One of the leading and most-read law journals adds multiple digital editions to its worldwide distribution. This current issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by scholars Ryan Scott (on sentencing disparity), Scott ...
One of the leading and most-read law journals adds multiple digital editions to its worldwide distribution. This current issue of the Stanford Law Review contains studies of law, economics, and social policy by scholars Ryan Scott (on sentencing disparity), Scott Hershovitz (what Harry Potter means to torts), Robert Cooter & Neil Siegel (collective federalism), and Brian Galle & Jonathan Klick (alternative minimum tax).
VOLUME 63, ISSUE 1's Contents:
"Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity After Booker: A First Look,"
by Ryan W. Scott
"Harry Potter and the Trouble with Tort Theory,"
by Scott Hershovitz
"Collective Action Federalism: A General Theory of Article I, Section 8,"
by Robert D. Cooter & Neil S. Siegel
"Recessions and the Social Safety Net: The Alternative Minimum Tax as a Countercyclical Fiscal Stabilizer,"
by Brian Galle & Jonathan Klick
The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. Each year the Law Review publishes one volume, which appears in six separate issues between December and July. Each issue contains material written by student members of the Law Review, other Stanford law students, and outside contributors, such as law professors, judges, and practicing lawyers.
In the ebook edition, the footnotes, graphs, and tables of contents are fully linked and functional, the original note numbering is retained, and the issue is properly formatted for ereaders.
The journal is edited by students at Stanford Law School and features scholarly articles in law, economics, and social policy. Contributors to this issue include leading academics at the law schools of the University of Indiana-Bloomington, the University of Michigan, the University of California-Berkeley, Duke, Boston College, and the University of Pennsylvania.