BN.com Gift Guide

The Arché Papers on the Mathematics of Abstraction / Edition 1

Hardcover (Print)
Used and New from Other Sellers
Used and New from Other Sellers
from $170.91
Usually ships in 1-2 business days
(Save 36%)
Other sellers (Hardcover)
  • All (9) from $170.91   
  • New (7) from $170.91   
  • Used (2) from $215.19   

More About This Textbook

Overview

This volume collects together a number of important papers concerning both the method of abstraction generally and the use of particular abstraction principles to reconstruct central areas of mathematics along logicist lines.

Gottlob Frege's original logicist project was, in effect, refuted by Russell's paradox. Crispin Wright has recently revived Frege’s enterprise, however, providing a philosophical and technical framework within which a reconstruction of arithmetic is possible. While the Neo-Fregean project has recieved extensive attention and discussion, the present volume is unique in presenting a thorough going examination of the mathematical aspects of the neo-logicist project (and the particular philosophical issues arising from these technical concerns). Attention is focused on extending the Neo-Fregean treatment to all of mathematics, with the reconstruction of real analysis from various cut - or cauchy-sequence-related abstraction principles and the reconstruction of set theory from various restricted versions of Basic Law V as case studies. As a result, the volume provides a test of the scope and limits of the neo-logicist project, detailing what has been accomplished and outlining the desiderata still outstanding.

All papers in the anthology have their origins in presentations at Arché events, thus providing a volume that is both a survey of the cutting edge in research on the technical aspects of abstraction and a catalogue of the work in this area that has been supported in various ways by Arché.

Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781402042645
  • Publisher: Springer Netherlands
  • Publication date: 2/3/2008
  • Series: Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science , #71
  • Edition description: 2007
  • Edition number: 1
  • Pages: 454
  • Product dimensions: 6.00 (w) x 9.40 (h) x 1.40 (d)

Table of Contents

Preface: by Crispin Wright

Introduction: by Roy T. Cook

Part I: The Philosophy and Mathematics of Hume's Principle

Boolos, G. [1997], "Is Hume's Principle Analytic?", In Language, Thought, and Logic, R. Heck (ed.), Oxford, Oxford University Press: 245 – 261.

Wright, C. [1999], "Is Hume's Principle Analytic?", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40: 6 - 30.

Heck, R. [1997], "Finitude and Hume's Principle", Journal of Philosophical Logic 26: 589-617.

Clark, P., ''Frege, Neo-Logicism and Applied Mathematics ''

Fraser MacBride, [2000], "On Finite Hume", Philosophia Mathematica 8:150-9.

Fraser MacBride, [2002], "Could Nothing Matter?", Analysis 62: 125-135.

Demopoulos, W. [2003], "The Philosophical Interest of Frege Arithmetic" Philosophical Books 44: 220-228

Part II: The Logic of Abstraction

Shapiro, S. & Weir, A. [2000], "Neo-logicist logic is not epistemically innocent", Philosophia Mathematica 8, 160-189.

Cook, R. [2003], "Aristotelian Logic, Axioms, and Abstraction", Philosophia Mathematica 11: 195-202.

Rayo, A. [2002], "Frege's Unofficial Arithmetic", Journal of Symbolic Logic 67: 1623-1638.

Part III: Abstraction and the Continuum

Hale, R. [2000], "Reals by Abstraction", Philosophia Mathematica 8: 100-123.

Cook, R. [2002], "The State of the Economy: Neologicism and Inflation", Philosophia Mathematica 10: 43-66.

Wright, C. [2000], "Neo-Fregean Foundations for Real Analysis: Some Reflections on Frege's Constraint", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41: 317-334.

Shapiro, S. [2000], "Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41: 335-364.

Part IV: Basic Law V and Set Theory

Shapiro, S. & Weir, A. [1999], "NewV, ZF and Abstraction", Philosophia Mathematica 7: 293-321.

Uzquiano, G. & I. Jané [2004], "Well- and Non-Well-Founded Extensions", Journal of Philosophical Logic 33: 437 – 465.

Hale, R. [2000], "Abstraction and Set Theory", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41: 379-398

Shapiro, S. [2003], "Prolegomenon to Any Future Neo-Logicist Set Theory: Abstraction and Indefinite Extensibility", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 59-91.

Weir, A [2004], "Neo-Fregeanism: An Embarassment of Riches", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44: 13 - 48

Cook, R. [2004], "Iteration One More Time", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 44: 63 - 92

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)