SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance [NOOK Book]

NOOK Book (eBook)
$11.99
BN.com price

Available on NOOK devices and apps

  • Nook Devices
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for iPad
  • NOOK for iPhone
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK for Android (Tablet)
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK Study
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

Overview


The New York Times best-selling Freakonomics was a worldwide sensation, selling over four million copies in thirty-five languages and changing the way we look at the world. Now, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with SuperFreakonomics, and fans and newcomers alike will find that the freakquel is even bolder, funnier, and more surprising than the first.




Four years in the making, SuperFreakonomics asks not only the tough questions, but the unexpected ones: What's more dangerous, driving drunk or walking drunk? Why is chemotherapy ...

See more details below

Overview


The New York Times best-selling Freakonomics was a worldwide sensation, selling over four million copies in thirty-five languages and changing the way we look at the world. Now, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with SuperFreakonomics, and fans and newcomers alike will find that the freakquel is even bolder, funnier, and more surprising than the first.




Four years in the making, SuperFreakonomics asks not only the tough questions, but the unexpected ones: What's more dangerous, driving drunk or walking drunk? Why is chemotherapy prescribed so often if it's so ineffective? Can a sex change boost your salary?




SuperFreakonomics challenges the way we think all over again, exploring the hidden side of everything with such questions as:





  • How is a street prostitute like a department-store Santa?

  • Why are doctors so bad at washing their hands?

  • How much good do car seats do?

  • What's the best way to catch a terrorist?

  • Did TV cause a rise in crime?

  • What do hurricanes, heart attacks, and highway deaths have in common?

  • Are people hard-wired for altruism or selfishness?

  • Can eating kangaroo save the planet?

  • Which adds more value: a pimp or a Realtor?






Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and great storytelling like no one else, whether investigating a solution to global warming or explaining why the price of oral sex has fallen so drastically. By examining how people respond to incentives, they show the world for what it really is – good, bad, ugly, and, in the final analysis, super freaky.




Freakonomics has been imitated many times over – but only now, with SuperFreakonomics, has it met its match.


  • SuperFreakonomics

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Most survivors of Economics 101 leave the course feeling no great urgency to pick up a book on the subject as leisure reading. One very unconventional book changed that: Steven D. Levitt's 2005 Freakonomics became an international bestseller, racking up sales of more than four million copies. Fans have waited eagerly for this follow-up and, fortunately, it doesn't disappoint. Like its predecessor, SuperFreakonomics explores "the hidden side of everything." In this case, the roster of improbable topics includes the similarities between streetwalkers and department store Santas; the most effective ways to catch terrorists; whether eating kangaroos can save the planet; correlations between television viewing and crime; and whether we're hardwired for altruism and selfishness.
Publishers Weekly
Economist Levitt and journalist Dubner capitalize on their megaselling Freakonomics with another effort to make the dismal science go gonzo. Freaky topics include the oldest profession (hookers charge less nowadays because the sexual revolution has produced so much free competition), money-hungry monkeys (yep, that involves prostitution, too) and the dunderheadedness of Al Gore. There’s not much substance to the authors’ project of applying economics to all of life. Their method is to notice some contrarian statistic (adult seat belts are as effective as child-safety seats in preventing car-crash fatalities in children older than two), turn it into “economics” by tacking on a perfunctory cost-benefit analysis (seat belts are cheaper and more convenient) and append a libertarian sermonette (governments “tend to prefer the costly-and-cumbersome route”). The point of these lessons is to bolster the economist’s view of people as rational actors, altruism as an illusion and government regulation as a folly of unintended consequences. The intellectual content is pretty thin, but it’s spiked with the crowd-pleasing provocations—“'A pimp’s services are considerably more valuable than a realtor’s’” —that spell bestseller. (Nov.)
Kirkus Reviews
A sequel to the megaselling Freakonomics (2005). It's not exactly economics for dummies-or, as Levitt (Economics/Univ. of Chicago) and business journalist Dubner (Confessions of a Hero-Worshiper, 2003, etc.) write, "Chicken Soup for the Freakonomics Soul"-but this follow-up is certainly more of the same, a relentlessly enthusiastic cheer for the application of the dismal science to everyday life. That is, everyday life as the world knows it, as when Levitt and Dubner explore some of the curious economic questions on the underside of terror bombings. Econometrics can be a soulless and sometimes divisive business, so the authors may incite some controversy with their report that in the UK, "a person with neither a first nor last Muslim name stood only a 1 in 500,000 chance of being a terrorist," whereas for a person with both first and last Muslim names the odds went to 1:2,000. (They add, however, that the odds scale way back if the person has a savings account and a life-insurance policy.) Less controversial, perhaps, is their look at the economics of prostitution, with some surprising findings-not least that the average street hooker in Chicago earns only $27 an hour and works only 13 hours a week, drawing about $350 a week. They're priced out of the market, the ever-provocative authors assert, by women willing to have sex for free. The authors also write that it's safer to travel by car than by most other means of transport, thanks in part to no less a personage than Robert S. McNamara, and by far less safe to walk drunk than to drive drunk. The authors' view of the climate crisis through an economic lens is similarly spirited, but certainly worth adding to the debate. Jaunty,entertaining and smart. Levitt and Dubner do a good service by making economics accessible, even compelling. Agent: Suzanne Gluck/William Morris Endeavor

