The Best American Erotica 2001

( 2 )

Overview

Abandon your inhibitions. You are about to experience the most provocative, sensual fiction of the year.
In The Best American Erotica 2001, Marge Piercy introduces us to the nerd kid sex club, Nathan Englander explores the addictive power of a peep show, Jerry Stahl relates a dare from an extremely demanding girlfriend, and Dani Shapiro proves the difference between the fantasy and the reality of losing your virginity.
Twenty-two of America's ...

See more details below
Paperback (Original)
$13.44
BN.com price
(Save 10%)$15.00 List Price
Other sellers (Paperback)
  • All (50) from $1.99   
  • New (8) from $10.02   
  • Used (42) from $1.99   
Sending request ...

Overview

Abandon your inhibitions. You are about to experience the most provocative, sensual fiction of the year.
In The Best American Erotica 2001, Marge Piercy introduces us to the nerd kid sex club, Nathan Englander explores the addictive power of a peep show, Jerry Stahl relates a dare from an extremely demanding girlfriend, and Dani Shapiro proves the difference between the fantasy and the reality of losing your virginity.
Twenty-two of America's finest writers bring something for everyone in The Best American Erotica 2001, which will gratify Susie Bright's fans and entice newcomers to her bestselling and always arousing series.
Contributors
Todd Belton · Marge Piercy · Cara Bruce · Matt Bernstein Sycamore · Tsaurah Litzky · Nathan Englander · Ginu Kamani · Joe Maynard · Wendy Becker · Jerry Stahl · Dani Shapiro · Dodie Bellamy · Dan Taulapapa McMullin · Claire Tristram · James Williams · M. J. Rose Damian Grace · Wade Krueger · Rosalind Christine Lloyd · Charles Flowers · Hanne Blank · Jack Murnighan

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

From Barnes & Noble
Series editor and self-proclaimed "sexpert" Susie Bright brings erotica into the mainstream by tapping into the Internet (a hotbed of erotic writing), as well as magazines, journals, and books published in the year 2000, to make The Best American Erotica 2001 one of the most astonishing and eclectic collections ever. This volume includes work by such distinguished writers as Nathan Englander, Marge Piercy, and Jerry Stahl.
From the Publisher
Edward Rothstein The New York Times Susie Bright has become the avatar of American erotica.
Kirkus Reviews
The eighth in Bright's series of hit-or-miss pillow books has a little something for everybody, but not much of anything for anybody. Noting in her Introduction how far the genre has come since her 1993 inaugural volume, which could have been titled The Only American Erotica, the editor cites the explosion of erotic fiction on the Web—a phenomenon that makes contemporary erotica "the fastest-growing fiction genre ever seen." Given the endless fields she's gleaning, however, the 22 stories chosen as the most "arousing yet literary" of their kind are a disappointing lot. It's not just that the sort of literary values you might associate with the O. Henry Prize winners are in short supply, or that the most obviously literary stories (with the happy exception of Charles Flowers's sharp, funny boxing memoir) aren't very successful as either lubricant or lit. What turns some readers on (Todd Belton's prodigiously expanding breasts, Cara Bruce's exotic dancer seduced by a female client, Dodie Bellamy's adventures of a woman who really is from Venus, James Williams's paean to "Jason's Cock") will send others looking for greener pastures. As in earlier volumes, the leading principle of selection here, pace Bright, isn't "sincerity" but variety; Bright seems determined to leave no sexual preference or practice unrepresented, and the result reads less like The New Yorker than like National Geographic. There's masturbation (Matt Bernstein Sycamore), serial sex (Damian Grace), sex before waking (Hanne Blank), sex professionals (Nathan Englander, Wendy Becker, M.J. Rose), hopeful young love (Dani Shapiro), remembered old love (Jack Murnighan), and the usual generous helpingof gay, lesbian,andinterracial couples and multiples. As with a photo album whose every picture dissatisfies some member of the family, every user returning to this volume after the initial survey can expect to reread one or two stories devotionally and ignore the rest.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9780684869148
  • Publisher: Touchstone
  • Publication date: 2/8/2001
  • Series: Best American Erotica Series
  • Edition description: Original
  • Pages: 208
  • Product dimensions: 0.47 (w) x 5.50 (h) x 8.50 (d)

