Tie-dye? Fine. Bell bottoms? OK. But....
I don't know or mind if Frank Schaeffer, the author of "Sex, Mom, & God," wears tie-dyed clothes or bell bottoms, but some of the ideas he promotes in this book have on an enormous scale since the late 1960s been tried and not so much found wanting as they have been tried and found catastrophic. SCHAEFFER WRITES: (p. 115) "I said that I thought that there would be fewer abortions if women had access to the better health care and the other social services that Obama was proposing during his campaign." RATHER, SCHAEFFER (A) joins those fobbing off as "health care" poisonous drugs designed to induce a diseased state - prolonged infertility - in women and sometimes men or devices which monkey-wrench the human reproductive works; and (B) fails to recognize that these drugs and devices have been tried for decades by hundreds of millions of women and sometimes men and the results have been exactly opposite of what their proponents have prognosticated: rates of unwanted pregnancy, abortion and other forms of child abuse, divorce, and sexually related diseases have soared astonishingly (and, again, though it is tough to measure, I suspect adultery). SCHAEFFER WRITES: (p. 209) "If the Republicans had wanted to prevent abortions, they would have funded a thorough and mandatory sex education initiative from the earliest grades in all schools and combined it with the distribution of free contraceptives in all high schools, public and private (religious schools included)...." RATHER, SCHAEFFER seems unaware that, even according to the Guttmacher Institute (named after Alan Guttmacher, a president of Planned Parenthood and a vice-president of the American Eugenics Society), the majority of women who procure abortions in the USA were using a "contraceptive" drug or device when they conceived the child they aborted and that an even higher percentage were experienced "contraceptive" users but abandoned these drugs or devices, often because of their side effects. (One should note that many so called "contraceptives," besides failing to prevent conception, may also cause a very early abortion.) Data from several consecutive decades are in; widespread use of artificial contraceptives has been correlated with an increase in procured abortions. (I believe the correlation is causal and refer the reader to the transcript of Janet Smith's "Contraception: Why Not?" for a good initiation on why this is so). Yet Schaeffer and so many others overly devoted to reductionism keep insisting that the use of artificial contraceptives will prevent abortion. And it is not hard to imagine one of Schaeffer's putative sex educators intoning about "safe abortion" even though procured direct abortion (A) may be a risk factor for breast cancer; (B) is a risk factor for cerebral palsy in babies conceived later; (C) is a risk factor for infertility; and (D) is deliberately fatal to the fetus targeted by the abortion, for a few examples. I'm sure that Schaeffer's sex educators would be as punctilious regarding informed consent with respect to these consequences as President Bill Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, Secretary Hillary Clinton, and "The New York Times" have been whenever they deploy the curiosity "safe abortion," aren't you?
0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.