Scotland: The Story of a Nation


"In Scotland: The Story of a Nation Magnus Magnusson tells the long and fascinating history of Scotland, reexploring some cherished myths and unearthing a wealth of fascinating new detail." "From the first Mesolithic settlers in 7000 B.C. to the struggle for nationhood and the present movements for independence, Scotland is a journey through the history of Scotland. Magnusson explains the roots of the original Scottish people and examines the extent to which Scotland was shaped by Viking raids and settlements. He judges the truth - and lack
... See more details below
Paperback (Reprint)
$16.88 price
(Save 24%)$22.50 List Price

Pick Up In Store

Reserve and pick up in 60 minutes at your local store

Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (26) from $4.95   
  • New (5) from $13.40   
  • Used (21) from $4.95   
Sending request ...


"In Scotland: The Story of a Nation Magnus Magnusson tells the long and fascinating history of Scotland, reexploring some cherished myths and unearthing a wealth of fascinating new detail." "From the first Mesolithic settlers in 7000 B.C. to the struggle for nationhood and the present movements for independence, Scotland is a journey through the history of Scotland. Magnusson explains the roots of the original Scottish people and examines the extent to which Scotland was shaped by Viking raids and settlements. He judges the truth - and lack thereof - of legends about historical figures such as Macbeth, William Wallace, and Robert Bruce. While revealing the truth behind many popular myths, Magnusson also gives ample weight to the importance of these myths, which have shaped the lives of Scots for hundreds and thousands of years." Full of colorful stories, bloody battles, vicious political intrigues, and a rich pageant of historical characters, Scotland: The Story of a Nation is history on an epic level, and is essential for anyone interested in the past of this intriguing land.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
This overly heroic history of Scotland focuses almost exclusively on royalty and warfare. Loosely patterned after Sir Walter Scott's Tales of a Grandfather (1827-1829), Magnusson's (The Vikings) narrative purports to describe Scotland from the Stone Age to the present. Yet his omissions are breathtaking. What of Scotland's amazing (for its size) achievements during the European Enlightenment? Adam Smith is mentioned once, the seminal philosopher David Hume twice in passing. We're treated to a dozen pages about the Battle of Falkirk (wherein England's implacable King Edward I defeated William Wallace in 1298) and its aftermath. But Magnusson never mentions Scotland's central role in the Industrial Revolution, when Glasgow emerged as a global industrial center ("industry" isn't even listed in the index). Magnusson's narrative reads like a medieval saga, filled with swashbuckling tales of kings and battlefield heroics, leaving the reader to wonder how the average person lived. That said, he does emphasize some crucial themes in Scottish history: its constant struggle with hegemonic England, the problems of royal succession and how they led to national instability, and the bloody conflict between Church and State, especially during the reign of the Stuarts. Former chairman of the Ancient Monuments Board for Scotland, Magnusson deftly describes Scotland's geopolitical heritage. He also works hard to dispel some myths, taking particular aim at the film Braveheart and Shakespeare's Macbeth. Magnusson's critical problem, however, is that once he runs out of Scottish kings (circa 1745), he runs out of steam. Still, while hardly definitive, this is worthwhile for those with an interest in earlyScottish history. Color & b&w illus. not seen by PW. (Sept.) Copyright 1999 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
The book's subtitle takes on a second meaning, as Magnusson ambitiously sets out to chronicle a nation of storytellers who hold their literary and oral traditions close to their individual and collective hearts. Magnusson's solid effort brings the reader from ancient Scotland (before there were any "Scots" in it), past semimythic figures like Macbeth and Wallace, to the modern era of union with England and revived Scottish nationalism. Magnusson understands the power of myth in nation building and adeptly infuses his history with sparkling examples of Scottish fables. Combining fine literature and scholarly study, he commences his chapters with lively excerpts from an earlier Scottish history, Sir Walter Scott's Tales of a Grandfather, thus giving his work a storybook feel. Also, the modern critical scrutiny of Scott's political biases and historical blunders is enlightening. Magnusson, who has written over 20 books on his native Iceland and on Scotland, succeeds admirably in creating a pleasurable read, certainly for those with Gaelic heritage but also for any casual student of Scotland. Recommended for public and academic libraries. Gail Benjafield, St. Catharines P.L., Ont. Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
Almost as weighty as the Stone of Destiny, this vast, superb history relates Scotland's past over a dozen millennia. Devotees of BBC America and the History Channel may know Magnusson, familiar on UK airwaves as a historian of the British Isles. The Icelandic transplant, an archaeologist and prolific author (The Vikings, 2001, etc.) and translator (The Fish Can Sing, 2001, etc.), has a greater sense of Scottish history than do most natives. He is thus admirably suited to the difficult task of condensing Scotland's history-made dauntingly complicated by family rivalries, contending clans, and ceaseless tensions with sometime-conqueror, England-into a coherent narrative. Magnusson begins by promising to undo a few "cherished conceptions" about Scottish history, while advancing a few of his own. Along the way he considers such oddities as whether the tartan is a comparatively modern invention and whether Macbeth and Thorfinn the Mighty, the Norse earl of Orkney, might not have been one and the same. More seriously, he closely examines the effects of the 18th-century union with England and the cost and benefits to both countries, and the apparent inability of Scots throughout history to unite without betraying one another. Magnusson takes care to set events on the ground, giving driving directions to the remotest places, so that readers can see battlegrounds and ruins for themselves, and he lingers over curious artifacts (for instance, a box made of the wood from a great tree called Wallace's Oak and given to George Washington, "the Wallace of America"). His narrative ends in 1999, when a Scottish parliament convened for the first time in almost 300 years, and the legend-shrouded Stone ofDestiny was returned to Edinburgh from Westminster Abbey-whereupon, Magnusson wryly remarks, this talisman of Scottish nationhood "lost all its potency as a symbol and became just another ordinary and undistinguished chunk of rock." Lively, opinionated, and dense with detail, Magnusson's tome belongs on the shelves of anyone interested in matters Scottish.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780802139320
  • Publisher: Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
  • Publication date: 1/10/2003
  • Edition description: Reprint
  • Pages: 734
  • Sales rank: 263,718
  • Product dimensions: 8.76 (w) x 6.02 (h) x 1.57 (d)