Meet the Author

Susie Bright is the editor of The Best American Erotica series and host of the weekly audio show In Bed with Susie Bright on Audible.com. She has been a columnist for Playboy and Salon, and has been profiled in USA TODAY, Los Angeles Times, Esquire, Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, and Vanity Fair, among other publications. An international lecturer on sexuality and feminism, she won the 2004 Writer of the Year Award at the Erotic Awards in London. Ms. Bright lives in Santa Cruz, California.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Contents

Introduction

TODD BELTON

Expanding on an Idea

MARGE PIERCY

From Three Women: The New Kid

CARA BRUCE

You Know What?

MATT BERNSTEIN SYCAMORE

Sink

TSAURAH LITZKY

Greek Sex

NATHAN ENGLANDER

From "Peep Show"

GINU KAMANI

Waxing the Thing

JOE MAYNARD

Fleshlight

WENDY BECKER

Backstage Boys

JERRY STAHL

From Perv — A Love Story

DANI SHAPIRO

Bed of Leaves

DODIE BELLAMY

Spew Forth

DAN TAULAPAPA McMULLIN

Sunday

CLAIRE TRISTRAM

When the Student Is Ready

JAMES WILLIAMS

Jason's Cock

M J ROSE

From Lip Service

DAMIAN GRACE

The Man Who Ate Women

WADE KRUEGER

That's Awful, That's Nothing

ROSALIND CHRISTINE LLOYD

Deflower

CHARLES FLOWERS

In This Corner

HANNE BLANK

And Early to Rise

JACK MURNIGHAN

Rooster

Contributors

Reader's Directory

Credits

Reader Survey

Read More Show Less

Interviews & Essays

A Conversation with Susie Bright

Series editor and self-proclaimed "sexpert" Susie Bright brings erotica into the mainstream by tapping into the Internet (a hotbed of erotic writing), as well as magazines, journals, and books published in Y2K, to make The Best American Erotica 2001 one of the most astonishing and eclectic collections ever. Barnes & Noble.com had the opportunity to speak with Bright about childhood, sex, fiction, power, and the qualities of first-rate erotica.

Barnes & Noble.com: What was the first piece of erotic literature that really impressed you?

Susie Bright: I have to divide that into two sections: my childhood impressions of sexy literature, which blew my mind, because I was such a goody-two-shoes, and then my "older-and-wiser" impressions, which I would say started after I was 16.

When I was a kid, even a steamy romance novel could scandalize and arouse me. I remember reading pulp novels,John Updike, and stories in Playboy, and the fact that they all used "dirty words" made me think of them in the same camp. I was very secretive and deliberate about finding these kind of "adult" fictions -- left alone in a new house, I would search people's bookshelves to find their sex books

When I became a more sophisticated reader, I was introduced to Henry Miller, via Kate Millet, and really, I have her to thank for discovering The Story of O as well. I also lived in Los Angeles, where Charles Bukowski was writing a column for the L.A. Free Press, Notes of a Dirty Old Man, and I thought he was terrific. Later I discovered Anaïs Nin, and a number of the counterculture feminist authors who were reinventing erotica in the 1970s.

B&N.com: Why did you decide that there needed to be a collection of the best American erotica? Did you think that it would be so successful?

SB: The early erotic renaissance in the mid-80s was very ghettoized -- lesbians over in one corner, gay men in another, straight men and women in separate camps, etc. That was so annoying -- I knew that wasn't the way people's erotic imaginations worked.

I also thought erotic fiction, done well, was as influential and important as any fiction an author could compose. It's a very telling sign of the times, what people have to say about sexuality and their lives in a given year.

Yes, I thought it would do well, but that's because I think everyone loves a good story, and loves sexual revelation, both of which are strong elements of this collection.

B&N.com: Are there specific elements that a story needs to have in order for it to make it into one of your collections, or do you simply go with your gut instinct?

