The Courage Of Our Convictions
  • Alternative view 1 of The Courage Of Our Convictions
  • Alternative view 2 of The Courage Of Our Convictions

The Courage Of Our Convictions

by Gary Hart

See All Formats & Editions

A rallying cry "for Democrats who dream about governing and are eager to get their party back on track."—CBS News

In this powerful and provocative manifesto, former senator Gary Hart offers a call to action for Democrats to embrace moral principles and progressive leadership and not to fall back into a pattern of caution and calculation. He


A rallying cry "for Democrats who dream about governing and are eager to get their party back on track."—CBS News

In this powerful and provocative manifesto, former senator Gary Hart offers a call to action for Democrats to embrace moral principles and progressive leadership and not to fall back into a pattern of caution and calculation. He urges a return to the principles bequeathed to the party by its great twentieth-century presidents: Franklin D. Roosevelt's commitment to a single national community; Harry S. Truman's security through internationalism; John F. Kennedy's ideal of civic duty and service to the nation; and Lyndon B. Johnson's insistence on equality for all citizens. With the Democrats now in control of Congress, Hart speaks directly and passionately to those who seek to transform this political opportunity into a robust progressive program. As the 2008 presidential election approaches, it is the wake-up call so many Americans have been waiting for.

Editorial Reviews

Library Journal
The former Democratic senator from Colorado (1975-87), Hart (The Shield and the Cloak) captures the frustration of many grassroots Democrats with their party's timid and rudderless response to the Bush administration. Hart pointedly mentions the advice that former Senate Majority Leader Mike Mansfield gave him when he first entered the Senate: "Draw a line. Fix a point beyond which you will not go and stick to it." In Hart's view, far too many Democratic politicians have no such line of principle. He advises them to return to the four guiding ideas that were the foundation of the party's success in the 20th century: FDR's sense that all Americans are one community, Truman's internationalism, JFK's call to service, and LBJ's dedication to social equality. Hart believes that Democrats must counter right-wing social Darwinism, imperial isolation, corruption, and the veneration of the super-rich at the expense of all others. To regain power, he writes, Democrats need to offer policies that will provide healthcare, a cleaner environment, and opportunity for all. This book will find a ready audience of those seeking an alternative to contemporary policies. Highly recommended for public and academic libraries.-Duncan Stewart, Univ. of Iowa Libs., Iowa City Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.
Kirkus Reviews
A former senator exhorts the Democratic Party to lead the recovery from the catastrophic Bush years by returning to its core principles. United States senator from Colorado (1975-87) and author of 16 books (James Monroe, 2005, etc.), Hart outlines a unified approach to the reconstruction of domestic politics and international relations. He begins with a declaration of defeat in Iraq and the excoriation of the Democratic leadership that supported or condoned the invasion: if only they had listened to the few brave souls, such as himself, who in 2002 were opposing intervention. The Iraq war today is the precise analogue of the final years of the Vietnam War, just as the Bush administration's outrages against civil liberties, the author says, are akin to those of the Nixon Administration. Indeed, Hart never ceases to draw attention to the relevance of the '70s, when he began his senatorial career-he would have it that the Democratic Party has done nothing right since. The four great Democratic presidents of the 20th century epitomized the party's core principles: Franklin Roosevelt, for his defense of community; Harry S. Truman, for his belief in alliance-based internationalism; JFK's call to civic duty; and Lyndon Johnson's push for equal rights. In the 1980s, however, the Democratic Leadership Council induced the party to abandon principle in favor of centrist positions and electoral success. Hart acknowledges that the party has suffered in part because it sought to realize its tenets in outmoded ways. "Security," he suggests, is the umbrella concept that can cover all those principles in the future: security of livelihood, community, the environment, energy supplies and borders. Thesegoals cannot be achieved on just the domestic level, he says-they require the re-integration of the United States into the international community. Some penetrating insights, particularly regarding the tension between libertarianism and civic duty. But this is really a think piece padded with cliche and bombast.

Product Details

Holt, Henry & Company, Inc.
Publication date:
Edition description:
Sales rank:
Product dimensions:
5.00(w) x 8.00(h) x 0.50(d)

Read an Excerpt

The Courage of Our Convictions

A Manifesto for Democrats
By Hart, Gary

Times Books

Copyright © 2006 Hart, Gary
All right reserved.

ISBN: 0805081011

"The best lack all conviction," Yeats might well have written for today, "while the worst are full of passionate intensity." That passionate intensity, always so near the crusader's soul, is a far different thing from genuine conviction rooted in principle, history, and moral purpose. Though there is often a fine line between them, in that difference rests the integrity of a democratic republic.

Like pride, conviction is one of those rare qualities resisting excess. It is possible to have either too much or too little of both. In the mind of the dictator, too much conviction is the source of tyranny. In the mind of the democrat, too little conviction is the source of drift and calculation.

Courage may be defined as a beneficent act against self-interest--risking one's life for another; risking one's career for a principle; taking an unpopular stand, particularly against powerful interests; saying what needs to be said when others remain silent. It means standing for something larger than oneself and one's own interests. America's founders complimented those who were "disinterested." Then, the disinterested citizen was one who placed the common good, the collective interest, above his or her own interest. Today weconfuse being disinterested with being uninterested.

