Taking Sides: Clashing Views in World History, Volume 2: The Modern Era to the Present / Edition 4

Paperback (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $50.27
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 14%)
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (9) from $50.27   
  • New (6) from $56.06   
  • Used (3) from $50.27   

More About This Textbook


The Taking Sides Collection on McGraw-Hill Create™ includes current controversial issues in a debate-style format designed to stimulate student interest and develop critical thinking skills. This Collection contains a multitude of current and classic issues to enhance and customize your course. You can browse the entire Taking Sides Collection on Create, or you can search by topic, author, or keywords. Each Taking Sides issues is thoughtfully framed with Learning Outcomes, an Issue Summary, an Introduction, and an Exploring the Issue section featuring Critical Thinking and Reflection, Is There Common Ground?, and Additional Resources and Internet References. Go to McGraw-Hill Create™ at www.mcgrawhillcreate.com, click on the "Collections" tab, and select The Taking Sides Collection to browse the entire Collection. Select individual Taking Sides issues to enhance your course, or access and select the entire Mitchell/Mitchell: Taking Sides: Clashing Views in World History, Volume 2: The Modern Era to the Present, 4/e ExpressBook for an easy, pre-built teaching resource by clicking here. An online Instructor's Resource Guide with testing material is available for each Taking Sides volume. Using Taking Sides in the Classroom is also an excellent instructor resource. Visit the Create Central Online Learning Center at www.mhhe.com/createcentral for more details.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780078133251
  • Publisher: McGraw-Hill Higher Education
  • Publication date: 9/13/2013
  • Series: Taking Sides Series
  • Edition description: New Edition
  • Edition number: 4
  • Pages: 242
  • Sales rank: 759,504
  • Product dimensions: 8.40 (w) x 10.80 (h) x 0.60 (d)

Table of Contents

TAKING SIDES: Clashing Views in World History, Volume 2: The Modern Era to the Present, Fourth Edition

Table of Contents

Clashing Views in World History, Volume 2: The Modern Era to the Present,
Fourth Edition

• Unit: The Modern World
• Issue: Did the Industrial Revolution Lead to a Sexual Revolution?
YES: Edward Shorter, “The Reason Why” from The Making of the Modern Family (Perseus, 1975)
NO: Louise A. Tilly, Joan W. Scott, and Miriam Cohen, from “Women’s Work and European Fertility Patterns,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History (vol. VI, no. 3, Winter 1976)
Historian Edward Shorter argues that employment opportunities outside the home that opened up with industrialization led to a rise in the illegitimacy rate, which he attributes to the sexual emancipation of unmarried working-class women. Historians Louise A. Tilly, Joan W. Scott, and Miriam Cohen argue that unmarried women worked to meet an economic need, not to gain personal freedom; and they attribute the rise in illegitimacy rates to broken marriage promises and the absence of traditional support from family, community, and church.

• Issue: Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Costs?
YES: Peter Kropotkin, from The Great French Revolution, 1789֪1793 (Shocken Books, 1971)
NO: Marisa Linton, from “Robespierre and the Terror,” History Today (vol. 56, no. 8, 2006)
Peter Kropotkin (1842-1921), a Russian prince, revolutionary, and anarchist, argues that the French Revolution eradicated both serfdom and absolutism, and paved the way for France’s future democratic development. Marisa Linton, a professor and writer, argues that Maximilien de Robespierre offers a lens through which to view the terror and the real human costs of the French Revolution.

• Issue: Does Napoleon Bonaparte Deserve His Historical Reputation as a Great General?
YES: Graham Goodlad, from “Napoleon at War: Secrets of Success, Seeds of Failure? History Review (December 2009)
NO: Jonathon Riley, from “How Good Was Napoleon?” History Today (July 2007)
Professor Graham Goodlad argues that, because of his extraordinary military career, Napoleon Bonaparte deserves his reputation as a great general. Author and Military Commander Jonathon Riley argues that because Napoleon never succeeded in transforming a defeated enemy into a willing ally, his historical reputation as a general must be questioned.

• Issue: Did British Policy Decisions Cause the Mass Emigration and Land Reforms That Followed the Irish Potato Famine of the 1840s and 1850s?
YES: Christine Kinealy, from This Great Calamity: The Irish Famine 1845֪52 (Roberts Rinehart Publishers, 1995)
NO: Hasia R. Diner, from “Where They Came From,” Erin’s Daughters in America: Irish Immigrant Women in the Nineteenth Century (The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983)
Professor at Drew University Christine Kinealy argues that the British government’s response to the Irish potato famine was deliberately inadequate because its “hidden agenda” was the long-term aim of economic, social, and agrarian reforms, which the famine accelerated; mass emigration was a consequence of these changes. Historian Hasia R. Diner argues that large-scale emigration occurred both before and after the famine and credits the Irish people with learning from their famine experiences that the near-total reliance of the poor on the potato and the excessive subdivision of land within families were no longer in their own best interests.

• Issue: Did the Meiji Restoration Constitute a Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Japan?
YES: Thomas M. Huber, from The Revolutionary Origins of Modern Japan (Stanford University Press, 1981)
NO: W.G. Beasley, from The Meiji Restoration (Stanford University Press, 1972)
Historian Thomas M. Huber argues that the Meiji Restoration was revolutionary and should be recognized as “the most dramatic event of Japan’s modern history.” Historian W.G. Beasley argues that when compared with other revolutions like the French and Russian, the Meiji Restoration did not constitute a revolution in the classical sense.

• Issue: Was Popular Opinion a Significant Ingredient in Nineteenth-Century British Imperialism?
YES: John MacKenzie, from “Another Little Patch of Red,” History Today (August 2005)
NO: Bernard Porter, from “What Did They Know of Empire?” History Today (October 2004)
Professor Emeritus, John MacKenzie, argues that both imperial rule and the possession of an empire were essential components of British identity, life, and culture during this period. Professor of modern history, Bernard Porter, argues that, through most of the nineteenth century, most Britons knew little and cared less about the spread of the Empire.

• Unit: The Early Twentieth Century
• Issue: Was China’s Boxer Rebellion Caused by Environmental Factors?
YES: Paul A. Cohen, from “Drought and the Foreign Presence,” History in Three Keys: The Boxers in Event, Experience, and Myth (Columbia University Press, 1997)
NO: Henrietta Harrison, from “Justice on Behalf of Heaven,” History Today (September 2000)
Professor Paul A. Cohen argues that while antiforeign and anti-Christian attitudes played a role in the start of the Boxer Rebellion, a more immediate cause was a severe drought and its impact on Chinese society. Historian Henrietta Harrison argues that, while the Boxers were motivated by more than a single factor, opposition to Christian missionary activity was at the core of their rebellion.

• Issue: Did Prussian Militarism Provoke World War I?
YES: Peter H. Wilson, from “The Origins of Prussian Militarism,” History Today (May 2001)
NO: Christopher Ray, from “Britain and the Origins of World War I,” History Review (March 1998)
History Professor Peter H. Wilson argues that Prussian militarism, though not a direct cause of later horrors in the two world wars, posed a threat to Europe in the prewar period. History Professor Christopher Ray argues that threatened German actions represented a challenge to English interests and honor, mobilizing public opinion in favor of Britain’s declaration of war in 1914.

• Issue: Was the Treaty of Versailles Responsible for World War II?
YES: Derek Aldcroft, from “The Versailles Legacy,” History Today (December 1997)
NO: Mark Mazower, from “Two Cheers for Versailles,” History Today (July 1997)
Historian Derek Aldcroft argues that a combination of the flaws present in the postwar Versailles Treaty and the resultant actions and inactions of European statesmen created a climate that paved the way for World War II. Historian Mark Mazower argues that, while the Treaty of Versailles contained weaknesses, it failed due to a lack of enforcement of its principles by a generation of European leaders.

• Issue: Did the Bolshevik Revolution Improve the Lives of Soviet Women?
YES: Richard Stites, from “The Russian Revolution and Women,” in Marilyn J. Boxer and Jean H. Quartaert, eds., Connecting Spheres: Women in the Western World, 1500 to the Present (Oxford University Press, 1987)
NO: Lesley A. Rimmel, from “The Baba and the Comrade: Gender and Politics in Revolutionary Russia,” The Women’s Review of Books (September 1998)
Former history professor Richard Stites argues that in the early years of the Bolshevik Revolution the Zhenotdel or Women’s Department helped many working women take the first steps toward emancipation. Russian scholar Lesley A. Rimmel argues that the Russian Revolution remains unfinished for women, who were mobilized as producers and reproducers for a male political agenda.

• Issue: Was German “Eliminationist Anti-Semitism” Responsible for the Holocaust?
YES: Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, from “The Paradigm Challenged,” Tikkun: A Bimonthly Interfaith Critique of Politics, Culture & Society (May/June 1998)
NO: Christopher R. Browning, from “Ordinary Germans or Ordinary Men? A Reply to the Critics,” in Michael Berenbaum and Abraham J. Peck, eds., The Holocaust and History: The Known, the Unknown, the Disputed, and the Reexamined (Indiana University Press, 1998)
Political science professor Daniel Jonah Goldhagen argues that due to the nature of German society in the twentieth century—with its endemic, virulent anti-Semitism—thousands of ordinary German citizens became willing participants in the implementation of Holocaust horrors. Holocaust historian Christopher R. Browning argues that Goldhagen’s thesis is too simplistic, and that a multicausal approach must be used to determine why ordinary German citizens willingly participated in the Holocaust.

• Issue: Was Stalin Responsible for the Korean War?
YES: Paul Wingrove, from “Who Started Korea?” History Today (July 2000)
NO: Hugh Deane, from “Korea, China, and the United States: A Look Back,” Monthly Review (February 1995)
Historian Paul Wingrove argues that Josef Stalin should be held primarily responsible for the Korean War. Historian Hugh Deane argues that the United States’ support for Syngman Rhee’s non-communist government was responsible for the Korean War.

