Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems: Global Lessons for Improving Water Management / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $63.28
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 57%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (12) from $63.28   
  • New (8) from $63.28   
  • Used (4) from $76.00   


A critical and insightful look at the past, present, and future state of water and wastewater services
In response to the worldwide water crisis foreseen by many experts, Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems presents practical solutions for making drinking water more affordable and available, as well as strategies for improving water sanitation to satisfy the demands of a growing global population. Through extensive data and case histories, this book demonstrates the potential success of privatizing water delivery and wastewater treatment facilities. In addition, it provides examples of state-of-the-art techniques for achieving higher efficiencies in water infrastructure facilities through reengineering, improved technologies, and quality benchmarking.
Contributed chapters are provided by leading global engineers and economists from such companies as the World Bank, Stone and Weber Consultants, the Atlantis Water Fund, and the Anglian Water Company. Coverage by these experts includes exploring regulatory frameworks, financing the water and wastewater infrastructure, reinventing public sector operations, analyzing the past and future of the global water industry, and examining the restructuring operations in selected U.S. cities.
Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems: Global Lessons for Improving Water Management is a constructive volume for civil engineers working in water and wastewater treatment, urban and regional planners, and environmental engineers, as well as government administrators overseeing infrastructure and water systems and financial institutions involved with underwriting major water improvement projects.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From The Critics
Contributors from utility companies, local governments, and the mysterious world of various Institutes and Groups discuss issues and impediments related to drinking and waste water primarily as capitalist enterprises. After an overview of private-sector participation in the US and around the world, they cover the regulatory framework, financing the water and wastewater infrastructure, reinventing public sector operations, restructuring operations in selected US cities, and topics from the past and future. Specific titles include water service reform in Latin America, the Manila concession as the largest water system privatization, and deregulating private water supplies as a policy option for developing countries. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780471064220
  • Publisher: Wiley
  • Publication date: 7/25/2002
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 496
  • Product dimensions: 6.28 (w) x 9.41 (h) x 1.10 (d)

Meet the Author

PAUL SEIDENSTAT is Associate Professor of Economics at TempleUniversity.

DAVID HAARMEYER is Associate Director with the private consultingfirm of Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

SIMON HAKIM is Professor of Economics and Codirector of the Centerfor Competitive Government at Temple University.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems

Global Lessons for Improving Water Management

John Wiley & Sons

Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-471-06422-X

Chapter One

An Overview of Private Sector Participation in the Global and US Water and Wastewater Sector

David Haarmeyer and Debra G. Coy


The global water and wastewater sector has the distinction of being the infrastructure sector with greatest promise-steady long-term cash flows from what many describe as the "last monopoly utility business"-and the sector that has shown the least amount of progress in terms of attracting private investment. Year after year, figures are released indicating that both developing and developed countries require tremendous capital investment to meet the basic needs of their populations. Estimates from the World Bank put the capital "needs" for developing countries at $60 billion over the next ten years. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that $275 billion is "needed" for investment in water and wastewater services over the next 20 years. And in the European Community, the figure is $220 billion.

Yet despite the tremendous needs, the amount of private capital flowing to the sector has been limited, especially when compared to other infrastructure sectors. As indicated in Figure 1.1,investment in water and sanitation has trailed transport, energy, and telecom investment throughout the 1990s during the emerging markets infrastructure revolution. Of the nearly $580 billion in total infrastructure investment directed to these sectors during this time, water and wastewater represented only $30 billion, or about 5%. Also noteworthy is the water industry's slow metamorpohsis to introduce competition and deregulate potential competitive segments of the sector's value chain, changes already made in the gas, electric, and telecom industries. As a result of this restructuring, consumers in these industries are experiencing significant benefits in terms of lower prices, a broader array of services, and greater innovation.

