Strife and Progress: Portfolio Strategies for Managing Urban Schools [NOOK Book]


Deficient urban schooling remains one of America's most pressing—and stubborn—public policy problems. This important new book details and evaluates a radical and promising new approach to K-12 education reform. Strife and Progress explains for a broad audience the "portfolio strategy" for providing urban education—its rationale, implementation, and results. Under the portfolio strategy, cities use anything that works, indifferent to whether schools are run by the public district or private entities. It combines ...

See more details below
Strife and Progress: Portfolio Strategies for Managing Urban Schools

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$18.99 price
(Save 34%)$28.95 List Price


Deficient urban schooling remains one of America's most pressing—and stubborn—public policy problems. This important new book details and evaluates a radical and promising new approach to K-12 education reform. Strife and Progress explains for a broad audience the "portfolio strategy" for providing urban education—its rationale, implementation, and results. Under the portfolio strategy, cities use anything that works, indifferent to whether schools are run by the public district or private entities. It combines traditional modes of schooling with newer methods, including chartering and experimentation with schools making innovative use of people and technology. Urban districts try to make themselves magnets for new talent, recruiting educators and career switchers looking to make a difference for poor children.

The portfolio strategy creates interesting new bedfellows: people who think that government should oversee public education align with those advocating choice, competition, and entrepreneurship. It cuts across political lines and engages city governments and civic assets (e.g., philanthropies, businesses, universities) much more deeply than earlier reform initiatives. New York and New Orleans were portfolio pioneers, but the idea has spread rapidly to cities as far-flung as Los Angeles, Denver, and Chicago.

Results have been mixed overall but generally positive in places that implemented the strategy most aggressively. Reform leaders such as New York's Joel Klein have been overly optimistic, however, assuming that the strategy's merits would be so obvious that careful assessment would be unnecessary. Serious policy evaluation is still needed.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From the Publisher

" Strife and Progress is a must-read for anyone who wants to act on the lessons of the past decade to improve urban education. It describes a revolutionary new approach to improving school systems that we've seen firsthand can attract and retain exceptional educators, unleash their leadership, empower parents, and expand opportunity for all children."—Wendy Kopp, Founder and CEO, Teach for America

"There can be no one-size-fits-all in our relentless pursuit to create an education system that exists solely for the benefit of students. In Strife and Progress: Portfolio
Strategies for Managing Urban Schools
, Hill, Campbell, and Gross present an innovative strategy for those looking for new ways to fix an old system."—Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, 1999-2007, and Chairman of the Foundation for Excellence in Education

"Paul Hill and his colleagues write with power and clarity about a school reform strategy—portfolio management—that he has long championed. He shows how it has worked in school districts throughout the country and the political pushback it has generated. This is an important book because portfolio strategies are critical to improving our public schools, and Hill's sharp eye will help future reformers move forward more effectively."—Joel Klein, Former New York City Schools Chancellor, CEO of the Education Division and Executive Vice President, News Corporation

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780815724285
  • Publisher: Brookings Institution Press
  • Publication date: 11/14/2012
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 140
  • File size: 955 KB

Meet the Author

Paul T. Hill is a research professor at the University of Washington Bothell. He is the founder and former director of the University of Washington Bothell's Center on Reinventing Public Education and a distinguished visiting fellow and a member of the Koret Task Force on K–12 Education at the Hoover Institution. He is coauthor (with Mary Beth Celio) of Fixing Urban Schools (Brookings, 1998) and (with Christine Campbell and James Harvey) It Takes a City (Brookings, 2000).

Christine Campbell is a senior research analyst and policy director at the Center on Reinventing Public Education.

Betheny Gross is a senior research analyst and research director at the Center on Reinventing Public Education. Before working at CRPE, she was a research analyst at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education at the University of Pennsylvania.

Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt


Portfolio Strategies for Managing Urban Schools
By Paul T. Hill Christine Campbell Betheny Gross


All right reserved.

ISBN: 978-0-8157-2427-8

Chapter One


Yolanda (not an individual but a composite) is a fourteen-year-old girl who attends a New Orleans charter school. She was eight in 2005, just about to enter third grade, when Hurricane Katrina forced her family to flee the city and separate in order to live with relatives. She spent several months out of school but eventually enrolled in elementary school in the small town in Texas where her mother's sister lived.

Schools in the Texas district were not considered at all advanced, so teachers in her new school were surprised to find out how far behind the other students Yolanda was. After trying placement in second grade, they returned her to a third-grade classroom but provided as much extra tutoring as they could.

Her father's work experience helped him get a job with a new construction company in New Orleans in early 2007, so her family was able to reunite and return to the city. Though the house the family had rented before the hurricane was destroyed, the family was able to rent a unit only a mile away. After a few weeks of moving and repairing a rental duplex that was not as "renovated" as promised, her parents contacted the Recovery School District and arranged for Yolanda's placement as a fifth grader in a new K–8 charter school.

The new school is run by a combination of New Orleans business people, college administrators, former New Orleans teachers, and teachers recruited from outside the state. It serves students like Yolanda, many of whom have experienced interrupted education, family separation, and loss of their old home. Moreover, most had been performing well below grade level in the schools they attended before the hurricane.

Throughout this book, we return to Yolanda's story and those of children, parents, and teachers in other cities. In the meantime, a debate rages about whether it is fair for Americans to demand more of their public schools. One side argues that high dropout rates and low achievement, especially among poor and minority students, are rooted in poverty and social conditions that schooling cannot overcome. The other side argues that schools do far less for poor and minority children than they could if they made better use of the time, money, and talent available to them. The debate has become nasty, with the first side claiming that schools and educators are being blamed for society's failings, and the second claiming that teachers unions and other defenders of the status quo put their own interests before those of children.

As is usual in polarized debates, both sides ignore inconvenient facts. Some schools are making innovative uses of time, money, and teaching methods and are having dramatic success with children who are otherwise likely to fail. However, even the most effective schools for disadvantaged children still don't work for all at-risk students. In particular, no one has found a way to reach the small minority of students who do not attend school faithfully and do not do the assigned work. Thus neither side's claims fit all the facts. In their candid moments, debaters on both sides concede both that poverty impedes many students and that many schools serving the poor are poorly staffed and inefficient. But neither side is about to abandon the debate, fearing that the other side would, if left unopposed, either totally dismantle public education or block reasonable efforts to improve it.

We are writing this book because we believe that both sides are partly right and that the current stalemate is harmful to everyone. It is possible both to maintain the core values of public education—including public oversight, a commitment to equity, and fair treatment of educators—and to organize public education so that it is always open to new ideas and new sources of talent. Stalemate leaves Americans in the worst possible position: millions of children leaving school unprepared to be effective participants in a competitive global economy and an increasingly complex political system.

Our goal is to explain a strategy that is emerging in many big cities. The strategy would preserve public education by transforming it from a stagnant entity that cannot adapt to the needs of its students into a dynamic public enterprise engaged in a constant search for the set of schools and instructional experiences that best meet the needs of a diverse urban student population.

The Portfolio Strategy: What It Is and What It Isn't

The portfolio strategy, often introduced by mayors and others concerned with a city's future viability, is so named because it is founded on an idea similar to a financial portfolio (table 1-1). A financial manager aims for a diverse portfolio that performs well. She avoids betting everything on one investment, knowing that some holdings will perform much better than expected and some much worse. This manager is agnostic as to which companies are represented but knows that diversity is key and regularly reviews performance as well as industry and company news. When some stocks make impressive gains, more of those are added, and when some are trending poorly, those are sold.

A school district portfolio manager thinks the same way. No school model is right for every child, so the district needs a diverse array of schools. By constantly reviewing school and student outcomes, as well as school climate and neighborhood need, the portfolio manager knows which schools are both performing and trending well, which schools have the possibility of improving, and which schools must be replaced with options that are right for the affected students. Portfolio district managers also track performance closely and make sure everyone in the system has access to good data. The portfolio strategy is a way to seek a solution to a problem that has never been solved before, akin to the methods used to discover remedies to previously incurable illnesses or to develop computers that can do things previously thought impossible. In K–12 education the problem to be solved is how to effectively educate all the children in a large city, including those from the most disadvantaged homes. The portfolio strategy does not assume that the best methods known today will always be the best available. Instead, it incorporates a spirit of continuous improvement, always asking, "Is this the very best we can do for our community's children?"

Not every effort to create a new school or improve an existing one can work as planned the first time. With a portfolio, leaders add more of what's working, eliminate what is not working, assess, and repeat. They also track performance closely and make sure everyone in the system has access to good data. As this book shows, school districts pioneering the use of the portfolio strategy have stirred up serious opposition. People whose jobs will change, or whose positions of influence are put at risk, often oppose the strategy. So do some families and property owners who like their current schools and do not want them to change, even when faced with evidence that some students are not doing well in them.

Ironically, despite the opposition it stirs up, the portfolio strategy has proven more sustainable than more narrowly conceived districtwide programs. As subsequent chapters show, school district portfolio strategies used in such big cities as New York, Washington, Denver, New Orleans, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Hartford have survived the departure of the public officials who introduced them. This rarely happens with narrow districtwide programs, which are identified with strong superintendents and have shallow support. Portfolio strategies can be more sustainable because they remake public education into a civic initiative that is open to both community input and resources.

Why Tell the Portfolio Story?

Our goal in this book is to inform mayors, governors, parents, educators, and civic leaders about the school district portfolio strategy—what it means, how it can be introduced into a city and used to benefit children, what conflicts it creates, and what political and financial resources are necessary to make it work. We think that many readers will conclude that the school district portfolio strategy is sensible, is necessary, can succeed, and is worth the effort.

We do not hide the risks and costs. These are real, as in any great undertaking that opens up new possibilities. Nor do we make claims that every school district that has tried a portfolio strategy has seen all its schools transformed. Though there is positive evidence in terms of school quality and benefits to students, leaders in all the cities we studied are still searching for ways to make their worst schools better and their mediocre schools good.

If the only definition of success is brilliant performance in all things, no city's public schools have attained it. Critics who claim that the strategy is unproven are right, in the same sense that any evidence-based process (like the search for the cure for a disease) is unproven until its success is total. Where critics go wrong is to suggest that the lack of total success to date means that the portfolio strategy should be abandoned in favor of some districtwide programs like class-size reduction.

Unlike traditional districtwide programs, which require total commitment to one idea until it is proven not to work as hoped, the portfolio is adaptable (like a good financial strategy) and lets city leaders hedge their bets. It can't promise success instantly or every time, but its ceiling—what can be accomplished over a long period of continuous improvement—is likely to be higher than that of any single districtwide program. This is because the portfolio strategy is not committed to a single idea about how to improve schools. It allows school districts to try out many ideas in a disciplined way, use common metrics to compare different initiatives, build on what works best, and keep searching for something better.

The need for effective public education is greater than ever. As lifetime jobs disappear, workers are forced to compete with motivated and educated people from around the world; effective citizenship requires literacy and critical thinking; and consumers must be wary and informed. This is also a time when public education must compete with many other demands for public funding and can't expect dramatic increases in re sources. In this situation there is no choice but to seek promising ideas from wherever they are available. That is the essence of the portfolio strategy and, we think, the future course of public education.

This book explains the portfolio strategy in detail: how it works, what it accomplishes, and how it handles (or exacerbates) the conflicts of public education. Though we try to present a balanced appraisal of the portfolio strategy, we do take one definite position: that the conflict stirred up by a reform strategy is in itself not evidence of its failure or a reason not to try it. Any change intended to drastically improve the performance of schools is bound to stir up these conflicts in some way; the fact that conflicts are raging now is evidence only that real changes are made, not that the changes themselves are good or bad.

Our Research

Our findings are based on a thirty-month study conducted by the Center on Reinventing Public Education with support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. The study consisted of extensive case studies of five cities—New York, New Orleans, Washington, Chicago, and Denver—that had transformed either all or major parts of their school districts via the portfolio strategy. We visited each of the cities several times, starting in January 2009, interviewing key actors in the city and school systems, interest groups in favor or opposed to the strategy (including union leaders), philanthropists, and educators. We also closely tracked developments in the implementation strategy (including major changes in direction and leadership) and gathered outcomes data (including analyses of student achievement and changes in teacher quality).

