Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century / Edition 1

Paperback (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
$34.47
Buy Used
Buy Used from BN.com
$32.35
(Save 41%)
Item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging.
Condition: Used – Good details
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $3.24
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 94%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (15) from $3.24   
  • New (7) from $27.98   
  • Used (8) from $3.24   

Overview

At the end of the nineteenth century, some physicists believed that the basic principles underlying their subject were already known, and that physics in the future would only consist of filling in the details. They could hardly have been more wrong. The past century has seen the rise of quantum mechanics, relativity, cosmology, particle physics, and solid-state physics, among other fields. These subjects have fundamentally changed our understanding of space, time, and matter. They have also transformed daily life, inspiring a technological revolution that has included the development of radio, television, lasers, nuclear power, and computers. In Quantum Generations, Helge Kragh, one of the world's leading historians of physics, presents a sweeping account of these extraordinary achievements of the past one hundred years.

The first comprehensive one-volume history of twentieth-century physics, the book takes us from the discovery of X rays in the mid-1890s to superstring theory in the 1990s. Unlike most previous histories of physics, written either from a scientific perspective or from a social and institutional perspective, Quantum Generations combines both approaches. Kragh writes about pure science with the expertise of a trained physicist, while keeping the content accessible to nonspecialists and paying careful attention to practical uses of science, ranging from compact disks to bombs. As a historian, Kragh skillfully outlines the social and economic contexts that have shaped the field in the twentieth century. He writes, for example, about the impact of the two world wars, the fate of physics under Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin, the role of military research, the emerging leadership of the United States, and the backlash against science that began in the 1960s. He also shows how the revolutionary discoveries of scientists ranging from Einstein, Planck, and Bohr to Stephen Hawking have been built on the great traditions of earlier centuries.

Combining a mastery of detail with a sure sense of the broad contours of historical change, Kragh has written a fitting tribute to the scientists who have played such a decisive role in the making of the modern world.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Nature
A readable and enormously valuable book. . . .
— Graham Farmelo
Physics World
An ambitious one-volume history: the first comprehensive textbook to address most of the significant aspects in the intellectual history of 20th-century physics. Kragh's achievement . . . is quite remarkable. . . . For physicists who want to 'humanize' their courses, or brush up on their professional past, for those who teach the history of modern science, and for anyone fascinated with physics, I can recommend this book as an indispensable resource.
— Diana Barkan
New Scientist
Within a century we've seen the rise of new physics, which has, however haltingly, at last begun to answer the big questions. . . . Taken together, they're an embarrassment of riches, and Kragh has had to pare the story down severely. But he's equal to the task, and manages to cover the pantheon of 20th-century physics. . . .
Financial Times
It is a thrilling story, full of excitement, danger, surprise and beauty, and it is told with lucidity and scholarship by Helge Kragh. What he gives us in this absorbing account is the story of what could be mankind's greatest intellectual adventure to date.
Booklist
Compared with the popular interest books on physics . . . Kragh presents appreciably more technical detail, and his estimable overview will appeal better to the active physics student.
Washington Times
A fine new study. . . . Mr. Kragh manages to cover this vast canvas in less than 500 pages, leaving very little of importance out. It is amazing how concise one can be if once knows what one is talking about.
— Jeremy Bernstein
Physics Today
An excellent guide to the historical literature on almost any subject in the history of twentieth-century physics.
— Laurie M. Brown
American Journal of Physics
Missing until now has been a relatively short, readable book that synthesizes the extensive research by historians of modern physics, to give an accurate guide to the new physics and the complex plaths by which it was developed. Quantum Generations does all this, and more . . . It is hard to think of anyone better qualified to write this book.
— Stephen G. Brush
Centaurus
A superb account of the last hundred years of physics. . . . I very much doubt we will see a comparable history of twentieth century physics for years to come. This is a magnificent work of synthesis that cannot be too highly commended for its balance, coverage, and clarity.
— Xavier Roque
Contemporary Physics
This is very good scientific history and in some measure philosophy written by someone who has an understanding of the process of scientific work. The writing is clear and largely non-technical. Although the focus is cosmology, the book will appeal to anyone with an interest in how science actually works, whether it is through the history of the philosophy.
— D.R. Matravers
ISIS
This book is a very ambitious and largely successful attempt to provide a one-volume history of twentieth-century physics. It is a Herculean task, and Helge Kragh is well aware of the problems and pitfalls. . . . Incredibly enough, Kragh . . . [gives] both a fair assessment of most of the major themes in this most busy and creative of centuries, and yet at the same time giving summaries of the major research developments within each of the major fields. This is no mean feat, and in fact it is a rather amazing one, so that we have here, in one volume, a wide-ranging view of many of the outstanding accomplishments of this century in physics.
— Daniel M. Greenberger
The Economist
A sweeping survey of the development of modern physics . . . wide-ranging, studiously researched, and comprehensive.
Nature - Graham Farmelo
A readable and enormously valuable book. . . .
Physics World - Diana Barkan
An ambitious one-volume history: the first comprehensive textbook to address most of the significant aspects in the intellectual history of 20th-century physics. Kragh's achievement . . . is quite remarkable. . . . For physicists who want to 'humanize' their courses, or brush up on their professional past, for those who teach the history of modern science, and for anyone fascinated with physics, I can recommend this book as an indispensable resource.
Washington Times - Jeremy Bernstein
A fine new study. . . . Mr. Kragh manages to cover this vast canvas in less than 500 pages, leaving very little of importance out. It is amazing how concise one can be if once knows what one is talking about.
Physics Today - Laurie M. Brown
An excellent guide to the historical literature on almost any subject in the history of twentieth-century physics.
American Journal of Physics - Stephen G. Brush
Missing until now has been a relatively short, readable book that synthesizes the extensive research by historians of modern physics, to give an accurate guide to the new physics and the complex plaths by which it was developed. Quantum Generations does all this, and more . . . It is hard to think of anyone better qualified to write this book.
Centaurus - Xavier Roque
A superb account of the last hundred years of physics. . . . I very much doubt we will see a comparable history of twentieth century physics for years to come. This is a magnificent work of synthesis that cannot be too highly commended for its balance, coverage, and clarity.
Contemporary Physics - D.R. Matravers
This is very good scientific history and in some measure philosophy written by someone who has an understanding of the process of scientific work. The writing is clear and largely non-technical. Although the focus is cosmology, the book will appeal to anyone with an interest in how science actually works, whether it is through the history of the philosophy.
ISIS - Daniel M. Greenberger
This book is a very ambitious and largely successful attempt to provide a one-volume history of twentieth-century physics. It is a Herculean task, and Helge Kragh is well aware of the problems and pitfalls. . . . Incredibly enough, Kragh . . . [gives] both a fair assessment of most of the major themes in this most busy and creative of centuries, and yet at the same time giving summaries of the major research developments within each of the major fields. This is no mean feat, and in fact it is a rather amazing one, so that we have here, in one volume, a wide-ranging view of many of the outstanding accomplishments of this century in physics.
From the Publisher

