The Sword and the Cross: Two Men and an Empire of Sand [NOOK Book]


A brief history of Algeria. Back in the 17th century it was controlled by Ottomans but controlled by Day pirates whose reputation for violence was known around the world. In 1858 a French consul visited the area and when he refused to pay back a debt, was injured by a Day representative. France seized on this to move into Algeria and found that conquering the Day wasn’t as difficult as they thought. France half-heartedly controlled the quasi-anarchic colony at first but the ...
See more details below
The Sword and the Cross: Two Men and an Empire of Sand

Available on NOOK devices and apps  
  • NOOK Devices
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 7.0
  • Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 NOOK 10.1
  • NOOK HD Tablet
  • NOOK HD+ Tablet
  • NOOK eReaders
  • NOOK Color
  • NOOK Tablet
  • Tablet/Phone
  • NOOK for Windows 8 Tablet
  • NOOK for iOS
  • NOOK for Android
  • NOOK Kids for iPad
  • PC/Mac
  • NOOK for Windows 8
  • NOOK for PC
  • NOOK for Mac
  • NOOK for Web

Want a NOOK? Explore Now

NOOK Book (eBook)
$9.99 price
(Save 33%)$15.00 List Price


A brief history of Algeria. Back in the 17th century it was controlled by Ottomans but controlled by Day pirates whose reputation for violence was known around the world. In 1858 a French consul visited the area and when he refused to pay back a debt, was injured by a Day representative. France seized on this to move into Algeria and found that conquering the Day wasn’t as difficult as they thought. France half-heartedly controlled the quasi-anarchic colony at first but the rule of Napoleon IV gradually strengthened their involvement. See p. 11 for descript of land’s horrors. By late 19th c the people of the land are severely dispossessed.

Charles Eugene, Vicomte de Foucauld is introduced. Brought up as an orphan, rootless, spoiled by grandparents and friendless, he lost his religious faith in his teens and became a layabout, filling his time at the dreaded military academy with pranks on the higher officers. He struggled w. depression and an uncompromising appetite for food. After a particular prank, he was expelled from the academy and sent to Africa, where he was expelled after it was discovered that the wife he had taken with him was actually a mistress. In 1881 France invaded Tunisia and the tribal leader Bu Amama invaded Algeria in retaliation, Foucauld reenlisted. France’s struggle to defend Algeria was wrapped up in a new plan to link Algeria to France’s colonies in the south by conquering the Sahara and effectively colonizing all of West Africa. This allowed them to import goods from these southern country by building a railroad across the Sahara, which they hypothesized contained other great resources.

A description of the Sahara which has been controlled by Tuareg nomads whose fierce grip on the area had dissuaded all previous would-be invaders. In 1861 an ambitious young French explorer Duvierier revealed that the Tuareg was not as hostile as they seemed and although subsequent murders disproved this, the French—gripped by a new wave of colonialism and a quest for rapidly diminishing national prestige—chose to try to overtake the Tuareg anyway. Fueled in part by a French engineer’s dream of a Transsaharan railway. See the last pages of the chapter for a description of an ill-fated expedition into the territory that eventually disintegrated into death and cannibalism.

Henry Laperrine is introduced. Foucauld’s opposite in every way—“where Foucauld lounged, Lepperine applied himself in every way. Foucauld was grossly overweight and languid, Lepperine thin and temperamental, etc etc” (p 42). Laperrine unlike Foucauld was intensely devoted to the military and eventually to reforming it. The two develop a friendship while stationed together during the Bu-Amama war but eventually Foucauld drops out to travel to Morocco, a country wary of French invasion but with boundaries are fluid to the west. Trained by a French explorer and accompanied by a scraggly sickly Jew with connections in Morocco, Foucauld—posing as a rabbi—discovers that the reigning class is not opposed to invasion (they see it as a call to civilization), although there are bandits throughout the country. Foucauld is praised when he comes home and eventually falls under the influence of a priest who convinces him to become a Trappist monk.

After attempts to take the Sahara (now open to exclusively to France after the Anglo-French convention) via the North (Algeria) fail when the conquered oases are too disparate for the consolidation of rule, France decides to conquer the area from the south (i.e. Sudan) up. Laperrine joins a band of “Senegalese hooligans” who, so far removed from France, are militant commandos. They take Timbuku but only after tremendous bloodshed at the hands of the Tuareg. Eventually Laperrine in an effort to take Lake Chad raids a Tuareg camp in retaliation for the Tuareg’s previously humiliating raid at Timbuktu. He becomes a legend and French morale is boosted. Seeking solitude he is dispatched to a place he sees as the key to French conquest—Forth MacMahon. There is placed in command of a group of Saphi camelmen.

