Superstition [NOOK Book]


Having exposed a group of fraudulent spiritualists, investigative journalist Joanna Cross is intrigued by the claims of psychologist Dr Sam Towne that paranormal phenomena do in fact exist. Accepting his challenge to enter into a scientific experiment to 'create' a ghost, Joanna, Sam and six volunteers bring to life 'Adam Wyatt' - a young American living in France after the American War of Independence. Associated with the great minds and mystics at the close of the eighteenth ...
See more details below

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK
  • NOOK HD/HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.46 price


Having exposed a group of fraudulent spiritualists, investigative journalist Joanna Cross is intrigued by the claims of psychologist Dr Sam Towne that paranormal phenomena do in fact exist. Accepting his challenge to enter into a scientific experiment to 'create' a ghost, Joanna, Sam and six volunteers bring to life 'Adam Wyatt' - a young American living in France after the American War of Independence. Associated with the great minds and mystics at the close of the eighteenth century, he dies tragically in the French Revolution.
The experiment is a great success, with poltergeist activity and disembodied messages all scientifically recorded. Sam's theory appears conclusive - that ghosts are created by the people who see them. But a series of inexplicable and ominous events force Joanna and Sam to realize the ghost they have brought to life can also cause death…
Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
For a scientific experiment in psychokinesis, university psychologist Sam Towne assembles a group of eight individuals who, using the power of their collective consciousness, create a "ghost" with whom they hope to communicate. With ace investigative journalist and love interest Joanna Cross on hand to bear witness, the scientific seances at Manhattan University succeed all too well: the entity the group conjures up not only communicates with them but also becomes integral to their lives--and deaths. British author Ambrose The Man Who Turned into Himself takes a poor paranormal premise and eventually overcomes it with a ripping good ending. Despite the publisher's play-up of the novel as supernatural suspense and horror, the book is almost science fictional as Ambrose ultimately speculates on a time-travel theory postulating that the past comes out of the present instead of the present emerging from the past. According to Ambrose's acknowledgments, the story is based on "an experiment that actually took place" in the early 1970s. Unfortunately, the author brings neither his almost comically dated fake psychic schemers nor parapsychology into the '90s. But his well-toned technique and winning characterizations carry patient readers along to the core of the story. The plot falters slightly as it falls into a "Don't-open-that-door!" groove and a lot of people suddenly and mysteriously drop dead. Once over the low hurdles, however, Ambrose plays an unflinching mastergame of reality manipulation right through to a chilling checkmate of an ending that is genuinely frightening. Film rights sold to Interscope for $1 million; foreign rights sold in Germany and Holland. Oct.
Kirkus Reviews
Still another hypnotic paranormal thriller from the Great Ambrose (Mother of God; The Man Who Turned Into Himself) that, once again, will drag you unfailingly into the small hours. No movie or book can be taken as evidential proof that a world of spirit exists parallel with ours. But paranormal investigators press on, peering into the invisible. In imitation of a real-life famous experiment conducted 20 years ago, when parapsychologists in Toronto claimed they'd invented a ghost named Philip, a team of Manhattanites decides here to invent its own ghost, or thought-form, by pooling their mental energies and focusing them on a fictitious English-speaking character named Adam Wyatt, whose life they write, placing it in the well-researched period of the French Revolution. As psychologist Sam Towne and his group of six volunteers (including a magazine reporter) go on meeting, they become so familiar with Adam that when he actually begins table-rapping, as presumably did Philip, they're naturally elated and begin asking him all sorts of questions. Many he can't answer because they can't answer the questions: He knows only what they know, being made of their thoughts. But, as it happens, he's also made of their darker natures, and the time comes when Adam himself begins to create an alien universe parallel with their own and starts sucking them into it by leading them to their deaths. As always, Ambrose misleads us toward one climax, only to substitute a hugely inventive, jaw-dropping, bittersweet alternate climax. Features a cast of warmly attractive adult characters and no human villain in sight.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781471128073
  • Publisher: Simon & Schuster UK
  • Publication date: 4/25/2013
  • Sold by: SIMON & SCHUSTER
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 432
  • Sales rank: 515,496
  • File size: 524 KB

Meet the Author

David Ambrose read law at Oxford before becoming a writer. He has worked internationally in theatre, film and television. He has written, to date, seven novels and a book of short stories based on his years in Hollywood. For more information, visit his official website on
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

Chapter One

Sam Towne was watching an upturned plastic pudding container crawl crablike back and forth across the smooth surface of the laboratory floor.

The technical name for the device was a tychoscope, derived from the Greek tukhe, meaning "chance," and skopion, meaning "to examine." The prototype had been invented by a Frenchman, Pierre Janin, in the late seventies. It rested on two wheels set parallel to each other and a fixed pivot leg, enabling it to move in a straight line either forward or backward, or rotate clockwise or counterclockwise.