"A readable and enormously valuable book. . . ."--Graham Farmelo, Nature

"An ambitious one-volume history: the first comprehensive textbook to address most of the significant aspects in the intellectual history of 20th-century physics. Kragh's achievement . . . is quite remarkable. . . . For physicists who want to 'humanize' their courses, or brush up on their professional past, for those who teach the history of modern science, and for anyone fascinated with physics, I can recommend this book as an indispensable resource."--Diana Barkan, Physics World

"Neither a specialized academic work nor a mere popularization, Kragh's tome [is a] synthetic, deeply detailed and carefully explained survey. . . An impressive reference work, and a serious award-winning read."--Publisher's Weekly

"A sweeping survey of the development of modern physics . . . wide-ranging, studiously researched, and comprehensive."--The Economist

"Within a century we've seen the rise of new physics, which has, however haltingly, at last begun to answer the big questions. . . . Taken together, they're an embarrassment of riches, and Kragh has had to pare the story down severely. But he's equal to the task, and manages to cover the pantheon of 20th-century physics. . . ."--New Scientist

"It is a thrilling story, full of excitement, danger, surprise and beauty, and it is told with lucidity and scholarship by Helge Kragh. What he gives us in this absorbing account is the story of what could be mankind's greatest intellectual adventure to date."--Financial Times

"Kragh does an exceptional job of trying to cover in a single volume one of the most prolific sciences of this century. . . ."--Library Journal

"Compared with the popular interest books on physics . . . Kragh presents appreciably more technical detail, and his estimable overview will appeal better to the active physics student."--Booklist

"A fine new study. . . . Mr. Kragh manages to cover this vast canvas in less than 500 pages, leaving very little of importance out. It is amazing how concise one can be if once knows what one is talking about."--Jeremy Bernstein, Washington Times

"An excellent guide to the historical literature on almost any subject in the history of twentieth-century physics."--Laurie M. Brown, Physics Today
"Missing until now has been a relatively short, readable book that synthesizes the extensive research by historians of modern physics, to give an accurate guide to the new physics and the complex plaths by which it was developed. Quantum Generations does all this, and more . . . It is hard to think of anyone better qualified to write this book."--Stephen G. Brush, American Journal of Physics

"A superb account of the last hundred years of physics. . . . I very much doubt we will see a comparable history of twentieth century physics for years to come. This is a magnificent work of synthesis that cannot be too highly commended for its balance, coverage, and clarity."--Xavier Roque, Centaurus

"This is very good scientific history and in some measure philosophy written by someone who has an understanding of the process of scientific work. The writing is clear and largely non-technical. Although the focus is cosmology, the book will appeal to anyone with an interest in how science actually works, whether it is through the history of the philosophy."--D.R. Matravers, Contemporary Physics

"This book is a very ambitious and largely successful attempt to provide a one-volume history of twentieth-century physics. It is a Herculean task, and Helge Kragh is well aware of the problems and pitfalls. . . . Incredibly enough, Kragh . . . [gives] both a fair assessment of most of the major themes in this most busy and creative of centuries, and yet at the same time giving summaries of the major research developments within each of the major fields. This is no mean feat, and in fact it is a rather amazing one, so that we have here, in one volume, a wide-ranging view of many of the outstanding accomplishments of this century in physics."--Daniel M. Greenberger, ISIS