Read an Excerpt

Chapter One


England is the southern, and Scotland is the northern part of the celebrated island called Great Britain. England is greatly larger than Scotland, and the land is much richer, and produces better crops. There are also a great many more men in England, and both the gentlemen and the country people are more wealthy, and have better food and clothing there than in Scotland. The towns, also, are much more numerous, and more populous.
Scotland, on the contrary, is full of hills, and huge moors and wildernesses, which bear no corn, and afford but little food for flocks of sheep or herds of cattle. But the level ground that lies along the great rivers is more fertile, and produces good crops. The natives of Scotland are accustomed to live more hardily in general than those of England.


* * *

For three billion years Scotland was on a collision course with England.

    I am talking in terms of geology. Scotland's geological past involves a barely believable story in which whole continents moved around like croutons floating half-submerged in a bowl of thick soup; a story of great oceans forming and disappearing like seasonal puddles, of mighty mountains being thrown up and worn down, of formidable glaciers and ice-caps advancing and retreating behind mile-thick walls of ice as they melted andreformed again. Scotland itself has been a desert, a swamp, a tropical rainforest, and a desert again; it has drifted north over the planet with an ever-changing cargo of lizards, dinosaurs, tropical forests, giant redwoods, sharks, bears, lynx, giant elk, wolves — and also, in the last twinkling of an eye in the geological time-scale, human beings.

    And always it was on that inexorable collision course with England.

    In their learned writings, geologists tend to toss millions of years around like confetti. About three billion years ago what is now (largely speaking) `Scotland' was part of a continent known as Laurentia, one of the many differently-sized `plates' which moved slowly around the surface of the globe. Some eight hundred million years ago it was lying in the centre of another super-continent thirty degrees south of the equator. Over aeons of time it wandered the southern hemisphere before drifting north across the equator. By six hundred million years ago Scotland was attached to the North American continent, separated by an ocean called Iapetus from the southerly part of what was to become Britain and which was then attached to the European continent.

