing of history, Wood presents Simon Schama's fictionalized history Dead Certainties as the unfortunate and irresponsible surrender of a major historian to the postmodern affection for blurring the lines between fact and fiction. Schama's "violation of the conventions of history writing actually puts the integrity of the discipline of history at risk," Wood complains. "Those conventions of history writing, like any conventions, are fragile and always vulnerable to challenge; they are scarcely more than a century old.... [T]hey have been painstakingly developed in the Western world and have respectable justifications for their existence; they ought not to be abandoned without a fight either to postmodern skepticism or to Schama's playful experiments in narration."

Wood displays a heartfelt (and more than justified) contempt for current academic jargon, castigating one scholar's use of trendy catchwords: the book in question, he complains, is full of stinkers like " 'interpellation,' 'exfoliation,' 'ambiguation,' 'valorized,' 'intellection,' 'narrativized,' and 'meta' this and 'meta' that." "It is ironic, to say the least," Wood grumbles, "that scholars eager to deconstruct 'texts' in order to expose the ways they wield power in our society should themselves create texts that mask and obscure much of what they want to say. And that bright younger scholars like [Michael] Warner should be induced by the fashions of their discipline to use this jargon is an especially poignant form of 'hegemonic coercion.' "

Most middlebrow readers, happily perusing old-fashioned narrative histories by popular authors like David McCullough and Ron Chernow, will be blissfully unaware of these bitter quarrels and turf wars within the profession. Wood's book will open their eyes to such dramas; more important, it will attune readers to the political and theoretical agendas of the histories they read and help direct them toward the acquisition of that "historical sense" which is so elusive, and so valuable. "History adds another dimension to our view of the world and enriches our experience," Wood insists. "Someone with a historical sense sees reality differently: in four dimensions." --Brooke Allen

Brooke Allen is the author of Twentieth-Century Attitudes; Artistic License; and Moral Minority. She is a contributor to The New York Times Book Review, The New Criterion, The New Leader, The Hudson Review, and The Nation, among others. She was named a finalist for the 2007 Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing from the National Book Critics Circle.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781616802967
  • Publisher: Penguin Group (USA)
  • Publication date: 3/13/2008
  • Pages: 336
  • Product dimensions: 6.20 (w) x 9.00 (h) x 1.20 (d)

Meet the Author

Gordon S. Wood is the Alva O. Way University Professor of History at Brown University. A Pulitzer Prize winner, he is a regular contributor to The New Republic and The New York Review of Books.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Introduction     1
"Influence" in History     17
Anachronism in History     30
Narrative History     40
The Lessons of History     62
Continuity in History     73
History and the New Historicism     85
History as Fiction     94
History as High Politics     110
Microhistory     119
Truth in History     133
History Versus Political Theory     146
History Without Ideas     164
History and Heritage     180
Comparative History     196
Postmodern History     212
Satirical History     227
Multicultural History     234
History and Myth     249
History as Cultural Criticism     264
Race, Class, Gender and History Writing     277
Presentism in History     293
Index     309
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)