Why does the flow of private capital to the water and wastewater sector worldwide appear constrained relative to the tremendous needs for investment in new facilities, rehabilitation of leaking pipes, and system upgrades? The following five characteristics of the sector and their associated risks are a helpful starting place to answering this question:

Significant Interaction with Government. Health, environmental, and monopoly concerns have meant that governments, often at multiple levels, have tended to be heavily involved in regulating water and wastewater services. This level of interaction with the government exposes the sector to significant regulatory and political uncertainty and risk.

Local and Small Project Size. Water supply and wastewater systems tend to be small and local, given the relatively low value of the service and high capital cost required for long-distance transmission. Consequently, financiers are relatively less attracted to the sector's fragmented structure, which, compared to gas, electric, and telecom, severely limits its ability to generate efficiencies from regional integration.

Political Risks. As sunk, highly specific, and non-redeployable investments, private investors, especially in developing countries with limited independent regulatory and judicial frameworks, are often exposed to government opportunism and expropriation. These forms of political as well as regulatory risks are costly and difficult to cover.

Currency Risk. Water and wastewater projects in countries with less developed capital markets depend on foreign capital for investment. The mismatch between the foreign currency and the domestic currency that consumers use to pay their bills means that international lenders are exposed to the risk that they may not receive back the full value of their investment because of fluctuations in the domestic currency.

Inadequate Tariffs. Given the high level of capital investment and the history of government-subsidized services, full-cost pricing of water and wastewater service has yet to take hold fully in many markets, even in the United States. The public perception in many countries is that water is "free," which means that it remains broadly underpriced, which discourages private investment, or forces investors to rely on subsidies to obtain sufficiently attractive rates of return on invested capital.

Taken together, these unique features of the water industry indicate that, despite its potentially attractive cash profile in terms of offering investors steady long-term revenue streams, the sector as it is presently structured and regulated has a relatively unattractive risk profile. Indeed, to adequately address these risks-especially political and regulatory risks-most privately financed water and wastewater projects in developing countries have tended to require some form of political risk insurance or guarantee, and/or the participation of multilateral organizations, (such as the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank (Haarmeyer and Mody, 1997). Absent fundamental restructuring to better separate risks and open up the sector to more competition and more accurate market pricing, the monopoly integrated structure of the industry is likely to continue to discourage private capital flows, and thus restrict the improvements and innovations that it tends to bring.

As indicated in the following summaries on international and US developments, over the past several years there have been a number of noteworthy advances, as well as setbacks, in the water and wastewater sector's ability to attract private capital and initiative. In some cases, it is clear that the accumulated experience that the public and private sector has in designing workable contracts and organizing competition can successfully overcome noncommercial risks. In the case of the United Kingdom, the combination of significant regulatory pressures, high capital investment needs, and highly transparent capital market participation is encouraging the industry to go beyond its present organizational and financial structure to consider alternatives such as splitting asset ownership from operations and injecting competition into the sector. Taken together, there are substantial lessons to be learned by governments and private participants in how to better mitigate risks and structure new organizations that properly reward investors and, at the same time, provide the incentive to increase the efficiency and affordability of water and wastewater services.


2.1 England and Wales

More than a decade after the United Kingdom privatized its water sector by floating 10 English and Welsh water and sewerage companies, its experiment remains controversial as ever. In response to tight price controls and a push to inject competition into the sector, water companies and regulators are fundamentally rethinking the organization of their industry.

In the early years postprivatization, the high returns available through a combination of pricing and efficiencies enabled a number of UK private water companies to build up substantial nonregulated international businesses that today are successfully competing and spreading technology and management practices around the world. The international water business is attractive, both from the perspective of the size of the business opportunities it represents and from the fact that it allows for more growth than the domestic market.

By nearly every measure, there have been substantial improvements in water and wastewater quality, making the United Kingdom one of the leaders in meeting the European Union (EU) Directives. These improvements have been the result of significant capital investment within the allowed price-cap structure. Since then, however, the Office of Water Services (Ofwat), the industry regulator, has dramatically squeezed prices and returns. In its third price review, which determined prices for 2000-2005, Ofwat stipulated average cuts to consumer bills of 12.4%, driving projected returns down to about cost-of-capital levels. In response, water companies announced cuts in dividends and workforce, and equity investors fled the sector.