The story of the Jew-hating Algerian entrepreneur who riles the natives up with his conspiracy theories before eventually organizes an expedition to tame the Sahara that ends in a dramatic shootout that makes him a French legend. France’s disastrous attempts at colonization are pushed further into the forefront.

We’re introduced to one of the greatest Saharan explorers Fernand Foreau, who as part of a three-pronged French attack on the crucial Lake Chad ventured into the Sahara with a gargantuan troop that included 381 well-armed troops. Overburdened with supplies, the camels die and the Tuareg attack, but are subdued. Meanwhile a separate army the Central African Mission attempts to take the land, committing incredible and gratuitous atrocities to intimidate the Tuareg, and when their two leaders renounce France, they are eventually overtaken in mutiny...... The armies eventually converge in Chad and although they take the town, they leave chaos around them, failing to effectively secure the area.

A discourse on camels is followed by a description of the taking of all-important In Salah, which is conquered in the guise of scientific discovery (a geologist goes out to examine and is accompanied by 150 troops for “self-defense,” who take the land from Morocco). Meanwhile Foucauld is having trouble adjusting to Trappist life, continuously rebuffed by his elders (who consider him a roughneck) when he tries to set up his own order. He buys property on the Mount of Beatitudes but discovers it’s a scam.

Foucauld ventures out to Beni Abbes where he sets up his monastery and tries to convert the natives, trying to serve by example where other missionaries have failed by preaching. A discussion of slavery and how Foucauld was told to go along with it despite his moral objections. Foucauld is used as a pawn by the military, doing reconaissance work, but is also militaristic himself, being called “imprudent” for insisting that Morocco be taken.

Laperrine is encharged with reorganizing the inefficient and expensive French control of the Tuat. He is in charge of what is essentially a police force, but turns it into an army when he raids a neighboring oasis out of retaliation. He forces an influential Hoggar ruler out of business—“Laperrine had to proceed with a conflicting mix of violence, diplomacy and intrigue.” He brings in Foucauld in order to show the Tuareg that French rule is peaceful and in order to keep an eye on the Hoggar without contravening the legislation that forbids him to establish new garrisons south of the Tuat

Laperrine enlists the help of the only people who have the maneuvering skill of Tuareg—rival Berber nomads called the Chaamba. See quote p 178. Foucould, while crossing to In Salah, petitions to settle down and establish his monastery somewhere in the Hoggar but is constantly rebuffed.

Foucould settles in a remote mountains pot—a “forsaken place” called Tumanrasset. Lepperine gets tribal leader Moussa to surrender to Hoggar. Foucould aims to “civilize” (Europeanize) the Tuareg—he becomes a cult hero. He gains a disciple He gains a disciple who eventually cant handle the ascetism and Foucould the fantatical taskmaster. He grows frustrated when Moussa tries to convert the natives to Islam, not Christianity, and finds himself w/o a congregations

Lepperine takes back a crucial salt mine from raiders. Forced to eat his camels. He takes advantage of Foucould as the perfect information source.

W/o permission Laperrine moves in on territory that is supposedly neutral ground between France and the Ottomon Empire, raising the ire of his higher-ups in Paris. Laperrine becomes disillusioned with the Sahara campaign and sickly. He returns to France to

