The Relationship Between Pedagogical Content Knowledge And Mathematics Teacher Questioning Strategies.

Paperback (Print)
Not Available on BN.com
 

More About This Textbook

Overview

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intense two-week professional development program for middle school mathematics teachers, along with follow-up classroom visits, video review of lessons (with feedback), and two six-hour follow-up sessions each semester would improve teacher questioning strategies and promote higher-level questioning based on Bloom's (1956) Taxonomy of cognitive categories. A second purpose of the study was to determine whether, through reflection and instructor feedback, teachers would gain the ability to involve students in high press questioning situations. The third purpose of the study was to investigate whether relevant professional development would result in an increase in teacher content knowledge. The fourth purpose was to determine if there was a relationship between teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, as measured by the CKT-M, and their ability to ask better questions, as determined by Bloom's (1956) Taxonomy of cogitative categories. The researcher used four statistical tests including chi-square test, z-test, t-test, and Spearman correlation. The population for this study was a group of 18 middle school mathematics teachers from southwest Arkansas. The instruments used for the study included several forms created by the instructor team as well as the Content Knowledge for Teaching-Mathematics pre-test and post-test. Prior to gathering data, human use forms and participant consent forms were completed from both Southern Arkansas University and Louisiana Tech University. In addition each teacher was required to have parental consent for each student involved in the video recording. Results showed iv significance in the first three of four hypotheses. Significance was found in the first hypothesis using a chi-square test that compared the number of high-level questions asked in the first video compared to the number of high-level questions asked in the last video. Significance was found in the second hypothesis using a two-proportion z-test that compared the number of high-press exchanges in the first video to the number in the last video. Significance was found in the third hypothesis using a paired t-test that compared the pre-test score to the post-test score on the CKT-M. There was no significant relationship found between teachers' pedagogical content knowledge on the post-test and teachers' use of high-level questions as defined by Bloom's (1956) Taxonomy.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781244023666
  • Publisher: BiblioLabsII
  • Publication date: 9/11/2011
  • Pages: 176
  • Product dimensions: 7.44 (w) x 9.69 (h) x 0.38 (d)

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)