A more far-reaching response to regulatory pressures has been for water companies to fundamentally rethink their company's financial and organizational structure. In 2000, Kelda, the renamed holding company for Yorkshire Water, proposed the most novel approach, which involves spinning the water and wastewater assets into a nonprofit mutual company financed completely by debt. Equity investors would be left with Kelda's unregulated business, which would be transformed into a contract operation service company, and thus no longer exposed to undue regulatory risk. Ofwat objected to the scheme on the grounds that a customer-owned company with a nonprofit structure would provide weak investment incentives and make it difficult for Ofwat to take enforcement actions.

In 2001, Ofwat did give the go-ahead to a similarly structured deal involving Glas Cymru, the renamed Welsh Water. The acquisition of the regulated water company is funded through a $2.7 billion securitization and, as a result of the new capital structure, the utility's cost of capital fell to just over 4%, compared with 6.5% industry threshold set by the regulator (Metcalfe, 2001). Two key differences in the deals are: 1) there was strong political support in the Welsh Assembly for community ownership of the water business, which serves all of Wales, and 2) Glas Cymru created a company that is legally liable for the nonprofit company's debt, rather than customers holding this obligation. To reduce risks for lenders and provide discipline for efficient operations, two four-year contracts were put out to competition: one for operations and the other for customer billing. While it is not clear that this model can be replicated, it does offer an attractive way of financing assets with heavily regulated revenue streams and fairly predictable capital expenditures, while at the same time injecting competition into operations.

Another innovative approach to restructuring the UK water industry has involved the promotion of cross-boundary competition and common carriage. With an Ofwat-approved "inset appointment," water and sewerage companies are able to compete to supply large customers in each other's territory. Similar to the gas industry practice, common carriage in the water sector requires water companies to make their pipes available to competitors. Although proposed many years earlier, in March 2000, the UK Competition Act 1998 was implemented, which gives Ofwat and the Office of Fair Trading legal powers to remove barriers to competition in the water sector and to promote common carriage. In addition to cost savings and better service to customers, the success of these approaches to advancing competition may also serve to minimize the need for regulation.

2.2 Europe

The integration of the European Union (EU), the significant capital demands to meet EU environmental directives, and liberalization are together increasing the attractiveness of private sector participation in the water and wastewater sector. A recent Standard & Poors (S&P) report expects that more than 250 billion Euros (about US $220 billion) will be required to meet EU environmental standards across Europe by 2005 (Standard & Poors, 2001). While the United Kingdom is the only country to privatize its water industry fully, the French and Spanish governments are relatively supportive of private sector participation compared to other European governments.

In France, under long-term contract, about 75% of water distribution, and 45% of wastewater treatment is provided by private companies. In Spain, almost 45% of the water supply is provided by private companies under long-term concession contracts. In Italy, the 1994 Galli Law is the main driver for making the sector more attractive to private investment by facilitating consolidation of the thousands of water utilities. As a result, international private companies, such as Severn Trent of the United Kingdom, have entered the market. In 1999, Portugal awarded its first major water and wastewater concession with a project financing structure. The Santa Maria da Feira Municipality granted Indaqua Feira a 35-year concession to operate and extend the town and outlying districts' water and wastewater systems (Swann, 2000).

The Netherlands and Germany have been less open to private sector participation, claiming, without substantiation, that involvement of private sector will compromise water quality. However, Nuon NV, the Netherlands' largest utility, is pushing for at least partial privatization within the next two years, in order to help fund its global expansion plans in the water and energy sectors. Germany, with a more mixed system than the Netherlands, has made some modest progress in opening up its industry to private investment. In 2000, Berlin sold a 49% stake in Berlin Water to a consortium that included the German energy and industrial conglomerate RWE and Vivendi.