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly
Adventure writer and historian Fleming (Barrow's Boys, etc.) turns to French colonial Africa for his latest chronicle of historical (mis)adventure. His meticulous research and fascination with the physical hardships faced by men bent on discovery and conquest are on impressive display. Following the sometimes parallel, sometimes intertwining biographies of Charles de Foucauld and Henri Laperrine, Fleming reconstructs the French colonial crusade in northern Africa that began with France's conquest of Algeria in 1830. Following a series of disgraces in the imperialist race, France needed the Sahara to resurrect its honor on the world's stage. Fleming concludes, "France was conquering Africa just for the sake of it." Foucauld and Laperrine met as soldiers during the Bou-Amama war in Algeria in 1881, and while Laperrine became a career soldier and Foucauld matured from a hedonistic womanizer into an evangelical ascetic, they remained friends until Foucauld's assassination by Muslim fundamentalists in 1916. Until their deaths (Laperrine died of thirst amid the dunes after a plane crash), the two men dedicated themselves to France's cause with zeal. As Fleming writes, "Evangelization was the mortar that imperialists hoped would turn the desert from conquered territory to complaisant colony," and while Foucauld became "a pawn in the colonial game," Fleming recognizes that most likely "he used the military as much as they used him." What emerges most notably from this dense, detailed history is Fleming's description of the colonialists flirting time and time again with a desert seemingly inimical to human life. As Fleming concludes, "The tragedy of their existences lay not so much in time as in landscape... the Sahara was the same after their deaths as before." 3 maps. Agent, Gillon Aitken. (Nov.) Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Library Journal
In this riveting story of French ambitions in the Sahara at the turn of the 20th century, freelance writer Fleming (Ninety Degrees North) focuses on two Frenchmen who hoped to conquer the desert but were instead transformed by that vast expanse of searing nothingness. Charles Foucauld was a corpulent aristocratic army officer who sought adventure in North Africa in the 1880s. Gradually, the desert took possession of his soul and transformed him into an ascetic monk who sought to bring Saharan tribesmen into the Christian fold through example. Henri Laperrine was an iconoclastic French officer whose goal was not to conquer the people of the Sahara but to earn their respect through strength and genuine friendship. In their separate ways, Foucauld and Laperrine were the best the French had to offer the Saharan culture. Inevitably, their nation's ruthless imperial ambitions doomed their struggle to conquer the Sahara, and the desert once again became the domain of the people who had lived there for thousands of years. Ably told and well researched, this telling of a unique and timely story should be in every academic and public library. [Previewed in Prepub Alert, LJ 7/03.]-Jim Doyle, Sara Hightower Regional Lib., Rome, GA Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
Fleming (Ninety Degrees North, 2002, etc.) profiles two distinct yet congruent personalities of late-19th- and early-20th-century French colonialism in Algeria. After the Phoenicians, the Romans, Arabs, and Ottomans, the French came to Algeria. Bourbon failings at home, combined with depredations of the Barbary pirates and an insult to the French consul, started France on a course of blockade, then bombardment, then occupation of Algiers. Subsequent French administrations, writes Fleming, had visions of empire. Their occupying forces became "clichés of North African conquest: white soldiers huddled in mud-brick forts, awaiting the doubtful arrival of supplies, while disease and guerrilla actions took their toll." But two characters turned the cliché on its head. Henri Laperrine was a freewheeling military spirit, not a rogue—"initiative does not mean indiscipline," he noted—but an officer who understood that to fight successfully against indigenous forces, one assumed indigenous tactics (as the French would try to do 60 years later, in the Battle of Algiers). Charles de Foucauld, in evident though not so substantive contrast, was an absinthe-quaffing soldier/sybarite who became a Trappist monk. With the declared aim of "a deeper dispossession and a greater lowliness so that I might still be more like Jesus," Foucauld took on the contradictory mantel of hermit/evangelical. Not that evangelism hurt the colonial cause; he was the perfect spy, ferrying to the colonial office information that, in the service of proselytism, tendered "a compendious list of ways in which the inhabitants of the Hoggar should be ‘civilized,’ " or at least Frenchified and colonialized. The two wereavatars of a process that would not become institutionalized for years to come, and even then it would be in vain. After concise storytelling that’s neither romantic nor sentimental, Fleming closes with the comment that Laperrine and Foucauld would have little lasting effect on the Sahara—"They lived within the circumstances of their age"—but would be swallowed by cultural will, and the sand. First printing of 35,000. Agent: Clare Alexander/Gillon Aitken
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780802197528
  • Publisher: Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
  • Publication date: 12/1/2007
  • Sold by: Barnes & Noble
  • Format: eBook
  • Pages: 368
  • File size: 3 MB

Meet the Author

Fergus Fleming was born in 1959 and studied at Oxford University and City University. He was a writer and editor at Time-Life Books for six years before becoming a freelance writer in 1991.
Read More Show Less

Read an Excerpt

The Sword and the Cross


By Fergus Fleming


Copyright © 2003

Fergus Fleming
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0-8021-1752-X

Chapter One

Absinthe and

In December 1880 the River Loire froze, giving Lieutenant Vicomte
Charles de Foucauld the chance to hold an evening party for his
fellow officers of the Fourth Hussars. By Parisian standards it was
not particularly grand - a provincial fête-champêtre, at best - but there
was no denying its host had a sense of style. When his guests
descended from their carriages they were greeted by a remarkable
sight. There, on the ice, Foucauld had created an al fresco ballroom:
a section of the Loire had been roped off as a dance floor; a band was
playing the latest tunes; on the bank, sideboards groaned under the
weight of Parisian delicacies; meanwhile, vats of blazing rum punch
cast a bluish glow over the scene. Everything had been taken care of,
including the provision of skates for each officer, their shoe sizes
having been obtained beforehand from the regimental quartermaster.