In the political arena the enemies of courage are calculation and careerism. The warmest friend of courage is conviction based on principle. Conviction requires a moral base and compass, for the world's worst scoundrels often proclaim the strongest conviction.

This is a meditation, perhaps a long essay, a series of connected short essays, or even a sermon, on the themes of courage and conviction, especially as they are required now for a twenty-first-century Democratic Party renaissance. In the fall of 2005, I was shocked to be told by a Democratic United States senator that the Democratic caucus in the Senate was going to take up the question "What do we stand for?" In the Senate of the 1970s, in which I served, such a question would never have occurred to us. We all knew what we stood for, and there was remarkable unanimity on many issues.

What has happened? Why do people in small towns, in large cities, and on college campuses ask, "What do the Democrats stand for? Why are the party leaders so quiet?" These questions have become more frequent and more intense as the war in Iraq drags on into its fourth year with no resolution in sight and no definition by President George W. Bush of the "course" we are to "stay." Yet Democratic leaders, including most of those preparing to seek the presidency in 2008, and especially those who voted for the war resolution in October 2002, find protection and anonymity in silence.

What do we stand for, indeed? It has become painfully apparent that the great Democratic Party, the dominant party of the twentieth century, the party that led America through two world wars and much of the Cold War, has become mute. The best Democrats lack all conviction, or at least all courage to state what those convictions are, while the worst conservatives, those full of passionate intensity, fill the vacuum in governance.

This book seeks to explore when, where, why, and how the Democratic Party lost its way--and its courage. But it also proposes a manifesto for the future, a manifesto constructed of the best of our twentieth-century heritage, a manifesto based upon the legacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, and Lyndon B. Johnson. Without that heritage and legacy there would have been no Carter or Clinton presidencies. And without that heritage and legacy there will be no Democratic presidencies or Congresses anytime soon.

Finally, I challenge all in my party, the Democratic Party, who dispute the manifesto proposed here, or the roots from which it springs, to state as specifically and concretely as possible what they believe the Democratic Party stands for and why they believe it deserves to lead our nation once again.

The purpose here is not to propound a declaration but rather to stimulate debate and reflection. At its best the Democratic presidential nomination process leading to the national election in 2008 can and should be a debate over the party's core beliefs and purposes. If the next presidential race devolves, as it traditionally does, into a mere contest for money, interest group endorsements, transient poll numbers, media advisers, press courtship, and commercial television advertising, then it will excite no broader interest than among full-time political activists, and it will leave the American people still in grave doubt over who the Democrats really are.

But if the 2008 contest for party leadership should become the occasion for a serious discussion about the Democratic Party's core beliefs and principles, and the policies those principles dictate, then it will be the occasion for restoration of the party and the proof of our qualification for national leadership.

Political parties must continually justify their existence. They do so not merely by the policies they propose but more significantly by the principles they stand for. It is not an easy thing for the Democratic Party, a coalition political party, to identify and coalesce around agreed principles. But once it forces itself through the difficult process of self-examination and self-definition, it is in much better condition to present itself to the public at large as the institution prepared to guide the nation forward.

That self-definition has not taken place since the end of the New Deal era in the late 1960s. Indeed, if anything, the Democratic Party has become more diffuse, more ill-defined, and more confusing to the American people.

In an age of ego, celebrity, and personality, there has been an overpowering search for a leader on a white horse, an exciting new candidate who will lead the Democratic Party out of the wilderness. This search has become a substitute for thought, for purpose, for conviction. Twenty-first-century Democrats cling to the hope of a messiah in the vacant centrist venue where messiahs never appear.

Instead, the Democratic Party must decide what its core principles are and then, and only then, decide which national leader or leaders best embody those principles. No politician can save a political party that does not know what it stands for.

It is well beyond the scope of this book to propose detailed domestic and foreign policies. The author's efforts to provide policy "beef," for those who appreciate the reference, are contained in a number of previous works.* This present effort is directed rather at reconstituting a governing manifesto from the rich Democratic heritage and culture of the previous century and seeking to apply its principles to the new realities of the twenty-first century, a century of international integration, failed states, information tsunamis, and urban warfare.

This base of Democratic conviction must be the foundation for the courageous promotion of a renewed internationalism founded on new international institutions and alliances, the restoration of principles of equality and social justice at home, and the reminder essential to all republics that we must earn our rights by performance of our duties.

It is our duty to our nation to prove that the best have not lost all conviction.

Copyright © 2006 by Gary Hart


Excerpted from The Courage of Our Convictions by Hart, Gary Copyright © 2006 by Hart, Gary. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Meet the Author

Gary Hart represented Colorado in the U.S. Senate from 1975 to 1987. He is the author of seventeen books and holds a doctorate of philosophy in politics from Oxford University. A lifelong Democratic reformer, he is currently a professor at the University of Colorado, a distinguished fellow at the New America Foundation, and chairman of the American Security Project and of the Council for a Livable World. He resides with his family in Kittredge, Colorado.

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews