The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms / Edition 1

by Alan Chalmers

Overview

Drawing on the results of his own scholarly research as well as that of others the author offers, for the first time, a comprehensive and documented history of theories of the atom from Democritus to the twentieth century. This is not history for its own sake. By critically reflecting on the various versions of atomic theories of the past the author is able to grapple with the question of what sets scientific knowledge apart from other kinds of knowledge, philosophical knowledge in particular. He thereby engages historically with issues concerning the nature and status of scientific knowledge that were dealt with in a more abstract way in his What Is This Thing Called Science?, a book that has been a standard text in philosophy of science for three decades and which is available in nineteen languages. Speculations about the fundamental structure of matter from Democritus to the seventeenth-century mechanical philosophers and beyond are construed as categorically distinct from atomic theories amenable to experimental investigation and support and as contributing little to the latter from a historical point of view. The thesis will provoke historians and philosophers of science alike and will require a revision of a range of standard views in the history of science and philosophy. The book is key reading for students and scholars in History and Philosophy of Science and will be instructive for and provide a challenge to philosophers, historians and scientists more generally.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9789400705333
Publisher:	Springer Netherlands
Publication date:	12/10/2010
Series:	Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science , #279
Edition description:	2009
Pages:	287
Product dimensions:	6.10(w) x 9.25(h) x 0.24(d)

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Atomism: Science or philosophy? 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Science and philosophy transcend the evidence for them 1.3 How the claims of science are confirmed 1.4 Inference to the best explanation 1.5 Science involves experimental activity and conceptual innovation 1.6 Reading the past in the light of the present 1.7 Writing history of science backwards 1.8 The structure of the book 1.9 A note on terminology Chapter 2. Democritean atomism 2.1 Philosophy as the refinement of common sense by reason 2.2 Parmenides and the denial of change 2.3 The atomism of Leucippus and Democritus: The basics 2.4 Atomic explanations of properties 2.5 Atomic explanations of specific phenomena 2.6 Atomism as a response to Zeno’s paradoxes 2.7 Aristotle’s critique of indivisible magnitudes 2.8 Did Democritus propose indivisible magnitudes as a response to Zeno? 2.9 Democritean atomism: an appraisal Chapter 3. How did Epicurus’s garden grow? 3.1 Epicureanism 3.2 Physical atoms in the void 3.3 Atoms and indivisible magnitudes 3.4 Atomic speeds and observable speeds 3.5 Gravity 3.6 Explaining the phenomena by appeal only to atoms and the void 3.7 The status and role of the evidence of the senses 3.8 Knowledge of atoms: Getting closer? Chapter 4. Atomism in its Ancient Greek perspective 4.1 Philosophical atomism versus less ambitious projects 4.2 The Aristotelian alternative 4.3 Hints of a granular structure of matter in Aristotle 4.4 Granular versus ultimate structures 4.5 Greek ‘science’ Chapter 5. From the Ancient Greeks to the dawn of science 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Natural minima 5.3 Hardline vesus liberal interpretations of Aristotle 5.4 Aristotelianism and alchemy 5.5 Geber’s ‘atomism’ 5.6 Thestatis and fate of Geber’s integration of Aristotle and alchemy 5.7 Currents of thought leading to Sennert’s atomism 5.8 Sennert’s atomic theory 5.9 The status of Sennert’s atomism Chapter 6. Atomism, experiment and the mechanical philosophy: The work of Robert Boyle 6.1 What was scientific about the scientific revolution? 6.2 Boyle’s version of the mechanical philosophy 6.3 Boyle’s case for the mechanical philosophy 6.4 Boyle’s use of the microscopic/microscopic analogy 6.5 Boyle’s experimental science as distinct from the mechanical philosophy 6.6 Empirical support for the mechanical philosophy 6.7 The lack of fertility of the mechanical philosophy 6.8 The various senses of ‘mechanical’ 6.9 Boyle’s mechanical philosophy and experimental support for atoms Chapter 7. Newton’s atomism and its fate 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Newton’s science 7.3 Newton’s atomism 7.4 The case for Newton’s atomism 7.5 The fate of Newtonian atomism in the eighteenth century Chapter 8. The emergence of modern chemistry with no debt to atomism 8.1 Introduction. 8.2 Klein on Geoffroy and the concepts of chemical substance, compound and combination 8.3 Reflections on Klein’s account of chemical combination 8.4 Boyle’s chemistry: Some preliminaries 8.5 Boyle’s mechanical rather than chemical construal of substances 8.6 Boyle on the properties of chemical corpuscles 8.7 Chemical properties and essential properties 8.8 The mechanical philosophy versus the experimental philosophy 8.9 Newtonian affinities 8.10 Chemistry from Newton to Lavoisier Chapter 9. Dalton’s atomism and its creative modification via formulae 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Dalton’s atomism 9.3 Dalton’s atomic chemistry 9.4 The introduction of chemical

Editorial Reviews

From the reviews:

“Chalmers presents a comprehensive history of the atom, from antiquity to the early twentieth century. … Chalmers’s account draws on his distinction between philosophical and scientific versions of atomism. … His writing and exposition are clear, and the account is well documented and balanced and draws judiciously on primary and secondary sources. It should be of interest to historians and philosophers of science and to scientists more generally.” (Victor D. Boantza, ISIS, Vol. 103 (1), 2012)

“This book offers a conceptual history of atomism from the pre-Socratics to the end of the nineteenth century. … the first covers ancient Greek and medieval atomic and matter theories; the second deals with the scientific and chemical revolutions; and the third takes the story from Dalton through to the experimental discovery of the electron … . Chalmers makes his arguments clearly, powerfully and well. … inspire debates not only in those fields, but also in related fields within science studies.” (Seth Suman, British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 44 (3), September, 2011)

“Alan Chalmers has strong views about what does and does not deserve to be considered ‘science’. In this book he examines a number of historical developments that are frequently cited in accounts of the origin of the outlook … . those generally used in introductory chemistry courses––and to take issue with specialized historians and philosophers. … historical stories widely used as background for introductory chemistry courses merits the serious attention of professional philosophers and historians, and also of science educators.” (Joseph E. Earley, Foundations of Chemistry, Vol. 13, 2011)

“Alan Chalmers has written by far the most important and incisive book of recent years on the fundamental and difficult notions of atoms and atomism. … In each chapter of his book Chalmers outlines modern lines of scholarship concerning the history of chemistry and physics … . Chalmers’ book is a masterpiece in the history and philosophy of science and on a neglected topic of great importance. It should be read by everyone with an interest in the field.”­­­ (Eric Scerri, Metascience, Vol. 19, August, 2010)

“The current book arose from Chalmers teaching of an advanced level HPS course … in the early 1990s. … a detailed scholarly work for graduate students, historians and philosophers. … Chalmers’ extensive research (about 250 references cited) his clarity of expression and well structured argument mean that both immodest realists and constructivists can benefit from a close and thoughtful reading of Atomism.” (Michael R. Matthews, Science & Education, March, 2010)

"It’s reasonable to see philosophy and science as natural partners, complementary in their application and intimately related. … Alan Chalmers textbook is an example of the healthy relationship that can, and often does, exist. It is therefore a welcome addition to the philosophy of science and should benefit students of philosophy and science … . it will help put the relationship between science and philosophy into the right perspective. … This serves to provide a comprehensive history of the relationship between philosophy and science." (Ken Perrott, Open Parachute, August, 2009)

From the Publisher