As Foucauld's guests cavorted over the ice, a sleigh carved in the
shape of a swan drew up amidst a circle of flaming brands. It
contained Foucauld's fur-swaddled mistress, Mimi. She was, he declared,
their 'honorary colonel' for the evening. Breaking into song, the men
whirled the sleigh across the dance floor while Foucauld skated
casually alongside, murmuring to his mistress. He had news: orders had
just come in, the Fourth Hussars were being posted to Algeria. Mimi,
however, was not to worry. He was sure she could accompany him,
and the move would do both of them good. As the jaded young
aristocrat explained, 'I need a change of scene.'

From Tunisia, the fertile zones of North Africa comprise a narrow
strip of land that stretches west to Morocco, where the Atlas
mountains, which form their southern boundary, dip southwards to create a
triangular wedge of prosperity on the Atlantic coast. As one
nineteenth-century writer put it, the effect is that of a verdant forage
cap perched on the great, bald head of the continent. In the middle of
this strip, sandwiched between Tunisia and Morocco, lies Algeria.
Topographically, Algeria differs little from its neighbours: a
Mediterranean littoral - the Sahel - followed by a stretch of good,
crop-growing land - the Tell - and then a series of high valleys, suitable
mainly for grazing - Les Hauts Plateaux - beyond which the
snow-clad mountains plunge abruptly to the Sahara. Its cultivable
area is small, extending approximately 250 kilometres inland from
900 kilometres of shoreline. Its history, however, is rich.

The Berbers, a pale-skinned race of semi-pastoralists, claim
priority as the first inhabitants of North Africa. Their tutelage was
disrupted by the Phoenicans, who set up coastal trading stations, the
most impressive of which was Carthage. Later, the Ancient Romans
assumed control of their possessions, moving inland to create
substantial colonies whose main purpose was the harvesting of wheat
and the processing of resources from the African interior - ivory, gold,
feathers, furs, wild animals for the circuses and, above all, slaves.
Between 800 and 1100 AD, as Arab invaders swept across North Africa
and into Spain, Roman control gave way to a succession of Islamic
dynasties. Then, in the seventeenth century, Algeria came under the
sway of the Ottomans, forming the western limit of a vast empire
that stretched eastward to Persia and all but encircled the
Mediterranean. Ottoman rule, however, was weak. Theoretically
under the fist of Constantinople, its outlying territories were run in
practice by local rulers who paid mere lip service to the Sultan. One
such ruler was the Dey of Algeria. It took the Deys very little time to
realize that they could do more or less as they wished and that, while
the trade in slaves continued very profitably, they could also, with the
covert blessing of the Sultan, make a lot of money from piracy.

Algeria, or the Barbary Coast as Europeans knew and feared it,
became the scourge of the Mediterranean - and of the Atlantic too. In
1644, Barbary pirates raided the British port of Penzance, seizing sixty
people to be sold as slaves; forty-four years later they took 237 men,
women and children from the Irish port of Baltimore. In the same
century, so voluminous were the crowds of women, who came to
London seeking restitution for breadwinners lost to Barbary corsairs,
that Parliament allocated them the fines levied on Members who
were late for morning prayers. It helped the women little and had no
deterrent effect on the corsairs, whose reputation was by now so widespread
that a group of Japanese pirates came to join in the fun. For
two centuries the Barbary Coast disrupted European shipping with
virtual impunity and in blithe disregard of world politics. In 1810,
during the Napoleonic War, when Britain supposedly ruled the waves,
Sir Arthur Paget, Commander of HMS Thetis, was forced to exchange
a gold snuff-box valued at £500 for two British captives held by the
pirates; in the same year London's Company of Ironmongers paid
£465 for the return of another thirteen. This was too much. In 1816 a
Royal Navy squadron anchored off Algiers and blew the pirates, their
ships and their port to smithereens. Troops were sent to invest the
rubble, which they did with notable success, using some of it to construct
a new pier, before sailing home with the satisfaction that the
Dey had been taught a lesson.