    And then, some sixty million years ago, the Iapetus ocean began to close. North Britain and South Britain came together, roughly along the line of Hadrian's Wall. That collision produced the Britain we know today (although it was still connected to Europe). But the weld continued to be subject to stress and strain long after the land masses had locked together: over a three-million-year period a chain of volcanoes erupting off the western seaboard of Scotland created many of the islands of the Hebrides, including Skye, Mull, Arran, Ailsa Craig, St Kilda and Rum.

    The foundation of history is geology and its related subject of geomorphology. The underlying rock has shaped the landscape and has influenced, through the soil, the kind of plants, animals, birds and insects in every part of the countryside; it has thereby shaped the lives and livelihoods of the human communities which have lived here.

    Agriculture would flourish on the productive farmland on the flatter east coast of Scotland. The more mountainous landscape of the west with its thin, acid soils was suitable only for subsistence husbandry. In the Central Belt of Scotland the abundance of coal and oil-shale entombed in the underlying rocks fuelled the Industrial Revolution and would foster the growth of the iron, steel, heavy engineering and shipbuilding industries.

    Edinburgh Castle, at the heart of what became the nation of Scotland, would be built on the eroded roots of a volcano which had erupted some 340 million years ago, when Scotland still lay south of the equator. Castle Rock itself was carved into a classic crag-and-tail shape by the gouging passage of ice during the last glaciation.

    When Sir Walter Scott opened his Tales of a Grandfather with his summary description of the difference between Scotland and England, the modern science of geology was in its infancy (that science, incidentally, was created by Scotsmen like James Hutton and Sir Charles Lyell. Scott did not know why Scotland was so different from England; it took the pioneers of geology to explain it.

The first people in Scotland (c.7000 BC)

One day in the early 1980s a ploughman was working on a potato field near the village of Kinloch, at the head of Loch Scresort on the island of Rum in the Inner Hebrides. As his ploughshare turned over the soil, he caught sight of a beautiful barbed and tanged stone arrowhead. He reported the find at once, and in 1984-85 archaeologist Caroline Wickham-Jones conducted an excavation of the area on behalf of Historic Scotland. What she unearthed was the earliest human settlement site yet discovered in Scotland, dating from the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age) period, nearly nine thousand years ago.

    It was a large camp-site rather than a formal settlement: arcs of stake-holes indicated the locations of several shelters, and there were many traces of fires and broken hearth-stones as well as numerous pits and hollows. These first `Scots' had built small tent-like shelters out of wood, brushwood and skins; they made hearths on which they could prepare food and even smoke meat and fish to keep for the winter. The climate at that time was moist and relatively warm — perhaps 2°C warmer than today; much of the island was covered by open heathlands with shrubs of juniper and bog myrtle, but there was also light, low-canopied woodland, while copses of birch and hazel flourished in the more sheltered areas. Remains of carbonised hazelnut shells showed that nuts were an important part of the early inhabitants' diet.

    The most significant find at Kinloch was the discovery of an assemblage of more than 140,000 stone tools and discarded flint-like material. The Mesolithic dwellers on Rum had made a variety of tools from stone, including microlithic (`small stone') arrowheads, scrapers, awls, blades and flakes. They used flint which they collected as pebbles from the beaches; but they also had access to a good knapping stone known as bloodstone, which has similar properties to flint. The source of the Rum bloodstone was on the west coast of the island, ten kilometres from the Kinloch settlement: Bloodstone Hill (Creag nan Steàrnan).

    Good-quality stone for tools is rare in Scotland, and the presence of bloodstone made Rum very special to the early inhabitants of the western seaboard; we know from archaeological sites elsewhere that people from many of the surrounding islands and the adjoining mainland used bloodstone from Rum for their tools.

    Such were the first known inhabitants of prehistoric Scotland. They had moved up from the south (i.e. England) soon after the end of the last Ice Age, ten thousand years ago, during the Mesolithic period. This sounds very ancient indeed, but it is worth remembering that hunter-gatherers had been living in England for at least four thousand years before that; and in the much warmer climate of the Middle East, people were already living in cities and experimenting with woollen textiles, metal-working, pottery and the irrigation of farmlands.

