- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
The people of Southern Appalachia are hill people of Scottish-Irish descent--religious mystics who cast out demons, drink strychnine, and handle rattlesnakes. When the author, himself Scottish-Irish, uncovers records of snake-handling Covingtons, he decides to take up serpents himself. The result is Flannery O'Connor, Carson McCullers and Garrison Keillor all rolled into one quirky, unforgettable read.
Posted February 27, 2001
This book was fascinating from page one. I would enjoy reading more by Mr. Covington. His technique of joining the worshipers in their unorthodox services while simultaneously revealing his own slightly ambiguous feelings toward this practice make for a great book. If at all interested in the topic, you should like this. Admittedly a strange cult-like Protestant sect, they obviously do have their reasons for engaging in the practice of snake-handling. Sensitive treatment of a controversial practice. Awesome!
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted November 22, 2013
From the perspective of the cosmopolitan New York Times to the small faith community in "hillbilly" country, Covington's journey transforms what counts as "knowledge" and belief. Remarkable in its move beyond "superior" secular judgment to profound human/spiritual encounter.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted September 4, 2012
The book lends phenomenal insight into the lives of an extraordinary group of people. Mr. Covington has done a remarkable job of detailing his experiences without using them to speculate the thoughts/feelings of others; this allows the reader become fully absorbed while remaining impartial. Well done!Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted November 21, 2003
I read this book in a single sitting after my fiancé' purchased it and told me about it. During my childhood, my mother took me to several Holiness churches through southeastern Ohio. Although Holiness churches (at least the ones I attended) tend to be more conservative than the snake handlers described in the book, they are roots of the mainstream Pentecostal movement and many of fringe doctrines, such as snake-handling. As a result of my upbringing, I have a close personal knowledge of the beliefs and doctrines of these people, and must say that I think Dennis captured with uncanny accuracy the underlying principles that drive these religious movements. The book begins as Dennis reports on the trial of a snake-handling preacher accused of attempted murder, but only briefly covers the trial. Dennis begins an investigation into the lives and peculiar spirituality of those who handle snakes, and soon finds himself immersed in that culture, attending religious services. As he strives to discover what motivates the worship habits of these sects, he becomes caught up in the 'fever' and becomes a snake handler himself, albeit for a brief period. The turning point comes when Dennis openly challenges his church brethren about their subservient view of the roles and responsibilities of the female gender. The snake-handling Christians expel him from their midst, and Dennis returns to his Methodist church in Alabama. The book relays the viewpoint and experiences of a contemporary mainstream Christian as he tries to understand the fringe doctrine of snake handling. I must admit that, after finishing the book, I was disappointed that he failed to explain the doctrine, and offer any substantial justification for it. The book quickly transforms into a diary of his personal experiences in the church, and offers little in the way of a journalistic expose'. Perhaps that it is the point; Dennis may have been trying to convey that that emotionalism and peer pressure drives this doctrine, without much substantive basis for doctrine. While devout Holiness people may disagree, I tend to think, based upon my own personal observation, that very few individuals caught in these extreme doctrines truly understand the basis of their own beliefs. A portion of the book is devoted to the genealogy of the snake handling movement, and traces it back to early immigration patterns in which newcomers to early America were driven from the Eastern US cities into Appalachia. There, they spent generations secluded from the evolution of modern society, and developed conservative religious beliefs that have remained basically unchanged since the early 1800s. As the post-Industrial era began to saturate even the mountains of the eastern and southern United States in the early 1900s, small groups of believers 'rebelled' and evolved their already-conservative beliefs into near fanaticism. Some readers of the book have balked at this explanation, and felt that it unfairly characterizes these believers as backwoods radicals, suspicious of the secular world and purposefully shy of it. To an outsider, this type of viewpoint must seem improbable and unlikely, but it is accurate and typical of these doctrines. All in all, it is a compelling read that offers unique insight into the lives of a handful of snake handlers, whose attitudes and beliefs are typical. It shows us how singularly driven these individuals are, and offers a glimpse into the attitudes and motivations of these people. Unfortunately, it does little to answer the question of ¿why¿ or explore the theological basis of the doctrine.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 10, 2003
This is a good read, but as much or more about the author than the snake handlers. The snake handlers themselves do not think he treated them quite fairly, especially reguarding Punkin Brown. Finally, one gets the impression from the book and the publishers statements that all appalachians are snake handlers and that just is not so.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 15, 2013
No text was provided for this review.
Posted May 14, 2010
No text was provided for this review.