SB: My "gut instinct" is actually based on an awful lot of years of reading and editing erotica. I always had a feel for what I thought was good, an eye for talent, but that disposition has gotten quicker and sharper since I first began.

I'm looking for great stories with a compelling erotic ingredient. The writing really comes first; I don't look for specific sexual content. I like to be surprised.

B&N.com: Do you try to balance gay stories with straight stories, or do you simply pick the best?

SB: Oh, I have to balance, because the tradition of gay men's erotic literature is much stronger than any other group of authors. Gay men have had their own genre of erotic fiction, short story and novel, for decades, and they were never suppressed by the conventional taboo about combining intelligence, poetry, and sex.

In that sense, the competition for gay-p.o.v. stories is much more stiff for BAE, because I get so many more great stories than I can choose.

I don't make it an exact "even" balance, because that would drive me crazy. Also, there are some stories that just don't fit easily into labels, thank goodness. There are stories that concern a solo experience, there are others that have some many characters twisting and turning their sexual preferences that you can hardly keep up with them. Also, some gay authors like to write "straight" sex, and vice versa. What I aim for is an engrossing variety, like a really good box of chocolates!

B&N.com: In your decision to include a story in your book, how much depends on whether that story fits in with the collection as a whole?

SB: Every once in a while, I'll have two or three stories, which amazingly are very similar in their specific subject. One year I liked three stories I read that involved making an omelet as a plot point. That was bizarre. In that case, it would be distracting to have more than one in the book; everyone would wonder if I'd become some sort of an egg freak.

So yes, the book is a composition, and I want it to have a certain feeling as a whole rather than just a list of parts. But it's a subtle composition, I don't impose themes like "this year, everyone has to include the color blue!" or nonsense such as that.

B&N.com: Do you ever like a story but decide to reject it because it is too graphic?

SB: No! That would go against my whole vision for erotica. No writing is bad because it is "explicit"; it can only fail if it is written badly.

B&N.com: How has The Best American Erotica developed through the years, and how is this collection different from previous ones?

SB: The obvious difference is that the pool of published talent is much larger than it was in 1993, when we began the series. I would say my reading for the series has increased tenfold. The competition is tougher, and also, genre mixing has become very popular -- erotic mysteries, erotic horror, erotic romance, etc.

I suppose the big question is are the writers better than they were, or is the ratio of great to not-so-great the same? I think the fact that larger numbers of both pro and novice writers are considering erotic writing has been in the series' favor. However, truly awesome erotic writers don't arrive on the scene in trends. They are pretty much miracles in any time they appear.

B&N.com: Most of the characters in The Best American Erotica 2001 seem guilt free and take almost an aggressive stance towards their rights as sexual beings (except for "Peep Show"). Does this have to do with your choices as an editor or do you feel that this is the nature of erotic/fantasy writing?

SB: The era of Portnoy's Complaint truly is over. The contemporary erotic writer doesn't employ much guilt or apprehension to make her point anymore.

"Peep Show" was an anomaly in the material I reviewed, not in its guilt factor, but rather that it has a heterosexual man's intimate point of view about sex and his life.

I don't want characters to be "cheerleaders" for sex. I'm just as likely to be attracted to a shy or ambivalent character. I'm rather turned off, actually, to erotic collections that are trying to make a point about how people should behave or feel.

I went back and looked at the table of contents. I think the female protagonists in Ginu Kamani's story, Dani Shapiro's, and Dodie Bellamy's, are all uneasy about sex in various ways.

B&N.com: Why did you choose to end BAE 2001 with the one of the saddest stories of the collection, "The Rooster"?

SB: It was one of my favorites, and I like to end the book with something especially powerful. Anything that makes me cry and turns me on simultaneously is a fine candidate. That's interesting that you commented on this, because in the BAE '99 collection, I chose the last story because it made me laugh so hard, and it seemed like the perfect political comment on the whole year: "Is Your Husband Obsessed with Online Pornography?"

It's also unusual to hear anyone writing about sex as an old person, or at the end of one's life. I think we'll be hearing a lot more on this topic.

B&N.com: It seems that the two women in "You Know What" gain sexual satisfaction not from each other, but from outdoing each other. What do you think is the significance of their sexual competition?

