Woefully, deeply disappointing...
First, I sincerely apologise for the length of this review, but I hope you will wade through it. To facilitate reading without paragraph breaks, my paragraphs are numbered. (- - 1 - -) Some Heisman Trophies go to the wrong athletes and some literary awards go to the unqualified. Such is the praise heaped upon Ms. Goodwin, in spite of her Pulitzer Prize (which may say more about the quality of the Pulitzer than it does about her)--for this interesting concept, however terribly wrong-headed and historically-revisionist. I cannot believe that professional critics have so far missed the mark in their reviews of this book, ignoring its significant failings and just accepting its assumptions and assertions as fact. Is the study of history in America so bereft of truth that we can no longer recognize error when it is paraded before us? (- - 2 - -) I was absolutely stunned to read, right off the bat (pg. 9) that Lincoln's speech at the Cooper Union (NYC) on February 27, 1860 was 'the pinnacle of his success' in securing the Republican nomination! Does this woman (a Ph.D.?!?) not even realize why it was such a success? Does she not know that this speech, perhaps more than any other single speech of Lincoln's jaded career, set in stone--and for all posterity to read in horror that has been largely lost in his undeserved praise--Lincoln's calculated effort to enshrine slavery as a permanent fixture in America? His frank, but oft overlooked assertion that slavery¿s 'presence among us makes that toleration and protection a necessity' was a profoundly important factor in the subsequent war that would literally tear the heart out of this divided nation. Does she not realize the implications of his words, this poet-president (America's 'only' one[!!}, she opines. Amazing! What about Jefferson's Constitution or even the Declaration of Independence, for crying out loud?) (- - 3 - -) I say, this 'poet' and 'the great emancipator' flatly stated that constitutional protection of slavery had to be 'fully and fairly, maintained'? Do you understand that Lincoln was saying that because slavery exists, we must protect it?!? Why, he was so poetic, he wanted to deport all citizens of African descent to the continent of Africa and insure that his view that no black man was his intellectual or social equivalent remained the law of the land! (- - 4 - -) Have Americans never read what Frederick A. Douglas said about Lincoln? 'Illogical and unfair as Mr. Lincoln¿s statements are, they are nevertheless quite in keeping with his whole course from the beginning of his administration up to this day, and confirm the painful conviction that though elected as an antislavery man by Republican and Abolition voters, Mr. Lincoln is quite a genuine representative of American prejudice and Negro hatred and far more concerned for the preservation of slavery, and the favor of the Border Slave States, than for any sentiment of magnanimity or principle of justice and humanity.' He was, perhaps, more eloquent in that statement than in his famous plea, spoken in 1853, 'What stone has been left unturned to degrade us? What hand has refused to inflame the popular prejudice against us? What whit has not laughed at us in our wretchedness?' Lincoln was that stone, that hand, that whit. (- - 5 - -) Lincoln LOVED colonization because, as he said in his 1857 response to the Dred Scott decision, there is 'a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people, to the idea of an indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races' (I dare you to Google 'abraham lincoln' and 'liberia' in the same search). (- - 6 - -) Ms. Goodwin apparently does not even know that the Emancipation Proclamation was forced upon Lincoln--another little-realized fact of U.S. history, and particulary of Lincoln-lore--and when he finally caved into the pressure, he did nothing, Nothing, NOTHING for slaves in Northern held territory--like Louisiana, for examp
9 out of 26 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback.
Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.