The Story of Taxol: Nature and Politics in the Pursuit of an Anti-Cancer Drug

Hardcover (Print)
Buy New
Buy New from BN.com
$57.28
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $1.99
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 96%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (18) from $1.99   
  • New (7) from $19.99   
  • Used (11) from $1.99   

Overview

"Taxol is arguably the most celebrated, talked about, and controversial natural product in recent years: Celebrated because of its efficacy as an anti-cancer drug and because its discovery has provided powerful support for policies concerned with biodiversity. Talked about because in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the American public was bombarded with news reports about the molecule and its host, the slow-growing Pacific yew. Controversial because the drug and the tree became embroiled in several sensitive political issues with broad public policy implications." "Taxol has revolutionized the treatment options for patients with advanced forms of breast and ovarian cancers and some types of leukemia; it shows promise for treating AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. It is the best-selling anti-cancer drug ever, with world sales of $1.2 billion in 1998 and expected to grow. Goodman and Walsh's careful study of how taxol was discovered, researched, and brought to market documents the complexities and conflicting interests in the ongoing process to find effective treatments. From a broader perspective, The Story of Taxol uses the discovery and development of taxol as a paradigm to address current issues in the history and sociology of science and medicine."--BOOK JACKET.
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Library Journal
Goodman (international economic history) and Walsh (technology management), both of the University of Mancheser Institute of Technology, have written a thorough account of the discovery, development, and politics of the cancer drug taxol. Like Goodman's previous book, Tobacco in History: The Cultures of Dependence (Routledge, 1993), this is a succinct study and covers its subject from many viewpoints: the biology and supply of the Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia); the USDA botanists who looked for new plants; the National Cancer Institute researchers who tested compounds; the Forest Service, which controlled access to the trees; the contractors who collected the Taxus bark; the companies that extracted compounds; the cancer researchers who did the trials; and, ultimately, the company that synthesized and made money from taxol. To some, this story will be a wonderful example of how people working together can discover an important medicine; to others, it might be a good example of how tax money is used to subsidize big business. An excellent book for public and academic libraries. Margaret Henderson, Huntington, NY Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information.
From the Publisher
"...well written and well documented. This book is recommended to anyone connected with cancer research, whether health professionals or patient. I would also highly recommend this book to students, not only in history, but in pharmacy, medicine, and nursing. It certainly will help build an understanding of the complexity required to bring a life-saving medicine to those who use it." Pharmacy in History

"...an extremely timely and interesting book; a fascinating history...I learned a great deal from this book, and I strongly recommend it." American Journal of Sociology

"[The authors'] detailed, well-researched account will be enjoyed by historians and scientists interested in the drug-development process and its many potential pitfalls." Science

"Jordan Goodman and Vivien Walsh have written a well-researched, careful account... At the same time, they provide an important exemplification of twentieth century public-private research relationships, the privatization of natural resources, and the backstage political activities involved in determining what is in the 'best interest' of the public." Isis

"It is a fascinating, well-written, and compelling history." Rima D. Apple, Journal of American History

"...insightful....This book is suited for practically all researchers, faculty, and professionals whatever their personal interests, since it contains something for nearly everyone: scientific fact, political strategy, business considerations, and social questions." Choice

"It is carefully researched and detailed, and as someone who was at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) during part of the development of Taxol, I found it factually accurate." New England Journal of Medicine

"[Goodman and Walsh] have written a thorough account of the discovery, development, and politics of the cancer drug taxol...[T]his is a succinct study and covers its subject from many viewpoints...To some, this story will be a wonderful example of how people working together can discover an important medicine; to others, it might be a good example of how tax money is used to subsidize big business. An excellent book." Library Journal

"A very readable and reliable account of the development of Taxol through 1992." Chemical & Engineering News

"The story of Taxol is a significant one that has received little attention from historians, and this book fills a gap in the literature. It is carefully researched, drawing upon a host of published and unpublished sources, as well as interviews with some of the key participants...an excellent book. It should be of interest not onlt to historians of science and medicine, but also to environmental and business historians, and in fact to anyone who would like to learn more about the development of this important therapeutic agent." American Historical Review

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780521561235
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • Publication date: 3/28/2001
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Pages: 296
  • Product dimensions: 5.98 (w) x 8.98 (h) x 0.94 (d)

Meet the Author

Jordan Goodman is a Senior Lecturer in History at the Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology. He has written on subjects as varied as the history of medicine and economic history for journal articles and in edited volumes. Goodman's previous books include Tobacco in History (Routledge, 1994) and Consuming Habits: Drugs in History and Anthropology (Routledge, 1995).

Vivien Walsh is Reader in Technology Management at the Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science & Technology.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

1. Cancer Chemotherapy: Plant Knowledge and Practice

In 1960, the National Cancer Institute (hereafter NCI) and the United States Department of Agriculture (hereafter USDA) began an interagency programme to procure and screen plant products as potential anti-cancer agents. It was an ambitious programme that would consume vast amounts of labour and laboratory time. The programme lasted just over twenty years and, although a huge number of plants were screened, no plant product reached the clinic during the period of the programme's existence. Though samples of the Pacific yew, Taxus brevifolia, were procured in 1962, taxol, the tree's promising compound, had not yet reached clinical trials by the time that the programme was wound up.

To follow and understand taxol's path through the American cancer research and biomedical community, it is necessary to explore, in some detail, two principal contexts: the history and development of cancer chemotherapy and its target; and the structure and strategy of the NCIUSDA plant screening programme.