    The Mesolithic incomers to Scotland were not `settlers', as such. They were small family groups or communities of nomadic people who lived by hunting, fishing and gathering plants; they would establish camps where they could spend the winter and then make forays in pursuit of deer herds in the spring and summer. They made tools and weapons of stone, they used fire for cooking and warmth, and they dressed in animal skins. They were mobile on both land and sea, and soon established barter-links with other semi-permanent communities.

    It is impossible to say how large the Mesolithic population of Scotland was, but several sites have already been identified at places like Morton on Tentsmuir, north of St Andrews and at various other places from Grampian to Argyll.

    The Mesolithic period in Scotland lasted for about four thousand years, and merged into the Neolithic (New Stone Age) period around 3000 BC. By then the last land-link between south-east England and the Continent was submerged, and Britain had become an island. This change had involved an influx of new people from the south, people who started to clear the forests and farm the land. There were now permanent communities, such as the marvellous Neolithic village of Skara Brae, on Orkney.

Skara Brae, Orkney (3100-2600 BC)

In the winter of 1850 a ferocious storm stripped the turf from a high sand-dune known as Skara Brae in the Bay of Skaill, on the west coast of mainland Orkney. An immense midden was exposed, as well as a semi-subterranean warren of ancient stone buildings. What came to light in that storm turned out to be the best-preserved prehistoric village in northern Europe. And not only was it perfectly preserved — it was the earliest in Europe as well: the village of Skara Brae was inhabited around 3100 BC, more than half a millennium before the Great Pyramid of Egypt was built (2500 BC), and long before Stonehenge (2000 BC).

    A splendid new £900,000 Visitor Centre was opened in April 1998. It had taken ten years to plan and build, and it provides a graphic introduction to the story of Skara Brae, using interactive computer images and a replica of one of the original stone houses. But nothing can match the extraordinary experience of seeing the place for oneself.

    The `village' comprises half a dozen separate houses and some associated structures, including a very large workshop for manufacturing stone tools. The houses are spacious and cellular, connected by covered passage-lanes. The village was deliberately embedded into the congealed mass of the midden up to roof height, to provide stability and insulation. The walls were made of local Orkney flagstone, which is easily worked and splits naturally into building slabs. All the fittings and furnishings were also fashioned from flagstone — the kitchen dressers, the cupboards, the shelves, the compartments for the beds. Some of the houses had under-floor drains for indoor sanitation.

    The houses are roofless now. Visitors walk along the tops of the walls and look down into the interiors of the houses. There is a startling sense of intimacy, peering down into these comfortable, well-furnished homes: it is easy to imagine the families who lived there for some twenty generations, from 3100 to 2600 BC. The village evokes a vivid sense of immediacy, of instant identity with that close-knit, self-sufficient farming and fishing community.

    They lived well. The womenfolk owned a lot of jewellery (necklaces, pendants and pins made from bone, as well as ivory and pumice) which they kept in a recess above the bed. They cooked with homemade pottery on a square stone-built hearth in the centre of the room. Farming consisted of keeping cattle and sheep and a few pigs, and growing barley; the sea provided cod and saithe, lobsters and crabs, cockles and mussels. The nearby cliffs were a cornucopia of seabirds' eggs. Wind and weather drove whales, dolphins, porpoises and walrus ashore on their doorstep.

    It was a stable, unchanging lifestyle. Then the village was deserted, around 2600 BC — no one knows how or why. There is no archaeological evidence of sudden emergency or destruction.

    The merging of the Neolithic Age into the Bronze Age also saw the flowering of an extraordinary architectural phenomenon — the erection of stone circles and standing stones. On Orkney, not far from Skara Brae, the Standing Stones of Stenness and the Ring of Brogar survive. But the most imposing, and probably the oldest, of the megalithic (`big stone') monuments of Scotland is the great complex at Calanais on the Isle of Lewis — Scotland's `Stonehenge of the North'.

Calanais (Isle of Lewis): 3000-2000 BC

It used to be called `Callanish' or `Callernish'. Before that it was `Classerniss'. But now the original Gaelic form of the name will be enshrined in the next Ordnance Survey maps of the Western Isles of Scotland, so `Calanais' it is, officially.

