The Challenge of Jesus: Rediscovering Who Jesus Was and Is


Today a renewed and vigorous scholarly quest for the historical Jesus is underway. In the midst of well publicized and controversial books on Jesus, N. T. Wright's lectures and writings have been widely recognized for providing a fresh, provocative and historically credible portrait. The Challenge of Jesus poses a double-edged challenge: to grow in our understanding of the historical Jesus within the Palestinian world of the first century, and to follow Jesus more faithfully into the postmodern world of the ...

See more details below
Audiobook (CD - Unabridged)
$22.52 price
(Save 9%)$24.98 List Price
Other sellers (Audiobook)
  • All (3) from $19.03   
  • New (2) from $19.03   
  • Used (1) from $77.37   
Sending request ...


Today a renewed and vigorous scholarly quest for the historical Jesus is underway. In the midst of well publicized and controversial books on Jesus, N. T. Wright's lectures and writings have been widely recognized for providing a fresh, provocative and historically credible portrait. The Challenge of Jesus poses a double-edged challenge: to grow in our understanding of the historical Jesus within the Palestinian world of the first century, and to follow Jesus more faithfully into the postmodern world of the twenty-first century.

Read More Show Less

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly - Publisher's Weekly
Here, prolific Anglican theologian and historical Jesus quester Wright makes accessible to lay readers the arguments he laid out in his scholarly tome Jesus and the Victory of God. But Wright does more than just rehash old arguments; he adds a discussion of the resurrection, absent from Victory, and addresses the prickly problem of relevance. In the first six chapters, Wright tackles many of the questions of the historical Jesus debate: Did Jesus believe the Kingdom of God was "now" or "later"? (Both, says Wright.) Did He know He was God in the same way "that one knows one is hungry or thirsty"? ("It was not a mathematical knowledge.... It was more like the knowledge that I have that I am loved by those closest to me.") What exactly happened on Easter? (Jesus' body seemed both physical and transphysical.) Wright then addresses how all these historical-cum-theological musings are significant for Christians living in a postmodern world. This superb addition to Wright's oeuvre will prove fruitful reading for neophytes as well as for those already familiar with his approach. (Jan.) Copyright 1999 Cahners Business Information.
Library Journal
Attempting to provide a fresh look at the Gospel through honest historical study and to produce a firm sitz im leben for Jesus, Wright (dean, Lichfield Cathedral) uses this portrait to motivate Christians to follow a "Jesus-shaped" model of discipleship. He has propounded a new orthodoxy that has caused many of his historical colleagues to call him a "fundamentalist," even as fundamentalists are calling him a "compromised pseudo-liberal." That aside, Wright has produced a work of frankly evangelical faith with strong historical integrity, because both are necessary for serious study, uncomfortable as that may be. While he believes that the quest for the historical Jesus is necessary, he is sharply critical of modern, skeptical scholarship. Wright closes with a rousing call for an active, Jesus-like involvement in the world. A refreshing and inspiring read for those who take both conservative faith and historical scholarship seriously. Recommended for academic and public libraries.--Eugene O. Bowser, Univ. of Northern Colorado, Greeley Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.
Linda Wilson
Was Jesus God? Was Jesus the promised, long-awaited Messiah? How did he view "the Kingdom of God?" Does the resurrection matter, and if it does, what did it mean to the people of Jesus' time? How did Jesus view himself?
"Christianity has always said, with John 1:18, that nobody has ever seen God but that Jesus has revealed God. We shall only discover whom the true and living God actually is if we take the risk of looking at Jesus himself. That is why the contemporary debates about Jesus are so important; they are also debates about God himself." This is the first reason historian Wright gives for his serious historical study of Jesus.
The first four chapters of the book present the beliefs and historical setting in which Jesus lived and during which period of time the Christian Gospels were written. The last four chapters are practical applications and implications of the ideas presented earlier. Wright offers precise historical evidence for the prevailing viewpoints held by the religious authorities and political leaders of Jesus' time and what the overarching purpose and mission of Jesus were. He also challenges us to think about these as Jesus' vocation: why he set about doing what he did, and what he believed would be the consequences of those actions.
The chapters are heavy with historical data and information that respond to and critique the information of the Jesus Seminar and John Dominic Crossan (as well as others) in their published works about their respective studies of Jesus. Wright, however, proposes that many of the battles being fought today are out of step with the reality of our present world. Theological wars, arguments over whether or not Jesus was divine or human, whether or not the Gospels are reliable and a host of other subjects simply have been moved into a different sphere by the study of first-century Judaism and Christianity in particular. "There are new battles not totally different, of course, from the old ones but with significant new elements."
The Challenge of Jesus brings the reader to an understanding of Jesus' vocation in this world and to a recognition that the Gospels are not just a story. The story is a play in which the part of Jesus is supposed to be played by the readers.
As the light of the world, as the kingdom of God on earth, the Christian will stop focusing on nonessentials and begin to live in the world with a new understanding of purpose, calling and consequence.
Wright has given those who have a concern for the future of Christianity in the post postmodern setting a tremendous challenge looking, in an almost entirely new framework, at the life of Jesus and what he was truly about when he "walked among us," and what that means for those who call themselves his followers.
Read More Show Less