• Unit: The Contemporary World
• Issue: Are Chinese Confucianism and Western Capitalism Compatible?
YES: A.T. Nuyen, from “Chinese Philosophy and Western Capitalism,” Asian Philosophy (March 1999)
NO: Jack Scarborough, from “Comparing Chinese and Western Cultural Roots: Why ‘East Is East and . . .’,” Business Horizons (November/December 1998)
Philosophy professor A.T. Nuyen argues that the basic tenets of classical capitalism are perfectly compatible with the key elements of Chinese philosophy. Management professor Jack Scarborough argues that the Confucian values of harmony, filial loyalty, and legalism are incompatible with the Western heritage of democracy, rationality, individualism, and capitalism.

• Issue: Was Ethnic Hatred Primarily Responsible for the Rwandan Genocide of 1994?
YES: Alison Des Forges, from “The Ideology of Genocide,” Issue: A Journal of Opinion (1995)
NO: René Lemarchand, from “Rwanda: The Rationality of Genocide,” Issue: A Journal of Opinion (1994)
Alison Des Forges argues that ethnic hatred between Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda was primarily responsible for the Rwandan genocide of 1994. René Lemarchand, while admitting that ethnic rivalries played a role in the catastrophe, argues that the ability of the Hutus to engage in “planned annihilation” free of any local or international restraint was a more important factor.

• Issue: Does Islamic Revivalism Challenge a Stable World Order?
YES: John L. Esposito, from The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press 1995)
NO: Sharif Shuja, from “Islam and the West: From Discord to Understanding,” Contemporary Review (May 2001)
Professor of Middle East studies John L. Esposito argues that the Iranian Revolution against Western-inspired modernization and Egypt’s “holy war” against Israel are examples of the Islamic quest for a more authentic society and culture, which challenges a stable world order. Professor of international relations Sharif Shuja argues that the rise of Islamic movements represents resistance to Western domination rather than a threat to the West as such and traces Western fears of a monolithic Islamic entity to the errors of an Orientalist mindset.

• Issue: Have Afghan Women Been Liberated from Oppression?
YES: Sima Wali, from “Afghan Women: Recovering, Rebuilding,” Ethics and International Affairs (October 2002)
NO: Norwan, Mariam, and Nasima, from “Afghanistan in Three voices: Three Afghan Women Talk About Violence and Shelter, the Taliban, and Getting to Vote,” The Wilson Quarterly (vol. 37, no. 1, Winter 2013)
International Afghan advocate for refugee women Sima Wali documents the pivotal roles Afghan women have played in rebuilding their communities, praises their courage in denouncing warlords, and calls for their full participation in the newly formed constitutional government. Norwan, Mariam, and Nasima, three Afghan women, argue that, despite some progress, many challenges remain for Afghan women as they seek liberation from oppression.

• Issue: Is the Influence of the European Union in World Affairs Increasing?
YES: Mitchell P. Smith, from “Soft Power Rising,” World Literature Today (January/February 2006)
NO: Efstathios T. Fakiolas, from “The European Union’s Problems of Cohesion,” New Zealand International Review (March/April 2007)
Political science and international studies professor Mitchell P. Smith argues that the European Union excels in the use of soft power to achieve desired outcomes at minimal cost, by avoiding the use of military force and sharing the burden of enforcement with others. Efstathios T. Fakiolas, strategy and Southeast European affairs analyst, argues that Europe’s failure to achieve European “Union-hood” seriously hampers its effectiveness in the global community.

• Issue: Is India’s Secular Democracy Severely Threatened by Religious Nationalism?
YES: Sharif Shuja, from “Indian Secularism: Image and Reality,” Contemporary Review (July 2005)
NO: Martha C. Nussbaum, from “Fears for Democracy in India,” The Chronicle of Higher Education (May 18, 2007)
Sharif Shuja, research associate in the Global Terrorism Research Unit at Monash University in Australia, asserts that the goal of the Hindu Nationalist Party (BJP) to convert India into a Hindu nation threatens both the secular democracy and the unity of India itself. Professor in the philosophy department, law school, divinity school, and the college at the University of Chicago, Martha C. Nussbaum argues that, despite internal divisions, India’s institutional and legal structure functioned well even after the Ayodhya riots, and within 2 years free national elections made a Sikh prime minister.

• Issue: Will the So-Called Arab Spring Benefit the Region?
YES: Elias D. Mallon, from “Will Democracy Bloom? A Closer Look at the Arab Spring,” America (October 10, 2011)
NO: Elliott Abrams, from “Dictators Go, Monarchs Stay: American Policy Before and After the Arab Spring,” Commentary (vol. 134, no. 3, October 2012)
Elias D. Mallon, education and interreligious affairs officer with the Catholic Near East Welfare Association in New York, takes a cautiously optimistic long-term view of the prospects, arguing for the establishment of some form of democracy in the region. Elliott Abrams, deputy national security advisor under the George W. Bush administration, takes a more pessimistic long-term view, citing the choice between monarchy and democracy that faces the region and the uncertainty of the outcome.
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)