    Calanais on the Isle of Lewis lies at the head of Loch Roag, some twenty-four kilometres west of Stornoway. It was built in stages from about 3000 BC and was certainly completed by 2000 BC. Briefly, it is a circle of thirteen standing stones huddled round a massive central monolith, 4.75 metres high, and a small chambered cairn. A double line or `avenue' of stones comes in from the north, and ragged tongues protruding from the circle create a rough cruciform shape.

    The importance of Calanais has long been recognised. In the seventeenth century the people of Lewis called the standing stones Fir Bhrèige (`False Men'):

It is left by traditione that these were a sort of men converted into stone by ane Inchanter. Others affirme that they were sett up in places for devotione.


By then the complex had been all but drowned in a layer of peat some 1.5 metres deep. In 1857 the owner of Lewis, Sir James Matheson, ordered the peat to be cleared, and the site became a Mecca for visitors. When the first Ancient Monuments Act was passed in 1882, Calanais was in the primary list of sixty-three prehistoric or later monuments to be scheduled for protection.

    The landscape setting, and the setting of the stones themselves, have changed considerably since then. The local inhabitants, who had lived in a row of crofting houses built in the 1860s at the southern edge of the site, were `cleared', like the peat. Various excavations of dubious value were undertaken. Early in the 1980s a `proper' excavation was mounted, led by Patrick Ashmore of Historic Scotland, to clarify the precise positions of fallen and missing stones and to repair and conserve the site; in 1982, in a BBC documentary to celebrate the centenary of the Ancient Monuments Act (Echoes in Stone), I filmed the tricky re-erection of one of the stones at Calanais. There is now a new Calanais Visitor Centre next door to the Edinburgh University Field Centre; here, visitors can find out about the main site before going on to admire the stones in situ.

    Calanais has a special aura of enchantment, of marvel and majesty and mystery. What was it originally intended to be? That is its continuing enigma. A temple? A huge funerary complex? A megalithic astronomical observatory to mark important events in the movements of the sun and the moon and the stars? Or all three, perhaps? The engineering and surveying skills required to construct such a complex monument are astonishing; they argue a high level of sustained social organisation, and the sophisticated and purposeful use of regional power to express ancient beliefs and rituals which we still cannot fathom.

    These beliefs and rituals were given their most impressive and enduring monument in the great prehistoric chambered tomb of Maes Howe, at Tormiston Mill on the Orkney mainland.

Maes Howe on Orkney (3000 BC)

In 1861 an assiduous local antiquary named J. Farrer, along with a friend, George Petrie, dug their way into the heart of a great green mound known as Maes Howe. They had no idea what to expect. First they tried to make their way along the entrance passage. When they found it blocked solid, they broke through a hole in the top of the mound. They dropped into a central chamber choked with clay and stones, and had it cleared by their workmen. What they found disappointed them: it was clearly a burial chamber, with three built-in recesses or cells for bodies, but all they found was a fragment of a human skull and some horse bones and teeth.

    They also discovered, however, that they were not the first `moderns' to have broken into Maes Howe. In the middle of the twelfth century AD, a band of Norse crusaders (`Jerusalem-farers') had dug a hole in the roof of what they called `Orkahaug' and dropped in, and the signs of their incursion were still apparent when Farrer and Petrie made their entry. The Norsemen had had their reasons for breaking into the chamber: they knew that the kings of antiquity had been buried in huge burial mounds accompanied by their choicest treasures and weapons, and ransacking burial mounds was a favoured diversion for viking heroes. But the crusaders had found nothing to satisfy their greed in Maes Howe, and had scrawled their disappointment — and their excuses for failure — in runic graffiti on the walls:

To the north-west a great treasure is hidden. It was long ago that a great treasure was hidden here. Happy is he who finds the great treasure.
It is surely true what I say, that treasure was taken away. Treasure was carried off in three nights before these Jerusalem-farers broke into this howe.

I make no excuses for returning to Orkney on this lightning tour of prehistoric Scotland, for Orkney is an archaeological paradise, with more outstanding monuments and sites than any other part of Britain of similar size. Maes Howe itself, which is acclaimed as the finest chambered tomb in north-west Europe, is associated with the Orkney farmers who built the Standing Stones of Stenness and the Ring of Brogar, and whose ancestors may have lived at Skara Brae. It was built within a century or two of 3000 BC. The mound stands more than seven metres high, and measures thirty-five metres across. The lofty central chamber is relatively small (some 4.6 metres square) and is approached by a low, stone-flagged entry-passage. The passage points south-west, and in the evenings around the shortest day of the year (21 December) the rays of the setting sun shine directly into the burial chamber.

    Maes Howe is a miracle of early engineering. It is built almost entirely of huge flagstone slabs (megaliths), the largest of which weigh more than thirty tonnes. The walls of the central chamber converge in overlapping slabs of stone to form a vaulted ceiling; the final square of space was closed with slabs.

    But Maes Howe has even more to offer than this amazing feat of prehistoric architecture, and for that we have the Norsemen to thank. The graffiti carved by the Orkney crusaders are not the only inscriptions in this fascinating place. After the first Norse break-in, the old burial chamber seems to have become a popular venue for courtship. One boastful inscription states boldly, Thorny bedded: Helgi carved [it]. Another, more gallantly, says, Ingigerð is the sweetest woman there is. Another refers obliquely to the amorous activities of the local merry widow: Ingibjörg the fair widow: many a woman has lowered herself to come in here; a great show-off. Erlingr.

    They form part of the largest collection of runic inscriptions anywhere in the viking world — and the fact that their subject-matter is so commonplace gives them, for me, a special value. These are not the epics of kings and heroes which you find in the Icelandic sagas, but the authentic voices of the ordinary folk who, throughout history, are usually as anonymous as a flock of birds. Maes Howe was the ancient, brooding, mysterious place which the Norsemen of Orkney made their own.

The Broch of Mousa

Round about 2000 BC the advent of the Bronze Age brought another revolutionary social change to Scotland with the introduction of metallurgy. A new metal, bronze, which was tougher than silver or gold or copper, underpinned the development of sophisticated social hierarchies based on wealth and power. Bronze brought about an increase in trade and an increase in the effectiveness of weaponry; and the new weaponry enabled ambitious leaders to indulge in territorial aggression.

    It was now that Scotland made another uniquely Scottish contribution to architecture — the brochs. They were magnificent edifices: tall round towers, with tapering double-skinned dry-stone walls bonded together at intervals by rows of flat slabs. Between the double walls were stairs leading to galleries and small rooms on separate storeys. There was room for livestock at ground level, which had only one small, low and easily defended entrance. There were no windows. The brochs were practically impregnable.

    There are some five hundred brochs, or traces of brochs, still surviving in Scotland. They were built in large numbers in the north, especially in the Northern Isles, the Western Isles and Caithness, with occasional examples in the southern part of the country.

    When were they built, and why? They seem to have originated in Orkney early in the Iron Age, around 200 BC, and were being built until about AD 200, when they were more or less abandoned; their stones were robbed for newer buildings in the farming communities which had been growing around them. They can only have been built as powerful symbols of local authority and prestige, which could also act as strongholds for the local people in times of danger: part refuge, part status symbol.


Excerpted from SCOTLAND by MAGNUS MAGNUSSON. Copyright © 2000 by Magnus Magnusson. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations
List of Maps
1 In the Beginning 1
2 The Romans in Scotland 13
3 Picts, Scots, Britons, Angles and Others 22
4 Macbeth 50
5 Malcolm Canmore and St. Margaret 61
6 David I 71
7 William the Lion 81
8 The Thirteenth Century: Alexanders II and III 90
9 John Balliol - 'Toom Tabard' 108
10 William Wallace 126
11 Robert Bruce 160
12 David II 195
13 Robert II and Robert III 210
14 James I 229
15 James II 249
16 James III 260
17 James IV and the Renaissance 274
18 James V 295
19 Mary Queen of Scots: 1 - Reign and the Reformation 317
20 Mary Queen of Scots: 2 - Imprisonment and Civil War 364
21 James VI and the Union of the Crowns 382
22 Charles I and the National Covenant 418
23 Charles II and the Covenanters 451
24 James VII & II: The Last Stewart King 500
25 William and Mary: The 'Glorious Revolution'? 510
26 Queen Anne and the Act of Union 535
27 Risings and Riots 558
28 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' and the '45 583
29 Sir Walter Scott: 'The Wizard of the North' 632
Epilogue: 'There Shall be a Scottish Parliament' 663
App. A: Chronology 693
App. B Kings and Queens of Scotland 700
Acknowledgements 701
Sources 703
Index 710
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 25, 2004