SB:Sexual competition is a whole feature to erotica; it really should be thought of as a sexual preference to itself. For some lovers, that one-on-one competitive tension and battle is the erotic high point of any sex. For some, even "losing" is the sexual high point, as long as the "showing off" has been sufficiently high pitched.

A lot of things "work" in sex that wouldn't necessarily work in a long term relationship. Diehard competition is one of them.

B&N.com: Natural imagery plays a large part in "Bed of Leaves." Did that have anything to do with your choosing it?

SB: I chose "Bed of Leaves" because it moved me. I thought it described -- painfully, realistically -- what it's like to defend your romantic feelings and your dreams for your own mental survival, even though no one else is seeing the world as you do. It's awful to watch her try to make this asshole out to be someone special, and yet you know if she can't have these kind of dreams, she wouldn't be able to care about anything.

B&N.com: "Jason's Cock" is a story where violence, power, and domination seem to be intrinsically linked with sex. Was it a difficult decision to put it in this collection?

SB: No, but then the BAE series has several complex, intense stories about S/M, domination, submission, etc. As erotic literature, these dynamics are hard to resist for any author because they lend themselves so well to conflict, climax, denouement, etc.

I would question your use of "intrinsically." I don't think the author poses this as a message about human sexuality in general, or what every couple ought to try to live up to. It's quite obsessive about this relationship in particular. It's not a political statement, any more than The Story of O was designed as a lifestyle manual.

B&N.com: Why did you choose this particular selection from "Lip Service"?

SB: With erotic novels, it's always a bit of a trick to find an excerpt that will work as a short selection. I wanted an arousing portion that would work alone without the readers having to know the rest of the plot. This was the one that worked.

B&N.com: In "That's Awful, That's Nothing," it seems that Birnauer initiates the "that's nothing" game so that he can disclose his disturbing dream about his brother. Why do you think he so easily shares a fantasy/nightmare that most men would probably keep to themselves?

SB: It had a bit of that "drinking game," truth or dare feel that you have when you play a game with others and the stakes keep getting higher and higher. People use the excuse of the "game" to blurt out things that you wouldn't get a normal chance to bring up in conversation.

B&N.com: In "Expanding on an Idea," why do you think Todd Belton chose his narrator to be female? Was there something that he was trying to accomplish through lesbian sex that he could not with a straight couple?

SB: I can't speak for him, but I know that many authors are quite fed up with the notion that in erotica, you have to write from your own gender and sexual preference. In no other part of literature is this expected.

B&N.com: A story like "Waxing the Thing," where the main character shares her background in the world of pubic waxing, is not what most people would consider erotica. What convinced you that it belonged in this collection?

SB: I think it was very erotic. I saw Ginu read it in front of a big audience in San Francisco and they were squealing their heads off -- of course, she's a wonderful performer, too. The story is erotic because the narrator is so naïve about the sexual aspect of this new job of hers. She doesn't realize that many of her clients are aching for this treatment because it's the only time anyone touches them there at all.

Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Average Rating 3
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(1)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 11, 2002

    It ain't Anais Nin for sure....

    I was very disappointed in the quality of the writing. I felt it lacked poetry, effort and sensuousness. Also, many of the stories were gay or lesbian oriented, which was a downer if you¿re not into that sort of thing. You¿ll be reading along about a beautiful man and getting a pretty good description of what¿s going on and then all the sudden it turns out to be a scene between two men, kind of a drag. I felt the stories lacked luster and sultriness. If you¿re into that, start with Anais Nin¿s Delta of Venus and move on to the Sleeping Beauty stuff by Anne Rice.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 12, 2001

    The Millenium Knows No Bounds...Erotica '01 is it!

    I've read nearly all of the 'The Best American Erotica' books, and 2001 ranks up there with 2000....very sexy, crazy, and eye popping reads that get your attention. This edition did not disappoint me.... Susie Bright, if you're out there reading these reviews, I am a fan who is devoted to reading your 'Erotica' anthologies; keep up the awesome work!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews

If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
Why is this product inappropriate?
Comments (optional)