Lactified Trickster Pimp
D'Souza describes three faces of Obama.
I label these three faces as follows:
"Lactified Trickster Pimp I," (LTP1,)
"Lactified Trickster Pimp II," (LTP2,) and
"Lactified Trickster Pimp III," (LTP3.)
LTP1 uses "camouflage" (pp. 20, 179,) such as the way he pimps the loyalty of the descendents of American slaves, (pp. 7-8, 145) the lies he told at the 2004 DNC, (p. 19-20) a fake story from "Dreams From My Father," (pp. 9-10) and placing Lincoln's bust in place of Winston Churchill's. (Newsweek.)
The Lincoln bust is also camouflage because it secretly symbolizes Kimathi and the KLFA (a.k.a. Mau Mau,) an emancipation movement. (pp. 113-116.)
LTP2 is a bearded Marxist who constantly blames and demonizes GWB, overthrows banks and investment houses, rams through totalitarian control of healthcare, and seeks to decimate the American energy industry through judicial activism and EPA diktat - all against the popular will of the people, (pp. 19-20.)
LTP3 is hiding in plain sight:
The anti-Colonial in "Dreams From My Father," veiled beneath the Lincoln bust camouflage.
D'Souza has critics and adequately responds to them.
For example, see the forward to the second edition of "The End of Racism."
Except, this time, he summarized the thesis for this book in a Forbes article, "How Obama Thinks," a month before its release, thus, drawing the fire of critics in advance.
Now, perhaps, he will answer some of the critics in the first edition.
Beside being one of my favorite authors and researchers, D'Souza is an amazing scholar with acute analytical skills and incisive interpretive vision.
Hence, I give him Five Stars in advance.
At the risk of preempting his responses to criticism thus far, here are some of my responses, even before the book is released.
Critics say:
D'Souza is complaining that Obama is funding Brazilian oil exploration while the oil stays in Brazil.
But the funding was unanimously endorsed by the bank's five board members, none of whom were Obama appointees.
My response:
It is TARP money and Obama could stop or regulate it if he were really concerned about environmental impact.
Critics say:
If Obama is motivated to protect poor countries from being ruined by excessive American consumption, why is his economic agenda an attempt to boost consumption?
My response:
When critics level this complaint, they conveniently leave out the fact that debt is destroying our economy and compromising national security.
They also forget to mention the schemes of Cloward and Pivens.
Critics say:
Obama propped up financial institutions and increased government oversight to make credit available for American businesses to grow their way out of the recession.
My response:
This is a risible complaint.
Much of the TARP money was ultimately used overseas.
While the intransient moratorium on drilling in the gulf is decimating American industry and pushing big oil abroad, (Mexico, Cuba and Chile,) Obama gives money to these countries to drill for their own consumption.
Tax increases on small business stifle growth and push business abroad.
While unemployment is 16.7% in the private sector, (including underemployment and hidden unemployment,) public union power and employment is on the rise, suffers no unemployment and pays members almost twice as much (in tax dollars) in earning and benefits than parallel private employment.
C
5 out of 10 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.