3.6 10
by John Shelby Spong

View All Available Formats & Editions

Using approaches from the Hebrew interpretive tradition to discern the actual events surrounging Jesus' death, Bishop Spong questions the hitorical validity of literal narrative concerned the Ressurection. He asserts that the resurrection story was born in an experience that opened the disciples' eyes to the reality of God and the meaning of Jesus of Nazareth.


Using approaches from the Hebrew interpretive tradition to discern the actual events surrounging Jesus' death, Bishop Spong questions the hitorical validity of literal narrative concerned the Ressurection. He asserts that the resurrection story was born in an experience that opened the disciples' eyes to the reality of God and the meaning of Jesus of Nazareth. Spong traces the Christian origins of anti-Semitism to the Church's fabrication of the ultimate Jewish scapegoat, Judas Iscariot. He affirms the inclusiveness of the Christian message and emphasizes the necessity of mutual integrity and respect among Christians and Jews.

Product Details

HarperCollins Publishers
Publication date:
Sold by:
Sales rank:
File size:
696 KB

Meet the Author

John Shelby Spong, the Episcopal Bishop of Newark before his retirement in 2000, has been a visiting lecturer at Harvard and at more than 500 other universities all over the world. His books, which have sold well over a million copies, include Biblical Literalism: A Gentile Heresy; The Fourth Gospel: Tales of a Jewish Mystic; Re-Claiming the Bible for a Non-Religious World; Eternal Life: A New Vision; Jesus for the Non-Religious, The Sins of Scripture, Resurrection: Myth or Reality?; Why Christianity Must Change or Die; and his autobiography, Here I Stand. He writes a weekly column on the web that reaches thousands of people all over the world. To join his online audience, go to He lives with his wife, Christine, in New Jersey.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Write a Review