Product Details

  • ISBN-13: 9781596444119
  • Publisher: Echristian
  • Publication date: 5/28/2006
  • Format: CD
  • Edition description: Unabridged
  • Sales rank: 911,095
  • Product dimensions: 5.00 (w) x 6.00 (h) x 0.75 (d)

Read an Excerpt

Chapter One

The Challenge
of Studying Jesus

A friend of mine, lecturing in a theological college in Kenya,introduced his students to "The Quest for the Historical Jesus." This,he said, was a movement of thought and scholarship that in its earlierforms was carried on largely in Germany in the eighteenth andnineteenth centuries. He had not gone far into his lecture explainingthis search for Jesus when one of his students interrupted him."Teacher," he said ("I knew I was in trouble," my friend commented,"as soon as he called me `teacher'!"), "if the Germans have lost Jesus,that is their problem. We have not lost him. We know him. We lovehim."

    Research into Jesus himself has long been controversial, not leastamong devout Christians. Several people in the wider Christian worldwonder if there is anything new to say about Jesus and if the attemptto say something fresh is not a denial either of the church's traditionalteaching or of the sufficiency of Scripture. I want to grasp this nettleright away and explain why I regard it, not just as permissible but asvitally necessary that we grapple afresh with the question of whoJesus was and therefore who he is. In doing so I in no way want todeny or undermine the knowledge of Jesus of which the Kenyanstudent spoke and which is the common experience of the churchdown the centuries and across widely differing cultures. I see thehistorical task, rather, as part of the appropriate activity of knowledgeand love, to get to know even better the one whom weclaim to knowand follow. If even in a human relationship of knowledge and lovethere can be misunderstandings, false impressions, wrong assumptions,which need to be teased out and dealt with, how much morewhen the one to whom we are relating is Jesus himself.

    I believe, in fact, that the historical quest for Jesus is a necessary andnonnegotiable aspect of Christian discipleship and that we in ourgeneration have a chance to be renewed in discipleship and missionprecisely by means of this quest. I want to explain and justify thesebeliefs from the outset. There are, however, huge problems and evendangers within the quest, as one would expect from anything that isheavy with potential for the kingdom of God, and I shall need to saysomething about these as well.

    There are well-known pitfalls in even addressing the subject, andwe may as well be clear about them. It is desperately easy whenamong like-minded friends to become complacent. We hear of wildnew theories about Jesus. Every month or two some publisher comesup with a blockbuster saying that he was a New Age guru, anEgyptian freemason or a hippie revolutionary. Every year or two somescholar or group of scholars comes up with a new book full ofimposing footnotes to tell us that Jesus was a peasant Cynic, a wanderingwordsmith or the preacher of liberal values born out of duetime.

    The day I was redrafting this chapter for publication, a newspaperarticle appeared about a new controversy initiated by animal-rightsactivists, as to whether Jesus was a vegetarian.