Cancer Chemotherapy and the Malignant Cell

The years from roughly 1945 to 1970 were formative in the history of cancer chemotherapy in two principal senses.' First, chemotherapy came to achieve status as a therapeutic regimen for the cure or at least the palliation of cancer, towering over surgery and radiotherapy, during this period.' Secondly, chemotherapy became a research regimen in biomedicine that mirrored, incorporated and modified models of large-scale cooperative ventures in other scientific endeavours.

The medical literature abounds with reviews of the historical development of cancer chemotherapy. The generalconsensus of the literature is that 'modern' cancer chemotherapy emerged from research in gas warfare by the Americans and British during World War II.' The landmark papers on nitrogen mustards contributed to a heightened interest and belief in chemical agents rather than radiotherapy and surgery as the techniques of choice in cancer treatment: attacking the 'biochemical soil' in which cancers arose, as a leading advocate of chemotherapy put it. Wartime programmes devoted to the large-scale production of penicillin and antimalarial drugs built on the success of the sulpha drugs of the late 1930s in convincing many people that disease could be eradicated by chemical means.

The bulk of experimental and clinical research on chemotherapeutic agents from roughly 1945 to 1960 focused on two kinds of chemicals and two mechanisms of action: alkylating agents that combine chemically with cellular constituents, and antimetabolites that compete with the substrate of an enzyme system for engagement in metabolism.' Steroid hormones and antibiotics were also examined for chemotherapeutic potential. Cortisone, for example, was studied for its ability to regress tumours long before its more famous effects on arthritis were observed.' Among antibiotics, the only one to be used clinically was actinomycin D.

Cancer chemotherapy was not then the core activity it would become. Research glided between experimental (laboratory) activities, predominantly biological work on animal tumours, and clinical trials on humans. Until the 1940s, experimental cancer chemotherapy was carried out by many different investigators in many different disciplinary specialties - biology, physiology, pharmacology and botany, and in many different sites - pathology laboratories, hospitals, universities, and private biological research institutes." One of the most important of the latter type was the Rockefeller Institute which, for many decades, had been actively engaged in experimental cancer research. James Murphy, who was with the Institute from 1911 to his death in 1950, summed up the achievements of cancer research during his period of activity. According to Murphy, the chief insights included: (i) that tumours could be transplanted, a fact that demonstrated that malignancy was centred in the cells; (11) that genetic factors influenced cancer but that they varied within the population; (iii) that there were certain agents called carcinogens that induced tumours; and (iv) that in the change from normality to malignancy, the cell was altered and that proliferation became automatic and therefore no longer dependent on the causative agent.

With the ending of World War II, the diffracted nature of experimental and clinical cancer chemotherapy gave way to a more standardized practice. As architects of early post-war American chemotherapy, Cornelius Packard 'Dusty' Rhoads and the Sloan-Kettering Institute were instrumental in this change. Rhoads began his professional career in haematology at the Rockefeller Institute in 1928,14 and in 1933 was put in charge of the clinical haematology service where he remained until 1940 when he was made director of the Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases. Within a very short time of the date of this appointment, Rhoads became the Chief of the Medical Division of the Chemical Warfare Service of the United States Army. Rhoads assembled under him an impressive array of medical scientists. Many of them joined him after the war at the Sloan-Kettering Institute and those that did not found their way into other cancer research centres in the United States.

It was during his time as Chief of the Division that experiments were conducted with nitrogen mustards, investigating their pharmacology, toxicology and mechanism of action: according to one commentator, nitrogen mustards became 'a model for the study of antitumor drugs'. Once the war ended and the ban on public statements about this research was lifted, it was Rhoads who made the knowledge public to the American Medical Association." At the close of the war, the work on nitrogen mustards came under the direction of the Committee on Growth of the National Research Council who, in turn assigned the work to three institutions, one of which was the Memorial Hospital."

The Sloan-Kettering Institute was founded in 1945 and rapidly became the largest private cancer research institute in the United States. In tracing the first few years of its history, the historian Robert Bud reminds us that the institute was founded on industrial principles of organization and practice. Not only were its founders and many of the trustees industrialists - Alfred P Sloan and Charles F Kettering of General Motors, Frank Howard of Standard Oil - but it also expressly adopted a programme of research modelled on the industrial laboratories of such companies as Bell, DuPont, General Motors, etc. The press release announcing the founding of the institute contended that its task was to 'concentrate on the organization of industrial techniques for cancer research'.

Precisely what was meant by the 'organization of industrial techniques' would only become apparent as the system of research evolved over the years. What was emphatically clear, however, was that the centrepiece of the entire organization was the cell. Rhoads had a deep conviction of the truth of the central tenet of chemotherapy, namely that there were chemical agents that could selectively destroy or control the cancer cell, in contrast to the prevailing focus on surgery and radiotherapy. This was founded on his own experience with nitrogen mustards and laid the foundation of what he called 'an empiric attack on cancer'. The laboratories at the institute began to construct an organization and programme to fulfil the promise. The structure of the organization followed on from the strategy of testing as many substances as possible against a number of experimental tumour models...

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents


Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Introduction
Part I: Agents
1: Cancer Chemotherapy: Plant Knowledge and Practice
Part II: Practices
2: Act I: 1962-1975
3: Act II: 1976-1983
4: Act III: 1984-1989
Part III: Controversies
5: The Politics of Exclusivity and the Business of Taxol
6: The Political Life (and Death) of Taxus brevifolia
References and Bibliography
Index
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)