and post it to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews >

Resurrection: Myth or Reality? 3.6 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 10 reviews.
The_seekerTR More than 1 year ago
Spong has done the leg work. He shows his familiarity with Christian Scriptures, at least the canonical ones, and the psychology, sociology,theology, and politics of the creation of Christianity. He asks hard questions of the texts and uses common sense in drawing information and conclusions therein and thereby. As a student of scripture and Christianity, I find Spong to be a wonderful and powerful reference. He supports his contentions by referencing chapter and verse(s) in the scripture. There's not one of his books that I have not benefited from.
Blackfriar More than 1 year ago
Exceptionally well written and researched. Only a reader with an open mind to new thoughts and willing to examine in a rational manner the basis of Bible beliefs will truly appreciate the depths of Spong's endeavor. Kudos to Bishop Spong for having the courage to pen a work that will no doubt face a flood of criticism from those that choose to follow with out understanding what their chosen faith is based upon. As a Catholic Prelate, I might not subscribe to all his conclusions, however I believe we should all feel free to question those matters we accept without reservation and authoritive investigation.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Name: Would you mind looking up, say, two centimeters? <br> Moons: 26 <br> Rank: Warrior, hopefully med-cat. <br> Appearance: A dark brown pelt with black stripes that curiously, just barely, look like the shapes wings of birds. The tip of his tail is jet black. <br> Personality: Humorous, a but sensitive and jumpy. Is honest and respectful. <br> Gender: &male <br> Other: Just ask! <br> RPer: &fnof&curren&#1071&#9378&epsilon &#20300
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
(My paragraph doesnt work.) Name: Lightningstripe. Gender: tom. Rank:warrior(maybe deputy.) Appearance: a yellowish golden pelt, with a black jagged stipe on both sides of his body. Mood: joking, fierce, usaully happy, short temperd. Kin: mother: Fallenleaf, father: rapidstar , brother: fireslash.(all dead.) Other: just ask!!! I dont bite!!! Unless your shadowclan... ;)
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
&starf Amberstar II &starf <br> Age &starf 33 Moons <br> Gender &starf &female <br> Rank &starf Leader <br> Lives &starf <br> First Life: Trust from Gingerleaf <br> Second Life: Strength from Freespirit <br> Third Life: Understanding from Roseblossom <br> Fourth Life: Love from Falconheart <br> Fifth Life: Rememberance from Forgotten <br> Sixth Life: Dedication from Gingerfoot <br> Seventh Life: Swiftness from Swiftclash <br> Eighth Life: Boundless Energy from Peachpaw <br> Ninth Life: Loyalty from Amberstar I <br> Appearance &starf A large, light golden tabby with bright, proud amber eyes, a long plume-like tail, and white paws. <br> Other &starf She has been a loner for a while, a part of a reincarnation of the other Amberstar. She was once known as Ambra but saw ThunderClan falling. <br> Kin &starf Roseblossom {Mother}; Ravinestar {Father}; Owlfur {Aunt}; Swiftclash {Uncle}; Ashface {Uncle}; Gingerleaf {Grandmother}; Falconheart {Grandfather}; Stormcloud {Great Uncle}; Iceshard {Great Aunt}; Firebloom {Great Aunt}; Peachpaw {Great Aunt}; Hopepaw {Great Aunt}; Jayfeather {Great Aunt}; Radiantpelt {Great Aunt}; Oakstar {Great Uncle}; Freespirit {Great Great Grandmother}; Stormsurge {Great Great Grandfather}; Articstar {Great Great Grandfather}; Flamewind {Great Great Grandmother}; Sagekit {Great Great Aunt}; Hooleflare {Great Great Uncle}; Flaresmoke {Great Great Uncle}; she is distantly related to Amberstar I. <p> &starf Risingstreak &starf <br> Age &starf 78 Moons <br> Gender &starf &female <br> Rank &starf Elder <br> Appearance &starf A large golden tabby with a plume-like tail and dark amber eyes. <br> Other &starf She was once a leader, so she still has two lives left. <br> Kin &starf Amberstar I {Sister}; Gingerfoot {Mother}; father unknown; Cloudtail {Great Grandfather}; Brightheart {Great Grandmother} <p> RPer &starf NRM &#22767
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Guest More than 1 year ago
Spong inhabits a worldview in which rationality and religion are remotely distant cousins. Through postmodern eyes, Spong sets the mythological stage upon which resurrection should be viewed. For the intellectual, the demise of objective reality and certain historical knowledge are well accepted premises secondary to limitations of language and culture. To Spong, only the ¿ignorant,¿ those who are left behind in the dungeon of ¿premodern ignorance,¿ seek pragmatic understanding of actual historical events, or apply literal interpretation to past reality. Only a ¿weak,¿ ¿pitiable,¿ and ¿frantically insecure¿ Christianity believes in the historical, physical resurrection of Jesus. To Spong, literalizing the stories of Scripture and particularly the resurrection of Christ, only serves to destroy faith (i.e., Spong¿s kind of faith). In this provocative book, Spong reaches beyond linear time and space to achieve a transcendent, symbolic truth of resurrection, comprehended as a subjective, experiential reality incorporating Jesus¿ as the ultimate ¿mythic hero.¿ Despite his avowed disclaimer against use of literal interpretation of Scripture, he vainly attempts to literally undermine and replace the persons, places, times and events of Easter. Spong grossly prooftexts and misuses scripture throughout the book. He conveniently ignores historic and textual evidences toward early creedal development, pre-Gospel manuscripts, well-established oral tradition, and the presence of contemporaneous sympathetic and non-sympathetic witnesses, while using liberal, late scriptural dating to justify his alternative perspectives. Spong commits the fallacy of special pleading. Despite his dogmatic assertion against knowledge of objective reality, he not only proclaims with confident, self-refuting certainty that Jesus actually died in Jerusalem, but that bodily resurrection of Christ, and any literal interpretation of the events surrounding such is a grossly mistaken idea. This begs the question as to how he has accessible, authoritative knowledge, the very thing he seeks to dismiss. His dichotomous views prevail throughout. One positive insight to be gleaned in these pages is Spong¿s desire and commission to live life unselfishly, guided by the amazing loving, sacrificial example of Jesus Christ. This book is true to its postmodern roots, a decided effort directed toward deconstruction of orthodox Christianity and reconstruction of Spong¿s own brand of mythology. He separates faith and rational thought, yet appeals to logic to substantiate his own religious knowledge. This is indeed `Spong¿s story,¿ a creative legend of his own with the blurring of fact and fiction to avoid direct implications of an empty tomb, to avoid the possibility of the supernatural, to avoid his unanswered questions toward life after death, and to futilely escape any arrogant positioning associated with knowledge. Spong¿s spiritual, linguistic and historical reconstructionism rejects critical historical analysis, whether scriptural, philosophical, cultural or secular.
Guest More than 1 year ago
His scholarship is weak, which is not unusual for him, and he really hasn't begun to get into the Jewish traditions¿.. Which, even if he had, would not make him cutting edge or daring. Not really worth the time.