    The best Scottish history book I've read

    At first glance, this lengthy tome seems rather daunting, but once you get past its sheer size, you'll find that Magnus Magnusson has written an absolute gem of a history book. The reading is always absorbing and entertaining, all the while maintaining an accurate and academic air. Highly, highly recommended.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 20, 2010

    WINSTON"S WAR: CHURCHILL 1940-1945 by Max Hastings-A portrait of a Tory at War. How Winston Churchill saved Western civilizations.

    Winston's War: Churchill 1940-1945 is an unromanticized picture of a British prime minister at war, written by a British historian who has written numerous books on World War II. He presents a portrait of Churchill etched in acid. His Churchill is a manic-depressive soaked in alcohol. An out of touch politician with very little support among the common people or in his own Conservative party. A reactionary tory who is obsessed with maintaining the British Empire as it existed in his youth at any cost. He is also the only politician in Britain, or for that matter in Western Europe, utterly determined to stop Adolf Hitler at any cost.
    The principal feat of Churchill's life was keeping his country in the war after the collapse of France in June, 1940. France and Belgium folded after a German offence in May and June of 1940. Britain could have easily made a shameful peace with Nazi Germany. There was a strong appeasement faction in Churchill's Conservative party. Working class Britains had suffered severely during the Great Depression and were bitterly hostile to the establishment. Churchill kept his country in the war for a whole year with no major allies and little help. The entry into the war of the Soviet Union in June, 1941 and the United States in December, 1941 were game changers. Both the U.S. and the Soviet Union had several times the population and resources of Great Britain.
    The book turns on Hasting's description of the relationship between Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Both men were determined to direct and control wartime strategy. Yet they had very different objectives. Prime Minister Winston Churchill wished to resurrect the old world as it existed before World War II and President Franklin Roosevelt understood that world was already dead. President Roosevelt was especially concerned that American resources not be used to bolster the British Empire.
    Then we come to Marshal Joseph Stalin, dictator of the Soviet Union and murderer of millions. It is the central theme of Hasting's book that the allies needed the Russians more than the Russians needed them. This is certainly true. Churchill once famously said, "The Russian front tore the guts out of the German army." Stalin used this need to extract everything he wanted from the Western Allies. What he most wanted was Eastern Europe. Churchill fought for a free Poland but was unable to save it from Soviet occupation and the imposition of a communist dictatorship. Hastings feels that President Roosevelt and Chief of Staff George C. Marshal "understood" the allied position better than Prime Minister Churchill. So we get the terrible irony that Britain went to war with Nazi Germany to save Poland from Nazi tyranny but was unable to save Poland from Soviet tyranny.
    The relationship between Roosevelt and Churchill can best be described through Operation Anvil-Dragoon. Anvil-Dragoon is the code name for the allied invasion of the Mediterranean France following the Normandy invasion. Winston Churchill wished for large allied forces be used to finish the Italian campaign and to invade the Eastern Europe and the Balkans. He wished to forestall Stalin's invasion of eastern Europe with one of his own. President Roosevelt and George C. Marshall insisted that all U.S. forces land in Southern France. They got their way because by 1944 American strength was predominant.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 16, 2004

    Fantastic history of Scotland

    This was the first of many books I read about Scotland. And by far the best. The way the author details everything about the kings and queens. And the battle descriptions are the best I have read.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 5, 2004


    It is an excellent overview of the full history of the Scottish people. I am re-reading and then channeling out to do more intensive study on various parts.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)