In Eastern Europe, capital needs are significantly greater, as infrastructure is both less developed and less well maintained. An important obstacle for attracting investment is the absence of supportive and comprehensive legal and regulatory frameworks. Nevertheless, the goal of joining the EU is driving countries to raise their environmental standards in line with the EU, and thus look for near-term solutions to modernize their infrastructure. One of the strategies for making the greatest progress has been privatization.

In 1999, the municipality of Sofia in Bulgaria signed a 25-year concession for water and wastewater services with International Water. The concession serves 1.2 million customers and includes investment of $150 million for upgrade and expansion over 15 years, which is expected to enable the municipality to meet EU standards. The concession is noteworthy not only in that it is Bulgaria's first major municipal infrastructure project that is privately financed, but that the project includes no municipal subsidies or state guarantees (Temple, 2000). The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is providing about $42 million in debt and equity to the project.

The concession generated substantial competition, with eight international water companies seeking prequalification.


Excerpted from Reinventing Water and Wastewater Systems Copyright © 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Editors and Contributors.

Part I: Introduction.


1. An Overview of Private Sector Participation in the Global and USWater and Wastewater Sector (David Haarmeyer and Debra G.Coy).

Part II: The Regulatory Framework.

2. Comparative Analysis of Regulation
Water and Other Network Industries (Yogita U. Mumssen and BrianWilliamson)

3. Ten Years of Water Service Reform in Latin America
Toward an Anglo-French Model (Vivien Foster).

4. The Pursuit of Efficiency Through Benchmarking
The Experience of the Water Industry in England and Wales (StephenRamsey).

5. The Development of Competition in the Water and SewerageIndustries of England and Wales (George Day).

Part III: Financing the Water and Wastewater Infrastructure.

6. Global Water and Wastewater Project Criteria
A Rating Agency Perspective (Michael Wilkins and Jane Eddy).

7. Water Concession Design and the Poor (Kristin Komives).

8. Development of the Mexican Water Sector (Edward Sondey and NeelA. Shah). Part IV: Reinventing Public Sector Operations.

9. Mexico's Federal District Water Reform
Lessons and Experience (Lillian Saade Hazin).

10. The Largest Water System Privatization
The Manila Concession (Mark Dumol and Paul Seidenstat).

11. Government-Owned Public Limited Companies in the Dutch WaterSector (Klaas Schwartz and Maarten Blokland).

Part V: Restructuring Operations in Selected US Cities.

12. Innovative Contracting for New Facilities
Seattle's Use of Design-Build-Operate for Implementation of WaterTreatment Plants (Elizabeth S. Kelly, Scott Haskins, and RodneyEng).

13. The Challenge and Benefits of Privatizing
Wilmington's Wastewater Treatment Plant &mdash A Case Study(James H. Sills, Jr.).

14. Houston's Strategy to Secure New Water Supply, Infrastructure,and Maintenance (Lee P. Brown)

15. A New Standard for a Long-Term Lease and Service Agreement(Michael A. Traficante and Peter Alviti, Jr.).

16. North Brunswick's Model Water and Wastewater
Public-Private Contract (Paul J. Matacera and Frank J.Mangravite).

17. Privatization of Operation and Maintenance of WastewaterControl Facilities
City of West Haven, Connecticut (H. Richard Borer, Jr.).

18. Phoenix Water Services Reengineers to Improve
Practices and Save Money (Skip Rimsza).

Part VI: A View of the Past and the Future.

19. London's Private Water Supply, 1582-1902 (Nicola Tynan).

20 Deregulated Private Water Supply
A Policy Option for Developing Countries (Penelope J. Brook andTyler Cowen).

21. The Future
Structural Change and Competition in the UK Water Industry (RebeccaReehal)

22. Creating Liquidity in an Illiquid Market
How the Internet Can Facilitate the Development of Efficient WaterMarkets (Patrick J. Meyers).

23. Project Financing of Water Desalination Plants
A Worldwide Trend (James S. Harris).

24. A Public Sector Alternative for the New Millennium (Michael J.Crean).

25. Global Lessons
Options for Improving Water and Wastewater Systems (PaulSeidenstat).


Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)