Reason in Law / Edition 8

Paperback (Print)
Rent
Rent from BN.com
$14.25
(Save 81%)
Est. Return Date: 10/28/2014
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $47.55
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 35%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (8) from $47.55   
  • New (4) from $70.94   
  • Used (4) from $47.55   

Overview

Arguing that good legal reasoning remains the best device by which we can ensure that judicial impartiality, the rule of law, and social trust and peace are preserved, Thomas F. Burke and Lief H. Carter present an accessible and lively text that analyzes the politics of the judicial process. Looking at the larger social and institutional contexts that affect the rule of law – including religious beliefs and media coverage of the courts – Reason in Law uses cases ripped from the headlines to illustrate its theory in real-world practice.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780205745395
  • Publisher: Pearson
  • Publication date: 8/4/2009
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 8
  • Pages: 208
  • Sales rank: 450,339
  • Product dimensions: 5.90 (w) x 8.90 (h) x 0.40 (d)

Meet the Author

Lief Carter grew up in the Seattle area in the age of “innocent” rock ’n roll (the 1950s). He earned his AB from Harvard College (1962) and his law degree from Harvard Law School (1965). The Vietnam War ended his career as a legal practitioner just as it started. He served in the Peace Corps (Bolivia) as an alternative form of service in 1966–1967 and then returned to graduate school at the University of California-Berkeley, where he earned his Ph.D. in political science (1972). His dissertation received the Corwin Award of the American Political Science Association. He taught at the University of Georgia from 1973 until 1995 and then served for a decade as the McHugh Family Distinguished Professor at The Colorado College. In addition to Reason in Law, he has published books on criminal prosecution, administrative law, and theories of constitutional interpretation. He comprehensively explores the similarities between the requirements of good competitive games—and particularly the requirement that the umpires and referees be impartial—and the requirements of good law doing in his latest publication, “Law and Politics a Play,” appearing in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, volume 3 (2008). Lief lives in Manitou Springs, Colorado.

Tom Burke is proud to have been born and raised in the city of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and to have received his undergraduate degree from the University of Minnesota. Nonetheless, he is also glad to have left his native state for the warm California sun. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California-Berkeley in 1996. At Berkeley Tom studied with many of the professors who two decades earlier had taught Lief Carter, and, like Lief, he received the Corwin Award of the American Political Science Association for his dissertation. In 1996 he began teaching at Wellesley College, just outside of Boston, Massachusetts, where he is the Jane Bishop ’51 Associate Professor of Political Science. He has written articles on campaign finance, the European Union, the Americans with Disabilities Act, how organizations respond to legal mandates, empirical rights scholarship, the Bush Administration’s approach to legal politics, and the place of rights in American politics. His most recent article is ”Political Regimes and the Future of the First Amendment,”Studies in Law, Politics and Society 44 (2008), 107-139.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

1 What Legal Reasoning Is, and Why It Matters

An Overview of Law and Politics

A Definition of Law

A Definition of Legal Reasoning

Legal Reasoning Does Not Discover the “One Right Answer.”

The Four Elements of Legal Reasoning

Sources of Official Legal Texts

The Choices That Legal Reasoning Confronts

Illustrative Case

Questions about the Case

2 Change and Stability in Legal Reasoning

Sources of Unpredictibility in Law

Is Unpredictability in Law Desirable?

Vertical and Horizontal Stare Decisis: A Stabilizing and Clarifying Element in Law.
Illustrative Cases

Questions about the Cases

3 Common Law

Origins of Common Law

Reasoning by Example in Common Law

Keeping the Common-Law Tradition Alive

The Common-Law Tradition Today

Illustrative Case

Questions about the Case

4 Statutory Interpretation

What are Statutes?

Four Misguided Approaches to “First Instance” Statutory Interpretation

Purpose: The Key to Wise Statutory Interpretation

Stare Decisis in Statutory Interpretation

A Summary Statement of the Appropriate Judicial Approach to Statutory Interpretation

Illustrative Case

Questions about the Case

5 Interpreting the United States Constitution

“The Supreme Law of the Land”

Conventional Legal Reasoning in Constitutional Interpretation

Judicial Review and Democratic Theory

The Turn to Individual Dignity

Illustrative Case

Questions about the Case

6 Law and Politics

The Rule of Law

Three Threats to the Rule of Law

The Rule of Law as Liberal Justification

Illustrative Case

Appendix A: Introduction to Legal Procedure and Terminology

Appendix B: Law and Politics: The Rule of Law and the Bush Administration

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)