- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
All (1) from $17.94
-
Used (1) from $17.94
Ships from: Queen Creek, AZ
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Laudan constructs a fresh approach to a longtime problem for the philosopher of science: how to explain the simultaneous and widespread presence of both agreement and disagreement in science. Laudan critiques the logical empiricists and the post-positivists as he stresses the need for centrality and values and the interdependence of values, methods, and facts as prerequisites to solving the problems of consensus and dissent in science.
| Acknowledgments | ix | |
| Preface | xi | |
| 1 | Two Puzzles about Science: Reflections on Some Crises in Philosophy and Sociology of Science | 1 |
| The Consensual View and the Puzzle of Agreement | 3 | |
| The "New Wave" Preoccupation with Dissensus | 13 | |
| 2 | The Hierarchical Structure of Scientific Debates | 23 |
| Factual Consensus Formation | 26 | |
| Methodological Consensus Formation | 33 | |
| 3 | Closing the Evaluative Circle: Resolving Disagreements about Cognitive Values | 42 |
| The Covariance Fallacy | 43 | |
| The Reticulated Model and the Mechanics of Goal Evaluation | 50 | |
| The Reticulated Model of Scientific Rationality | 62 | |
| 4 | Dissecting the Holist Picture of Scientific Change | 67 |
| Kuhn on the Units of Scientific Change | 68 | |
| Kuhn's Critique of Methodology | 87 | |
| 5 | A Reticulational Critique of Realist Axiology and Methodology | 103 |
| Epilogue | 138 | |
| References | 141 | |
| Index | 145 |
Overview
Laudan constructs a fresh approach to a longtime problem for the philosopher of science: how to explain the simultaneous and widespread presence of both agreement and disagreement in science. Laudan critiques the logical empiricists and the post-positivists as he stresses the need for centrality and values and the interdependence of values, methods, and facts as prerequisites to solving the problems of consensus and dissent in science.