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780061959936
  • Publisher: HarperCollins Publishers
  • Publication date: 10/20/2009
  • Sold by: HARPERCOLLINS
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 320
  • Sales rank: 13,279
  • File size: 596 KB

Meet the Author

Steven D. Levitt is a professor of economics at the University of Chicago and a recipient of the John Bates Clark Medal, awarded to the most influential economist under the age of forty.

Table of Contents

An Explanatory Note xiii

Introduction: Putting the Freak in Economics 1

1 How Is a Street Prostitute Like a Department-Store Santa? 26

2 Why Should Suicide Bombers Buy Life Insurance? 81

3 Unbelievable Stories About Apathy and Altruism 139

4 The Fix Is in-and It's Cheap and Simple 190

5 What Do Al Gore and Mount Pinatubo Have in Common? 235

Epilogue: Monkeys Are People Too 301

Acknowledgments 309

Notes 313

Reading Group Guide

ARE YOU A SUPERFREAK?
Take the Quiz Now!

Where do you stand on the freak-o-meter?

Four years ago, you were cool. You read Freakonomics when it first came out. You impressed family and friends and dazzled dates with the insights you gleaned. Now Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with SuperFreakonomics, a freakquel even bolder, funnier, and more surprising than the first.

Have you been keeping up? Can you call yourself a SuperFreak? Test your SuperFreakonomics know-how now:

Question 1
5 points

According to SuperFreakonomics, what has been most helpful in improving the lives of women in rural India?
A. The government ban on dowries and sex-selective abortions
B. The spread of cable and satellite television
C. Projects that pay women to not abort female babies
D. Condoms made specially for the Indian market

Question 2
3 points

Among Chicago street prostitutes, which night of the week is the most profitable?
A. Saturday
B. Monday
C. Wednesday
D. Friday

Question 3
5 points

You land in an emergency room with a serious condition and your fate lies in the hands of the doctor you draw. Which characteristic doesn't seem to matter in terms of doctor skill?
A. Attended a top-ranked medical school and served a residency at a prestigious hospital
B. Is female
C. Gets high ratings from peers
D. Spends more money on treatment

Question 4
3 points

Which cancer is chemotherapy more likely to be effective for?
A. Lung cancer
B. Melanoma
C. Leukemia
D. Pancreatic cancer

Question 5
5 points

Half of the decline in deaths from heartdisease is mainly attributable to:
A. Inexpensive drugs
B. Angioplasty
C. Grafts
D. Stents

Question 6
3 points

True or False: Child car seats do a better job of protecting children over the age of 2 from auto fatalities than regular seat belts.

Question 7
5 points

What's the best thing a person can do personally to cut greenhouse gas emissions?
A. Drive a hybrid car
B. Eat one less hamburger a week
C. Buy all your food from local sources

Question 8
3 points

Which is most effective at stopping the greenhouse effect?
A. Public-awareness campaigns to discourage consumption
B. Cap-and-trade agreements on carbon emissions
C. Volcanic explosions
D. Planting lots of trees

Question 9
5 Points

In the 19th century, one of the gravest threats of childbearing was puerperal fever, which was often fatal to mother and child. Its cause was finally determined to be:

A. tight bindings of petticoats early in the pregnancy
B. foul air in the delivery wards
C. doctors not taking sanitary precautions
D. the mother rising too soon in the delivery room

Question 10
3 Points

Which of the following were not aftereffects of the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks on September 11, 2001:

A. the decrease in airline traffic slowed the spread of influenza.
B. thanks to extra police in Washington, D.C., crime fell in that city.
C. the psychological effects of the attacks caused people to cut back on their consumption of alcohol, which led to a decrease in traffic accidents.
D. the increase in border security was a boon to some California farmers, who, as Mexican and Canadian imports declined, sold so much marijuana that it became one of the states most valuable crops.