Physics World
An ambitious one-volume history: the first comprehensive textbook to address most of the significant aspects in the intellectual history of 20th-century physics. Kragh's achievement . . . is quite remarkable. . . . For physicists who want to 'humanize' their courses, or brush up on their professional past, for those who teach the history of modern science, and for anyone fascinated with physics, I can recommend this book as an indispensable resource.
— Diana Barkan
American Journal of Physics
Missing until now has been a relatively short, readable book that synthesizes the extensive research by historians of modern physics, to give an accurate guide to the new physics and the complex plaths by which it was developed. Quantum Generations does all this, and more . . . It is hard to think of anyone better qualified to write this book.
— Stephen G. Brush
Jeremy Bernstein
Mr. Kragh's stated objective is to write a history that will be accessible to other than professional physicists who, by the way, do not seem to have much of an interest in either the history or philosophy of their subject these days - with some notable exceptions. To this end, he has kept the equations to a bare minimum. Nonetheless, since this is a history of physics, there is inevitably a good deal of physics. I expect that a non-physicist reader will have some difficulty with some of this, but there is plenty in this book for such a reader as well.
Washington Times
Sidney Perkowitz
Living in a century that has seen more than its share of warfare and genocide, the notion that we live in a golden age seems strikingly at odds with reality. Yet it's true: within a century we've seen the rise of the new physics, which has, however haltingly, at last begun to answer the big questions. Modern physics has laid bare the nitty-gritty of the physical world, creating what is in essence a scientific renaissance. It resembles those other great intellectual ages: classical Greece, the Renaissance itself and the Enlightenment. It's amazing how neatly this revolution fits into the hundred-year frame: modern physics began in 1895 when Wilhelm Roeentgen discovered X-rays. This finding is just one of the high points that Helge Kragh, historian of science at Aarhus University in Denmark, showcases in"Quantum Generations."
New Scientist
Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
How did modern physics get from Rutherford and radioactivity to Heisenberg, Hiroshima and Stephen Hawking? Whose discoveries led to what theories, and why? How were physics and physicists affected by the micro- and macro-politics--from institutional rivalries to totalitarian movements--so visible throughout our century? Kragh (Dirac; Cosmology and Controversy), a historian of science at Aarhus University in Denmark, offers a hefty account of experiments and theories, experimental scientists and theoreticians, from the 1890s (marked by the rise of "electrodynamic models" as against mechanical ones) to the 1990s, when Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) promised to explain a forest of charmingly named elementary particles. In between, he covers debates about atomic structure; "the slow rise of quantum theory"; cryogenics; Einsteinian relativity (and its misinterpretations); the political, military and economic roles of physicists in and between the world wars; the Bomb; the meson, the boson, et al.; the Big Bang; superconductivity; and the perpetually frustrating dances between scientists and the organizations that fund them. Unable to cover all the physics there is, Kragh focuses on the best-known and most influential parts: on nuclear and subatomic physics, on relativity and cosmology and on European and American scientists. He concludes that, despite the surprises of quantum mechanics, 20th-century "physics... [has] resulted in new and much-improved theories, but that these have been produced largely cumulatively and without a complete break with the past." Neither a specialized academic work nor a mere popularization, Kragh's tome exhibits the kind of synthetic, deeply detailed and carefully explained survey more common in military or art history than in the history of science. It's an impressive reference work, and a serious, rewarding read. 22 b&w illus., 34 tables. (Nov.) Copyright 1999 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
Kragh, a Danish historian of science, has written many important works on this subject, among them Cosmology and Controversy: the Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. His new book is a brief, condensed, and selective description of physics in the 20th century. Hragh does an exceptional job of trying to cover in a single one volume one of the most prolific sciences of this century, concentrating on its major developments while sketching out some important applications such as materials science and medical physics. A complementary reading is Robert D. Purrington's Physics in the Nineteenth Century (Rutgers Univ., 1997). Recommended for public and academic libraries and would be a nice addition to history of physics, history of science, and Western civilization history collections.--Nestor Osorio, Northern Illinois Univ. Libs., Dekalb Copyright 1999 Cahners Business Information.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780691095523
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Publication date: 3/4/2002
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 512
  • Sales rank: 546,333
  • Product dimensions: 6.10 (w) x 9.26 (h) x 1.23 (d)

Read an Excerpt




Chapter One


FIN-DE-SIÈCLE PHYSICS: A WORLD PICTURE IN FLUX


The philosopher and mathematician Alfred North Whitehead once referred to the last quarter of the nineteenth century as "an age of successful scientific orthodoxy, undisturbed by much thought beyond the conventions.... one of the dullest stages of thought since the time of the First Crusade" (Whitehead 1925, 148). It is still commonly believed that physics at the end of the century was a somewhat dull affair, building firmly and complacently on the deterministic and mechanical world view of Newton and his followers. Physicists, so we are told, were totally unprepared for the upheavals that took place in two stages: first, the unexpected discoveries of x-rays, the electron, and radioactivity; and then the real revolution, consisting of Planck's discovery of the quantum of action in 1900 and Einstein's relativity theory of 1905. According to this received view, not only did Newtonian mechanics reign supreme until it was shattered by the new theories, but the Victorian generation of physicists also naively believed that all things worth knowing were already known or would soon become known by following the route of existing physics. Albert Michelson, the great American experimentalist, said in 1894 that "it seems probable that most of the grand underlying principles have been firmly established and that further advances are to be sought chiefly in the rigorous application of these principles to all the phenomena which come under our notice" (Badash 1972, 52). How ironic, then, that Professor Röntgen's new rays—the first ofseveral discoveries that defied explanation in terms of the known "grand underlying principles"—were announced only a year later. And how much more important the new physics of the early twentieth century appears if compared with views such as Michelson's.