In 1830, France decided that the Dey needed another lesson - this
time in manners. During the past fifteen years, the world had become
increasingly interested in Ottoman North Africa. Nations as far afield
as America and Sweden were intrigued by its commercial possibilities
and despatched so-called 'Consuls' to pursue their interests. In every
major port, therefore, could be found a group of foreigners - adventurers
and spies for the most part - who manoeuvred for advantage in
the eyes of the local ruler. The Deys of Algeria, however, kept a
sharper eye on accounts than did most other rulers and in 1828 the
current Dey invited the French Consul to discuss a debt that had
been outstanding since the 1790s for a consignment of wheat. When
the Consul refused to countenance payment, the Dey became so outraged
that he struck the man with his fly whisk. For Charles X, the
unpopular Bourbon monarch who had been placed on the French
throne following the defeat of Napoleon, this was a perfect
opportunity to detract attention from his failings at home. Declaring the
incident 'an insult to the national honour', he put Algiers under
blockade. It was, alas, a seasonal blockade, and as soon as the French
ships left for the winter, Algerian pirates snatched three ships from the
Bay of Naples, sold them in Tangiers and returned home with the

Therefore, in 1830, France inflicted a second bombardment on
Algiers and sent marines to occupy the port. To the marines' surprise
they met almost no resistance, so they moved inland. The process was
repeated along the coast, at the ports of Oran and Bône. By the end of
the year, France, which had intended at first only to rid the
Mediterranean of a nuisance, and maybe at the same time flex its
muscles on the international stage, found itself in possession of a
small colony. Charles X would have been pleased, had he still been in
power. He had, however, been deposed and his successor, Louis
Philippe, the 'Citizen King', a ruler of more popularity and greater
caution, needed no such venture to bolster his regime. In fact,
colonization was the last thing he wanted. Afflicted, almost uniquely in
Europe, by a diminishing population, and with its finances in disarray,
France had neither the money nor the people to support new overseas
possessions. To the government's dismay, its North African territory
continued to expand. It was not a matter of policy but of practicality:
once they had recovered from the initial shock, tribal leaders did their
utmost to prevent the French advancing inland and the military
responded by securing their outer limits or, as one commentator put it,
'the presence of enemies induced battle'. Under the command of,
among others, the grizzled veteran General Thomas-Richard
Bugeaud, French troops marched ever deeper into Algeria.

For the invaders it was a glorious and exciting prospect, a chance to
display their martial prowess and to prove that, despite the ignominy
of Waterloo, they were still a formidable power. All they had to do to
take Algeria was smite a few natives armed with swords, spears and
the occasional musket. But, as they soon discovered, this was a land in
which European notions of warfare did not apply. Massed battalions,
long baggage trains and heavy artillery worked well enough in the
urbanized coastal regions; but in the countryside matters were not so
simple. The logistics alone were a nightmare. How was an offensive
force and all its supplies to be hauled through a trackless, occasionally
marshy and often mountainous hinterland? How were these cumbersome
columns to defend themselves against a foe that refused to fight
set-piece battles but pestered them with skirmishes and midnight
raids, vanishing into the bush whenever artillery was brought into
play? The French response was to advance by construction, consolidating
each hard-won piece of territory by means of a fortified redoubt
in which they could regroup before moving on. The result became
one of the clichés of North African conquest: white soldiers huddled
in mud-brick forts, awaiting the doubtful arrival of supplies, while disease
and guerrilla action took their toll. Even the Foreign Legion
failed to make an impression. Created in 1831 to siphon off undesirable
elements of France's alien population, it fought its first battles in
Algeria and later made its headquarters in the territory south of Oran.
But, notorious as it was for its brutality, it, too, became just another
part of the beleaguered garrison.

In the first year of their conquest the French had uttered vague
promises about the rights of the natives: they could retain their property,
their religion would be respected; they would be treated fairly.
Some, predominantly those around the towns and in the agricultural
zone of the Tell, had believed these promises, assuming that they had
merely exchanged rule by the Ottomans for rule by the French. 'Far
from being hostile to us, the Moors are friends of our civilization,'
wrote one observer. 'By treating them well, by according them liberty
and security, we will find the most useful support among them.' It
soon became obvious, however, that the promises were empty: one of

France's first acts was to transform Algiers' Ketchawa Mosque into a
church; Muslim feast days were no longer recognized as legal holidays;
and large stretches of farmland were confiscated and handed
over to colonists. As the occupation continued, resentment increased.
There had always been divisions within the Algerian population, the
main one being that between the coastal regions, inhabited by Arab
communities, and the highlands, which were occupied by Berbers.
The two groups did not share a common language - Berbers spoke
their own tongue, with numerous dialects. They were also at odds in
their religion: while both practised Islam, the Berbers pursued their
own, unorthodox version that incorporated ancient, pre-Islamic customs.
And their lifestyles differed - the Arabs were settled farmers,
the Berbers were pastoralists. The French had hoped to exploit these
differences but, to their dismay, both parties now came together in
opposition against them.

In the colony's outlying territories, settlers protected their villages
with ditches, walls and watchtowers. When they emerged to till their
fields they did so in armed groups and kept an eye out for the black
flag that was raised to warn them of danger. Raids were commonplace,
torchings, kidnaps and murders a matter of weekly occurrence.
Initially, the attacking tribesmen ransomed their hostages; latterly,
they just decapitated them, finding that the colonists would pay as
much for a head as they would for the living person. The settlers
replied in kind, with or without military assistance. Outside the
narrow coastal strip, where some order reigned and whose native
inhabitants actually volunteered to serve in the French army, Algeria
was a bloody and very unpleasant place. Yet still Frenchmen wanted
to live there. Displaced aristocrats who had been supporters of
Charles X - they were nicknamed the 'gants jaunes' or 'yellow
gloves' - built large estates from which they enriched themselves
while remaining in the safety of the city. Property speculators were
attracted by the promise of quick, if dangerous, profits: on seeing that
a rebellious village was about to fall, one land agent rushed in with his
wallet; the conquering officer had to pay the man several thousand
francs for the land on which he wanted to construct his fort, plus a
premium for the parade ground. And even in the most dangerous
areas settlers were united by a frontier spirit - the land might not have
been theirs originally, but having shed blood for it, they were not
going to give it up.

Paris fretted. In 1834 M. Dupin, Procureur-général, told the French
Assembly that 'The thing to do was to reduce expenditure to the
lowest possible limit, and hasten in every way the moment that would
free France from a burden which she could not and would not support
much longer.' Three years later, M. Thiers, Foreign Minister, said: 'If
we could secure a few leagues of land around Algiers, Oran and Bône,
I should for my part be satisfied. I am no friend of a general occupation.'
Even at the front there were doubts. While dealing with his
elusive enemy, a process that involved variously victory, submission,
double-dealing and a corrupt but highly profitable bit of arms-dealing,
General Bugeaud insisted that his task was a complete waste of time.
'Unfortunately,' wrote one of his officers, 'he professes these opinions
all day, to every one, and at the top of his voice, which, although he
may not be aware of it, is rather discouraging to the army.'
Nevertheless, it was thanks to Bugeaud that Algeria was finally vanquished.
Discarding traditional European methods, he created a force
of light infantry that moved swiftly, living off the land by means of
razzia, or raids, in the same manner as its opponents. As one veteran
described it, 'In Europe, once [you are] master of two or three large
cities, the entire country is yours. But in Africa, how do you act against
a population whose only link with the land is the pegs of their
tents? ... The only way is to take the grain which feeds them, the
flocks which clothe them. For this reason, we make war on silos, war
on cattle, [we make] the razzia.'

Bugeaud's tactics were ideally suited to their context, and gave
rise to a second cliché of colonial warfare, that of the infantry square
blazing defiantly at circling hordes of savages.

Excerpted from The Sword and the Cross
by Fergus Fleming
Copyright © 2003 by Fergus Fleming.
Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface and Acknowledgements
1 Absinthe and Barracks 1
2 A Painful Void 20
3 Into the Desert 28
4 Reconnaisance au Maroc 41
5 Senegalese Hooligans 63
6 The Monk's Friend 78
7 From Algiers to the Congo 96
8 'Think that you are going to die a martyr' 119
9 Beni Abbes 132
10 Laperrine's Command 156
11 A Tour of the Interior 167
12 Towards the Hoggar 184
13 "I choose Tamanrasset' 198
14 White Marabout 219
15 Djanet 238
16 Hermit of Assekrem 254
17 'It is the hour of my death' 269
18 Dune Flights 283
19 The Dying Days 301
Sources and References 315
Bibliography 333
Index 336
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)