All these movements were radio controlled by a random event generator (REG) in the next room. An REG was essentially no more than an electronic coin-tossing machine, its circuitry governed by some unpredictable physical process such as radioactive decay or thermal electron motion. A computer, programmed to sample this process at preset intervals, generated arbitrary series of numbers or movements accordingly.

The tychoscope's next move, in consequence, was always anybody's guess. Statistically there was a known probability that it would make any one of the possible moves open to it, just as a coin, every time it is tossed, has a 50/50 chance of coming down heads or tails. Over ten, a hundred, or a thousand tosses it will come down approximately half the time heads and half tails. That is the law of probability.

Yet what Sam and his assistant, Pete Daniels, were witnessing was a consistent and dramatic violation of that law. The little pudding-container robot was literally huddling in one corner of the floor. Each time the REG switched it to a new tack that looked liketaking it away, the next few switches would inexorably bring it back to the same area.

Sam and Pete exchanged a look, neither concealing his excitement from the other. Both knew that this was a historic moment: a repeatable demonstration, under laboratory conditions, of something utterly inexplicable.

"Okay, let's move the cage," Sam said.

There was an anxious twittering from the fifteen seven-day-old chicks as their world swung up into the air and came to rest two yards from where it had been. It took only a few moments for them to reorient themselves and begin calling for the featureless moving object that they had been conditioned to regard as "mom," and which was now farther away from them than they found comfortable.

Pete came back from the next room with a printout from the computer. He handed it to Sam in silence. The numbers spoke for themselves.

"That's almost three times," Sam said, doing a quick bit of mental arithmetic. "The goddamn thing spent three times longer hanging around the cage when the chicks were in it than when it was empty."


"But true."

They both turned as the chirping of the little birds grew more agitated. The tychoscope was making a turn of almost three hundred and sixty degrees. Sam caught Pete's eye, each of them knowing the thought that had shot through the other's head, followed by a jolt of self-reproach at such a cockeyed notion. It was absurd to think, as they both instinctively though briefly had, in terms of the tychoscope actively searching for its brood. It was a mindless machine without even the pretensions to ratiocinative thought of the simplest computer program. Any kind of program was an ordered process, and the whole point of the process by which the little robot's movements were controlled was that it lacked all order.

The only possible force causing the machine to move as it had been moving for the past twenty minutes was the will of the tiny caged chicks to keep it near to them. Like most baby birds, they had adopted as their mother the first moving object they had come in contact with on hatching from the egg. After their birth they had spent one hour every day for six days in the presence of the robot as it meandered on its random path. Today was the first time they had been caged and therefore unable to follow the machine in their accustomed way.

So, instead, they were making it come to them.

An hour later Pete brought in another cage of chicks to replace the first. The only difference was that these chicks had never seen the tychoscope before and therefore had no attachment to it. To establish this Sam did a twenty-minute control run during which the robot, as the computer printout confirmed, followed its normal random path while the chicks in their cage paid it no attention.

"Okay, Pete, pull the blinds, will you?" Sam said as soon as he had satisfied himself about the result. The lab became pitch dark, and the twittering of the chicks grew agitated.

"See what I mean?" Sam said. "They hate the dark during waking hours. It throws them into a panic."

The noise that the chicks were making certainly bore him out. They subsided somewhat as a small flame leapt from Pete's lighter, which he touched to a candle. He attached the candle to a clip on top of the tychoscope, which had remained stationary on the far side of the floor since the end of the previous run.

When the candle was in place—the only source of illumination in the room—Sam pressed the switch on his remote. The tychoscope began to move.

The chicks clamored for the light to come to them ...

"I'll never eat one of those things again," Pete murmured as they analyzed the data after several runs. "The little buggers are magicians."

Sam smiled. "Then you'd better become a vegetarian," he said, "because anything more awake than a carrot could pull off what you just saw. And some people have theories about carrots."

"You want to run a test with a basket of vegetables?"

"Nah—people would think we were nuts."

"They already do."

"Yeah, well," Sam shrugged, "maybe we are."

Pete shot a covert glance in his boss's direction. Sometimes he didn't understand Sam. By rights he should have been ecstatic at the results they were getting, but a sudden despondency seemed to have settled on him, as though everything they were doing was a waste of time.

"What's up?" he asked. "You found a flaw in the procedure, or what?"

"There's no flaw." Sam's voice was flat.

"So why the long face?"

There was a flash of annoyance in Sam's look that warned the younger man to back off and not push the question further. But Pete wasn't in this job because he liked being told what to do or what to think. He respected Sam, liked him, and admired what he was doing; because of that he wanted to be taken into his confidence.

"Don't look at me like that," he said, aware of a slightly whining note of protest in his voice that he disliked. "If there's something on your mind, I'd like to know."

Sam sighed. It was a form of apology. "It's nothing to do with the experiment."

"Then what's the problem?"

"The problem is figuring out what, if anything, it all adds up to."

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 4
( 18 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 18 Customer Reviews
  • Posted September 10, 2011

    more from this reviewer

    Loved this book!