    The received view is in part a myth, but like most myths, it has a foundation in fact. For example, Michelson was not the only physicist of the decade who expressed the feeling that physics was essentially complete and that what remained was either applied physics, more precise measurements, or relatively minor discoveries. When Max Planck entered the University of Munich in 1875, he was warned by a professor of physics that his chosen subject was more or less finished and that nothing new could be expected to be discovered. Yet, although such feelings certainly existed among physicists, it is questionable how widespread they were. Very few theoretical physicists of the 1890s seem to have accepted Michelson's view, and after the amazing discoveries of Röntgen, Henri Becquerel, J. J. Thomson, and the Curies, even the most conservative experimentalist was forced to realize its fallacy.

    What about the claim that physics a hundred years ago rested on orthodoxy and a complacent acceptance of Newtonian mechanics? Was there a mechanical worldview, or any commonly accepted worldview at all? Whereas the question of completeness can be discussed, it is squarely a myth that physicists stuck obstinately to the mechanical worldview until they were taught a lesson by Einstein in 1905 (or by Planck in 1900). The most important nonmechanical trend was based on electromagnetic theory, but this was only one of the indications of a widespread willingness to challenge the mechanical worldview and seek new foundations, either opposed to it or radical modifications of it. According to the classical mechanical world picture—the Laplacian version of Newtonianism (not to be confused with Newton's own ideas)—the world consisted of atoms, which were the sites of, and on which acted, various forces of long and short ranges. The gravitational force was the paradigmatic example of such forces acting at a distance over empty space. With the advent of field theory, the mechanism of force propagation changed, but Maxwell and most other field physicists continued to seek a mechanical foundation for their models. The most important conceptual shift was perhaps the rise to prominence—indeed, necessity—of a universal ether as the quasihypothetical, continuous, and all-pervading medium through which forces propagated with a finite speed.

    In 1902, in the final part of a textbook on optics, Michelson declared his belief that "the day seems not far distant when the converging lines from many apparently remote regions of thought will meet on ... common ground." He went on, "Then the nature of the atoms, and the forces called into play in their chemical union; the interactions between these atoms ... as manifested in the phenomena of light and electricity; the structures of the molecules and molecular systems of which the atoms are the units; the explanation of cohesion, elasticity, and gravitation—all these will be marshaled into a single compact and consistent body of scientific knowledge" (Michelson 1902, 163). And this was the same Michelson who, eight years earlier, had suggested that physics was near its end. Was it the discoveries of the electron and radioactivity that caused the changed attitude? Or perhaps Planck's discovery of the radiation law based on the notion of energy quantization? Not at all; these recent discoveries were not mentioned in the book. Michelson's enthusiasm was rooted in "one of the grandest generalizations of modern science ... that all the phenomena of the physical universe are only different manifestations of the various modes of motion of one all-pervading substance—the ether."

    Maxwell considered the possibility of explaining gravitation in terms of his electromagnetic theory, but abandoned the attempt after realizing that he would then have to ascribe an enormous intrinsic energy to the ether. Other Victorian physicists were less easily discouraged and there were, in the last quarter of the century, many attempts to either explain or revise Newton's divine law of gravitation. Some of these attempts were based on electrodynamics, others on hydrodynamic models. For example, in the 1870s, the Norwegian physicist Carl A. Bjerknes studied the motion of bodies in an infinite and incompressible fluid and was led to the conclusion that two pulsating spheres would give rise to forces between them varying inversely to the separation of their centers. He considered this a kind of hydrodynamic explanation of gravitation, or at least an interesting analogy. Bjerknes's work was taken up by some British theorists and, in 1898, was revived by the German Arthur Korn at the University of Munich, who developed a hydrodynamic theory of gravitation. At that time, however, electrodynamics was in focus, and complicated hydrodynamic models in the style of Bjerknes and Korn failed to arouse much interest.

    Related to hydrodynamical thinking, but of more importance and grandeur (if, in the end, no more successful), were the attempts to construct the world solely out of structures in the ether. The most important of the nonelectromagnetic theories was the vortex atomic theory, originally suggested in 1867 by William Thomson (later, Lord Kelvin) and subsequently developed by a whole school of British mathematical physicists. According to this theory, the atoms were vortical modes of motion of a primitive, perfect fluid, usually identified with the ether. In his Adams Prize essay of 1882, young J. J. Thomson gave an elaborate account of the vortex theory and extended it to cover chemical problems, including affinity and dissociation. The theory was also applied to electromagnetism, gravitation, and optics and was an ambitious attempt to establish a unitary and continuous "theory of everything" based solely on the dynamics of the ether. As late as 1895, William Hicks gave an optimistic report on the state of art of the vortex atom at the annual meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS). Hicks's view of the goal of theoretical physics is worth quoting at some length:


While, on the one hand, the end of scientific investigation is the discovery of laws, on the other, science will have reached its highest goal when it shall have reduced ultimate laws to one or two, the necessity of which lies outside the sphere of our recognition. These ultimate laws—in the domain of physical science at least—will be the dynamical laws of the relations of matter to number, space, and time. The ultimate data will be number, matter, space, and time themselves. When these relations shall be known, all physical phenomena will be a branch of pure mathematics. (BAAS Report 1895, 595)


As we shall see, very similar views continued to play an important role throughout the twentieth century. Although many of Hicks's contemporaries would have subscribed to his philosophy, by 1895, the vortex theory of atoms had been abandoned by most physicists. Decades of theoretical work had led to no real progress and the grand vortex program was degenerating into sterile mathematics.

    Much the same can be said of another hydrodynamic atomic theory, the "ether squirt" theory worked out by the mathematician Karl Pearson in the 1880s and 1890s. According to this theory, the ultimate atom was a point in the ether from which new ether continuously flowed in all directions of space. Like the vortex theorists, Pearson applied his theory to a variety of problems and believed it would be able to explain—in principle—gravitation, electromagnetism, and chemical phenomena. Although Pearson's theory did not attract the same kind of interest as the vortex theory, it is worth mentioning because it included not only sources but also sinks of ether—that is, a kind of negative matter. Gravitationally "negative" matter, which repels ordinary matter but attracts other negative matter, had already been discussed in the 1880s by Hicks within the framework of the vortex atomic theory, and the strange concept reappeared in Pearson's theory, as well as in other discussions of fin-de-siècle physics. For example, the British physicist Arthur Schuster speculated lightheartedly that there might exist entire stellar systems of antimatter, indistinguishable from our own except that the two stellar systems would be repelled rather than attracted. Not only did he introduce the names "antimatter" and "antiatoms" in 1898, but he also suggested that colliding matter and antimatter would annihilate each other, thus anticipating an important concept of later quantum physics.

    In Pearson's version of antimatter, ether poured in at a squirt and disappeared from our world at a sink. Where, in the first place, did the ether come from? According to Pearson, writing in 1892, it would not simply appear ex nihilo, but would possibly come from a fourth dimension, to which it would again return. Here we have another concept, usually seen as an invention of twentieth-century relativity theory, turning up unexpectedly in the physics of the old worldview. In fact, ideas of hyperspaces and their possible significance in physics were not new in the 1890s. In 1870, the British mathematician William Kingdon Clifford used Riemann's notion of curved, non-Euclidean geometry to suggest that the motion of matter and ether was in reality the manifestation of a variation of the curvature of space. This general idea of a "geometrization of physics" was well known at the end of the nineteenth century and inspired several physicists, astronomers, and mathematicians, not to mention science fiction authors, such as H. G. Wells. For example, in 1888, the eminent American astronomer Simon Newcomb suggested a model of the ether based on hyperdimensional space, and in 1900, the German Karl Schwarzschild made much use of non-Euclidean geometry in his astronomical work. Although these and other works were often speculative and always hypothetical, at the end of the century there existed a small group of researchers who considered hyperspace models of the ether or otherwise attempted to link four-dimensional space to problems of physical interest. Speculative or not, such attempts were considered legitimate within the spirit of physics characteristic of the 1890s.

    The hydrodynamic ether models differed from the Laplacian program in physics, but they nonetheless rested on mechanical ground and were not attempts to overthrow the Newtonian worldview. Hydrodynamics, after all, is the mechanical science of fluid bodies. Thermodynamics, the science of heat and other manifestations of energy, constituted a much more difficult problem for the classical worldview. This branch of physics was sometimes argued not only to be different from mechanics in principle, but also to have priority over mechanics as a more satisfactory foundation on which all of physics could be built. In the 1890s, together with electrodynamics, thermodynamics entered as a competitor to mechanics as far as foundational problems were concerned. In this decade, there was a continual discussion of the unity of physics, and it was not at all clear what discipline could best serve as the foundation of the unity that almost all physicists believed their science must have.

    Whereas the law of energy conservation was successfully explained in mechanical terms, the second law of thermodynamics did not succumb so easily to mechanical principles. For one thing, the laws of mechanics are reversible, or symmetric in time, whereas the second law of thermodynamics expresses an irreversible change in entropy. In his famous statistical-mechanical theory of entropy, developed first in 1872 and more fully in 1877, Ludwig Boltzmann believed he had reduced the second law to molecular-mechanical principles, but his interpretation was challenged and became the subject of much controversy. One of his critics, the German physicist Ernst Zermelo, argued in 1896 from Poincaré's so-called recurrence theorem that the second law could not be derived from mechanics and thus was incompatible with a unitary mechanical world picture. Boltzmann denied the validity of Zermelo's argument and remained convinced that there was no deep disagreement between mechanics and thermodynamics.

    According to the physicist Georg Helm and the chemist Ludwig Ostwald, both Germans, energy was the most important of the unifying concepts of the physical sciences. A generalized thermodynamics was therefore held to replace mechanics as the foundation of physics. Helm and Ostwald came to this conclusion about 1890 and called their new program energetics. The new science of energetics was, in many ways, contrary to the mechanical world picture and was thought of as a revolt against what was called "scientific materialism." This revolt included the position that mechanics was to be subsumed under the more general laws of energetics in the sense that the mechanical laws were held to be reducible to energy principles. Another aspect of energetics was its denial of atomism as other than a useful mental representation. Ostwald and some other physical chemists, including Pierre Duhem in France, argued that the belief in atoms and molecules was metaphysical and that all empirical phenomena could be explained without the atomic hypothesis.

    The energetics program was considered enough of a challenge to the traditional molecular-mechanical view that it was taken up as a discussion theme at the annual meeting of the German Association of Natural Scientists and Physicians in Lübeck in 1895. The meeting featured a famous discussion between Boltzmann, who attacked the energeticists, and Helm and Ostwald, who argued against the mechanical world picture. It is interesting to note that neither Boltzmann nor others present at the meeting simply defended the classical-mechanical worldview or fully subscribed to the views that Helm and Ostwald criticized. Boltzmann declared that the mechanical worldview was a dead issue and that the "view that no other explanation can exist except that of the motion of material points, the laws of which are determined by central forces, had generally been abandoned long before Mr. Ostwald's remarks" (Jungnickel and McCormmach 1986, 222). All the same, Boltzmann saw no merit in the energetics program and preferred to work on a mechanical foundation, feeling that it alone was sufficiently developed to secure scientific progress.

    The energetics alternative received only modest support among physicists and chemists, but criticism of the atomic theory and emphasis on the fundamentality of the energy concept were repeated also by many scientists not directly associated with the energetics program. The leading French physicist, Pierre Curie—perhaps better known as the husband of Made Curie—may be an example. In accordance with his positivistic view of science, Curie refrained from materialistic and atomistic hypotheses and favored a phenomenalism inspired by the laws of thermodynamics. He, and several other French physicists, held thermodynamics to be the ideal of physical theory. They argued that energy, not matter, was the essence of a reality that could be understood only as processes or actions. From the early 1880s onward, the Austrian physicist-philosopher Ernst Mach argued for a phenomenological understanding of physics, according to which physical theories and concepts were economical ways of organizing sense data. Mach admitted the usefulness of molecular mechanics, but considered it neither a fundamental theory nor one expressing physical reality. From a foundational point of view, he preferred the energy principles to the laws of mechanics. Again in agreement with Ostwald and his allies, Mach held that atoms were nothing but convenient fictions. Moreover, Mach criticized the very heart of mechanics, the idea of force as expressed by Newton's second law. A somewhat similar foundational criticism of mechanics from a positivistic point of view was undertaken by Heinrich Hertz in his 1894 reformulation of mechanics, building only on the fundamental conceptions of space, time and mass. However, this kind of critical analysis of mechanics did not necessarily involve a wish to abandon the mechanical world picture. In the case of Mach it did, but to Hertz, the new versions of mechanics merely affirmed this picture of the world. In fact, a major aim of Hertz's force-free mechanics was to establish a mechanical theory of the electromagnetic ether.

    The mechanical worldview was no longer considered progressive in the 1890s, and even traditionalists had to admit that it was not universally successful. Apart from the troubled relationship between mechanics and the entropy law, there was an older problem related to the kinetic theory of gases. As early as 1860, Maxwell had observed that the measured ratios between the specific heats of diatomic gases at constant pressure ([c.sub.p]) and at constant volume ([c.sub.v]) did not agree with the equipartition theorem based on the mechanical theory. According to this theory, [Gamma] = [c.sub.p]/[c.sub.v] = 1 + 2/n, where n is the number of degrees of freedom of the molecule. The problem was that the predicted result for diatomic gases matched experiments (which gave [Gamma] = 1.4) only if it was assumed that the molecule was rigid and had no internal parts; this assumption seemed inconsistent with the results of spectroscopy, which strongly indicated internal vibrations exchanging energy with the ether. The problem was recognized as an anomaly, but of course, it needed more than a single anomaly to shatter the mechanical world view. Yet the apparent failure of the equipartition theorem was considered serious enough to figure as one of the two clouds in a famous lecture, "Nineteenth Century Clouds Over the Dynamical Theory of Heat and Light," that Lord Kelvin delivered before the Royal Institution in April 1900. The other threat was the failure to explain the motion of the earth through the ether, as exhibited by the ether drift experiment of Michelson and Edward Morley. (For this, see chapter 7.)

    The new physics that arose in the early years of the twentieth century was not a revolt against a petrified Newtonian worldview, something analogous to the revolt of Galileo against Aristotelianism. By 1905, the mechanical worldview had been under attack for more than a decade, and for this reason alone, there never was much of a clash between Einstein and Newton. Even more important than the opposition inspired by thermodynamics and energetics was the new and vigorous trend in electromagnetic theory that characterized the 1890s. We shall deal in more detail with this so-called electromagnetic worldview in chapter 8, and here we only emphasize its importance and key elements. The basic problem of physics in the late nineteenth century was perhaps the relationship between ether and matter: Was the ether the fundamental substratum out of which matter was constructed? Or, on the contrary, was matter a more fundamental ontological category of which the ether was just a special instance? The first view, where primacy was given to structures in the ether, became increasingly more common at the turn of the century, when mechanical ether models were replaced by electrodynamic models.