ANSWERS and SCORING

Question 1
B, Cable and satellite TV. Women with television were less willing to tolerate wife beating, less likely to admit to having a "son preference," and more likely to exercise personal autonomy. Plus, the men were perhaps too busy watching cricket.

Question 2
A, Saturday nights are the most profitable. While Friday nights are the busiest, the single greatest determinant of a prostitute's price is the specific trick she is hired to perform. And for whatever reason, Saturday customers purchase more expensive services.

Question 3
C, One factor that doesn't seem to matter is whether a doctor is highly rated by his or her colleagues. Those named as best by their colleagues turned out to be no better than average at lowering death rates - although they did spend less money on treatments.

Question 4
C, Leukemia. Chemotherapy has proven effective on some cancers, including leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, and testicular cancer, especially if these cancers are detected early. But in most cases, chemotherapy is remarkably ineffective, often showing zero discernible effect. That said, cancer drugs make up the second-largest category of pharmaceutical sales, with chemotherapy comprising the bulk.

Question 5
A, Inexpensive drugs. Expensive medical procedures, while technologically dazzling, are responsible for a remarkably small share of the improvement in heart disease. Roughly half of the decline has come from reductions in risk factors like high cholesterol and high blood pressure, both of which are treated with relatively inexpensive drugs. And much of the remaining decline is thanks to ridiculously inexpensive treatments like aspirin, heparin, ACE inhibitors, and beta-blockers.

Question 6
False. Based on extensive data analysis as well as crash tests paid for by the authors, old-fashioned seat belts do just as well as car seats.

Question 7
B, Shifting less than one day per week's worth of calories from red meat and dairy products to chicken, fish, eggs, or a vegetable-based diet achieves more greenhouse--gas reduction than buying all locally sourced food, according to a recent study by Christopher Weber and H. Scott Matthews, two Carnegie Mellon researchers. Every time a Prius or other hybrid owner drives to the grocery store, she may be cancelling out its emissions-reducing benefit, at least if she shops in the meat section. Emission from cows, as well as sheep and other ruminants, are 25 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than the carbon dioxide released by cars and humans.

Question 8
C, the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines discharged more than 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere, which acted like a layer of sunscreen, reducing the amount of solar radiation and cooling off the earth by an average of one degree F.

Question 9
C, doctors not taking sanitary precautions. This was the dawning age of the autopsy, and doctors did not yet know the importance of washing their hands after leaving the autopsy room and entering the delivery room.

Question 10
C. the psychological effect of the attacks caused people to increase their alcohol consumption, and traffic accidents increased as a result.

SCORING
32-40 Certified SuperFreak
25-31 Freak-surprises lay in wait for you
16-24 Wannabe freak-you've got some reading to do
1-15 Conventional wisdomer-you're still thinking in old ways


Meet the PROFESSORS, PROSTITUTES, DOCTORS, INVENTORS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, and OTHER REAL-LIFE CHARACTERS of SUPERFREAKONOMICS

CRAIG FEIED, a onetime Berkeley skateboarder, has revolutionized emergency medicine by building a system that has little to do with actual doctor skill.

IAN HORSLEY is a "completely average and unforgettable" Englishman who found his calling as a bank officer stopping fraud - and who has now turned his attention to using bank data to hunt down terrorists.

NATHAN MYHRVOLD is a physics geek with a realistic, budget-friendly plan to prevent the next Hurricane Katrina - and to stop global warming too. He and his colleagues have another few thousand inventions up their collective sleeve as well.

ALLIE is a highly paid prostitute and unlikely entrepreneur who got rich by maintaining quality control and understanding the market forces of supply and demand.

JOHN LIST is an accidental economist, the son of a truck driver, who proves that most altruism isn't as altruistic as we might think.

SUDHIR VENKATESH, an inventive sociologist who collected real-time, on-the-spot data from Chicago street prostitutes, shows how the feminist revolution has lowered prostitutes' wages (and cheapened the price of oral sex).

KEN CALDEIRA runs an ecology lab at Stanford and is one of the most respected climate scientists in the world - but his research shows that carbon dioxide is the wrong villain, and that even trees can exacerbate global warming.

BEN BARRES, a Stanford neurobiologist who was born Barbara Barres and had a sex-change operation, is part of a statistical look at why men make more money than women.

JOSEPH DE MAY, Jr. is a lawyer and Kew Gardens, Queens, resident, who tears apart the legend of the Kitty Genovese murder, which shocked the world in 1964 because 38 people apparently witnessed the crime and did nothing to help.

K. ANDERS ERICSSON, a professor of psychology at Florida State University, studies talented performers in all fields and finds that the thing we call "raw talent" is vastly overrated.

KEITH CHEN, a thirty-three-year-old, spiky-haired associate economics professor at Yale and the son of Chinese immigrants, taught a bunch of monkeys to use money, disproving Adam Smith's contention that humankind alone had a knack for monetary exchange.

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 488 )

Rating Distribution

5 Star

(186)

4 Star

(158)

3 Star

(89)

2 Star

(31)

1 Star

(24)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or Leave Anonymously

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identiy on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

We're sorry, but penname is already taken.

Please select one of the following:
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

penname is available!

By visiting the BN.com website or marking a purchase on BN.com, a User is deemed to have accepted the Terms of Use.

Continue Anonymously

Welcome, penname

You have successfully created your Pen Name. Start enjoying the benefits of the BN.com Community today.

See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 490 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 12, 2009

    Innovative

    The information is super-useful. Some of it was of immediate use in the classes I've been teaching at college. Only caveat is that sometimes there is an inductive leap in the reasoning chains--but once that is understood it is an extremely useful, creative and worthy book.

    3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 13, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Great Follow-up!

    It's funny because as his intro explains the issues they had trying to get their book's title approved and the way the book may have an un-cohesive structure and as I listened to this sequel, so to speak, I realized how true it was but at the same time, how "Tarantino-esque" their approach was which made it even more enjoyable (who doesn't like a good Quinten Tarantino film??). The book would take you into a subject which it would sentence-summarize in the beginning, then send you all over the world into different directions and down back roads through a scenic route and then BOOM! The subject's point is reached, and you're almost sad because it means the trip is over! lol I would recommend it to anyone whose interests include a variety of scientific and historical facts and fascinations.

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 8, 2011

    Not as good as the original...

    ...but some interesting thoughts nonetheless. I highly recommend the global warming chapter (at a minimum) for all the 'environmentalists' out there.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 10, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    This would be your standard fare, modest follow-up to a surprisingly successful first effort, if it weren't for the final 20% of the book.

    This would be your standard fare, modest follow-up to a surprisingly successful first effort, if it weren't for the final 20% of the book. Here the authors apply their lens of data and incentives to the global issue of Climate Change. They change the focus from the left-right divide of "whether" there is climate change and to what extent it is manmade to the more meaningful question of what do we do about it. Therein is the revelation. The unintended (some have argued conspiratorially intended) consequences of the single course of remedial action of dramatically reducing manmade carbon through Cap-n-Trade legislations, which would greatly add to costs and taxes in developed countries, would significantly reward the Gore-like doomsayers by creating a mega-market for their carbon-offset investments, while dramatically limiting vast swaths of the planet from advancing beyond subsistence existence.

    (As a side note: given the atmospheric harm done by the methane gases in ruminate belches and farts, an adult could, by a factor of three, decrease their carbon footprint more by cutting out red meat from their diets then by driving a hybrid.)

    But, I digress. The key question is are we looking for a solution or must we accept the tremendously high cost proposals presently being pushed forward. The myopic carbon focus is particularly troublesome especially if there are far less costly and more elegant solutions. Superfreakonomics' review of these possible alternative solutions reveals how little has been included in the public policy debate. The most sobering consideration is that the narrow solutions being driven at Kyoto, Copenhagen and next year, at Mexico City could create as much adverse impact on life as the worst case planetary scenario. But at least Al Gore would have made a pile of money!

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 9, 2012

    Reasoned and logical...and fun!

    I thoroughly enjoyed this book. It is a quick read, partially because of the subject matter, and partially because it is just over 200 pages long. I think what is especially cool about “Super Freakonomics” is that you never quite know what you’re going to read about next. The chapters deal with seemingly disconnected (but all interesting) topics and even within the course of a single chapter a half dozen different topics might be touched upon. This also means that it isn’t necessary to have read the earlier “Freakonomics” book to understand and enjoy this one. (I have yet to read the previous book.) The two books share little, I would guess, except the title. Especially appealing to me was the reasoned and logical method of the authors and the investigators they highlight. For instance, it was fun to revisit the Kitty Genovese murder (a story I remember from college Sociology) and read more facts and research into this event. To learn that, well, it might not have been exactly like I was taught in college. But also that, perhaps in some ways, it was. Another favorite chapter—though I thought it wouldn’t be—was the one on Global Warming. Though not necessarily skeptics themselves, the authors do a great job of seeing many sides of the issue, all in a reasoned and logical (i.e. not panicked and alarmist) manner. They also present a possible solution offered by a team in Seattle. As a past Microsoftie myself, it was cool to see what other former employees are up to, especially one who, in this case, I remember quite well from company meetings. (The chapter also tends to make many prominent environmental activists seem more about control and power then about solutions.) Anyway, this is a great book. Read it and learn something new. I think the theme could best be summed up by the words from “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”: Don’t Panic!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 8, 2012

    Awsome!!!!

    It gives a great,different,cool veiw on things

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 1, 2011

    Two Thumbs Up!

    SuperFreakonomics! Although I didn't read the first book by Levitt and Dubner, Freakonomics, SuperFreakonomics was excellent in its information and point of views. The authors provide the reader with shocking statistics and tests to remove prejudices from political affilations and odd cultural services. The book shows the importance of an underestimated subject, economics, and how often we need to look into this subject to truly understand many every day happenings. Regardless if you care about "Patriotic Prostitues" or not, this book has something to you! A truly great read.

    *****

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 31, 2011

    Entertaining, and very engaging!

    Superfreakonomics by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner is an entertaining book that makes one look at topics at a very different angle, with very intriguing results. It looks at such topics as global warming, prostitution, hospital sanitation, terrorism, and various other topics. However, these points are looked at from an economist's point of view, and it provides some eye-opening realizations. One such example would be by using statistics, it can be determined that walking home drunk is actually much more dangerous than driving home drunk. There are actually more walking related deaths under the influence of alcohol than driving related ones, even taking the innocent deaths into account. The style of the book is engaging, and humorous as well, however it is not overly wacky or goofy. It is witty in its hilarity, and I found myself laughing out loud while reading it. Dubner says while explaining climate change, "Rising sea levels, for instance, 'aren't being driven primarily by glaciers melting,' Wood says, no matter how useful that image may be for environmental activists. The truth is far less sexy". However, during the global warming chapter some of the information that is in the book is actually false after researching. Many climate specialists and economists denounce Dubner and Levitt's argument that geo-engineering is a viable option as opposed to CO2 emission reduction in order to prevent global warming. The diction and language choices are not difficult, and just about anyone can follow along easily. Regardless, the points talked about in the section, and the rest of the book is extremely stimulating. I enjoyed this book, and would recommend it to anyone who is interested in quirky or interesting truths, or anyone who likes to see everything from more than one perspective.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 31, 2011

    Awesome book

    This was a very eye opening experience. This book exposed a lot of seemingly random correlations.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 30, 2011

    Absolutely Great!

    Super Freak was uniquely funny as well as genuinely interesting. For those who have read/enjoyed the original, this feels like going back to a comfortable friend. Dubner and Levitt have scoured the records for interesting data, and their thorough research is evident in every chapter. Truly an enjoyable and "smart" read! If you have not read Freakonomics, read it before this one, as it will help you understand the "inside jokes" the authors present at the beginning. An easy book to get into even if economics is not your forte!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 26, 2011

    Test headline

    Test review text

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted September 15, 2011

    Not as good as Freakanomics

    This seemed like the light version, filled with leftovers that didnt make it inti the original

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 18, 2011

    Not as good as the first

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 17, 2011

    Don't waste your money

    I really liked Freakonomics and was looking forward to the sequel Super Freakonomics . What a major disappointment!!! The content of each chapter wondered unmercifully from the chapter titles. Old material form Freakonomics was rehashed and the new material was not very interesting except for the subject on global warming. DO NOT BUY THIS BOOK. I would ask for a refund if I could. P.S. The book contained about 320 pages of which the last 50 pages were appendices!!!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 5, 2011

    Highly Recommended

    If you love learning about economics and what influences people's actions, then you'll love this book. This is an extremely enjoyable book for it's hilarity, and true life stories of human experiences, and the influence that economics has on their choices.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 28, 2011

    more from this reviewer

    Good read

    There is some great research in this book that can be applied to many other aspects of daily life.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 8, 2011

    This was a better stand alone book than a "sequel"

    Superfreakonomics establishes itself very early as the same as Freakonomics, only different. Huh? Again the Stephens portray not only an excellent array of theses and research but also follow the same logical and methodical presentation as Freakonomics. Overall I enjoyed this book. It was an easy weekend read and it gives me something to talk about at overly-pretentious parties with people I don't know.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 29, 2010

    Very fun read

    If you were a fan of the first one, you'll find more of the same here. The writer's unabashedly take on hard subjects like prostitution and global warming, addressing the issues in novel ways that most readers won't hear in the media.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 12, 2010

    interesting book!

    .

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 7, 2010

    an easy, curious book to read and more entertained that didactic

    hope that nobody expects big lessons of economic from this book. its very basic and serves above all to see how once can apply approaches of economic base and statistics to any part of our lives. its examples are very limited and both authors try hard to shock and amaze the audience, but the organization is scattered and the evidences seems questionable.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
See All Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 490 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)
500 character limit