    This was such an interesting and original story. I found the science behind it all well researched and not at all overbearing. If you don't have the stomach for technical details and science/philosophy this book is probably not for you. If you like an intelligent, deep, and unique paranormal story you will like this book.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted September 15, 2009

    I Also Recommend:

    Would make a good screenplay

    In fact, I see that the film rights have been sold. This is not a great book, but not a book that you will soon forget, either.

    The descriptions of surroundings and phenomena are evocative and detailed -- very visual. One gets the feeling that the author is describing places that he's been, they seem that real.

    The early chapter on fraudulent mediumship was unfortunately unrealistic, but given the premise of the book, it works. I kept visualizing Lily Dale new York.

    If you have read other reviews, you already know that this book explores a mediumship experiment gone horribly wrong. If you have actually practiced in this field, you know that the events in this book are not typical, if even possible. Still, that does not detract from this being an exciting read and an interesting trip.

    The ending should contain at least some elements of surprise for everyone, even if some of the closing events are foreshadowed.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 19, 2004

    Psychological Horror to a whole new level

    This is truly an amazing story that shook me to the core. David Ambrose masterfully leads the readers into a reality, which then unnoticeably changes into a hellish experience. I recommend this book to all fans of the psychological horror. No other book really touches the thin line between nonexistence and hell except probably Simon Cleveland's 'Basenji Revelation'.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 17, 2004

    read this book

    Don't read this book when you are alone in the house at night! Fans of 'The XFiles' will love this book which concerns a psychologist named Dr Sam Towne who gathers a group of people together for an experiment in PK.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 5, 2001


    Good ghost story, dissapointed by the ending.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 30, 2001


    This is a great book with a great ending!! The book will suck you in and bring you out a different person! I couldn't put it down. You must read this book!!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 29, 2000

    What If?

    Because there are some things that we haven't fully explored, and the line between reality and the unknown has never been measured, this is frightening. This book isn't full of monsters and gore that you forget minutes after closing the book. It has a suggestion that plants itself into the subconscious mind and suddenly makes you wonder.... could this happen to you? What would you do if it did?

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 21, 2000

    Will suck you in and hold onto you!

    Everyone is superstitious to some degree. They have to be. Look at the fact. Every cause has an effect. Cause and effect are opposites. so are black and white, right and wrong, good and evil - the list is endless! Opposites, like the two sides of a mirror. One cannot exist without the other. OR CAN IT? <BR><BR> Sam Towne was a Parapsychologist that believed ghosts came from the human mind, not from beyond. For an experiment he got eight volunteers, including reporter Joanna Cross and physics professor Roger Fullerton. They would use 'psi' to make 'tulpas'. To put it simply, they would make up a person, give him a pretend life, discuss him until he became 'real' to all of those in the group, and then have the 'thought-form' respond to them! They would make a real ghost! <BR><BR> Soon, Adam Wyatt was made. He was a tragic Revolutionary War hero. Everyone was thrilled when he began rapping on tables and spelling out messages. But then members of the group began to die in awful ways! And there was no way to exorcize Adam. He was killing them one at a time! <BR><BR> *** Scary and unprovable! I felt a couple chills as I read this one. Perfect for fans of horror or those who just enjoy a good ghost story! Should not give you nightmares. But you will remember this story, and wonder, for the rest of your life! Excellent! ***

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 23, 2000

    A Strange and Fascinating Tale!

    I was really engrossed in this story and find myself still thinking about it a week after having finished it. It's a lot more than just a ghost story; the characters, who participate in an experiment in parapsychology, become mere pawns in a supernatural game of chess, powerless to control their own fate. Much was left unexplained, putting the reader in the same unsteady boat as the subjects in the experiment, facing the terror of the unknown and fast losing hope. I'm looking forward to the sequel -- there has to be one!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 27, 2000

    If you like 'disturbing' horror.........

    This book gets 4 stars because sometimes the author rushes through plot developement and sometimes just a little farfetched in ideas, but over all, a very good read with an ending that disturbs and gives the creeps !

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 23, 2000

    Incredibly Unique!!!

    I thought this book was just incredible! I couldn't stop reading it. I loved the twists and the way the story kept my interest was great. I fell in love with the characters and the whole idea of the 'paranormal'. I thought Ambrose did an excellent job writing this novel. I would love to see a movie of this book!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 21, 2000

    A Unconvincing Contrivance

    This plodding story revealed stock characters it was impossible to care about and a contrived story that one got the feeling the author was making up as he went along. A bad, boring novel.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 18, 2000


    Comparing this book to the X-Files is sheer heresy. Even the less acclaimed X-Files episode is more well-researched, well-conceived and well-told than this. I expected much from this book, but found virtually nothing in it. The characters are lame, the plot ridiculous, the prose juvenile. Even if you're into pseudo-cientific-spiritualist-parallel-world kind of stuff you'll regret this one. The main characters go to bed several times before disappearing into pointless oblivion, so I hope *they* had some fun.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 23, 1999


    I just love this book!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 4, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 14, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 19, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 22, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 18 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)