Good read but could be more accurate
I'm a stickler for accuracy. So with a subject I know - like the Westerfield-van Dam case - I notice any errors. Unfortunately, I found a lot. For example:
Westerfield didn't leave behind, in Danielle's house, "virtually" no proof of having been there: the forensic people couldn't find ANY proof.
The burglar alarm story is wrong. When Brenda arrived home 2 a.m., she noticed the alarm light blinking, found the side garage door open, and closed it. At about 3:30 a.m., Damon woke up, noticed the alarm light blinking again, and found and closed the rear sliding door.
Westerfield's weekend trip story is also wrong. After leaving Dad's Friday night, he returned home, slept, fetched his RV around 8 a.m. Saturday, brought it back home, filled it with water, stocked up on groceries, and then went to the Strand. He returned home Saturday afternoon, and that's when he found the law enforcement and media frenzy. He then went to the desert, returning home Monday morning.
The tow truck driver didn't say he heard voices inside the RV; he thought he heard a voice say a couple of words.
The "palmprint and fingerprint" was a handprint.
Only one hair similar to Danielle's was found in his RV sink; a second one was similar only in color.
64,000 is the total images on Westerfield's computers; 100 is the number that were "questionable" - the females MAY have been underage. His son DID see the zip disks, but didn't see any child porn on them. And his niece didn't say he fondled her, but that he rubbed her teeth.
He didn't have an unobstructed view into the van Dam back yard, there were trees in the way.
Brenda said she asked the DA to offer him a plea deal, and the earliest media report of the deal implies he rejected an offer made by law enforcement.
Damon asked detailed questions about how deputies transported Westerfield to and from the trial, so the judge thought him a security risk.
The body wasn't found in the desert; it was only about 25 miles (by road) away from her home (13 miles direct).
There was only one orange fiber, and it was entwined in Danielle's hair.
The entomology dates the first insect infestation of the body to the MIDDLE of February. The EARLY February dates were derived from the very slow development rate in one study (of Canadian black blowflies), compounded by confusion and mistakes, by prosecutor, entomologist and reporters alike, due to the multiplicity of different combinations of development rates, weather stations and insect species, and an inability by the prosecutor to understand the calculation method.
It might appear that I am totally negative towards this book. I'm not. It states clearly that the body was only PARTIALLY mummified, whereas many reports incorrectly describe the mummification as "advanced". It mentions that the detective didn't see the cadaver dog's supposed alert at the RV compartment. And so on. So there is some degree of BALANCE in this emotive case.
And the book provides the first confirmation that a condom wrapper was found under the body. This was supposedly a sex crime, yet that's the only evidence of sexual activity and we're told it's not related to the case. Like the hair under her body.
The book is interesting. It's a pity about the errors. Dr Wecht got his information in good faith from media reports, but they are unreliable. The only way to get correct information is to study the trial tra
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Overview
No one has performed more autopsies in high-profile cases than Dr. Cyril Wecht. During the past four decades, he has dissected more than 16,000 bodies to determine how and why they died. He has testified in hundreds of trials and exhumed dozens of corpses. He's investigated the deaths of presidents and princes, coal miners and Hollywood stars.
From the tragic homicides of Laci Peterson and Nicole Brown Simpson to the mysteries that surround the deaths of JonBenét Ramsey and Natalee Hollaway, CNN, MSNBC, FOX News, the New York Times, and scores of other publications constantly call upon Dr. Wecht to provide his expert ...