    We may well react to all this sort of thing by saying that it is all awaste of time, that we know all we need to know about Jesus, andthere is no more to be said. Many devout Christians taking this linecontent themselves with an effortless superiority: we know the truth,these silly liberals have got it all wrong, and we have nothing new tolearn. Sometimes people like me are wheeled out to demonstrate,supposedly, the truth of "traditional Christianitu," with the impliedcorollary that we can now stop asking these unpleasant historicalquestions and get on with something else, perhaps something moreprofitable, instead.

    Some, however, react by reaching for equally misleading alternativestereotypes. A defense of a would-be "supernatural" Jesus caneasily degenerate into a portrayal of Jesus as a first-century version ofSuperman—not realizing that the Superman myth is itself ultimatelya dualistic corruption of the Christian story. There are several Jesus-pictureson offer that appear very devout but that ignore what theNew Testament actually says about the human being Jesus of Nazarethor what it meant in its original context.

    I do not intend to encourage any of these attitudes. I repeat: I regardthe continuing historical quest for Jesus as a necessary part of ongoingChristian discipleship. I doubt very much if in the present age we shallever get to the point where we know all there is to know and understandall there is to understand about Jesus, who he was, what he saidand what he did, and what he meant by it all. But since orthodoxChristianity has always held firm to the basic belief that it is by lookingat Jesus himself that we discover who God is, it seems to me indisputablethat we should expect always to be continuing in the quest forJesus precisely as part of, indeed perhaps as the sharp edge of, ourexploration into God himself.

    This, of course, carries certain corollaries. If it is true that Christianfaith cannot preempt the historical questions about Jesus, it is also truethat historical study cannot be carried out in a vacuum. We have beentaught by the Enlightenment to suppose that history and faith areantithetical, so that to appeal to the one is to appeal away from theother. As a result, historians have regularly been suspect in the communityof faith, just as believers have always been suspect in thecommunity of secular historiography. When Christianity is truest toitself, however, it denies precisely this dichotomy—uncomfortablethough this may be for those of us who try to live in and to speak fromand to both communities simultaneously. Actually, I believe this discomfortis itself one aspect of a contemporary Christian vocation: asour world goes through the deep pain of the death throes of theEnlightenment, the Christian is not called to stand apart from this painbut to share it. I shall say more about this in the concluding chapter. Iam neither a secular historian who happens to believe in Jesus nor aChristian who happens to indulge a fancy for history. Rather, I amsomeone who believes that being a Christian necessarily entails doingbusiness with history and that history done for all it's worth willchallenge spurious versions of Christianity, including many that thinkof themselves as orthodox, while sustaining and regenerating a deepand true orthodoxy, surprising and challenging though this will alwaysremain.

    Let me then move to the positive side. What are the reasons thatmake it imperative for us to study Jesus?

The Necessity of the Quest

The most basic reason for grappling with the historical question ofJesus is that we are made for God: for God's glory, to worship Godand reflect his likeness. That is our heart's deepest desire, the sourceof our deepest vocation. But Christianity has always said, with John1:18, that nobody has ever seen God but that Jesus has revealed God.We shall only discover who the true and living God actually is if wetake the risk of looking at Jesus himself. That is why the contemporarydebates about Jesus are so important; they are also debates about Godhimself.

    The second reason why I engage in serious historical study of Jesusis out of loyalty to Scripture. This may seem deeply ironic to some onboth sides of the old liberal-conservative divide. Many Jesus scholarsof the last two centuries have of course thrown Scripture out of thewindow and reconstructed a Jesus quite different from what we findin the New Testament. But the proper answer to that approach is notsimply to reassert that because we believe in the Bible we do not needto ask fresh questions about Jesus. As with God so with the Bible; justbecause our tradition tells us that the Bible says and means one thingor another, that does not excuse us from the challenging task ofstudying it afresh in the light of the best knowledge we have about itsworld and context, to see whether these things are indeed so. For methe dynamic of a commitment to Scripture is not "we believe the Bible,so there is nothing more to be learned," but rather "we believe theBible, so we had better discover all the things in it to which ourtraditions, including our `protestant' or `evangelical' traditions, whichhave supposed themselves to be `biblical' but are sometimes demonstrablynot, have made us blind." And this process of rethinking willinclude the hard and often threatening question of whether somethings that our traditions have taken as "literal" should be seen as"metaphorical," and perhaps also vice versa—and, if so, which ones.

    This leads to the third reason, which is the Christian imperative totruth. Christians must not be afraid of truth. Of course, that is whatmany reductionists have said, as with apparent boldness they havewhittled down the meaning of the gospel to a few bland platitudes,leaving the sharp and craggy message of Jesus far behind. That is notmy agenda. My agenda is to go deeper into the meaning than we havebefore and to come back to a restatement of the gospel that groundsthe things we have believed about Jesus, about the cross, about theresurrection, about the incarnation, more deeply within their originalsetting. When I say the great Christian creeds—as I do day-by-day inworship—I mean them from the heart, but I find that after twentyyears of historical study I mean something much deeper, much morechallenging, than I meant when I started. I cannot compel my readersto follow me in this particular pilgrimage, but I can and do hold outan invitation to see Jesus, the Gospels, ourselves, the world and, aboveall, God in what may well be a new and perhaps disturbing light.

    The fourth reason for undertaking the study of Jesus is because ofthe Christian commitment to mission. The mission of most Christianslikely to read this book takes place in a world where Jesus has been ahot topic for several years now. In America particularly, Jesus—andthe quest for him—has been featured in Time magazine, on televisionand elsewhere in the media. And the people whom ordinary Christiansmeet, to whom they must address the gospel, have been told overand over by the media, on the basis of some recent book or other, thatthe Jesus of the Gospels is historically incredible and that Christianityis therefore based on a mistake. It simply will not do to declare thisquestion out-of-bounds, to say that the church's teaching will do forus, thank you very much, so we do not need to ask historical questions.You cannot say that to a serious and enquiring person who engagesyou in conversation on a train or to someone who wanders into achurch one Sunday and asks what it is all about. If Christianity is notrooted in things that actually happened in first-century Palestine, wemight as well be Buddhists, Marxists or almost anything else. And ifJesus never existed, or if he was quite different from what the Gospelsand the church's worship affirms him to have been, then we are indeedliving in cloud-cuckoo-land. The skeptics can and must be answered,and when we do so we will not merely reaffirm the traditions of thechurch, whether Protestant, Catholic, evangelical or whatever. We willbe driven to reinterpret them, discovering depths of meaning withinthem that we had never imagined.

    One of the reasons why we had not imagined some of the depthsthat, I believe, are actually there to be found lies in our own historicaland cultural setting. I am a first-century historian, not a Reformationor eighteenth-century specialist. Nevertheless, from what little I knowof the last five hundred years of European and American history, Ibelieve that we can categorize the challenge of the eighteenth-centuryEnlightenment to historic Christianity in terms of its asking a necessaryquestion in a misleading fashion. The divide in contemporary Christianitybetween liberals and conservatives has tended to be between thosewho, because they saw the necessity of asking the historical question,assumed that it had to be asked in the Enlightenment's fashion andthose on the other hand who, because they saw the misleadingness ofthe Enlightenment's way of asking the question, assumed that thehistorical question was itself unnecessary. Let me speak first of thenecessity of the Enlightenment's question and then of the misleadingway it has been addressed.

    To understand why the Enlightenment's historical question wasnecessary we need to take a further step back to the ProtestantReformation of the sixteenth century. The protest of the Reformationagainst the medieval church was not least a protest in favor of ahistorical and eschatological reading of Christianity against a timelesssystem. Getting at the literal historical meaning of the texts, as theReformers insisted we must, meant historical reading: the question ofwhat Jesus or Paul really meant, as opposed to what the much-laterchurch said they meant, became dramatically important. Go back tothe beginning, they said, and you will discover that the developedsystem of Roman Catholicism is based on a mistake. This supportedthe Reformers' eschatological emphasis: the cross was God's once-for-allachievement, never to be repeated, as the Reformers saw theirCatholic opponents doing in the Mass. But, arguably, the Reformersnever allowed this basic insight to drive them beyond a halfway housewhen it came to Jesus himself. The Gospels were still treated as therepositories of true doctrine and ethics. Insofar as they were history,they were the history of the moment when the timeless truth of Godwas grounded in space and time, when the action that accomplishedthe timeless atonement just happened to take place. This, I know, is agross oversimplification, but I believe it is borne out by the sequel.Post-Reformation theology grasped the insights of the reformers as anew set of timeless truths and used them to set up new systems ofdogma, ethics and church order in which, once again, vested interestswere served and fresh thought was stifled.

