- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Using approaches from the Hebrew interpretive tradition to discern the actual events surrounging Jesus' death, Bishop Spong questions the hitorical validity of literal narrative concerned the Ressurection. He asserts that the resurrection story was born in an experience that opened the disciples' eyes to the reality of God and the meaning of Jesus of Nazareth. Spong traces the Christian origins of anti-Semitism to the Church's fabrication of the ultimate Jewish scapegoat, Judas Iscariot. He affirms the ...
Using approaches from the Hebrew interpretive tradition to discern the actual events surrounging Jesus' death, Bishop Spong questions the hitorical validity of literal narrative concerned the Ressurection. He asserts that the resurrection story was born in an experience that opened the disciples' eyes to the reality of God and the meaning of Jesus of Nazareth. Spong traces the Christian origins of anti-Semitism to the Church's fabrication of the ultimate Jewish scapegoat, Judas Iscariot. He affirms the inclusiveness of the Christian message and emphasizes the necessity of mutual integrity and respect among Christians and Jews.
|Pt. 1||Approaching the Resurrection|
|1||The Method Called Midrash||3|
|2||The Impact of Easter - A Place to Begin||23|
|3||The Vehicle of Words - An Unsteady Ship||33|
|Pt. 2||Examining the Biblical Texts|
|4||The Witness of Paul||47|
|5||Mark: The Kerygma Is Joined to the Sepulcher||57|
|6||Matthew: Polemics Enter the Tradition||65|
|7||Luke: The Turn Toward Gentile Understandings||74|
|8||John: Sometimes Primitive, Sometimes Highly Developed||87|
|9||A New Starting Point||97|
|Pt. 3||Interpretive Images|
|10||The Primitive Interpretive Images||111|
|11||The Atoning Sacrifice - The Image of the Book of Hebrews||121|
|12||The Suffering Servant - The Image of 2 Isaiah||131|
|13||The Son of Man - The Image of the Book of Daniel||144|
|Pt. 4||Clues That Lead Us Toward Easter|
|14||The First Clue: It Occurred in Galilee, Not in Jerusalem||161|
|15||The Second Clue: The Primacy of Peter||181|
|16||The Third Clue: The Common Meal||198|
|17||The Fourth Clue: The Third Day - An Eschatological Symbol||210|
|18||The Fifth Clue: The Burial Tradition As Mythology||221|
|Pt. 5||Reconstructing the Easter Moment|
|19||But What Did Happen? A Speculative Reconstruction||233|
|20||Grounding the Speculation in Scripture||261|
|21||Life After Death - This I Do Believe||283|
Posted May 27, 2009
Spong has done the leg work. He shows his familiarity with Christian Scriptures, at least the canonical ones, and the psychology, sociology,theology, and politics of the creation of Christianity. He asks hard questions of the texts and uses common sense in drawing information and conclusions therein and thereby. As a student of scripture and Christianity, I find Spong to be a wonderful and powerful reference. He supports his contentions by referencing chapter and verse(s) in the scripture. There's not one of his books that I have not benefited from.
4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 12, 2006
Spong inhabits a worldview in which rationality and religion are remotely distant cousins. Through postmodern eyes, Spong sets the mythological stage upon which resurrection should be viewed. For the intellectual, the demise of objective reality and certain historical knowledge are well accepted premises secondary to limitations of language and culture. To Spong, only the ¿ignorant,¿ those who are left behind in the dungeon of ¿premodern ignorance,¿ seek pragmatic understanding of actual historical events, or apply literal interpretation to past reality. Only a ¿weak,¿ ¿pitiable,¿ and ¿frantically insecure¿ Christianity believes in the historical, physical resurrection of Jesus. To Spong, literalizing the stories of Scripture and particularly the resurrection of Christ, only serves to destroy faith (i.e., Spong¿s kind of faith). In this provocative book, Spong reaches beyond linear time and space to achieve a transcendent, symbolic truth of resurrection, comprehended as a subjective, experiential reality incorporating Jesus¿ as the ultimate ¿mythic hero.¿ Despite his avowed disclaimer against use of literal interpretation of Scripture, he vainly attempts to literally undermine and replace the persons, places, times and events of Easter. Spong grossly prooftexts and misuses scripture throughout the book. He conveniently ignores historic and textual evidences toward early creedal development, pre-Gospel manuscripts, well-established oral tradition, and the presence of contemporaneous sympathetic and non-sympathetic witnesses, while using liberal, late scriptural dating to justify his alternative perspectives. Spong commits the fallacy of special pleading. Despite his dogmatic assertion against knowledge of objective reality, he not only proclaims with confident, self-refuting certainty that Jesus actually died in Jerusalem, but that bodily resurrection of Christ, and any literal interpretation of the events surrounding such is a grossly mistaken idea. This begs the question as to how he has accessible, authoritative knowledge, the very thing he seeks to dismiss. His dichotomous views prevail throughout. One positive insight to be gleaned in these pages is Spong¿s desire and commission to live life unselfishly, guided by the amazing loving, sacrificial example of Jesus Christ. This book is true to its postmodern roots, a decided effort directed toward deconstruction of orthodox Christianity and reconstruction of Spong¿s own brand of mythology. He separates faith and rational thought, yet appeals to logic to substantiate his own religious knowledge. This is indeed `Spong¿s story,¿ a creative legend of his own with the blurring of fact and fiction to avoid direct implications of an empty tomb, to avoid the possibility of the supernatural, to avoid his unanswered questions toward life after death, and to futilely escape any arrogant positioning associated with knowledge. Spong¿s spiritual, linguistic and historical reconstructionism rejects critical historical analysis, whether scriptural, philosophical, cultural or secular.
2 out of 7 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 25, 2013
Exceptionally well written and researched. Only a reader with an open mind to new thoughts and willing to examine in a rational manner the basis of Bible beliefs will truly appreciate the depths of Spong's endeavor. Kudos to Bishop Spong for having the courage to pen a work that will no doubt face a flood of criticism from those that choose to follow with out understanding what their chosen faith is based upon. As a Catholic Prelate, I might not subscribe to all his conclusions, however I believe we should all feel free to question those matters we accept without reservation and authoritive investigation.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted July 18, 2002
His scholarship is weak, which is not unusual for him, and he really hasn't begun to get into the Jewish traditions¿.. Which, even if he had, would not make him cutting edge or daring. Not really worth the time.
1 out of 6 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted August 9, 2014
Posted May 21, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Posted March 12, 2009
No text was provided for this review.