    If electromagnetism was more fundamental than mechanics, it made sense to try to derive the mechanical laws from those of electromagnetism, and this was precisely what many theoretical physicists aimed at. Electromagnetism was considered a unifying principle of all science, not unlike the role assigned to energy in Ostwald's energetics. The way in which Ostwald and his energeticist allies spoke of "matter as subordinate to energy" and "all events [being] ultimately nothing but a change in energy" was strikingly similar to the rhetoric of the electrodynamicists, only with "ether" or "electromagnetic field" substituted for "energy." In both cases, materialism was discarded and matter declared an epiphenomenon. Joseph Larmor, the eminent British theorist, had no difficulty imagining a world based on a nonmaterial, transcendent ether. He admitted, as he wrote in 1900, that this might seem "as leaving reality behind us," but defended his ether worldview by arguing that it described an inner reality not directly accessible to the senses (Larmor 1900, vi). This was an argument that Mach, Ostwald, and other phenomenalists would not have accepted. At the beginning of the new century, the monistic, electromagnetic worldview was accepted by a growing proportion of avant-garde physicists in Germany, England, France, and the United States. Physics consisted of the physics of matter and the physics of the electromagnetic ether, and the trend to avoid the unwanted dualism was to identify matter with ether, rather than the other way around. This is not to say that there were no dissenting voices or that the electromagnetic doctrine permeated the entire field of physics. There were physicists who—years before Einstein—rejected the ether as a metaphysical concept, and there were those who continued to search for mechanical models of the ether or even considered the ether as a special state of ordinary matter. Textbooks of this period usually rested on a mechanical basis and did not reflect the change in worldview discussed in frontier theoretical physics. This is how textbooks usually are: They are by nature conservative and cautious in their attitude toward modern ideas.

    The trend of theoretical physics around 1900 was more than a shift in fundamental ideas from mechanics to thermo- and electrodynamics, and it was more than the result of a number of spectacular discoveries. It was part of a change in worldview that had ramifications outside physics and was nourished by the particular Zeitgeist of the period, a spirit of time sometimes characterized as neoromantic. The historian Russell McCormmach has aptly summarized the situation as follows: "The whole cultural configuration at the turn of the century was implicated in the change from mechanical to electromagnetic thinking. The immaterial electromagnetic concepts were attractive in the same measure that the inert, material imagery of mechanics was displeasing" (McCormmach 1970, 495). One important element of this cultural configuration was a widespread antimaterialism. Taking different shapes in the different scientific nations, the antimateralistic doctrine amounted to the belief that "matter is dead." If matter was not the ultimate reality, but merely some manifestation of an immaterial ether, it would not seem unreasonable to challenge other established doctrines derived from the physics of matter, including the permanence of chemical elements and the laws of conservation of matter and energy. Indeed, in some quarters, the very qualities of permanence and conservation were considered suspicious within a world view emphasizing transformation, evolution, and becoming.

    As an example, consider the French psychologist and amateur physicist Gustave LeBon, who, in 1896, reported the discovery of what he called "black light"—a new kind of invisible radiation that he believed was distinct from, but possibly related to, x-rays and cathode rays. Although LeBon's discovery claim did not fare well, his general ideas of matter, radiation, and ether were received favorably by the public and were, to some extent, representative of the period's Zeitgeist in scientific circles. In his book The Evolution of Matter, a hit that went through twelve editions and sold 44,000 copies, LeBon concluded that all matter is unstable, constantly emitting radiation or "effluvia." Material qualities were held to be epiphenomena exhibited by matter in the process of transforming into the imponderable ether from which it had once originated. According to LeBon, there was no dualism between energy and matter, which just represented different stages in an evolutionary process, the end result of which was the pure ethereal state. Among his many arguments for the continual degradation of matter into ether, LeBon considered radioactivity to be particularly convincing. He shared the view of many physicists that radioactivity is a property exhibited by all matter. Then, if all chemical elements emitted ether-like radiations, would they not slowly melt away and would this not prove the nonmateriality of matter? Or, as LeBon expressed it rather more dramatically, would the ether not represent "the final nirvana to which all things return after a more or less ephemeral existence" (LeBon 1905, 315)? LeBon and many of his contemporaries believed that this was indeed the case.

    LeBon's quasiscientific speculations had considerable appeal among the many scientists who were dissatisfied with positivistic ideals and longed for an undogmatic, more youthful science that would better satisfy what they associated with the human spirit. His ideas struck a chord in a period that has been described as a "revolt against positivism" and even—but less justifiably—a "revolt from reason" (MacLeod 1982, 3). Among those who listened with sympathy to LeBon's arguments was the great Henri Poincaré. But LeBon was not a theoretical physicist and his views, although fashionable, were not particularly modern. If he was not taken too seriously by physicists outside France, it may have been because he failed to incorporate the electromagnetic ether into his speculations. Although it is reasonable to speak of a general spirit of physics about the turn of the century, the degree of consensus should not be exaggerated. There were considerable differences among the views of leading individual physicists and there were also important national differences. In Germany and France, for instance, the reaction against the mechanical worldview was more often associated with positivistic virtues and thermodynamic ideals than was the case in England. British physicists typically had no sympathy for the positivistic, fact-oriented view of science championed by Pierre Curie, Duhem, Ostwald, Mach, and others. In 1896, in a critical comment on Ostwald's energetics, the Irish physicist George FitzGerald distinguished between the metaphysically receptive British style and the inductive, unphilosophical German style. "A Briton wants emotion," he wrote, "something to raise enthusiasm, something with a human interest" (Wynne 1979, 171). The battle cry for emotions, actions, and evolutionary processes "with a human interest" was repeated by French neoromanticists, who contrasted their style with that of the supposedly unimaginative Germans. At the same time, they objected to the British style of physics, which they found too mechanistic and lacking in esprit.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


Preface xi
PART ONE: FROM CONSOLIDATION TO REVOLUTION 1
CHAPTER ONE Fin-de-Siecle Physics: A World Picture in Flux 3
CHAPTER TWO The World of Physics 13
Personnel and Resources 13
Physics Journals 19
A Japanese Look at European Physics 22
CHAPTER THREE Discharges in Gases and What Followed 27
A New Kind of Rays 28
From Becquerel Rays to Radioactivity 30
Spurious Rays, More or Less 34
The Electron before Thomson 38
The First Elementary Particle 40
CHAPTER FOUR Atomic Architecture 44
The Thomson Atom 44
Other Early Atomic Models 48
Rutherford's Nuclear Atom 51
A Quantum Theory of Atomic Structure 53
CHAPTER FIVE The Slow Rise of Quantum Theory 58
The Law of Blackbody Radiation 58
Early Discussions of the Quantum Hypothesis 63
Einstein and the Photon 66
Specific Heats and the Status of Quantum Theory by 1913 68
CHAPTER SIX Physics at Low Temperatures 74
The Race Toward Zero 74
Kammerlingh Onnes and the Leiden Laboratory 76
Superconductivity 80
CHAPTER SEVEN Einstein's Relativity, and Others' 87
The Lorentz Transformations 87
Einsteinian Relativity 90
From Special to General Relativity 93
Reception 98
CHAPTER EIGHT A Revolution that Failed 105
The Concept of Electromagnetic Mass 105
Electron Theory as a Worldview 108
Mass Variation Experiments 111
Decline of a Worldview 114
Unified Field Theories 116
CHAPTER NINE Physics in Industry and War 120
Industrial Physics 120
Electrons at Work, I. Long-Distance Telephony 123
Electrons at Work, II: Vacuum Tubes 126
Physics in the Chemists' War 130
PART TWO: FROM REVOLUTION TO CONSOLIDATION 137
CHAPTER TEN Science and Politics in the Weimar Republic 139
Science Policy and Financial Support 139
International Relations 143
The Physics Community 148
Zeitgeist and the Physical Worldview 151
CHAPTER ELEVEN Quantum Jumps 155
Quantum Anomalies 155
Heisenberg'S Quantum Mechanics 161
Schrodinger's Equation 163
Dissemination and Receptions 168
CHAPTER TWELVE The Rise of Nuclear Physics 174
The Electron-Proton Model 174
Quantum Mechanics and the Nucleus 177
Astrophysical Applications 182
1932, Annus Mirabilis 184
CHAPTER THIRTEEN From Two to Many Particles 190
Antiparticles 190
Surprises from the Cosmic Radiation 193
Crisis in Quantum Theory 196
Yukawas Heavy Quantum 201
CHAPTER FOURTEEN Philosophical Implications of Quantum Mechanics 206
Uncertainty and Complementarity 206
Against the Copenhagen Interpretation 212
Is Quantum Mechanics Complete? 215
CHAPTER FIFTEEN Eddington's Dream and Other Heterodoxies 218
Eddington's Fundamentalism 218
Cosmonumerology and Other Speculations 221
Milne and Cosmophysics 223
The Modem Aristotelians 226
CHAPTER SIXTEEN Physics and the New Dictatorships 230
In the Shadow of the Swastika 230
Aryan Physics 236
Physics in Mussolini's Italy 238
Physics, Dialectical Materialism, and Stalinism 240
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Brain Drain and Brain Gain 245
American Physics in the 1930s 245
Intellectual Migrations 249
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN From Uranium Puzzle to Hiroshima 257
The Road to Fission 257
More than Moonshine 261
Toward the Bomb 265
The Death of Two Cities 269
PART THREE: PROGRESS AND PROBLEMS 277
CHAPTER NINETEEN Nuclear Themes 279
Physics of Atomic Nuclei 279
Modem Alchemy 283
Hopes and Perils of Nuclear Energy 285
Controlled Fusion Energy 290
CHAPTER TWENTY Militarization and Megatrends 293
Physics-A Branch of the Military? 295
Big Machines 302
A European Big Science Adventure 308
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE Particle Discoveries 312
Mainly Mesons 312
Weak Interactions 317
Quarks 321
The Growth of Particle Physics 325
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO Fundamental Theories 332
The Ups and Downs of Field Theory 336
Gauge Fields and Electroweak Unification 339
Quantum Chromodynamics 344
CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE Cosmology and the Renaissance of Relativity 349
Toward the Big Bang Universe 349
The Steady State Challenge 354
Cosmology after 1960 357
The Renaissance of General Relativity 361
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR Elements of Solid State Physics 366
The Solid State Before 1940 366
Semiconductors and the Rise of the Solid State Community 370
Breakthroughs in Superconductivity 375
CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE Engineering Physics and Quantum Electronics 382
It Started with the Transistor 382
Microwaves, the Laser and Quantum Optics 386
Optical Fibers 391
CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX Science under Attack--Physics in Crisis? 394
Signs of Crisis 394
A Revolt against Science 401
The End of Physics? 405
CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN Unifications and Speculations 409
The Problem of Unity 409
Grand Unified Theories 411
Superstring Theory 415
Quantum Cosmology 419
PART FOUR: A LOOK BACK 425
CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT Nobel Physics 427
CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE A Century of Physics in Retrospect 440
Growth and Progress 440
Physics and the Other Sciences 444
Conservative Revolutions 447
APPENDIX Further Reading 453
Bibliography 461
Index 481
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)