×

Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

The Risk of Being: What It Means to Be Good and Bad
     

The Risk of Being: What It Means to Be Good and Bad

by Michael Gelven
 

The Risk of Being attempts to forge a new language and a new way of reasoning about what it is like to be good and bad by focusing on existential phenomena that reveal what it means to be good and bad. It is thus a work that cannot be located among or compared to the more traditional theories of ethics or morality. What distinguishes this inquiry is not only

Overview

The Risk of Being attempts to forge a new language and a new way of reasoning about what it is like to be good and bad by focusing on existential phenomena that reveal what it means to be good and bad. It is thus a work that cannot be located among or compared to the more traditional theories of ethics or morality. What distinguishes this inquiry is not only the use of existential themes, such as outrage, temptation, and corruption, but the reasoning itself in an existential critique, which allows us to consider how and what we think as well as feel about being good and bad—the logos and pathos of these existential phenomena—and thus provides an access to the question about the reality of good and bad.

Recognizing that we have done wrong may induce frustrated responses, such as, "How could I have been so stupid?" or "Why was I so weak? " or even, "What has become of me? " These reactions, Gelven argues, point to folly, weakness, and corruption as ways of being bad, which can then be countered in phenomena such as judgment, courage, and integrity of character, as ways of being good. The analyses of these phenomena can reveal a great deal of existential understanding that no mere ethical or moral approach can offer. The emphasis is on understanding that "good" and "bad" are not mere axiological terms, but can refer to ways of existing.

By careful analysis, these ways can be forced to reveal the truth about goodness and badness. As Gelven's argument proceeds to show not only what it is "like" to be good and bad, but also what the reality of being good and bad must be, he offers new and often unorthodox insights into one of the great philosophical issues challenging the thinking mind.

Editorial Reviews

Booknews
In this reflective meditation on ethical reality, Gelven (philosophy, Northern Illinois U) asserts that people are not good bad, but good bad, and that the fundamental presupposition for responsibility and moral ascription lies in our being fundamentally good and bad. He maintains that morals and ethics are distinct, and as a result, neither one is sufficient in itself for being good. No index. Paper edition (unseen), $17.95. Annotation c. by Book News, Inc., Portland, Or.

Product Details

ISBN-13:
9780271017075
Publisher:
Penn State University Press
Publication date:
11/01/1997
Pages:
182
Product dimensions:
6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.63(d)

Meet the Author

Michael Gelven is Presidential Research Professor of Philosophy at Northern Illinois University. He has published many books, two of them with Penn State Press, including Truth and Existence (1991) and War and Existence (1994).

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network

     

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews