Quest for Certainty: A Comparative Study of Heidegger and Sankara

Available through our Marketplace sellers.
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (1) from $30.00   
  • Used (1) from $30.00   
Close
Sort by
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Note: Marketplace items are not eligible for any BN.com coupons and promotions
$30.00
Seller since 2005

Feedback rating:

(260)

Condition:

New — never opened or used in original packaging.

Like New — packaging may have been opened. A "Like New" item is suitable to give as a gift.

Very Good — may have minor signs of wear on packaging but item works perfectly and has no damage.

Good — item is in good condition but packaging may have signs of shelf wear/aging or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Acceptable — item is in working order but may show signs of wear such as scratches or torn packaging. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Used — An item that has been opened and may show signs of wear. All specific defects should be noted in the Comments section associated with each item.

Refurbished — A used item that has been renewed or updated and verified to be in proper working condition. Not necessarily completed by the original manufacturer.

Like New
1989 Fine 0820410292 Fine. (Binding: Hard Cover, Jacket: No Jacket)

Ships from: Berkeley, CA

Usually ships in 1-2 business days

  • Canadian
  • International
  • Standard, 48 States
  • Standard (AK, HI)
  • Express, 48 States
  • Express (AK, HI)
Page 1 of 1
Showing All
Close
Sort by
Sending request ...

More About This Book

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780820410296
  • Publisher: Lang, Peter Publishing, Incorporated
  • Publication date: 6/28/1989
  • Series: Revisioning Philosophy Series
  • Pages: 239

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 22, 2001

    Dealing with Uncertainty

    As a Management Scientist and professor teaching decision-making processes, I have the need and interest to this comparative study. The exerts taken form both authors are well balanced. They are explained or defined although in metaphysical terms. It is a well balanced discussions and comparative study of 'what is'. 'What is', I believe is anything and it is not actually defined but our perception of it is. Let me clarify this. Because we are not actually defined but we are defining we are actually only defining our perception of that object. Our perception can be based on scientific fact or the analysis of complicated machines but these are only an 'approximation to the essential nature of all thing' and thus not an exact definition. <p> The book goes on to talk about scientific irruption into defining 'what is' in that our studying the object to define it develops a relationship to it and thus changes it's definition all together. Other effects on the definition of an object are its relationship to the world and every attitude towards its presence. Beyond any of these relationships there is 'nothing', which is the heart of Sankara to study or we simply wouldn't realize 'what is' existed. The author proceeds to define 'nothing' in its relationship to 'what is'. I felt at this point Heidegger tried to make the point that an object either exists as 'what is' or because of lack of relationship did not exist as 'nothing' by defining 'what is'. <p> The problem is two different views of the world that because our definition of 'what is' is actually only a perception our definition of 'nothing' was infinitely skewed, and there was point in defining it at all. <p> In conclusion, human's worldviews in the West or in the East can be rationalized. This process of rationalization can arrive either by metaphysics, or theology. Reality is through something he/she is still only left with a perception of its definition and might want to look at the problem from a different angle. Or decide that they have already wasted too much time with nonsensical gibberish and forget it all together. This book certainly convince you well that decision making is central to human activities in the East as much as in the Western world.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)