Thanks to the Annie E. Casey Foundation we were able to add case studies from Hartford and Baltimore, which provided a perspective on how the strategy can be implemented in smaller cities. Starting in late 2011 we were able to make a close study of Cleveland, which had just committed to a portfolio strategy under the leadership of Mayor Frank Jackson.

Chapters to Come

Chapter 2 summarizes the results of our close examination of school districts using the portfolio strategy over three years. It identifies the many attributes these districts have in common, such as adopting performance-based accountability systems for all schools, establishing a financially level playing field between existing and new schools, working to make themselves attractive to new principals and school leaders, opening themselves up to civic and human resources previously excluded from schools, closing unproductive schools and replacing them with more productive new schools, starting new schools, and making sure schools have choices about where they purchase teacher enhancement programs and other services. The chapter also shows how these districts differ, both in the overall design of their strategies and the degree to which their strategies have been implemented.

Chapter 3 tells stories of how portfolio strategies emerged. It focuses on two cities, New York and Denver, with very different histories and politics. In New York, the takeover of schools by an extremely powerful mayor led to adoption of the portfolio strategy; moreover, Chancellor Joel Klein was able to exercise a tremendous degree of discretion, recruiting a small working group of highly capable outsiders to turn the school district around. In Denver, Superintendents Michael Bennet and Tom Boasberg shared Klein's ideas about the need to break up the public school monopoly but were constrained by the need to maintain a shaky majority on an elected conventional school board. Comparison of New York and Denver (with some further examples from Chicago, Washington, New Orleans, Hartford, Cleveland, and Baltimore) illustrates both how portfolio strategies can emerge under very different political circumstances and what preconditions school districts using a portfolio strategy have in common.

Chapter 4 examines the topic that is so often associated with portfolio strategies: conflict. It shows why there is always potential for strife around the subject of public education. Parents, teachers, neighbors, elected officials, and taxpayers all have their own interests, which overlap only imperfectly and partially with those of children. Those parties can act in ways they think are consistent with children's interests, yet clash with one another. The chapter shows how city leaders and others concerned about public education have handled these conflicts and how—or if—they have been resolved. Portfolio strategies have reopened issues that had for a long time been decisively settled in favor of one group over another. By doing so, the strategy raises the possibility that previously neglected groups could get a better deal. Only time will tell whether that, or some other less desirable result, will emerge.

The fifth chapter asks the bottom-line question: whether or not children benefit from a portfolio strategy. It first lays out an approach to assessing effects on different groups of students: those whom the strategy allowed to enroll in new schools, those who were forced to leave schools that were closed, and those whose existing schools experienced new performance pressures and the need to compete for students. Though no city now has all the data required to fully assess its portfolio strategy, this chapter assembles evidence from many sources to make the first broad outcomes assessment. No reader will be surprised to learn that the results are mixed. But there is evidence that the portfolio strategy has succeeded in creating new options for the most disadvantaged students.

Chapter 6 assesses the future of the portfolio strategy as the leaders who first introduced it to their cities leave the scene. The chapter starts with a surprising result: that portfolio strategies have survived and even flourished despite the departure of figures like Joel Klein in New York City, Michelle Rhee in Washington, Paul Vallas in New Orleans, Michael Bennet in Denver, Arne Duncan in Chicago, Stephen Adamowski in Hartford, and Ramon Cortines in Los Angeles. Except for Klein and Duncan, successors were hired expressly to advance the portfolio strategy, and many have done so aggressively. In New York and Chicago, the strategy is back, but its future depends on city politics and superintendent succession.


Excerpted from STRIFE AND PROGRESS by Paul T. Hill Christine Campbell Betheny Gross Copyright © 2013 by THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION. Excerpted by permission of BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PRESS. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments vii

1 Introduction 1

2 The Portfolio Strategy in Practice 10

3 How the Portfolio Strategy Gets Adopted: A Tale of Two Cities 42

4 Conflict in Portfolio Districts 65

5 Judging the Results of the Portfolio Strategy 90

6 Does the Portfolio Strategy Have Legs? 102

7 A Ratchet Effect? 121

Notes 125

Index 133

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)