    The Enlightenment was, among many other things, a protestagainst a system that, since it was itself based on a protest, could notsee that it was itself in need of further reform. (The extent to which theEnlightenment was a secularized version of the Reformation is afascinating question, one for brave Ph.D. candidates to undertakerather than the subject for a book like this. But we have to do businessat least with these possibilities if we are to grasp where we have comefrom and hence where we may be being called to go to.) In particular,the Enlightenment, in the person of Hermann Samuel Reimarus (1694-1768),challenged unthinking would-be Christian dogma about theeternal son of God and his establishment of the oppressive systemcalled "Christianity." Reimarus challenged it in the name of history—thesame weapon that the reformers had used against Roman Catholicism.Go back to the beginning, he said, and you will discover thatChristianity is based on a mistake. Jesus was, after all, another in along line of failed Jewish revolutionaries. Christianity as we know itwas the invention of the early disciples.

    I believe that Reimarus's question was necessary. Necessary to shakeEuropean Christianity out of its dogmatism and to face a new challenge—togrow in understanding of who Jesus actually was and whathe actually accomplished. Necessary to challenge bland dogma with aliving reality; necessary to challenge idolatrous distortions of whoJesus actually was and hence who God actually was and is, with afresh grasp of truth. The fact that Reimarus gave his own question ananswer that is historically unsustainable does not mean he did not askthe right questions. Who was Jesus, and what did he accomplish?

    This necessity has been underlined in our own century, as ErnstKäsemann saw all too clearly. Look what happens, he said in a famouslecture in 1953, when the church abandons the quest for Jesus. Thenonquesting years between the wars created a vacuum in whichnonhistorical Jesuses were offered, legitimating the Nazi ideology. Iwould go so far as to suggest that whenever the church forgets its callto engage in the task of understanding more and more fully who Jesusactually was, idolatry and ideology lie close at hand. To renounce thequest because you do not like what the historians have so far come upwith is not a solution.

    But the Enlightenment's raising of the question of Jesus was donein a radically misleading manner, which still has profound effects onthe research of today. The Enlightenment notoriously insisted onsplitting apart history and faith, facts and values, religion and politics,nature and supernature, in a way whose consequences are written intothe history of the last two hundred years—one of the consequencesbeing, indeed, that each of those categories now carries with it in theminds of millions of people around the world an implicit oppositionto its twin, so that we are left with the great difficulty of even conceivingof a world in which they belong to one another as part of a singleindivisible whole. Again, so much debate between liberals and conservativeshas taken place down this fault line (history or faith, religion orpolitics and so on), while the real battle—the challenge to rearticulatea reintegrated worldview—has not even been attempted. But there isa deeper problem with the Enlightenment than its radically splitworldview. The real problem is that it offered a rival eschatology to theChristian one. This needs a little explanation.


Excerpted from THE CHALLENGE of JESUS by N.T. WRIGHT. Copyright © 1999 by N. T. Wright. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Read More Show Less

Table of Contents

Preface 9
1 The Challenge of Studying Jesus 13
2 The Challenge of the Kingdom 34
3 The Challenge of the Symbols 54
4 The Crucified Messiah 74
5 Jesus & God 96
6 The Challenge of Easter 126
7 Walking to Emmaus in a Postmodern World 150
8 The Light of the World 174
Notes 199
Read More Show Less

Customer Reviews

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

    If you find inappropriate content, please report it to Barnes & Noble
    Why is this product inappropriate?
    Comments (optional)