Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $14.65
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 51%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (6) from $14.65   
  • New (3) from $28.55   
  • Used (3) from $14.65   


"Science is rooted in conversations," wrote Werner Heisenberg, one of the twentieth century's great physicists. In Quantum Dialogue, Mara Beller shows that science is rooted not just in conversation but in disagreement, doubt, and uncertainty. She argues that it is precisely this culture of dialogue and controversy within the scientific community that fuels creativity.

Beller draws her argument from her radical new reading of the history of the quantum revolution, especially the development of the Copenhagen interpretation. One of several competing approaches, this version succeeded largely due to the rhetorical skills of Niels Bohr and his colleagues. Using extensive archival research, Beller shows how Bohr and others marketed their views, misrepresenting and dismissing their opponents as "unreasonable" and championing their own not always coherent or well-supported position as "inevitable."

Quantum Dialogue will fascinate everyone interested in how stories of "scientific revolutions" are constructed and "scientific consensus" achieved.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Theoretical concerns, experiment, logic, emotions, and ambitions as well as the conversations cited by Heisenberg fuel the creativity that drives science, finds Beller (history and philosophy of science, Hebrew U. of Jerusalem). She constructs a radical new reading of the history of the quantum revolution by looking at Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, Born's probabilistic interpretation, and Bohr's complementarity principle. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
Read More Show Less

Product Details

Meet the Author

Mara Beller is the Barbara Druss Dibner Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations
Preface and Acknowledgments
1. Novelty and Dogma
Dialogical Creativity
Rhetorical Strategies
Part One: Dialogical Emergence
2. Matrix Theory in Flux
A Revision of the Origins of the Matrix Theory
The Emotional Confrontation between the Matrix Physicists and Schrödinger
Born's Probabilistic Interpretation: A Case Study of "Concepts in Flux"
3. Quantum Philosophy in Flux
Positivism in Flux
Indeterminism in Flux
4. The Dialogical Emergence of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Paper
Dialogue with Schrödinger
Dialogue with Pauli
Dialogue with Dirac
Dialogue with Jordan
Dialogues with "Lesser" Scientists
5. The Polyphony of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Paper
The Polyphony of the Notion of Interpretation
The Contingency of Acausality
Anschaulichkeit and the Status of Classical Concepts
6. The Dialogical Birth of Bohr's Complementarity
Dialogue with Schrödinger: The Structure of Atoms
Dialogue with Einstein and Compton
Dialogue with Campbell
Clash with Heisenberg: Setting the Historical Record Straight
Confrontation with Pauli
7. The Challenge of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen and the Two Voices of Bohr's Response
Two Voices in Bohr's Response to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen
Bohr's Victory?
Disturbance, Reality, and Acausality
Bohr's Doctrine of the Indispensability of Classical Concepts and the Correspondence Principle
Part Two: Rhetorical Consolidation
8. The Polyphony of the Copenhagen Interpretation and the Rhetoric of Antirealism
What Scientists "Need Not" and "Must Not" Do
The Appeal of Antirealism: Some General Considerations
Reality, Classical Concepts, and Symbols
The Appeal of Antirealism: Bohr's Version
Antirealism and Opposition
The Appearance of Consensus and Conclusion
9. The Copenhagen Dogma: The Rhetoric of Finality and Inevitability
Acausality and the Indispensability of Classical Concepts
Operationalism: From Consistency to Inevitability Arguments
Bohm on Classical versus Quantum Concepts and on Indeterminism
10. Constructing the Orthodox Narrative
Introduction: "Whiggish" History and "Winner's" Strategies
Discontinuities and Quantum Jumps
Indeterminism and Historiographical Doubts
11. The Myth of Wave-Particle Complementarity
Introduction: The Dramatic Historical Narrative
Mathematical Physicists and the Wave-Particle Dilemma
Ambiguity and the Wave-Particle Issue
Ideological and Pedagogical Uses of Wave-Particle Complementarity
12. Complementarity as Metaphor
The Web of Correspondences and Harmonies
"Wholeness" as Metaphor
Bohr: Mathematics and Common Language
Metaphorical Appeal and Conclusion
13. Hero Worship, Construction of Paradigms, and Opposition
Bohr and Hero Worship
The Issue of Consistency
Opposition, Paradigms, and Past Science
14. Dialogues or Paradigms?
Heisenberg's "Closed Theories" and Kuhnian "Paradigms"
Where Did Kuhnian Incommensurability Come From?
Hanson's Incommensurability and the Copenhagen Dogma
Paradigms and the History of Science
Paradigms and Holism
Paradigms and Creativity
15. Dialogical Philosophy and Historiography: A Tentative Outline
In Praise of Disagreement
The Philosophical and Historiographical Advantages of Dialogism
Theory as Practice: Between Tools and Metaphors
Truth and Beauty

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)